Waverely Council set to vote for glass bottle ban ahead of 2025 Bronte Beach Christmas Day party
A strictly enforced booze ban and a greater police presence could be on the way for the legendary Christmas Day bash at Sydney's Bronte Beach.
Waverley Council, which takes in the iconic beach and Bronte Park along with Bondi Beach, is expected to vote on Tuesday night for a sweep of new enforcement measures to reduce the scale of rowdiness and rubbish that has marked the beloved celebration in recent years.
Thousands of tourists from around the world descend on the beach to soak up the day, often donning red bathing suits.
But tensions between residents and visitors boiled over in 2023, when the park the park was left littered with rubbish and broken glass.
'It's basically people sh***ing on our doorstep,' Waverley Bondi Ward Councillor Leon Goltsman told NewsWire on Boxing Day that year.
'The fact there is still broken glass there, people are cutting their feet, the fact people are still having illegal parties … the fact if anyone gets injured or hurt, we can't even get an ambulance to them because it is all blocked, it's unacceptable.'
But from Tuesday night, the council will likely entrench new rules to control the party, including a prohibition on all glass bottles and additional crowd management officers.
'Enhancements following community consultation are recommended, with additional focus on police presence to address anti-social behaviour and preserve public safety, including the implementation of alcohol bans or other alcohol checkpoints, depending on what is most practical given the unfenced location,' the council's June 17 agenda document states.
'Further enhancements include a comprehensive communications campaign to deter attendance and promote positive behaviour.
'Further, in this option, council officers will collaborate with various stakeholders including ride share operators, emergency services, traffic management and waste and cleansing services to improve outcomes across those areas.'
The 'option three' model was one of five considered by the council to reorganise the Christmas Day event.
Other options included putting on a fenced, ticketed event or leaving the park as an open slather with no enforcement mechanisms in place.
Waverley Mayor Will Nemesh, speaking with NewsWire ahead of the vote, said he backed option three and said it was 'highly likely' other councillors would too.
'It's basically an evolving strategy, over two years, to make sure we get the balance right between community expectations and people having fun,' he said.
Alcohol is already prohibited on the beach and in the park, Mayor Nemesh noted, but the vast numbers of attendees meant liquor usually slipped through.
The councillors hope a strict ban on glass coupled with a larger police presence will suppress alcohol consumption.
'We want everyone to have fun,' he said.
'Bronte is an absolutely spectacular part of the world. We want to ensure by implementing option three, all people can enjoy the public open spaces, but do so responsibly and respectfully.'
'Option three is sensible and reasonable and a measured approach to dealing with this ongoing issue we have each year at Christmas in Bronte.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Need a lie down': NSW parliamentary inquiry erupts over Labor's workers comp reforms
NSW's nominal insurer is 'plunging further into insolvency' by more than $6m a day the state's Treasurer has revealed, as Labor's controversial workers compensation reforms face another round of public inquiry. Treasurer Daniel Mookhey revealed during an heated parliamentary inquiry on Tuesday that icare was tipped to rise from a deficit of $4.9bn at the end of 2024 to $6bn on July 1 absent reform. 'The nominal insurer is likely to hold $0.78 in assets for every dollar of future liability, meaning it is plunging further into insolvency at a faster rate,' Mr Mookhey said. 'Or, to put it even more simply, the scheme is no longer going backwards by $5m per day, it is going backwards by more than $6m every day.' The state government's plan to reform workers compensation in NSW hit a major hurdle earlier this month when a strange coalition of the Liberals, Greens and the independents joined together to force another public inquiry. The Liberals have proposed a number of amendments to the Bill, namely staying the lifting of the threshold of permanent whole person impairment (WPI) for psychological injury, and have called on the government to provide costings. After hours of hearings, sparks immediately flew over modelling for the amendments between opposition treasury spokesman Damien Tudehope and Mr Mookhey who said 'the government is co-operating with this inquiry'. Mr Mookhey and Mr Tudehope clashed again over the WPI, which Labor proposes lifting to 30 per cent. The Opposition claims doing so would harm workers injured psychologically to such an extent they may never work again. NSW Treasury Secretary Michael Coutts-Trotter earlier told the committee there was a 'well developed pathway' for those people who, once completing their 130 weeks of payments, would instead transition to the NDIS scheme. Labor claims the changes would not only help reduce the burden on the beleaguered state self-insurer, but would also allow injured workers access to lump sum payments should they wish, instead of remaining on compensation. It was over the WPI that Mr Mookhey faced his second heated argument, this time with Greens MLC Abigail Boyd who asked if he knew the change 'would make us the harshest jurisdiction in Australia and one of the harshest in the world'. Mr Mookhey said he didn't 'accept the characterisation'. He claimed that at 130 weeks, 88 per cent of psychologically injured workers were back at work and accused Ms Boyd of being 'deliberately misleading' in claiming it would cut off '90 something per cent of people' currently on the scheme. Consultant psychiatrist Dr Michael Epstein told the committee earlier on Tuesday afternoon that in comparison with other states, NSW's lifting of the WPI to 30 per cent would make it the 'harshest' in the country. 'NSW is going to take the crown,' Dr Epstein said. Ms Boyd went on to summarise the evidence presented to the committee in three ways: she disputed the projected $2.5bn cost to the self-insurer, said there was 'no imminent danger of scheme collapse', and that the proposed WPI threshold was 'unbearably cruel'. 'I'll just make the point, you're entitled to vote against the legislation,' Mr Mookhey said in reply. Ms Boyd went on to accused Mr Mookhey of using 'misleading language' in referring to payments made by the state government to the self-insurer as a 'bail out', and asked him to 'admit you were wrong'. In response, Mr Mookhey said: 'No'. Following the heated exchange, Ms Boyd said: 'I think we need a bit of a lie down now'. A range of practising psychiatrists, insurance industry representatives and leaders from NSW Treasury and the nominal insurer, icare, gave evidence during the hours-long hearing on Tuesday. Mr Mookhey has warned the state self-insurer is tipped to cost the budget $2.6bn over the next five years, while premiums for the nominal insurer have already been set for eight-per-cent for the next financial year. Exactly how the state government will deliver savings through the scheme was under the spotlight during the hearing, with leaders from NSW Treasury and the nominal insurer grilled over costings for the proposed amendments. Largely, though, the numbers were not available.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Markets brace for Donald Trump's next move as the Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Wilson Asset Management's Matthew Haupt says investors are more concerned about the escalating Israel iran conflict, than the cancelled meeting, which had been scheduled between Donald Trump and Anthony Albanese.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Defence zeros in on lack of motive
Prosecutor Dr Nannette Rogers SC finished her closing address, telling the jury there was a final alleged deception by Erin Patterson: how she allegedly deceived the jury from the witness box. The defence then stepped up, with Colin Mandy SC presenting a type of anti-motive and arguing that Erin Patterson had plenty of reasons to not kill her lunch guests. If you've got questions about the case that you'd like Rachael and Stocky to answer in future episodes, send them through to mushroomcasedaily@ - It's the case that's captured the attention of the world. Three people died and a fourth survived an induced coma after eating beef wellington at a family lunch, hosted by Erin Patterson. Police allege the beef wellington contained poisonous mushrooms, but Erin Patterson says she's innocent. Now, the accused triple murderer is fighting the charges in a regional Victorian courthouse. Investigative reporter Rachael Brown and producer Stephen Stockwell are on the ground, bringing you all the key moments from the trial as they unravel in court. From court recaps to behind-the-scenes murder trial explainers, the Mushroom Case Daily podcast is your eyes and ears inside the courtroom. Keep up to date with new episodes of Mushroom Case Daily, now releasing every day on the ABC listen app.
