logo
Alex Salmond's family accuse 'cowardly' Nicola Sturgeon of 'cashing in' on his death with smears in new memoir

Alex Salmond's family accuse 'cowardly' Nicola Sturgeon of 'cashing in' on his death with smears in new memoir

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Alex Salmond 's niece has accused Nicola Sturgeon of 'cashing in' on his death by using smears about her uncle to flog her new book.
Christina Hendry, 30, branded the former Scottish first minister's claims, which include attacks on his work ethic and references to alleged womanising, as 'cowardly'.
She said it had been impossible to shield Mr Salmond's widow Moira, 88, from the accusations - and insisted that Ms Sturgeon would never have levelled them had her uncle still been alive.
In the memoir - for which she will receive £300,000 - Ms Sturgeon claims that in the run-up to the 2014 referendum, Mr Salmond failed to read a key 650-page White Paper promoting independence.
It is also alleged that he was 'implacably opposed' to gay marriage and was rumoured to have had 'consensual affairs' during his relationship with Moira.
Responding to Ms Sturgeon's new memoir, Ms Henry said in an interview with The Sun: 'I find it very distasteful. In some ways it is quite cruel.
'She is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money — she could have said these things in the past few years.
'She has chosen to wait until he is no longer here to defend himself. It's left to the family to deal with this and there's an element of cowardice to that.'
In the book, titled Frankly, Ms Sturgeon also alleges Mr Salmond sought revenge after she refused to intervene in the internal Scottish Government probe into allegations of sexual misconduct against him.
Mr Salmond, who was first minister from 2007 to 2014, was cleared of 13 sexual offence counts at a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh in March 2020.
Earlier misconduct claims made against him by two women led to a massive falling out with his successor Ms Sturgeon and a split in the Nationalist movement.
In 2018, Mr Salmond resigned from the SNP after the claims emerged and challenged a Scottish Government probe into them.
His successful judicial review showed the in-house inquiry had been unfair, unlawful and 'tainted by apparent bias', and he was awarded £512,00 in legal costs.
In an excerpt of her new memoir, Ms Sturgeon speaks of the impact of events on her relationship with Mr Salmond, stating how she initially believed their friendship could survive 'his thirst for revenge'.
She added: 'Eventually, though, I had to face the fact that he was determined to destroy me.
'I was now engaged in mortal political combat with someone I knew to be both ruthless and highly effective.
'It was a difficult reality to reconcile myself to. So too was losing him as a friend. I went through what I can only describe as a grieving process.'
Referring to the court case against Mr Salmond, Ms Sturgeon said that while he conceded that his behaviour towards women was at times inappropriate he failed to ever show 'contrition' for his actions.
She also said he was prepared to repeatedly 'traumatise' the women at the centre of the complaints.
In a furious response, Mr MacAskill said: 'Nicola Sturgeon is seeking to rewrite history and distorting the truth. Alex Salmond was vindicated it Scotland's High Court.
'It was Nicola Sturgeons Government which was found to have acted unlawfully procedurally unfairly and tainted with apparent bias. It was for that reason that enhanced expenses were awarded against the Government.
'Far from being some passive bystander Ms Sturgeon was at the centre of events that many see as a conspiracy.
'It's why there has to be an inquiry into the role of the Scottish Government in their actions against Alex Salmond and the cover up that has been ongoing ever since.
'History will judge her cruelly as her legacy is shown to be tawdry and failed but justice dictates that there is a full accounting for her role in this shameful episode.'
The memoir also includes Ms Sturgeon's account of the moment when Mr Salmond first informed her of the allegations against him, stating that she was 'shocked' and 'felt sick' on hearing them.
She has also insisted she was not the one who had leaked the outcome of the Scottish government investigation into her predecessor to the press - but, astonishingly suggested that Mr Salmond might have.
Touching upon the ongoing impact of events and Mr Salmond's role in her life, Ms Sturgeon admitted she will never escape his shadow 'even in death'.
Mr Salmond died on October 12 last year and Ms Sturgeon did not attend his funeral on October 29.
Addressing the fallout in a BBC interview months before his death, Mr Salmond had said: 'A big regret that Nicola and I are no longer on speaking terms, and I seriously doubt if that's going to improve.
'Now, that's a great pity because I did indicate that you shouldn't say anything's for ever, but that's the way it looks and that's just the way it's going to be.'
In other extracts, Ms Sturgeon discussed her arrest in 2023, describing it as 'mental torture', her miscarriage in 2010 and her sexuality, which she said is not 'binary'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump praises Zelensky's attire for White House meeting
Trump praises Zelensky's attire for White House meeting

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump praises Zelensky's attire for White House meeting

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky arrived at the White House today for the first time since an explosive row with Donald Trump in February. The US President is hosting European leaders at the White House today to discuss plans for an immediate ceasefire to end the Ukraine-Russia war . Zelensky will be joined by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italy's Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Germany's Friedrich Merz and more. The Ukrainian leader was kicked out of the White House in a previous meeting after a shouting match erupted between the two leaders during a press conference, leaving Zelensky to walk out of the West Wing and into his SUV prematurely . Amongst the fiery exchange, Brian Glenn, Chief White House Correspondent Real America's Voice, asked Zelensky: 'Why don't you wear a suit? You're at the highest level in this country's office and you refuse to wear a suit. Do you own a suit? 'A lot of Americans have problems, with you not respecting the dignity of this office.' Responding to the criticism at the time, the Ukrainian leader said he faced more pressing problems with the war in Europe. He added that he 'will wear a kostium (Ukrainian for 'suit') after this war will finish' and it would be 'maybe something like yours, maybe something better, maybe something cheaper'. In a sign of support towards Zelensky, before the meeting escalated into a tense war of words, Trump quickly came to his aid and defended the president's clothing. 'I do like your clothing by the way,' Trump said. 'I don't know if you two like each other, but I think he (Zelensky) is dressed beautifully.' However, reports suggested that Trump privately was irritated by Zelensky's attire. The Ukrainian leader has rarely been seen wearing anything other than casual combat clothes since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 and has even visited 10 Downing Street and Buckingham Palace without a suit. Supporters of Zelensky have compared him to the UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who notably also refused to wear a suit during a visit to the White House in the midst of World War Two. However, Zelensky was seen today wearing a suit in a potential bid to please the US President ahead of the crucial talks. The European leaders traveling to Washington DC today are being dubbed Mr Zelensky's 'back-up' following the previous acrimonious visit to the White House. Ahead of today's meeting, Trump posted a series of angry social media posts, tearing into the 'fake news' media for calling the meeting a 'big loss '. 'Actually, it is a great honor for America!!!' he insisted. The president also defended his high-stakes meeting with Russian President Putin on Friday in Alaska, which ended without a ceasefire deal or rough framework for peace with Ukraine. He also sent supporters into a tailspin on Sunday after posting a one-word message 'bela' to his Truth Social without additional context. Tempers flared on all sides during February's Oval Office showdown. Trump threatened to abandon Ukraine completely if Zelensky did not agree to his peace terms. He also accused the Ukrainian leader of not being grateful. Zelensky showed Trump photos he brought of the devastation to his country, and argued he had thanked the American people. The yelling match was unlike anything ever seen publicly in the Oval Office. And it played out on TV screens across the world. 'You're gambling with World War III,' Trump bellowed Zelensky at one point. Both men were tense and on the defensive as they repeatedly tried to talk over one another. Oksana Markarova, Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S., seated to the side in the Oval Office , buried her face in her hands. After the heated meeting Trump announced he had asked Zelensky to leave . The row started when Trump was pressed on historic Russian domination of its neighbors and repositioning the U.S. toward Russia. 'If I didn't align myself with both of them, you'd never have a deal,' Trump explained. 'You want me to say really terrible things about Putin and then say: 'Hi, Vladimir. How are we doing on the deal? It doesn't work that way. I'm not aligned with anybody. I'm aligned with the United States of America.' Then Vice President JD Vance jumped in. 'I will respond to this. So look, for four years the United States of America, we had a president who stood up the press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country,' said Vance. 'The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy. Then a fight over history ensued, as Zelensky ran through Ukraine's 2014 illegal annexation of Crimea. After Zelensky mentioned 2015, Trump jumped in: 'I was not here.' 'But during 2014 till 2022 … people have been dying on the contact line. Then he brought up broken ceasefire and other agreements. 'What kind of diplomacy JD was speaking about?,' asked Zelensky. 'I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country, Mr. President, Mr. President, with respect. I think it's disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media,' Vance told Zelensky, whose country has been under siege since 2022, and who came to Washington to ink a deal that will give the U.S. access to its rare earth minerals.' 'Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems, you should be thanking the president,' Vance told him. Vance accused Zelensky of bringing in dignitaries to his country on 'a propaganda tour' 'Do you think that it's respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?' Vance berated him. Zelensky tried to respond, but that only angered Trump more. 'Don't tell us what we're going to feel, because you're in no position to dictate,' he said. 'You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position,' Trump told Zelensky, after last week calling him a 'dictator' and blaming Ukraine for starting the war . Yelling with his face getting red, Trump intoned: 'You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now … You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. 'You're gambling with World War Three. You're gambling with World War Three, and what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country – this country that's backed to you far more than a lot of people say they should have. 'Have you said thank you once, this entire meeting,' Vance said next in the tag team pile-on. 'You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October,' Vance, said, characterizing Zelensky's trip to an ammunition factory. 'Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country,' he demanded. 'You think that, if you will speak very loudly,' Zelensky tried to counter in his accented English. 'He's not speaking loudly,' Trump said. 'Your country is in big trouble.' 'I know,' Zelensky responded. 'You're not winning. You're not winning this,' Trump told him. Zelensky got a moment to try to counter, saying 'in our country, staying strong, from the very beginning of the war, we've been alone, and we are thankful.' Trump contradicted him, telling him he hadn't been alone. 'We gave you, through this stupid president, $350 billion we gave you military equipment,' he said, overstating the amount of military hardware. Trump said Zelensky's men are 'brave,' but then told him, 'If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.' 'It's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this,' Trump said. That brought Vance back to demanding thanks. 'Just say thank you,' Vance told him. 'I said it a lot of times,' Zelensky responded. Then Trump gave remarks indicating the blow-up was serving a purpose for him. 'I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful you don't have the cards. You're buried there. You people are dying. You're running low on soldiers,' Trump said. 'You're running low on soldiers. Listen, you're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing. Then you tell us, 'I don't want a cease fire. I don't want a cease fire,' Trump said, delivering a mocking impression of his counterpart. 'I want to go, and I want this – look, you could get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed.' 'Of course I want to stop the war. What I said to you – with guarantees,' Zelensky said. He has been pushing for security guarantees from the U.S. Shortly after the argument, Trump ended the public part of the meeting. 'This is going to be great television, I will say that,' he said. As press was being ushered out, President Trump reached over and patted Zelensky's shoulder.

Urgent hunt for men with a pushchair after £1,000 worth of goods is stolen from Curry's
Urgent hunt for men with a pushchair after £1,000 worth of goods is stolen from Curry's

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Urgent hunt for men with a pushchair after £1,000 worth of goods is stolen from Curry's

Police are urgently hunting for two men who have been pictured with a pushchair after £1,000 worth of goods was stolen from a Curry's shop. A locked cupboard was apparently forced open at the store in Hereford Retail Park at around midday on Friday. A white van was later seen being driven away from a Pizza Hut car park at speed. Now officers are looking for two men who they believe might have information about the theft. A spokesperson for West Mercia Police said: 'Officers would like to speak with these two men as they believe they can help with their enquiries into a robbery in Hereford on Friday 8 August. 'Around midday two men went into Currys on Hereford retail park, forced entry into a locked cupboard, and stole items worth over £1000. 'One of the men was seen leaving the area in a small white van which was driven at speed out of the Pizza Hut car park. 'It is believed the men pictured had been in the area at the time of the robbery.'

UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws
UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws

Britain's first transgender judge has lodged an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. Victoria McCloud is seeking a rehearing of the case as she claims the UK's highest court undermined her Article 6 rights to a fair trial when it declined to hear evidence from her. In April the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that 'woman' and 'man' refer to biological women and men in the context of the Equality act and that 'the concept of sex is binary'. Ms McCloud - who left her role as a judge last year - is seeking a review as she claims the Supreme Court refused permission for her to provide evidence on how its clarification of the law would affect trans people. But women's rights campaigners have dismissed the case as a 'fantasy' and say Ms McCloud should exhaust 'all domestic legal remedies' before appealing to the court in Strasbourg. The former judge will be represented by Oscar Davies, the UK's first openly non-binary barrister, and Olivia Campbell-Cavendish, the founder of the Trans Legal Clinic and the UK's first black trans lawyer. 'There is no space for decision-making about us, without us,' Ms McCloud said in a statement yesterday. 'I intend to ensure that there will be no peace for the gender-critical ideological movement, the Labour Government appeasing it, or space in our schools, homes and workplaces for an ideology which causes harm, misery and oppression of a small and law-abiding minority in our formerly tolerant country.' A spokesman for the Trans Legal Clinic said: 'For the trans community, it embodies a simple truth: there must be no more conversations about us, without us. 'At its heart lies the principle in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the right to a fair and impartial hearing by an independent tribunal. 'This cornerstone of democratic societies exists to guarantee that those whose rights are affected can take part in proceedings that determine their future.' However Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said Ms McCloud's appeal is legally 'incomprehensible' and a 'fantasy'. She said: 'What we are being told about this proposed case is incomprehensible. The ECHR only hears cases that have exhausted all domestic legal remedies, and since McCloud wasn't a party to For Women Scotland in the Supreme Court, that's not the case here. 'It's a fantasy that someone can go straight to Strasbourg to complain that the Supreme Court in their own country didn't listen to them.' Ms Forstater added: 'This looks more like a deceptive and expensive PR campaign than a serious legal strategy.' The Supreme Court can consider outside arguments from 'interveners' at its discretion but rarely allows individuals to intervene and often rejects them if it will hear the same arguments from others. In the biological sex case, the UK's highest court did consider arguments on trans issues from the human rights campaign group Amnesty International. Susan Smith - from For Women Scotland, which brought the Supreme Court case - said that it is the Supreme Court's 'prerogative whether to accept interventions or not' and that it 'rarely takes interventions from individuals' 'We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed,' she added. Ms McCloud transitioned in the 1990s and became the first transgender barrister and judge in the UK. She stood down last year, saying she could not continue her work amid the increasingly fraught public debate. In her resignation letter, Ms McCloud likened herself to civil rights activist Rosa Parks. It comes as Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy was criticised for wearing a trans rights T-shirt with the slogan 'protect the dolls' while attending a Pride march in her Wigan constituency. Critics have said a government minister should not be promoting the slogan and described it as a 'middle finger from the Labour Government'. The term 'doll' is a slang term from the 1980s for biological men who 'pass' as women but has seen a revival after celebrities including Pedro Pascal, Madonna and Tilda Swinton were photographed in a £75 T-shirt emblazoned with the slogan. James Esses, a gender critical campaigner and therapist, said it was a 'middle finger from the Labour Government to everyone who believes in biological reality'. Fiona McAnena, from Sex Matters, said: 'No elected representative of the public - let alone a government minister - should be promoting the slogan of campaigners who are calling for men to be able to identify into any space for women'. The Culture Secretary was contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store