Global minimum tax: G7 endorses 'side-by-side' system replacing top-up levies; US, UK firms exempted
In a landmark development, the Group of Seven (G7) nations have agreed to exempt US-headquartered multinational corporations from key provisions of the global minimum tax agreement under a new "side-by-side" system.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
British businesses will also benefit from similar relief.
As per news agency ANI, the new proposal, backed by the US and its G7 partners, will allow American firms to be taxed only domestically, on both foreign and local profits, rather than face additional top-up taxes overseas.
The framework recognises existing US tax laws, specifically its domestic minimum tax, and offers a carve-out from the OECD's Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) and Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR).
The G7 announcement, released by Canada, which currently holds the rotating presidency, said the system was intended to 'provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward.'
The breakthrough came after the United States dropped Section 899, a controversial clause in US President Donald Trump's tax bill, which had proposed retaliatory taxes on foreign companies operating in the US.
According to news agency Reuters, its removal paved the way for broader agreement and eased concerns in countries like the UK, where businesses feared exposure to punitive tax provisions.
British finance minister Rachel Reeves welcomed the development and was quoted by Reuters as saying, 'Today's agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns.'
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Reeves also reaffirmed the UK's continued efforts to combat aggressive tax avoidance globally.
The move follows concerns raised earlier this year after Trump pulled the US out of the 2021 OECD-brokered global tax deal through an executive order. That landmark agreement, supported by nearly 140 countries under the Inclusive Framework, had aimed to ensure large multinational companies pay at least a 15% tax rate globally.
According to news agency AFP, Trump also threatened retaliatory taxes on countries applying the global rules to US companies, a step that created apprehension among international investors.
With the Section 899 provision now withdrawn, the new dual-track solution reflects a broader consensus among G7 nations to preserve tax sovereignty while maintaining progress on tackling base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).
The US Treasury said on X that this side-by-side approach would "preserve important gains made by jurisdictions inside the Inclusive Framework" and that it looks forward to developing this solution further through constructive discussions.
The agreement now awaits further deliberation at the OECD level to determine how exemptions for US and UK firms will be formally recognised under the global tax regime.
G7 leaders reiterated that the final solution must be "acceptable and implementable to all."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
The stock-market rally is moving beyond Big Tech and investors are thrilled
The summer stock rally is broadening beyond big tech. Megacap technology stocks such as Nvidia, Microsoft and Broadcom led the market's rapid, tariff-spurred selloff earlier this year, only to rebound just as quickly a few weeks later when trade fears eased. Now, with economic fears diminished and optimism growing that the Trump administration will take a milder stance on trade, the recovery has expanded to include stocks across a more diverse group of sectors, such as financials, industrials and utilities. The number of stocks in the benchmark S&P 500 closing above their 50-day moving average has climbed recently to levels last seen in the fall, before Donald Trump's election victory launched an end-of-year rally. And in another sign of breadth, a measure that tracks the number of stocks rising versus those declining notched a new high on Friday. While the so-called Magnificent Seven tech stocks still hold investors' attention—and sway over the market—a broader participation in the recovery has helped propel the Nasdaq composite and the S&P 500 to all-time-highs in June. It could also signal that stocks will keep climbing through the summer, analysts say. 'We've seen this before: big tech leads and the market follows," said Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial. 'It seems like we are dusting off that playbook." Wall Street generally views improving breadth as a signal of a healthy stock market and a sustained advance. Whether the trend continues will depend on a few uncertainties still looming in the second half of the year: potential conflict in the Middle East, the path of interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve and the final outcome of President Trump's tariff plans. 'As long as things can stay stable, then this market is not exhausted by any stretch of the imagination," said Tom Essaye, founder of the Sevens Report, a market analysis firm. Market breadth has improved as investors who missed out on tech stocks' historic rebound search for new opportunities in different industries, Essaye said. He called it the 'FOMO trade," referencing the acronym for 'fear of missing out." Others have made longer-term bets in less popular industries. Jamie Cox, a managing partner at Harris Financial Group in Richmond, Va., didn't increase his proportion of big-tech holdings over the past few months even as prices dipped. But in recent weeks, his strategy—which includes a blend of defense, financial and large-cap international shares—has started to pay off. 'I'm surprised it took this long," he said. 'It's been a long time coming." Cox, who manages $1.2 billion at Harris, said that, in recent months, he has heard from clients looking to diversify the stocks in their portfolios. 'That lends itself to owning different things than just the most effective of the tech stocks," he said, such as shares of defense contractors Lockheed Martin and RTX Corp. 'You buy the less-aggressive, more tried-and-true, boring stocks." The recovery hasn't worked its way through every corner of the market. Small-cap stocks still lag behind major indexes. It might take a significant shift in the outlook to change that, said George Pearkes, macro strategist at Bespoke Investment Group. 'We would have to see a change in risk appetite." Some investors think that a confidence boost could come sooner than expected. Eric Teal, chief investment officer at Comerica Wealth Management, said he is adding midcap, small-cap and even microcap companies. He is buying shares of domestic banks that he thinks won't be affected by future tariffs, and said the Fed's rate cut could also boost smaller firms. 'The broadening out that we've seen over the last number of months is not something that's going to be short-lived," Teal said. It is unlikely that the market's biggest tech names will fade into the background soon, analysts said. Optimism for artificial intelligence, which powered tech stocks' ascendance to new highs, is still top-of-mind for professional and individual investors alike. But as tech shares have rebounded, so have valuations: Some large-cap names traded at more than 30 times their expected earnings over the next year last week, compared with an S&P 500 average of about 22 times. Those rich prices could be another nudge for traders to start snapping up shares in different industries, said Brian Buetel, a managing director at UBS Private Wealth Management. 'Nobody disagrees that the Mag Seven are just extremely expensive," he said. 'People forget there are sectors of the market that are on sale—that are cheap." Write to Hannah Erin Lang at and Roshan Fernandez at
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Qatar thwarted Iran's attack on US base; 300 troops scrambled – missiles lit up Doha sky
Qatar successfully intercepted a wave of Iranian missiles aimed at the US military's Al Udeid Air Base, in what officials described as a swift and coordinated defensive operation that averted catastrophe. The attack came in retaliation for US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and marked a critical flashpoint in the widening Israel-Iran conflict. Despite the scale of the attack, no casualties were reported, and damage was minimal, thanks to a rapid response by Qatari and US forces. President Donald Trump later described the Iranian strike as a 'very weak response,' while Qatar condemned it as a 'flagrant violation' of its sovereignty. Qatari-led response averts major damage According to CNN , Qatari officials were first alerted around 7pm local time when their military detected Iranian missiles airborne and heading toward Al Udeid, a key regional hub for US air operations. Brigadier General Jassim Al-Ansari, speaking to the network, said the response was 'Qatari-led,' even though it was closely coordinated with US forces. Within minutes, 300 Qatari troops were mobilised, and multiple Patriot missile defence systems were activated across two locations. A total of 19 missiles were fired from Iran, according to Qatari sources. Seven were intercepted over the Persian Gulf, and 11 were shot down over the capital, Doha. Only one missile landed in an uninhabited area of the airbase, causing limited damage. President Trump, speaking after the incident, said Iran had fired 14 missiles, 13 of which were intercepted, with one left to land harmlessly as it posed no threat. Despite the discrepancy in numbers, US Central Command confirmed that no personnel were harmed. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi insisted the attack was calibrated not to harm civilians, and on state television, Iran's National Security Council said the strikes posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar.' Al-Ansari, however, dismissed any suggestion that Qatar had prior knowledge of or permitted the strike. 'We would never put our people in danger for any political outcome,' he told CNN. 'This was a complete surprise.' Tensions erupt over nuclear site bombing The missile barrage followed US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordo, last Saturday. Satellite images released Sunday showed damage to the underground enrichment site, reportedly hit with precision bunker-buster bombs. Iran later claimed it had removed key nuclear material from targeted locations ahead of time. The attack on Al Udeid was widely viewed as Tehran's attempt to send a message without causing a direct confrontation with Washington. Trump claimed the US had been warned in advance, which allowed it to take precautionary measures. Iran said the number of missiles matched the bombs dropped by the US. Qatar's airspace was shut down for several hours during the attack, disrupting over 100 flights scheduled to land at Hamad International Airport. Commercial operations resumed on Tuesday. The UK and US embassies had earlier advised citizens in Qatar to shelter in place. Ceasefire emerges but tensions persist The fragile ceasefire officially took effect on June 24, following intensive diplomacy mediated by the US and Qatar, with Israel affirming its acceptance of the terms and Iran agreeing to halt operations in synchrony. However, the truce has been shaky: Iran allegedly launched two missiles into northern Israel on the morning of the ceasefire—intercepted by Israeli defenses—prompting immediate Israeli retaliatory strikes on Tehran's military infrastructure. Both sides accuse each other of early violations, with US intelligence indicating Iran's nuclear enrichment program was only set back by months, and not 'obliterated' like Trump had earlier claimed.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Why the Jeff Bezos-Lauren Sanchez wedding festivities in Venice saw protests
Amazon founder and billionaire American businessman Jeff Bezos married journalist Lauren Sanchez earlier this week in Venice, Italy. Over 200 guests, including Oprah Winfrey, Ivanka Trump, Kim Kardashian, Queen Rania of Jordan, Bill Gates and Leonardo DiCaprio, were in attendance even as hundreds of locals protested the three-day festivities. The venue of one event was changed following the demonstrations. 'We are here to continue ruining the plans of these rich people, who accumulate money by exploiting many other people… while the conditions of this city remain precarious,' one demonstrator told the Associated Press. Some of the issues that the protesters cited have been raised previously, but the wedding of the world's fourth-richest man provided an opportunity to highlight them. Here is what to know. One reason is the growing frustrations over 'overtourism' in Europe. Multiple factors — increased global travel post-pandemic, long-haul movements becoming more accessible and social media adding a sense of glamour, trendiness and aspiration around travelling — are held responsible for tourists flocking to the continent. While Europe has long been a global tourist hotspot, locals in cities like Venice and Barcelona have increasingly become critical of the after-effects. Last year, thousands of people in Barcelona fired water pistols at tourists in protest, raising slogans of 'Tourism Kills the City' and 'Barcelona is Not for Sale'. With a population of approximately 1.6 million, the city has seen a significant increase in tourist numbers after the Covid-19 pandemic. From 9.7 million tourists in 2022, the number rose to around 26 million in 2023. They generated significant economic activity, but at the same time, higher demand has raised prices, making renting houses expensive for locals. Overtourism at beaches, mountains and other natural areas can also add to environmental pollution and degradation. The famous Venetian boats, as well as the speedboats at the Bezos wedding, can adversely impact water flows and aquatic life. To tackle this, some caps have been imposed on the number of tourists allowed in some cities, and additional payments have been mandated for short stays. However, not everyone agrees that the wedding in question will have a net negative impact. Caterer Rosa Salva told the AP, 'Events like this bring quality tourism to Venice,'' he said. 'I don't see how an event with 200 people can create disruptions. It's responsible tourism.' Bezos has also reportedly donated 1 million euros each to three environmental research organisations working to preserve Venice. Beyond overtourism, another factor at play may be the people in question. Bezos is not the first celebrity to wed in Italy — the Kardashians, actor George Clooney and human rights lawyer Amal Clooney, and closer home, actors Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh are among the many to have done so in the last decade. What sets Bezos apart is his net worth of $231 billion, a fraction of which (around €40 million or Rs 400 crore) will be on display. Extremely wealthy businessmen are also not a new phenomenon, but the wedding comes at a time when public perception of such displays — and the mere existence of billionaires — has become a moral issue for some. According to the AP, the protestors were joined by the British group 'Everyone Hates Elon,' which has smashed Tesla cars to protest billionaire businessman Elon Musk. Lauren Sanchez also came under fire in April for using a spacecraft from Bezos' private company, Blue Origin, to take an 11-minute trip to space with an all-women crew, dubbed by some as a 'vanity project'. Bezos, meanwhile, has come under criticism over the years with reports of Amazon workers at warehouses being made to work in difficult conditions, including in the United States. This has been contrasted with his rise, and against excesses such as the ninety private jets that flew in the celebrity guests to Venice. Other billionaires, such as the singer Taylor Swift, have previously been heavily criticised for using private jets for short rides in particular, given the large amounts of fuel they burn. Those critiques, especially online, often sarcastically compare such actions with the general calls for the masses to use paper straws to lessen their carbon footprint. The negative perception also goes beyond the actions of billionaires. One protesting group said they had no problem with the wedding, but were 'against unchecked wealth, media control, and the growing privatisation of public spaces.' In a 2019 article in The Washington Post ('Why does everybody suddenly hate billionaires? Because they've made it easy.'), journalist Roxanne Roberts noted that following the 2008 global financial crisis, high-earning bankers who were at the centre of it largely went unpunished in the United States. This gave birth to the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York in 2011, with slogans such as 'We are the 99%'. This cultural shift is also backed by data on increasing income inequality. 'In the 1950s, the average chief executive made 20 times more than their employees; now, chief executives earn 361 times more — about $13 million per year at the country's top corporations,' Roberts wrote. 'This isn't about blaming any specific billionaire, but a growing resentment that the richest people and corporations have somehow managed to get richer while most working stiffs are just one or two missed paychecks away from a food bank… It's a gut feeling that the game is rigged, and the middle class and the poor are losing,' she added. Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India. ... Read More
