
Taoiseach rejects 'housing vs data centres' energy claim by senior civil servant
The Taoiseach has rejected claims from a senior civil servant that Ireland faces a choice between providing energy for data centres or housing.
Oonagh Buckley, secretary general at the Department of Environment, Climate and Energy, told an event on Wednesday that data centres had used up the spare capacity in the energy grid, which would require policymakers to make stark choices.
'We're having to even think about prioritising what is the social need of the demand [for energy] — is it housing or is it AI (artificial intelligence)?' Ms Buckley said.
'We're going to have to think much more about managing demand.'
Speaking at the Bloom event in the Phoenix Park, however, Micheál Martin said that he was "surprised" at the comments.
CLIMATE & SUSTAINABILITY HUB
"I was surprised by that comment. I mean, we have a cabinet subcommittee. Minister Darragh O'Brien is very clear that we need to drive on with renewable energy. And there's a lot of work yet to be done... The presentation of the issue is not true."
2021 file picture of Oonagh Buckley who is now the secretary general at the Department of Environment, Climate and Energy. File picture: Colin Keegan, Collins
Speaking in Dublin earlier on Thursday, infrastructure minister Jack Chambers said that Ms Buckley had oversimplified the issue.
'I think the binary simplicity that was put forward by the secretary general doesn't reflect the general issue that's at play here,' Mr Chambers said.
'Yes, we have the constraints that are immediate, but if we're going to build and enhance the green and digital transition as an economy and build the prosperity and opportunities that will come from AI, we need to work with the community that is there and the investors that are there in terms of digital infrastructure, who acknowledge that there are short-term constraints that the secretary general was reflecting,' he added.
He admitted there were immediate constraints on the grid, but the Government needed to set out a roadmap for the medium term to allow digital infrastructure like data centres to continue to be built in Ireland.
Asked if secretary generals needed to 'know their place', Mr Chambers said it was fair for senior civil servants to make 'observations'.
'But their primary duty is to implement policy and to drive delivery of the programme for Government and in fairness they do,' Mr Chambers said.
Mr Chambers was also asked about comments by Graham Doyle, the secretary general of the Department of Housing, who spoke out against the introduction of a "housing tsar".
Mr Chambers pushed back by saying senior civil servants are required to implement Government policy.
Sinn Féin's spokesperson for the Environment, Climate and Energy, Pa Daly said that Ms Buckley's comments were "a stark warning".
If even the government's own officials are now calling out the government's reckless approach to [energy] demand management, it is clear there is a serious problem.
'We are in the midst of a seemingly never-ending housing crisis. Solving it should be the government's number one priority.
'Instead, both they and the energy regulator are rolling out the red carpet for data centres — placing the needs of the corporate balance sheet over the essential needs of ordinary workers and families."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
David W Higgins: How the Occupied Territories Bill could risk triggering Ireland's own damaging trade war
David W Higgins: How the Occupied Territories Bill could risk triggering Ireland's own damaging trade war If Ireland can remove all involvement with Israel, why wouldn't it do the same to us? People protesting outside Leinster House in Dublin, calling on the Government to enact the Occupied Territories Bill. Photo: Sam Boal /Collins David W Higgins Today at 03:30 The Trump trade war continues. The EU has joined China with a 90-day reprieve. A burst of dealmaking is unfolding behind the scenes. Exporters are continuing to count the fallout. Everyone has more questions than answers.


Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Injuries Resolution Board proposes rethink on whether it can sanction the paying of legal fees
The Injuries Resolution Board has called on the Government to consider changing the law to allow it to sanction the paying of legal fees. Such a move would represent a massive U-turn because the board was set up 20 years ago with the express intention of avoiding costly legal fees. Under current legislation, the board can sanction the paying of legal fees only in very limited circumstances. In a submission to the Department of Finance, as part of the public consultation on a new Action Plan For Insurance Reform, the Injuries Resolution Board says that 95pc of claimants using its services are represented by a solicitor. The fact that it does not pay legal fees means people often reject its settlement offers, the submission states. Close to half of the settlement offers made by the board are rejected. However, legal fees often end up being paid by insurers' lawyers after the claim leaves the Injuries Resolution Board, the submission says. 'For a large proportion of claims that leave our system, legal fees are incurred thereafter and paid,' the submission said. The Injuries Resolution Board, formerly known as the Personal Injuries Assessment Board, is the state body allowing people to resolve personal injury claims without having to go to court. It deals with road traffic, public liability and workplace personal injury claims. Most injury claims have to go to it before going to court, and can go to court only if an assessment by the board is rejected by either side. The longer a claim lasted before being resolved, the higher the legal fees, the board said. The submission said that many insurers offered to pay legal fees where the claimant's solicitor agreed to accept the award initially recommended by the Injuries Board after the claim had left the Injuries Board system. This meant that the board should consider paying legal fees. The submission states: 'In the interests of resolving claims at an earlier juncture for all concerned, 20 years after the establishment of the board, the question of legal fees needs to be considered.' ADVERTISEMENT Such a move may undercut lawyers who have a financial interest in getting cases out of the Injuries Board to generate fees for themselves. The Injuries Board calls for consideration for a 'scale of fees' that it would pay. It understood that typical legal fees would be between €1,000 and €2,000, reflecting that fact that Injuries Board assessments are resolved much faster than if they are litigated. A separate submission from the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission says that resolving personal injury claims through the Injuries Resolution Board is faster than litigation and has lower legal costs. Central Bank research has found that settlement costs for claims of less than €150,000 are €23,000 for both cases settled by the Injuries Board and for those involving litigation. For cases taken through the Injuries Board, the legal costs are €1,000. But if they involved litigation, the legal costs rise to €23,000. More than 70pc of claims are settled by litigation, representing 89pc of injury settlement costs, the Central Bank found. And legal costs have risen despite the Personal Injuries Guidelines, used by both the courts and the Injuries Board, having dropped by up to 40pc in the past few years. And judges have controversially recommended that award guideline levels rise by 16.7pc, which the Government has yet to endorse. The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission submission calls for more data on legal costs. Fast-food giant Supermac's, whose owner Pat McDonagh has long campaigned for insurance reform, submitted that there should be insurance pricing transparency legislation. The company wants mandatory disclosure by insurers of the key components contributing to premium calculations. It also wants insurers to be forced to justify 'significant year-on-year premium increases, with oversight by a regulatory body'. The Alliance for Insurance Reform submitted that broker charges account for an increasing proportion of the overall cost of insurance and that brokerage firms are being sold for huge multiples. 'Many brokers now charge a fee based on a percentage of the cost of the policy. This is inherently unfair to consumers as the 'worse' the premium they secure for them, the more money they will make. We believe this needs further examination,' the Alliance stated. Representative group for small businesses, ISME, said there is 'no moral hazard for fraudulent claims'. The Convenience Stores and Newsagents Association (CSNA) called for insurance companies to 'devote more time and resources to investigating claims rather than paying up due to a cost-benefit analysis'. Some 70 submissions were made, but the Law Society, which represents solicitors, and the Bar Council, which represents barristers, do not appear to have made submissions.


Agriland
5 hours ago
- Agriland
Bord Bia's Bloom attracts 100,000 visitors over five day festival
Bord Bia's annual Bloom festival, held annually over the June Bank Holiday weekend, attracted 100,000 visitors this year according to figures released on its concluding day (Monday, June 2). The gardening and food festival which takes place each year in the Phoenix Park, Dublin, was originally launched to promote plants, garden design, horticulture and gardening. However over nearly two decades Bord Bia has developed the festival to also create a food and drink experience and promote learning experiences in gardening, growing fruit and vegetables, cooking and culture. Jim O'Toole, Bord Bia's chief executive, believes the festival now has an 'enduring popularity'. He added: 'Bloom 2025 has been a fantastic success — we welcomed wonderful crowds over the five days, enjoyed mostly favourable weather, and the atmosphere throughout the show has been incredibly positive. 'As we wrap up this year's event, excitement is already building for a very special milestone: Bord Bia Bloom's 20th anniversary in 2026.' Bloom Two of the key themes of each Bord Bia Bloom festival are sustainability and waste reduction and many elements of the 2025 show and feature gardens will be relocated follwing the event. The Grass Advantage garden – designed by Robert Moore and sponsored by the National Dairy Council Source Bord Bia Every element of the Grass Advantage garden, designed by Robert Moore and sponsored by the National Dairy Council 'will be reused, replanted, or repurposed' after the festival. According to Bord Bia the alder, hazel and field maple trees will be rehomed in a woodland setting in Wicklow while the weathered corrugated steel will return to dairy shed in Stamullen, County Meath. The milk churn structure will be reused as a focal point in a community garden, and the stone walls and stone-pave paving will be reused in a community allotment. Meanwhile the Estate's Essence garden, designed by Patrik Weisser and sponsored by Abbeyleix House and Farm, will be brought back to Abbeyleix House and Farm in County Laois where they will be used to build on the gardens at the estate. Awards As part of the celebrations to mark the final day of the festival two awards were also unveiled today including the People's Choice Award, voted for by visitors who chose their favourite show garden. This year it was awarded to Tulsa's 'Fostering is for You' garden designed by Pip Probert. Meanwhile Bloom garden designers also get a chance to vote on their favourite garden and this year the Designer's Choice Award was presented to Louise Checa who designed the gold medal winning Citroen Downsizers' Garden. Bord Bia has also confirmed today that Bloom 2026 will take place from Thursday, May 28 to Monday, June 1.