
From FEMA To Freedom: Can Trump Transform States Into Doomsday-Prep Dynamos?
While it's not yet commonly acknowledged, in a government with as hefty a gravitational pull as ours, federal spending is also federal regulation.
TOPSHOT - Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and US First Lady Melania Trump look on as US President ... More Donald Trump speaks during a fire emergency briefing at Station 69 in Pacific Palisades, a neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, on January 24, 2025. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
That's why deregulation—when it does happen—can sometimes emerge from surprising places. A new executive order from Donald Trump may fit that bill, perhaps even more significantly than his earlier 'one-in, ten-out' directive.
The COVID-19 pandemic five years ago exposed serious vulnerabilities in our national preparedness, revealing a troubling reliance—by virtually everyone and everything—on federal intervention during crises. The resulting surge in federal spending (and its attached regulatory strings) tends never to recede. This year, the Congressional Budget Office projects a $1.9 trillion deficit on $7 trillion in spending—even in the absence of an emergency.
Back then, I argued for an 'Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act' (AOC Prevention) to curb the predatory exploitation of emergencies for political gain and to foster resilience at all levels of society before the next economic shock. The core idea was simple: instead of funneling trillions into reactive federal rescues, we should prioritize policies that empower individuals, businesses, and states to weather shocks independently. Pertinent now thanks to a new Trump executive order, two sections in particular (Titles IV and V, noted below) called for getting the federal government out of crisis response best left to states and localities.
Framing an "Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act" to Confine Washington
Today, that vision aligns with a new Donald Trump initiative to shift responsibility back to the states, as seen in Executive Order 14239, titled 'Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness.' (Here's a 'Fact Sheet.') The order reads in part:
Federal policy must rightly recognize that preparedness is most effectively owned and managed at the State, local, and even individual levels, supported by a competent, accessible, and efficient Federal Government. Citizens are the immediate beneficiaries of sound local decisions and investments designed to address risks…. When States are empowered to make smart infrastructure choices, taxpayers benefit. This order empowers State, local, and individual preparedness and injects common sense into infrastructure prioritization and strategic investments through risk-informed decisions that make our infrastructure, communities, and economy resilient to global and dynamic threats and hazards.
The 2020 CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act) and the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act (with its $1.9 trillion price tag) exemplified the problem that the new order can help correct. States were funded regardless of their lockdown choices; inefficiencies were rewarded; and worst of all, the idea of universal basic income (UBI)—which erodes self-reliance—gained dangerous legitimacy.
Rather than learning from the pandemic (and 9/11, and the 2008 financial meltdown) to build resilience, the federal government's instinct remains to double down on dependence. We remain vulnerable to another round of runaway deficit spending as soon as the next shock hits.
Along with ending states' reliance on federal handouts during non-crisis times, my earlier call for reform emphasized several related pillars for fostering a culture of preparedness—and reducing the need for massive, knee-jerk federal flash-policy responses. Among them:
Trump's Executive Order 14239, while not explicitly aimed at universal economic shocks (it highlights cyberattacks, wildfires, hurricanes, and 'space weather'), nonetheless reflects this same philosophy, pursuing a norm of states taking the lead in disaster preparedness and infrastructure resilience.
It's an important conversation starter—especially in this era of rethinking supply chains from every angle. E.O. 14239 mandates a National Resilience Strategy within 90 days, aiming to streamline federal policy and prioritize risk-informed state, local, community, and individual decisions over blanket federal interventions. This shift could support broader moves to reduce the strings-attached federal grants-in-aid—already nearing $1 trillion pre-COVID—and help pave the way for eventually phasing out federal private aid altogether.
Of course, challenges remain. States vary in capacity, and without clear guidance on decoupling from federal funding, some may struggle or fail to engage in the balancing acts required. Still, the order's directive for FEMA to 'review all national preparedness and response policies' is a vital step toward a system in which crises don't automatically trigger trillion-dollar bailouts.
By fostering state-level resilience, we can preserve limited government and shield future generations from the debt and dependency that crisis exploitation inevitably breeds. Trump's order represents one important piece of a broader Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act. Executive action alone won't solve the problem—legislation will be necessary—but here's to letting the next crisis go to waste.
The Case for Letting Crises Go to Waste: How an 'Abuse-of-Crisis Prevention Act' Can Help Rein in Runaway Government Growth, Competitive Enterprise Institute
'The Best American Rescue Plan Is An 'Abuse-Of-Crisis Prevention Act,' Forbes
'A Constitutional Amendment Banning Subsidies, Grants And Loan Guarantees,' Forbes
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call
LONDON (AP) — High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng is due to meet U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at an undisclosed location in the city. The talks are due to last at least a day. They follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. The U.K. government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' the British government said in a statement. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
June 8, 2025 - Trump presidency, Los Angeles protest news
• On the ground: Police have used flash-bangs and tear gas while dispersing crowds, with some hitting and pushing protesters while making arrests, CNN witnessed. Protesters set at least two self-driving cars on fire. All of Downtown Los Angeles has been declared an unlawful assembly area. • Troop deployment: About 300 National Guardsmen are on the ground after President Donald Trump called them up to protect federal personnel and property. It's the first time a president has called in the National Guard without a state's request or consent in decades. Also prepared to deploy are 500 Marines. • Trump vs Newsom: California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will file a lawsuit against the Trump administration over deployment of the National Guard, which he and LA Mayor Karen Bass have called inflammatory. • Why are there protests? Authorities and demonstrators have clashed for days after dozens of people were detained by immigration agents. Intelligence analysts believe protesters are motivated by several factors, including immigration raids, deployment of the National Guard, and agitators who fit profiles of 'professional rioters.'


CNBC
24 minutes ago
- CNBC
China and U.S. trade officials to hold talks in London
U.S. President Donald Trump's top trade officials are meeting their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving an ongoing trade dispute between the world's two largest economies. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are representing the U.S. China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that Vice Premier He Lifeng, Beijing's lead trade negotiator, will be in the U.K. between June 8-13, and that a meeting of the "China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism" would take place. The talks come after Trump last week said that he had held a lengthy phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping as both look to avert a full-blown trade war. Diplomatic efforts by both sides have ramped up after weeks of heightened trade tension and uncertainty after Trump announced sweeping import tariffs on China and other trading partners in April. Beijing retaliated, and a tit-for-tat escalation in duties ensued before both sides agreed in Geneva in May to temporarily slash duties and facilitate talks. At the time, the U.S. tariff on Chinese imports was cut from 145% to 30% , while China's levies on U.S. imports were lowered from 125% to 10%. China and the U.S. have since repeatedly accused each other of violating the Geneva agreement, with Washington saying Beijing was slow to approve the export of additional critical minerals to the U.S., while China criticized the U.S. imposing new restrictions on Chinese student visas and additional export restrictions on chips. U.S. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Sunday said that the London talks would focus on moving forward with the Geneva agreement, noting the two sides' strategic interests in each other's markets.