US government tells staff in China not to have romantic ties with Chinese citizens
The US government has reportedly implemented a blanket ban on romantic and sexual relationships between its personnel in China and Chinese citizens.
The ban was reportedly enforced by Nicholas Burns just before he departed as US ambassador to Beijing in January. It applies to diplomats, their family members, and contractors with security clearances stationed at the US embassy and consulates in mainland China and Hong Kong.
Four sources with knowledge of the secret directive confirmed its existence on the condition of anonymity to the Associated Press.
The ban was reportedly introduced amid concerns over espionage, especially about Chinese intelligence using 'honeypot' tactics.
Previously, US personnel in China were subject to limited restrictions, mainly requiring them to report such relationships. The new directive, a Cold War-style measure, mandates that anyone with an existing Chinese partner seek an exemption, end the relationship, or leave their post if the exemption is denied.
Violation will result in immediate expulsion from China, the sources told the news agency.
The Independent has reached out to the US embassy in Beijing and Mr Burns for comment.
Mr Burns served as the US ambassador in Beijing from 2021 until January this year. He joined The Cohen Group, a consultancy firm, as vice chair in February.
The US government has not publicly acknowledged the directive, which was reportedly prompted by pressure from members of Congress concerned about espionage risks.
The US government's non-fraternisation policies for its personnel in other nations remain largely unknown as they are classified, and the extent of their restrictiveness is also unclear.
The geopolitical rivalry between the US and China has intensified in recent years, a friction further fuelled by president Donald Trump 's decision on 2 April to impose sweeping 54 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports.
China's foreign ministry and several other government agencies prohibit their staff from engaging in sexual or romantic relationships with foreign nationals. Members of the Chinese military and police are also typically not allowed to travel abroad without explicit approval from their superiors.
Peter Mattis, a former CIA analyst, told the Associated Press that China's ministry of state security had previously used seduction to target American diplomats and often coerced ordinary Chinese citizens to gather intelligence. However, he added, this had rarely happened in recent years.
He said any romantic involvement between Chinese citizens and US diplomats could pose a security risk. The state security ministry was 'willing to leverage any human connection that a target has to collect intelligence', he added. 'This rule change suggests the MSS has gotten a lot more aggressive at trying to access the embassy and US government.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Les Misérables cast boycott latest show with Trump appearance
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump faced a boycott at the Kennedy Center for the debut performance of Les Misérables. In Washington, DC, on Wednesday night, Trump, 78, was among the guests at the Kennedy Centre for the performing arts, marking the first time the President had attended the event since his election in 2024. It was reported that several cast members opted out of performing as a way to boycott his attendance, meaning that understudies were likely called upon to step in. When asked about this form of defiance from the cast, Trump responded that he was unbothered. 'I couldn't care less. Honestly, I couldn't,' said Trump. 'All I do is run the country well.' Trump was booed and cheered as he arrived and took his seat next to his wife, Melania Trump. At the end of the intermission, it was reported that someone loudly cursed his name and drew applause from the audience. Drag Queens also appeared in the crowd, their presence was a silent protest against Trump's claims that the Center had hosted an excessive number of drag shows in the past. Earlier this year, Trump made himself chairman of the Kennedy Centre, firing the board of trustees and confirming that he would reduce the number of drag shows at the historically liberal space. In a post on X in February he announced: 'At my direction, we are going to make the Kennedy Center in Washington D.C., GREAT AGAIN. I have decided to immediately terminate multiple individuals from the Board of Trustees, including the Chairman, who do not share our Vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture. We will soon announce a new Board, with an amazing Chairman, DONALD J. TRUMP! 'Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth — THIS WILL STOP. The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across our Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!' A response from the Kennedy Center at the time revealed that they had not received any communication from the White House about this, but were aware some members of their board had received termination notices. The Kennedy Center's statement continued: 'Per the Center's governance established by Congress in 1958, the chair of the board of trustees is appointed by the Center's board members. There is nothing in the Center's statute that would prevent a new administration from replacing board members; however, this would be the first time such action has been taken with the Kennedy Center's board.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While at the event, Trump told reporters that he was a huge fan of Les Misérables. 'I've seen it, we've seen it, a number of times, it's fantastic. It was just about our first choice. That's what we got and we've got other ones coming, other great ones coming,' Trump said. More Trending Despite being a huge fan, the President was unable to answer basic questions about the plot, like whether he found himself relating to the villain or the hero of the play. The reporter asked the President if he felt more aligned with the ruthless Inspector Javert, or Jean Valjean, the former convict mercilessly hunted down by Javert for stealing a loaf of bread to feed his family. 'Oh, that's a tough one, the last part of that question, that's tough, I think,' Trump said with a laugh. 'You better answer that one honey, I don't know.' Melania did not have a response for the reporter either. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Eva Longoria tearfully blasts Donald Trump's 'inhumane' immigration raids joining devastated celebrities MORE: British photographer films moment US police shoot him with rubber bullet MORE: TikTok star Khaby Lame with 162,000,000 followers flees US after being detained by ICE
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Is Israel preparing to strike Iran?
While much of the Western debate remains trapped in tired slogans and false moral narratives, events on the ground in the Middle East have taken a decisive turn. In the past 24 hours, U.S. embassies have begun evacuating non-essential staff. Military dependents are being authorised to leave key bases. Multiple reports say U.S. officials have been told Israel is fully ready to launch an operation against Iran if required, and Washington expects possible Iranian retaliation on American sites in Iraq. The U.S. anticipates that Iranian retaliation against U.S. assets in Iraq could follow any Israeli strike The trigger is Iran's growing stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium, its preparations for potential retaliation against any Israeli strike, and the breakdown of progress in nuclear talks. Meanwhile, in Gaza, as Western commentators obsess over supposed Israeli crimes, Hamas deliberately attacked a convoy of humanitarian aid workers, killing and injuring those delivering life-saving relief, according to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The region is moving to dangerous thresholds while too many in the West cling to delusional narratives and moral theatre that can no longer disguise the facts. U.S. embassies across the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and North Africa have been ordered to convene emergency action committees and report their risk mitigation measures to Washington. This directive, as reported by the Washington Post, led to Secretary of State Marco Rubio's decision on Wednesday to authorise the departure of nonessential personnel in Iraq. 'We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies,' a State Department official said. 'Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq.' A senior diplomat in the region put the mood in stark terms: 'We are watching and worried. We think it's more serious than any other time in the past.' Military preparations are also accelerating. Naval Support Activity Bahrain, home to U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, has been placed on high alert. In Iraq's Al-Anbar province, increased military air activity has been observed. The U.S. anticipates that Iranian retaliation against U.S. assets in Iraq could follow any Israeli strike. This concern contributed to Washington's decision to advise some Americans to leave the region earlier on Wednesday. Iran's posture is evolving in parallel. The New York Times reports that Iranian military and government officials have already met to discuss their response to a potential Israeli strike. A senior Iranian official told the paper that Tehran has prepared a response plan involving an immediate counterstrike on Israel with hundreds of ballistic missiles. The catalyst behind these developments remains Iran's advancing nuclear programme. According to a recent confidential IAEA report cited by Reuters, Iran has amassed about 408.6 kg of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, a quantity sufficient for nearly one nuclear weapon if further refined. Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, have signalled they are ready to trigger UN 'snapback' provisions to reapply sanctions on Iran if its nuclear programme continues unchecked, with some Western diplomats suggesting such action could come as early as August. Diplomatic efforts continue, but seem increasingly futile. A sixth round of direct talks between U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is scheduled for the coming days. Two U.S. officials confirmed to CBS News that Witkoff still plans to attend. Yet Witkoff's public remarks last night underscore the gravity of the challenge. Speaking at a United Hatzalah event, he said: 'A nuclear Iran represents an existential threat to Israel as does an Iran with a large amount of missiles. That is as big an existential threat as the nuclear threat. And this is an existential threat to the United States and the free world and the entire GCC. We must stand resolute and united against this danger and ensure that Iran never attains the means to achieve its deadly ambitions no matter what the cost.' Markets have responded sharply. Oil prices rose more than 4 per cent on Wednesday, reaching their highest level in two months, amid fears that Persian Gulf shipping lanes could be affected by military escalation. Alongside these developments, a separate gruesome attack demands clear moral response. On Wednesday night at approximately 10 p.m. local time, a bus carrying over two dozen members of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation team (local Palestinian aid workers working alongside the U.S. GHF team) was attacked by Hamas terrorists as it travelled to a distribution centre west of Khan Younis. The GHF's statement leaves no doubt: 'At least five fatalities, multiple injuries, and fear that some of our team members may have been taken hostage. We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms.' The GHF reports that Hamas had openly threatened its team and the civilians they serve in recent days, while Western news outlets ran cover for them by constantly suggesting Israel was shooting at civilians seeking aid. The attack represents a direct assault on humanitarian principles and the integrity of civil society. 'These were aid workers,' the GHF statement continues, 'Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives every day to help others.' When Israel mistakenly killed World Central Kitchen aid workers after terrorists knowingly endangered them, the world reacted with outrage. Now we will see whether politicians and the media speak out on this deliberate targeting of aid workers by Hamas. Until now, Hamas's threats against the humanitarian efforts were met with silence from those who should have condemned them. The UK was busy sanctioning Israeli cabinet ministers. That silence must end, with the international community unequivocally denouncing Hamas for this atrocity. Despite these developments in the Gaza Strip and across the entire region, the complex humanitarian effort to feed Gaza's citizens continues, as do the diplomatic efforts to address Iran's nuclear programme – even as military preparations advance on multiple fronts, and the possibility of kidnapped American humanitarian workers is being investigated. There is a hard reality that many in the West have chosen not to confront. From Paris, London, and Ottawa to the BBC and other Western media outlets, public debate has too often been trapped in abstract talking points: the fantasy of a viable Palestinian state led by terrorist factions, the ritualised condemnation of Israel, and the refusal to acknowledge the scale of Iranian and Hamas aggression. But events on the ground are indifferent to such illusions. Iran's nuclear and missile posture is advancing. Hamas is murdering aid workers. The region is moving toward dangerous thresholds while too many in the West cling to a moral fable of putative Israeli bloodlust and deliberate starvation – a narrative that no longer fits the facts. The question now is whether Western leaders are prepared to face this reality with the clarity and resolve it demands, or whether they will persist in narratives that leave them powerless as others reshape the strategic landscape of the Middle East.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Blow for Rachel Reeves after UK economy shrinks by more than expected
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
