logo
From FEMA To Freedom: Can Trump Transform States Into Doomsday-Prep Dynamos?

From FEMA To Freedom: Can Trump Transform States Into Doomsday-Prep Dynamos?

Forbes14-04-2025

While it's not yet commonly acknowledged, in a government with as hefty a gravitational pull as ours, federal spending is also federal regulation.
TOPSHOT - Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and US First Lady Melania Trump look on as US President ... More Donald Trump speaks during a fire emergency briefing at Station 69 in Pacific Palisades, a neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, on January 24, 2025. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
That's why deregulation—when it does happen—can sometimes emerge from surprising places. A new executive order from Donald Trump may fit that bill, perhaps even more significantly than his earlier 'one-in, ten-out' directive.
The COVID-19 pandemic five years ago exposed serious vulnerabilities in our national preparedness, revealing a troubling reliance—by virtually everyone and everything—on federal intervention during crises. The resulting surge in federal spending (and its attached regulatory strings) tends never to recede. This year, the Congressional Budget Office projects a $1.9 trillion deficit on $7 trillion in spending—even in the absence of an emergency.
Back then, I argued for an 'Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act' (AOC Prevention) to curb the predatory exploitation of emergencies for political gain and to foster resilience at all levels of society before the next economic shock. The core idea was simple: instead of funneling trillions into reactive federal rescues, we should prioritize policies that empower individuals, businesses, and states to weather shocks independently. Pertinent now thanks to a new Trump executive order, two sections in particular (Titles IV and V, noted below) called for getting the federal government out of crisis response best left to states and localities.
Framing an "Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act" to Confine Washington
Today, that vision aligns with a new Donald Trump initiative to shift responsibility back to the states, as seen in Executive Order 14239, titled 'Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness.' (Here's a 'Fact Sheet.') The order reads in part:
Federal policy must rightly recognize that preparedness is most effectively owned and managed at the State, local, and even individual levels, supported by a competent, accessible, and efficient Federal Government. Citizens are the immediate beneficiaries of sound local decisions and investments designed to address risks…. When States are empowered to make smart infrastructure choices, taxpayers benefit. This order empowers State, local, and individual preparedness and injects common sense into infrastructure prioritization and strategic investments through risk-informed decisions that make our infrastructure, communities, and economy resilient to global and dynamic threats and hazards.
The 2020 CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act) and the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act (with its $1.9 trillion price tag) exemplified the problem that the new order can help correct. States were funded regardless of their lockdown choices; inefficiencies were rewarded; and worst of all, the idea of universal basic income (UBI)—which erodes self-reliance—gained dangerous legitimacy.
Rather than learning from the pandemic (and 9/11, and the 2008 financial meltdown) to build resilience, the federal government's instinct remains to double down on dependence. We remain vulnerable to another round of runaway deficit spending as soon as the next shock hits.
Along with ending states' reliance on federal handouts during non-crisis times, my earlier call for reform emphasized several related pillars for fostering a culture of preparedness—and reducing the need for massive, knee-jerk federal flash-policy responses. Among them:
Trump's Executive Order 14239, while not explicitly aimed at universal economic shocks (it highlights cyberattacks, wildfires, hurricanes, and 'space weather'), nonetheless reflects this same philosophy, pursuing a norm of states taking the lead in disaster preparedness and infrastructure resilience.
It's an important conversation starter—especially in this era of rethinking supply chains from every angle. E.O. 14239 mandates a National Resilience Strategy within 90 days, aiming to streamline federal policy and prioritize risk-informed state, local, community, and individual decisions over blanket federal interventions. This shift could support broader moves to reduce the strings-attached federal grants-in-aid—already nearing $1 trillion pre-COVID—and help pave the way for eventually phasing out federal private aid altogether.
Of course, challenges remain. States vary in capacity, and without clear guidance on decoupling from federal funding, some may struggle or fail to engage in the balancing acts required. Still, the order's directive for FEMA to 'review all national preparedness and response policies' is a vital step toward a system in which crises don't automatically trigger trillion-dollar bailouts.
By fostering state-level resilience, we can preserve limited government and shield future generations from the debt and dependency that crisis exploitation inevitably breeds. Trump's order represents one important piece of a broader Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act. Executive action alone won't solve the problem—legislation will be necessary—but here's to letting the next crisis go to waste.
The Case for Letting Crises Go to Waste: How an 'Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act' Can Help Rein in Runaway Government Growth, Competitive Enterprise Institute
'The Best American Rescue Plan Is An 'Abuse-Of-Crisis Prevention Act,' Forbes
'A Constitutional Amendment Banning Subsidies, Grants And Loan Guarantees,' Forbes

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Online Tax Firm MyExpatTaxes Alerts Expats: Final Chance to Claim 2021 Stimulus Payments
Online Tax Firm MyExpatTaxes Alerts Expats: Final Chance to Claim 2021 Stimulus Payments

Business Upturn

time19 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Online Tax Firm MyExpatTaxes Alerts Expats: Final Chance to Claim 2021 Stimulus Payments

Vienna, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — MyExpatTaxes, a leading US expat tax company known for its support of U.S. citizens living overseas, is highlighting an important upcoming deadline for American expatriates. By June 16th, expats must act to claim the 2021 stimulus payments. This deadline represents the final opportunity for expats who haven't already to benefit from COVID-19 economic stimulus payments, which can total thousands of . MyExpatTaxes is urging individuals not to miss out on this opportunity. As the U.S. is one of just two countries that taxes based on citizenship rather than residence, Americans living abroad have to report their worldwide income by filing a U.S. tax return every year. Many Americans expats are unaware of this requirement to file from overseas though, so get behind in their filing. The IRS has an amnesty program for these expats though called the Offshire Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. This process offers a chance for overseas Americans who have unintentionally failed to meet their filing obligations to catch up on their U.S. tax filing without facing penalties. It requires submitting the last three years of tax returns and, where applicable, up to six years of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Reports (FBARs). The procedure can seem complex, but with MyExpatTaxes offering either self-service or guided assistance, expats can find a sense of relief with easy access to tools like a US expat tax calculator and a stimulus check calculator found on their website. Nathalie Goldstein, CEO of MyExpatTaxes, underscores the significance of acting before the June 16th deadline for non-compliance overseas Americans, saying, 'The June 16th 2025 deadline is the last opportunity for American expatriates who may not have been aware that they have to file U.S. taxes from abroad to claim teh COVID-19 stimulus payments. It's also a valuable opportunity to get tax compliant without facing penalties. Our goal is to provide them with the guidance they need to make the most of these benefits.' Her words reflect the broader mission of MyExpatTaxes – supporting American expats in navigating what can often be a daunting process filing from overseas (often as well as filing taxes in the country where they reside). The 2021 expanded Child Tax Credit is also available for American families living abroad. This credit offers a substantial benefit of up to $3,600 per child, refundable for qualifying families. Timely filing is critical to claim this credit, ensuring families don't inadvertently miss out. To aid in this, expats can access comprehensive guidance and information on the Streamlined Procedures through MyExpatTaxes' dedicated page: Adding to the firm's efforts, Goldstein remarks, 'The potential gains for catching up and filing for 2021 for expats who qualify for the stimulus payments are typically far outweigh the costs of becoming compliant. Our platform is designed to simplify the tax filing process for U.S. citizens abroad, offering practical solutions and expert support. With the deadline imminent to claim these valuable payments, we're dedicated to helping expatriates claim what they are rightfully owed.' This statement emphasizes MyExpatTaxes' commitment to easing the stress associated with U.S. tax filing for expats. To further assist expats, the company has developed easy-to-use resources such as tax guides, quick start checklists, and webinars available on their website. These resources provide education and support, aimed at simplifying and demystifying the intricacies of international tax reporting for Americans living abroad. User testimonials and official reviews highlight the effectiveness and reliability of MyExpatTaxes' services, reinforcing their reputation as a helpful aid for expats. As the June 16th deadline approaches, expats need to be vigilant. Missing this date means losing out on the chance to claim the stimulus payments for good. Through proactive action and using MyExpatTaxes' offerings, expatriates can not only ensure compliance but also capitalize on available benefits. MyExpatTaxes remains committed to guiding expatriates through these important periods, helping them understand and fulfill their tax responsibilities while maximizing their eligible claims. For those seeking to learn more or benefit from these services, they can learn more through the platform's site: The resources provided are not just about fulfilling obligations – they also empower expats to take control of their financial responsibilities with confidence. ### For more information about MyExpatTaxes, contact the company here: MyExpatTaxesMackenzie Passegger [email protected]

Treasury yields slip as U.S.-China trade talks enter Day 2
Treasury yields slip as U.S.-China trade talks enter Day 2

CNBC

time22 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Treasury yields slip as U.S.-China trade talks enter Day 2

Treasury yields slipped Tuesday as U.S. and Chinese officials resumed trade negotiations in London for the second day. The 10-year Treasury yield was down almost 3 basis points to 4.456% at 3.30 a.m. ET. The 2-year yield slipped around one basis point to 3.993%. The 30-year yield was lower by 3 basis points to 4.921%. One basis point equals 0.01%. Yields and prices move inversely in the bond market. U.S.-China trade negotiations in London resumed on Tuesday, building on a recent call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. On Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had talks with Chinese officials. Both sides have intensified diplomatic efforts following weeks of escalating trade tensions and uncertainty sparked by Trump's broad import tariffs on China and other key trading partners in April. "While we await any concrete news, it's worth remembering that markets have been used to a lot of back-and-forth in recent weeks," Deutsche Bank's analysts said, in reference to how U.S. tariffs slapped on China went all the way up to 145%, before being slashed to 30%, among other instances of policy reversals. "There've been several twists and turns already, and markets are getting fairly used to this uncertainty by now," wrote in a note published Tuesday. Deflation in China is also putting pressure on the Chinese government to negotiate a trade deal with Trump that benefits both countries, said Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. China's consumer prices fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, with the CPI falling 0.1% from a year earlier, data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed on Monday.

'Collateral damage': Fund managers lobby Congress over Section 899 to avert foreign investors leaving the U.S.
'Collateral damage': Fund managers lobby Congress over Section 899 to avert foreign investors leaving the U.S.

CNBC

time23 minutes ago

  • CNBC

'Collateral damage': Fund managers lobby Congress over Section 899 to avert foreign investors leaving the U.S.

American fund managers are lobbying Congress over a provision tucked inside President Donald Trump's tax bill that they say could lead to foreign investors "quickly" pulling investments out of the U.S. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which passed through the U.S. House of Representatives in May, aims to penalize foreign-owned firms operating in the U.S. and that are from countries with "unfair foreign taxes" under a provision known as Section 899. It is currently being considered by the Senate. The Investment Company Institute (ICI), which represents fund houses in the U.S., is lobbying Congress for an amendment as it warns the bill in its current form also impacts most foreign investments in U.S. stock markets, according to documents seen by CNBC. "In order to avoid the impact of section 899, portfolio investors are likely to retreat quickly from US equities, leading to capital outflows from the United States," the ICI said in a letter sent to Senator Mike Crapo, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, on June 5. "If sustained selling by foreign investors depresses US equity markets, this would harm both US companies and investors." Section 899 aims to introduce retaliatory tax measures against entities from countries that have levies such as the Digital Services Taxes and the OECD's global minimum tax rules. If signed into law, it could impact investors from the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Switzerland, among others. The tax would start at 5% and escalate by five percentage points annually to a maximum of 20%, on top of existing taxes, which vary by country and tax treaties. That could dent returns for foreign investors in U.S. equities. In the letter, the ICI also suggests that the U.S. fund management industry, which has collectively invested around $18 trillion in U.S. stock markets, would be "collateral damage" due to the impact of Section 899. "We do believe, however, that the current drafting of proposed section 899 should clarify its scope and avoid discouraging foreign investment in US equity markets through 'investment funds' such as US mutual funds and ETFs and their foreign counterparts (e.g., UCITS funds)," the ICI said. The letter to Senators goes on to say, "section 899 would penalize these funds and their shareholders by taxing passive income from US equity investments. To this end, investment funds would be collateral damage to the intended focus of section 899." Funds typically charge fees as a percentage of assets under management, and a withdrawal by foreign investors, over Section 899 concerns, could lead to lower earnings for the investment management firm. The Senate Finance Committee declined to comment, and Senator Mike Crapo's office did not respond to CNBC's request for comment. Foreign investors own $19 trillion in the U.S. stock markets, $7 trillion in U.S. government bonds, and $5 trillion in U.S. credit, according to data compiled by Apollo Global Management. The ICI said it's largely in support of the U.S. government's attempt to "protect US business interests overseas and to address discriminatory foreign taxes." However, it cautions that the current draft of the bill does the opposite. "Some foreign governments may actually cheer this capital flight from the United States because it benefits their local equity markets, which is not the behavioral incentive that Section 899 seeks to achieve," it said. Yuri Khodjamirian, chief investment officer for Tema ETFs, said investors in Europe who are focused on dividend-distributing U.S. companies would be "thinking quite carefully" about their holdings at this stage. "If suddenly you have to pay tax on that income, why would you hold that?" Khodjamirian questioned. Tema ETFs runs the American Reshoring ETF that is available to both U.S. and foreign investors. Tax experts suggest earnings paid out to foreign investors are more likely to be hit by Section 899 than capital gains and other methods of shareholder distributions. The Tema ETFs investment chief cautioned that the impact on the U.S. equities market would be relatively minimal as U.S. companies, say in the S&P 500, are typically not known for their dividends. "In the US, dividend yields are quite low. There's not a lot of companies paying. And most of the capital gets returned to share buybacks," Khodjamirian told CNBC. "Is that actually going to be that big of an issue then?"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store