Local representatives react to Grangemouth oil refinery's last day
It was confirmed on Tuesday by PetroIneos, a joint venture between billionaire Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos and the Chinese state-owned PetroChina, in an email reported by the media that Scotland's last oil refinery had ceased processing crude oil for good.
The site, which is situated in the Falkirk council area, is due to close later this year, with the loss of around 400 jobs.
Leading local representatives in the area, SNP MSP Michelle Thomson, has written to Labour's Anas Sarwar challenging him to keep his general election campaign promise to the refinery workers and back growing calls for a nationalisation plan to secure the site.
READ MORE: Labour minister rejects calls to recognise state of Palestine with France
During the 2024 General Election, the Scottish Labour leader promised that his party would 'step in to save the jobs at the refinery', which he's since argued the UK Government can't do anything as the refinery is operated by a privately owned company.
Thomson said Sarwar's argument has 'completely fallen apart' after the UK Government moved at a rapid pace to take control of British Steel, a privately owned company, stating that it is a critical economic asset.
She wrote: 'You promised before the General Election that a UK Labour Government would 'step in to save the jobs at the refinery' and Daniel Johnson MSP said the refinery could be saved with a 'small investment'.
'Despite this, under Labour Government plans, the refinery will be lost and most jobs that could come from Project Willow recommendations will not be delivered until at least 2030.'
(Image: Andrew Milligan/ PA)
Thomson added: 'It would appear the only reason these sites are not comparable, and why Westminster is not offering parity of treatment, is geography. One site is in England, the other is in Scotland.
'This is not the first time Westminster governments have allowed Scottish industry to fail.'
Labour's MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, Brian Leishman, said the Labour Government had broken its promise by not stepping in and saving the workers jobs at Grangemouth.
Leishman had called on Keir Starmer to nationalise the Grangemouth site like the UK Government did for British Steel last month.
He added that in the 10 months that Labour has been in power, they have not done enough and that his party needs to do 'so much better' than what they are currently doing.
Leishman said: 'Today is an absolutely dreadful day, not just for Grangemouth, but for all of Scotland.
(Image: Office of Brian Leishman MP)
'Today Grangemouth – after a century of refining oil – stops. That means hundreds of workers in the local community are going to lose their jobs – thousands in the wider supply chain; and Scotland's energy security severely weakened and compromised.
'The Labour Party, in fact, the Labour leadership said in the General Election campaign that they would step in and they would save the jobs at the refinery.
'Yet it hasn't happened. It is broken promises like that that turn the electorate away from mainstream politics, and they lose the faith in politicians to actually work in their favour.
'This Labour Government in the first 10 months has got Grangemouth wrong. What we have done is nowhere near enough. We have to do so much better now that we are in power.'
Leishman added: 'There are so many Labour MPs I know, and also Labour Party members, that want to reject austerity, want to invest in our communities and want to have a proper industrial strategy and a just transition that takes workers and communities along with them.
'This is a dreadful day, not just for Grangemouth and not just for Scotland, but also for the Scottish Labour Party.'
Meanwhile, Scottish Green MSP Gillian Mackay, who grew up 200 yards from the refinery and represents the area at Holyrood, said the closure is devastating for both the workers and the local community.
She said: We should have seen our Governments doing more to protect jobs and modernise the refinery into a space that would help our transition to a greener future.
'It is a further blow to the community. It is deeply disappointing that Labour have not stepped in to protect workers or to future proof jobs in the same way that they have with steelworks down south.
'Grangemouth is my home, and it has been frustrating to see promises being made and dropped as easily as Petroineos' detached billionaire has now dropped the workforce.
Mackay added: 'I am concerned about what this will look like in the short term for the town. Warm words will not pay the bills. Grangemouth holds a lot of potential, as do the workers who offer the skills we need for transitioning away from fossil fuel.
'Governments have not done enough to protect the workers, and my fear is that Grangemouth will now go the same way as so many other communities and towns, where big businesses have cut their losses and left at the expense of the communities and livelihoods.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
30 minutes ago
- The National
Scottish Highland port £42.2million expansion to begin
The expanded facilities could attract projects with the potential to create up to 1500 jobs once the port is fully developed, HES has said. Kishorn Port was used in the 1970s for the construction of the Ninian Central oil production platform, which at the time was the world's largest floating concrete structure and has one of the largest openings of any dry dock facility in Europe. The investment forms part of the Scottish Government's commitment of up to £500m over five years to develop ports and offshore wind energy supply chain. Construction work on the project is scheduled to start on June 16, creating 84 jobs for up to 18 months. Investors hope the port will play a key role in delivery of offshore wind projects. READ MORE: Historic Aberdeen church building price slashed after failing to sell Investment of up to £24m in the project by regional development agency Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) was announced by Scotland's Deputy First Minister, Kate Forbes, last week. Kishorn Port Limited (KPL) director, Alasdair Ferguson, said: 'With a quarry on-site, Kishorn Port is ideally suited for manufacturing of concrete floating offshore wind sub-structures. This Phase 1a expansion project will enable us to provide full integration, with laydown, marshalling and assembly in the long-term. 'The development opens Kishorn to new market opportunities and we are receiving strong expressions of interest to utilise the enlarged dry dock area, along with the additional laydown space, for floating offshore and decommissioning projects. As well as Scotland, our key target markets are the Celtic Sea and the Irish Sea.' Ferguson continued: 'Importantly, this project will provide the catalyst for the support and creation of jobs within Wester Ross and the wider Highlands, benefiting communities across the area. 'This is another very significant milestone in the continuing development of Kishorn Port and we are grateful to Highlands and Islands Enterprise and Scottish Government for their support.' The principal contractor for the project is RJ McLeod, based in Scotland, with offices in Dingwall and a long-established reputation in the Highlands. Supporting services are also being delivered by Scottish firms: marine consulting civil engineers, Wallace Stone; environmental consultants, Affric, and; project management consultants, Leapmoor.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Rachel Reeves wants to teach her critics a lesson
Photo by Hannah McKay -. The toughest job in politics is usually said to be the leader of the opposition – an impression that Kemi Badenoch's tenure has done nothing to dispel. But it is arguably rivalled by that of chancellor. Every incumbent since the 2008 financial crisis has faced a version of the same dilemma: the UK is a poorer country than it once expected to be. At last year's Budget, Rachel Reeves escaped her fiscal straitjacket through two manoeuvres: she raised taxes by £41.5bn and loosened her debt rules to increase investment. The Spending Review is the moment at which the Chancellor gets to distribute the bounty that resulted. Reeves has already launched a pre-emptive strike against critics who liken her to the flinty George Osborne. A graph shows how Labour's spending far exceeds that planned by the Conservatives before the election (one aide calls it 'the honesty chart'). This isn't just spin: Reeves intends to increase day-to-day spending by £190bn – the biggest real-terms rise since Gordon Brown occupied the Treasury in 2000 – and capital investment by £113bn. Austerity this is not. But two things can be true. Yes, overall spending is rising by £303bn but some must lose in order that others may win. The latter includes the NHS – which has secured a 2.8 per cent real-terms rise – and defence (even if plenty regard 2.5 per cent of GDP as inadequate). Ed Miliband's energy security department will enjoy a large increase in capital investment including on nuclear power (allies point to the Energy Secretary's long-standing support for the sector as part of 'the sprint for clean energy abundance'). Other departments, however, face average real-terms cuts of 0.3 per cent to day-to-day spending. Hence the fraught negotiations of the last week. Angela Rayner – that former trade union negotiator – reached a settlement with Reeves last night having warned that cuts to affordable housing would render Labour's target of building 1.5 million new homes impossible. Yvette Cooper – who knows her way around the Treasury as a former chief secretary – is still holding out. After public dissent, the police will receive a real-terms increase but this will entail cuts to other Home Office areas. Last week I detailed Andy Burnham's rhetorical fusillades against the government. This week it's Sadiq Khan who is unhappy, with concern inside City Hall that Reeves will announce no new projects or funding for London at the Spending Review (key demands include Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line extensions, a tourist/visitors levy and a significant rise in funding for the Met Police). 'We must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government, which would not only harm London's vital public services, but jobs and growth across the country,' one person close to the Mayor tells me. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Here is further evidence of why some inside government believe that Reeves needs an 'economic reset' – abandoning her tax lock or further loosening her fiscal rules. But the Chancellor will have a message for such critics in her speech, which aides describe as a chance to 're-educate' these errant foes. Rewriting the UK's fiscal rules, Reeves will warn, would not be a cost-free choice, but one that would entail higher borrowing and higher mortgage rates. An ally speaks of a 'terrifying' gap between a commentariat that pleads for more taxes and more borrowing, and a much more sceptical electorate. 'They think we tax too much, they think we borrow too much, and a lot of people probably think we spend too much.' The Chancellor is seeking to pull off a tricky double act – assailing those who accuse her of austerity while reassuring those who fear Labour profligacy. This week will test whether she can keep her balance. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Rachel Reeves wants to level up your commute. Does she have the money?] Related
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Edge Group Scotland becomes latest accredited Living Hours employer in Scotland
Edge Group Scotland is also proud to be one of only three social care providers in Scotland, and one of just ten across the UK, to hold both Living Wage and Living Hours accreditations. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... This distinction places Edge Group Scotland at the forefront of fair work in the social care sector, setting a leading example for how employers can prioritise staff wellbeing through both secure income and secure hours. Living Hours accreditation requires employers to pay the real Living Wage to all their employees over the age of 18 and commit to providing at least four weeks' notice for every shift, with guaranteed payment if shifts are cancelled within this notice period. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Living Hours employers also provide a guaranteed minimum of 16 hours every week (unless the worker requests otherwise), and a contract that accurately reflects hours worked. TeamEdge Celebrate Living Hours Accreditation Based in Musselburgh, Edge Group Scotland is a social care provider supporting autistic young adults and those with additional support needs across the Lothians. This announcement of their commitment to Living Hours further demonstrates the importance they place on setting standards for fair work. David Myers, Director of Operations & Finance, Edge Group Scotland, said: 'Our Living Hours accreditation demonstrates our continued commitment to doing right by our people. Fair pay and secure work are the foundations of a resilient and motivated team—and that's good for our team and the communities we serve.' One support worker with Edge Group Scotland, saidL 'In a previous role, I was on a zero-hours contract and shifts would come and go with no real notice. It made it really hard to plan anything or feel secure in the job. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "Since joining Edge, that's completely changed. Having guaranteed hours and proper notice takes a lot of stress off. Knowing where I stand each week makes a big difference—and it shows that Edge genuinely values the people who work here.' Christine McCaig, Projects Coordinator, Living Wage Scotland said: 'There are thousands of Scottish-based employers that are committed to paying at least the real Living Wage, and it's fantastic to see Edge Group Scotland take further steps to protect their workers from low pay and insecure work by becoming Living Hours accredited. "The values that led them to commit to the real Living Wage are the same values that have led to their expanded commitment to fair work at a time when workers need it most.' Research published by the Living Wage Foundation showed that over 9% of workers in Scotland are in insecure work and paid below the Living Wage. This is approximately 250,000 workers. The Living Hours standard was created to ensure that people have predictable working patterns and income, enabling them to better plan their lives.
