Nightmare neighbour dubbed the 'human wrecking ball' by a judge has been freed from prison under Labour's early release scheme
Mark Coates, 57, was branded a 'human wrecking ball' by a judge after he tore the tiles and chimney pots off his £450,000 home before throwing them to the ground.
After he had finished destroyed his own roof he moved over to his neighbours and began demolishing their property.
The wrecking spree was the culmination of a bitter seven year boundary dispute over the location of a garden fence.
In March, Coates who was dubbed 'Britain's worst neighbour', was sentenced to four years and four months behind bars after he was found guilty of causing more than £200,000 of damage to the homes.
But now Coates, a father-of-five, has been freed under the Government's controversial early release scheme.
His victims, David Greenwood, 70, and Janice Turner, 66, claim their lives were made 'hell' by Coates and say they are now 'living in fear' and 'have lost all faith' in the British justice system.
Coates, who vowed in court never to stop pursuing the case, is living with his family just a few miles away from the pair.
The couple said the move made a 'complete mockery of the British justice system' and had put enormous stress on them.
Mr Greenwood, a mechanic, said the early release scheme, introduced by the Government last year to ease pressure on prisons, was a charter which favoured criminals over their victims.
'It's an absolute farce,' he said. 'This wasn't some piffling sentence for shoplifting. This was a serious crime which wrecked our home in an attempt to totally destroy our lives.
'It's a disgrace he has been freed from prison. We are devastated and it has put enormous stress on us.
'He is under a curfew at night but we live in fear of what he might do during the day. It's taking a huge toll on us.
'The early release scheme is a move that favours criminals over their victims and completely undermines the authority of UK courts.
'It's absolutely ridiculous. Why would the Crown Prosecution Service and the police bother to bring cases against criminals if they're just going to be freed?'
Coates was sentenced to four years and four months behind bars at Lewes Crown Court in March.
After a trial he was found guilty of two counts of criminal damage where he caused £200,000 worth of damage to the two properties in Robertsbridge, near Hastings, East Sussex in June 2024.
The 57-year-old father-of-five smashed a hole through the roof of his semi-detached home before clambering out.
He then began tearing off the tiles and chimney pots off the £400,000 home before throwing them to the ground.
When he had largely destroyed his own roof he moved over to his neighbours' home and began tearing the tiles from their home.
Ms Turner, 66, called police but was left crying in the garden as she watched Coates start to demolish her home.
Video of the incident, captured by police, showed Coates armed with a hammer methodically smashing up the roof of both homes.
A two hour police stand-off ensued before Coates was finally arrested and taken into custody.
Residents living close to the victims said the dispute had had a massive effect on the whole community and branded Coates 'one of the worst neighbours in Britain.'
Sentencing him, Recorder Ben Williams KC sentenced Coates said the destruction of the two homes was a clear 'revenge attack' on his neighbours.
He said Coates had fallen on the houses 'like a human wrecking ball' which had left the couple upset and traumatised.
The incident happened on June 10 last year and brought to an end the long-running dispute between the neighbours which started when a fence panel fell down.
When a new fence separating their two gardens was erected the two neighbours disagreed over where the boundary was.
Lewes Crown Court heard that, after years of litigation, the case had eventually gone to the High Court.
The warring neighbours had been warned by High Court judge, Mr Justice Morgan, that persisting in the row could result in financial ruin for one or both of them before a ruling was made against Coates.
Coates was found in contempt of the High Court, handed a £475,000 court bill and was ordered to sell his home to pay for the huge sum.
As a result his property was to be sold to reimburse the victims' legal fees as well as to pay for the damage caused to their property.
But just three days before he was due to hand over the house keys, Coates decided to cause massive damage to the properties.
Ms Turner said Coates smashed most of the tiles off his own roof before clambering onto her roof and starting the same.
She said: 'He was picking some of them up and throwing them into the garden and towards me. I was standing by my greenhouse and I felt debris from the roof go past my face.'
She said when the hole was big enough to climb through Coates clambered out onto the roof.
The 66-year-old added: 'He completely removed the best part of the roof at the rear of my property.'
A video, captured from a police body-worn camera, shows officers trying to reason with Coates and coax him down from the roof.
But he told officers: 'I've had this house stolen off me by a judge and corrupt police. I'll cause as much damage as I can to devalue the house.'
He told officers his aim was to cause as much damage as possible to ensure a jury trial in crown court where he said he would expose 'corrupt' officials who had fraudulently deprived him of his home.
In mitigation Richard Body, defending, said Coates was a dedicated family man who had a previous good character.
He said: 'However he has an aspect of his character that is stubborn which is how he has got himself into this very unfortunate position.'
Coates, who was cleared of two counts of causing fear of violence or harassment, was handed an indefinite restraining order not to approach the victims.
In September 2024 - three months after the attack - Coates was jailed for 16 months for contempt of the High Court which had to be served separately to the criminal conviction.
Mr Greenwood said: 'Mr Coates was also serving a sentence of 448 days in prison for civil contempt and was not due to be released from that sentence until December 2025.
'He was then due to start his criminal sentence so should still be in prison. Remission and the early release scheme do not apply to sentences for breaches of orders of the civil courts.'
He believes the release of Mr Coates from prison is unlawful.
He said: 'He has served just a fraction of his civil sentence and none of his criminal sentence. It's a total joke. No one - neither the police, courts or prisons - seem to know what they're doing.'
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'Offenders released on Home Detention Curfew are subject to strict conditions and will be sent back to prison if they break the rules.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Undercover BBC reporters paid £1,200 to people-smuggler
Undercover BBC reporters paid more than £1,200 to a violent people-smuggling gang as part of an investigation. The broadcaster's Paris correspondent, who led the year-long investigation into the Channel trafficking operation, justified the payments as 'the only way' to gain access to the gang. The BBC's investigation claimed to have infiltrated one of the major gangs operating on the north coast of France, helping tens of thousands of people cross the Channel to Britain each year. It used undercover reporters and secret filming to show the gang's forest hideout outside the French port of Dunkirk as well as tracking their members across Europe. As part of the investigation, the corporation's reporter paid for a place on a small boat to cross the Channel, and met a member of the gang's network at Birmingham New Street station to hand over the payment. Handover filmed for report In secretly recorded footage, a reporter can be seen handing over an envelope containing £900 in cash to a gang member with a glass eye who then walks away. In the special report, which was aired on BBC News at 6pm on Tuesday, Andrew Hardy, the BBC's Paris correspondent, said: 'That's it. He's taken the money and left the station. 'You may well be asking why we would pay money to criminals. We believe it is the only way we can gain access to the gang and expose its network – not least its network here in the UK.' Another payment of £348 was made to a gang member in Dunkirk. The report aimed to highlight how people smuggling gangs were using sophisticated techniques to stay one step ahead of the authorities, changing names and phone numbers and having no social media profile. The gang was linked by the BBC to 12 migrant crossing deaths. The investigation by the BBC comes as the Government's 'one in, one out' deal to return migrants to France is set to begin. The treaty was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, and will take effect from Wednesday, with detentions expected in the coming days. The UK-France deal, which will also bring approved asylum seekers on a safe route to Britain, was agreed last month on the last day of Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. Some 25,436 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel this year – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018. This is up 48 per cent on this point last year (17,170) and 70 per cent higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data. At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by the French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel. Ministers say they want to end the crossings because they 'threaten lives and undermine our border security'. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has said smuggling gangs have been allowed to take hold along the UK's borders over the last six years, making millions out of the dangerous journeys.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Police face weeks-long delay before they can reveal suspects' nationalities
Police face a weeks-long delay before they are allowed to reveal suspects' nationalities because Downing Street is waiting for new independent guidance before changing the rules. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is urging forces to give more information about suspects' nationalities and migration status after Reform accused Warwickshire Police of a 'cover-up' over the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. However, an official rule change on when foreigners can be publicly identified as suspects has been delayed because of a review that is not expected to be published until the autumn. It came amid criticism of the Government's broader strategy on illegal migration, after Ms Cooper was unable to say whether a new deal with the French would allow small boat migrants to be deported this month. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, warned that the deal was 'wide open to abuse' because France does not have to share any data on who is coming to Britain – meaning new arrivals could include criminals and terrorists. Ministers have asked the Law Commission, an independent advisory body, to update guidance on contempt of court rules, which currently prevent police or officials from giving details about suspects. The review, commissioned in February, is not expected to report until the autumn, and a change in guidance for police forces could be implemented weeks after that. Without an urgent change, ministers fear a repeat of the riots that followed the Southport stabbings last summer, while Downing Street has said police should be more 'transparent' about their suspects. There is concern among law enforcement officials and in Whitehall that public debate about crime by migrants and the threat of violent protests at asylum hotels will culminate into a summer of 'disorder' on the streets. Ms Cooper told the BBC on Tuesday: 'We do want to see more transparency in cases, we think local people do need to have more information.' One police leader told The Telegraph that while the previous system of 'saying as little as possible in order to preserve a fair trial' had worked well in the past, the rise of social media had 'driven a coach and horses' through that approach. He said the absence of information all too often created a vacuum, which was filled by mis- or disinformation, and said the risk to public order meant police must provide more information. The review of police protocol follows inaccurate speculation on social media of the Southport attacker's identity last year, with users alleging that Axel Rudakubana was an illegal immigrant. George Finch, the 19-year-old Reform leader of Warwickshire county council, on Monday accused the Government of covering up alleged crime by migrants in Nuneaton, claiming that the two men charged with the rape of a 12-year-old girl were Afghan. That claim has not been confirmed by police. There is not currently any guidance issued to forces about disclosing the ethnicity or immigration status of an individual on charge. The rules state only that a suspect should be named unless there is an exceptional and legitimate policing purpose for not doing so, or if reporting restrictions apply. Philip Seccombe, the Warwickshire Police and Crime Commissioner, has said that any release of information by police should 'follow national guidance and legal requirements'. The review of the guidelines on contempt of court was commissioned by Ms Cooper, Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, and Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, earlier this year. The Law Commission's review is expected to find that police officials and ministers should be allowed to reveal more information about suspects in cases where there is a 'threat of serious public disorder'. However, despite a request from ministers to publish new guidelines 'as soon as feasible', the body is not expected to report for some weeks. The delay has effectively left police forces defenceless against accusations of a cover-up, while Downing Street is urging them to make more information available. Another senior officer told The Telegraph any change to the rules would create new issues for the police because they do not routinely collect nationality and ethnicity data unless it is relevant to an investigation. 'The police's job is about gathering evidence and I can see some real practical difficulties in requiring forces to provide extra information,' the officer said. A Home Office source said: 'Not only are we deporting foreign criminals at a rate that Chris Philp and Robert Jenrick never managed when they were in charge at the Home Office, but we are also publishing far more information about that group of offenders than the Tories ever did.' Sir Keir is separately facing criticism over the one in, one out migrant deal agreed with Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, under which migrants who come to the UK illegally are meant to be swapped for people in France who have a legitimate asylum claim in Britain. The Prime Minister announced on Monday that the process of deporting the first Channel migrants under the deal will begin within days. But Mr Philp said the details of the agreement, published on Tuesday, show it will be a 'lawyer's paradise' that will make it too easy for migrants to stay. The agreement states that people who have made 'clearly unfounded' claims under the Human Rights Act will not automatically be deported, meaning lawyers will be able to create lengthy delays. The agreement states that anyone claiming to be under the age of 18 will be able to stay in the UK. Mr Philp said that because Britain does not carry out robust age checks, it means that people in their 20s who could they are under 18 could be allowed to stay. In addition, under the deal France will not have to hand over any data on the people they are sending to the UK, meaning they could be criminals or terrorists. 'This deal is unworkable and wide open to abuse,' he said. 'It's exactly what we've been warning about – a bureaucrat's dream and a lawyer's paradise set to prevent people ever being returned to France. 'There are no numbers specified, presumably because they are so small they would embarrass the Home Secretary. France won't even tell us any information about who we have to accept back, so they could be criminals or terrorists, and we wouldn't know. 'This is a pathetic deal, which simply won't work. No wonder this Government has presided over the worst channel crossing figures in history.'
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Father tells of his anguish as son's killer will be freed due to a brain tumour
A killer who is seeking early release on compassionate grounds should be left to die in prison, his victim's family have said. Alan Dewar, 35, has been diagnosed with brain and spinal cancer and is said to have 12 months left to live. Dewar was jailed in 2008 for stabbing 17-year-old Joshua Mitchell in a random, drug-fuelled attack. The violent thug had pounced on the teen as he walked home listening to his iPod. He killed him by stabbing him once through the heart - then stood smoking nearby as his victim lay bleeding in the street. At the time Dewar said he killed the teenager because 'he was in a bad mood that day' and has never publicly expressed remorse for the attack. Joshua's father, Andy Mitchell, 58, still lives in the family home in Inverness, just yards from where his son was stabbed. Speaking after news of Dewar's cancer battle emerged, he told the Daily Mail that his son's killer should never be released. 'He's never showed an ounce of compassion or regret for killing our Joshua, so there's no way he should be given any now,' he said. 'The spot where it happened is just yards from our house and I pass it every time I walk up the road, and if I thought Dewar was out of jail - even for the short time he says he has left, smirking as he has been all along, it would eat me up. 'There would be no justice if the parole board are so weak they let him out early. 'What I think would be justice is that this illness will see him away early, and that should happen inside the four walls of his cell. 'The parole board should take one look at his violent record and will surely see that he's not fit to be out. If he'd shown remorse or behaved in jail, found God or something I could maybe understand him getting out early. But he's a violent menace and should never be released in a million years.' However, Mr Mitchell, now a self-employed HGV driver, says he has little faith in the parole board making the 'right' decision. He also pointed to the case of Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, who was found guilty of mass murder and imprisoned for life in Scotland. The Scottish Government released terminally-ill Megrahi on compassionate grounds in 2009, three years before he died of cancer. Mr Mitchell said: 'You've only got to look at how they released Megrahi when it was said he had cancer and had months to live. 'He lived for another three years. That's the Scottish justice system for you though, if he can get out then I bet Dewar can by spinning the same tale.' The impact of Joshua's death had a long-lasting impact on his family, with Mr Mitchell saying his late wife Marilyn, who died in 2015, never got over the loss. He said: 'She died of a broken heart. There was so much anger inside us both, we were having our trauma for breakfast dinner and tea. 'I eventually learned how to deal with it, but Marilyn never did. She even tried to commit suicide once.' Another tragic aspect is that Joshua's girlfriend was pregnant with their son at the time of his death, meaning he never got to meet the boy, who was born the day after his killer was sentenced. Mr Mitchell said the prison service wrote to him earlier this year to advise him Dewar's parole hearing was due on September 25, a standard process advising victims of possible release thereafter. He learned later that the killer had cancer. Dewar's medical issues emerged at Perth Sheriff Court, where he was due to stand trial for stalking two women and making threats against them while serving time at the city's jail. He denied stalking but admitted making a call to the pair. Dewar's lawyer told the court he had been given just 12 months to live, after he was diagnosed with a rare form of brain and spinal cancer, called ependymoma, in January. Originally charged with stalking the two women, he pled guilty to a reduced charge of threatening or abusive behaviour on a single day. The court heard Dewar, now at HMP Low Moss, will ask to be released 'on compassionate grounds' at a parole hearing on September 25. Sheriff Mark O'Hanlon told Dewar in view of his condition he would be admonished. Dewar has now served more than the 13-year punishment element of his sentence for Joshua's murder, having now been behind bars for nearly 18 years due to committing more violent crimes while inside. He had 32 months added to his sentence in 2010 for attacking a fellow Polmont inmate with a pool cue. In 2022, he had his sentence extended by another eight months following a brawl in HMP Perth's C Hall.
