There are no secrets on the internet. Just ask the women who entrusted their data to Tea
The latest data breach to hit the headlines is particularly nasty. A popular women-only dating-safety app called Tea lets users compare notes about men to see if they are dating the same person or if anyone has red flags to share. It's a bit like an app version of the popular 'Are we dating the same guy?' Facebook groups. Last Friday, the company behind Tea confirmed it had been breached. Women have to submit a selfie (to 'prove' their gender) in order to use the app; an estimated 72,000 images, including 13,000 verification photos and photos of government IDs, have been leaked online. More than 1m private messages have also been leaked.
This isn't just a run-of-the-mill data breach – it's revenge. It seems users of 4chan, a message board popular with rightwing and misogynistic trolls, were upset by the app and called for a 'hack and leak' campaign. 404 Media reported that the database of stolen images has now been posted on 4chan and X. Someone has reportedly even created a site where men can rate women's selfies exposed in the leaked data.
There are obviously numerous ethical issues with apps such as Tea, or the Facebook groups that allow people to share unverified and potentially defamatory information about men. But there is a reason these digital whisper networks exist: social media companies and dating sites do very little to protect women. According to one survey, 31% of women reported being sexually assaulted or raped by someone they had met through an online dating site. Tea was supposed to be a rare safe space – but now I suspect a lawsuit is brewing.
Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
44 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT 5 vs Claude Opus 4.1 AI Coding Performance Compared
What if the future of coding wasn't about learning a language, but choosing the right AI? With the rise of advanced AI coding assistants, the debate over which model reigns supreme has never been more intense. On one side, we have ChatGPT 5, celebrated for its affordability and versatility, making it a favorite among beginners and creative coders. On the other, Claude Opus 4.1 stands as the go-to for professionals who demand precision and speed. These two powerhouses promise to transform how we approach coding, but which one truly delivers? This report dives deep into their performance, revealing surprising contrasts that could redefine your workflow. In the following comparison, Leonardo Grigorio uncovers how these models stack up across critical dimensions like code quality, usability, and performance. Whether you're a seasoned developer seeking production-ready results or a newcomer exploring the world of coding, this analysis will help you identify the tool that aligns with your needs. But the choice isn't as simple as 'better' or 'worse'—it's about understanding which model fits your unique goals. As we unpack their strengths and trade-offs, you might find that the best AI for you isn't the one you expected. GPT-5 vs Claude 4.1 Pricing: Balancing Affordability and Value For users with budget constraints, GPT-5 emerges as a significantly more cost-effective option. Its input costs are approximately 12 times lower, and its output costs are 7.5 times lower compared to Claude Opus 4.1. This affordability makes GPT-5 particularly appealing for users who need to experiment extensively without worrying about escalating expenses. On the other hand, Claude Opus 4.1 justifies its higher price by delivering polished, professional-grade results. For developers working on high-stakes or time-sensitive projects, the premium cost may be a worthwhile investment. The choice ultimately depends on whether you prioritize affordability or the assurance of high-quality outputs. Code Quality: Iterative Flexibility vs. Professional Precision The two models differ significantly in their approach to code quality, catering to distinct user needs: Claude Opus 4.1: Known for generating production-ready code, it excels in handling complex tasks such as building web applications, games, or landing pages. Its outputs are precise and polished, making it an excellent choice for experienced developers who require minimal revisions. Known for generating production-ready code, it excels in handling complex tasks such as building web applications, games, or landing pages. Its outputs are precise and polished, making it an excellent choice for experienced developers who require minimal revisions. GPT-5: Adopts a more verbose and forgiving approach, allowing users to refine their code through multiple iterations. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for beginners or those engaging in creative coding projects where trial and error is part of the process. If you value precision and minimal revisions, Claude Opus 4.1 is the superior option. However, for users who prefer a tool that accommodates iterative learning and experimentation, GPT-5 offers the adaptability needed to refine and improve code over time. OpenAI ChatGPT 5 vs Claude Opus 4.1 Watch this video on YouTube. Enhance your knowledge on AI coding by exploring a selection of articles and guides on the subject. Performance Metrics: Speed vs. Versatility Performance benchmarks reveal distinct strengths for each model, making them suitable for different types of projects: GPT-5: Excels in reasoning and general-purpose tasks, offering versatility across a wide range of coding challenges. Its ability to adapt to various scenarios makes it a reliable choice for users seeking a flexible tool. Excels in reasoning and general-purpose tasks, offering versatility across a wide range of coding challenges. Its ability to adapt to various scenarios makes it a reliable choice for users seeking a flexible tool. Claude Opus 4.1: Delivers faster real-time coding with lower latency and higher throughput. This makes it particularly effective for projects requiring quick turnarounds or immediate results. Your decision should be guided by whether you prioritize broad functionality and adaptability or speed and efficiency in your coding tasks. Context Window Management: Capacity vs. Efficiency The ability to manage context is a critical factor for complex coding projects, and both models take different approaches to this challenge: GPT-5: Features a larger context window, allowing users to input and process more extensive information. This capability is especially useful for projects requiring detailed instructions or handling large datasets. Features a larger context window, allowing users to input and process more extensive information. This capability is especially useful for projects requiring detailed instructions or handling large datasets. Claude Opus 4.1: Demonstrates superior efficiency in using its context window, effectively remembering and applying prior prompts. This ensures consistent and precise outputs, even when working with limited input sizes. For projects that demand handling large amounts of data or detailed instructions, GPT-5's larger context window is advantageous. Conversely, Claude Opus 4.1's efficient context management makes it a better fit for users who prioritize precision and consistency. User Experience: Beginner-Friendly vs. Expert-Oriented The user experience offered by each model varies based on the technical expertise of its target audience: GPT-5: Designed with non-technical users in mind, it provides a forgiving interface that supports iterative learning. Its verbosity and flexibility make it an excellent starting point for beginners or hobbyists exploring coding for the first time. Designed with non-technical users in mind, it provides a forgiving interface that supports iterative learning. Its verbosity and flexibility make it an excellent starting point for beginners or hobbyists exploring coding for the first time. Claude Opus 4.1: Tailored for experienced developers, it excels at handling precise prompts and delivering professional-grade results. This makes it a preferred choice for users with clear objectives and advanced technical skills. If you're new to coding, GPT-5's user-friendly design offers a smoother learning curve. For advanced users, Claude Opus 4.1 provides the precision and reliability needed for complex, high-stakes projects. Empirical Observations: Forgiveness vs. Accuracy In practical applications, the models exhibit contrasting strengths that cater to different user preferences: GPT-5: More forgiving of errors, it allows users to refine their code over multiple attempts. This makes it ideal for experimentation, learning, and creative projects where flexibility is key. More forgiving of errors, it allows users to refine their code over multiple attempts. This makes it ideal for experimentation, learning, and creative projects where flexibility is key. Claude Opus 4.1: Excels in one-shot prompt handling, delivering accurate results on the first try. This capability is particularly valuable for time-sensitive or high-stakes projects where precision is critical. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize flexibility for iterative learning or accuracy for immediate results. Use Cases: Matching Tools to Your Needs The suitability of each model depends on your specific goals, expertise, and project requirements: GPT-5: Best suited for non-technical users, hobbyists, or those exploring creative coding projects. Its affordability and forgiving nature make it an excellent entry point for beginners. Best suited for non-technical users, hobbyists, or those exploring creative coding projects. Its affordability and forgiving nature make it an excellent entry point for beginners. Claude Opus 4.1: Ideal for developers with technical expertise and well-defined objectives. Its superior code quality and efficiency cater to professional-grade outputs, making it a reliable choice for experienced users. By understanding your project requirements and technical proficiency, you can determine which tool aligns best with your needs and goals. Both models offer unique strengths, making sure that there is an option for every type of user. Media Credit: Leonardo Grigorio | AI Automation Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump Media to broadcast GB News on US streaming platform Truth+
The Trump family media company has partnered with GB News to broadcast the British news channel on its US streaming platform, Truth+. Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), which operates the social media app Truth Social, the streaming platform Truth+, and the FinTech brand announced on Friday it will add GB News to its list of available channels, making it accessible to most countries globally, including the US. GB News, which has hosted rightwing commentators such as Nigel Farage, will be offered with the free basic package on Truth+, and can be accessed through several devices and platforms including iOS, Android, Web, Apple TV, Android TV, and Amazon Fire. The US president continues to criticise the mainstream media, filing lawsuits against giants such as Rupert Murdoch, as well as broadcasters and smaller newspapers. Earlier this year, Trump said the US media was full of 'radical-left monsters', who were guilty of 'illegal' reporting. More recently the White House communications director, Steven Cheung, said 'liberal media' is spreading 'fake news' in relation to reports, claiming that Trump's name appeared in US justice department files about Jeffrey Epstein. Trump Media's chief executive and chairperson, Devin Nunes, said in a statement: 'GB News is a terrific source for news, facts and commentary. 'By expanding its global reach, we aim to connect an enormous new, international audience to the network's unique reporting and opinion, while putting another dent in the global woke news monopoly.' Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Angelos Frangopoulos, GB News's chief executive, said: 'As the fearless champion of freedom of speech in Britain, it is important that we launch across the United States of America and globally on the Truth+ streaming platform.'
Times
13 hours ago
- Times
Signal boss: ‘disturbing' laws show the UK doesn't understand tech
S tudying a book in a café window on a cobbled Parisian street, Meredith Whittaker, curly haired, tattooed and dressed all in black, has the air of a scholarly punk. When I ask what's on her mind, the boss of Signal, WhatsApp's privacy-obsessed messaging rival, stares deep into my eyes with a look that suggests the answer should be obvious: the rise of the 'robot butler'. In the tech world Whittaker inhabits, entrepreneurs and investors salivate over a not-too-distant future where average Joes will have their own low-cost, errand-running AI agents. 'It books a concert for you,' Whittaker recites. 'It finds a time; what date would work for you and your friends. It messages your friends to co-ordinate, and then puts that in your calendar.'
