logo
Do anti-Trump protests mark a turning point?

Do anti-Trump protests mark a turning point?

Sam Hawley: Over the weekend, as Donald Trump was watching a military parade, huge numbers of Americans took to the streets in the largest nationwide protests against his administration since returning to the White House. They were there to rally against what they say is Trump's authoritarian rule and the threat he poses to democracy. Today, senior political correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, Molly Ball, on the shift in public mood and what it means for the president. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Molly, over the weekend, there were two celebrations. One was the US Army's 250th anniversary. The other, of course, was Donald Trump's 79th birthday. And to celebrate, there was this rather unusual military parade in Washington. Just tell me about that because you were there.
Molly Ball: Well, President Trump has wanted this sort of a grand spectacle for some years now. He attended a military parade in France and complimented President Macron on it, was very impressed and spent much of his first term trying to get something similar to no avail. So he's finally gotten his big military parade. It was technically a celebration of the 250th birthday of the US Army, which was founded in 1775 around this time. Happened to coincide with his birthday, but the president said that was just a coincidence. So it was quite an impressive spectacle.
Announcer: The iconic Sherman tank is here, ladies and gentlemen. It was the cornerstone of the US Armed Forces.
Donald Trump, US President: Every other country celebrates their victories. It's about time America did too. That's what we're doing tonight.
Molly Ball: It was on a day that a real torrential downpour had been forecast. So that may have thinned out the crowd a little bit. It was, I wouldn't say it was a totally packed house. There were also some criticisms of the cost of the parade, as much as $45 million. And this is at a time when Congress is seeking to cut the budget and do away with wasteful spending. So there's been some controversy about that.
Saw Hawley: Yeah. I gather the precision of the soldiers wasn't quite like what you get from the North Korean soldiers when they hold these sorts of parades.
Molly Ball: Well, certainly critics of Donald Trump, people who are not big fans of his presidency, have drawn that parallel. Those who accuse him of having sort of authoritarian tendencies have said that, you know, this isn't the sort of spectacle we put on in America. The last time we had a big military parade in Washington, D.C. was at the end of the Gulf War in the early 90s. And the parade had the potential to do quite a lot of damage to the streets of Washington. That's part of where that big price tag comes from is the need for repaving because the tanks are so heavy. They can weigh as much as 70 tons and city streets aren't prepared for that generally. When the mayor of Washington, D.C. was interviewed about this, she said, well, usually you have this kind of parade when you win a war. And so I think it was especially ironic that this happened not only after a week of incredible sort of drama and unrest across America, but it was also at a time when new conflicts are breaking out overseas in the Middle East.
Sam Hawley: Yeah. And the Californian governor, Gavin Newsom, who, of course, has been dealing with those riots in L.A., he said it was a vulgar display.
Gavin Newsom, Governor of California: How weak do you have to be to commandeer the military, to fete you on your birthday in a vulgar display of weakness? That's Donald Trump.
Sam Hawley: Well, while this parade was unfolding, there were these quite large protests also occurring across the country. They were dubbed the "No Kings". Tell me about those.
Molly Ball: This is a display of patriotic protest against what Trump's critics have called his authoritarian tendencies, pointing to the many allegedly unlawful actions this administration has taken. I don't actually know much about the genesis of these protests. They appear to have been relatively organic. A lot of liberal organisations and just rank and file folks coming together to put on these displays throughout the day.
Protester: The government gone wild, threat of fascism, breaking the laws left and right, courts can't keep up.
Protester: My biggest concern, of course, is for our democracy and our people. This is not the United States, and it makes me ashamed almost, really.
Molly Ball: And, you know, it's been interesting to watch the opposition to Donald Trump sort of come to life over the past few months, because when he was first elected eight years ago, there was an immediate outpouring of protest. And it was the day after his inauguration in 2017 when the Women's March became the largest protest in American history up to that time.
Protesters: This is what democracy looks like! Show me what democracy looks like!
Molly Ball: And then you had, after his first travel ban, which was only a couple of months into his administration, again, people poured into the streets and rallied to airports and so forth.
Newsreader: Once again, protesters descended on the White House.
Protesters: No hate! No Fear! Refugees are welcome here!
Molly Ball: Because of the different circumstances surrounding his comeback win in 2024, there really have not been masses of people in the streets. And there's been a feeling that the Democrats are sort of demoralised and on their heels. So this is the first time we have seen this sort of massive display of unified peaceful protest in order to send a signal that, at least in the minds of these demonstrators, what they're seeing from the Trump administration is not, in their view, what America stands for.
Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Donald Trump says he doesn't feel like a king.
Donald Trump, US President: I don't feel like a king. I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.
Sam Hawley: But of course, these protests, they came off the back of the LA riots where he sent in the Marines and National Guard, and also on the same weekend that a gunman targeted Democrat politicians in Minnesota, killing Melissa Hortman and her husband and injuring another couple.
Newsreader: Authorities say a man posed as a police officer before shooting dead Minnesota politician Melissa Hortman and her husband inside their Minneapolis home. Earlier, the man shot and injured state Senator John Hoffman and his wife, who both survived.
Sam Hawley: Tell me about that. There is a lot going on.
Molly Ball: There is. And you know, America has felt very much like a tinderbox for quite some time. But this week has been especially intense. As you said, the week began with these protests in Los Angeles that did turn violent on several consecutive nights with burning of cars and destruction of property, although there were no serious injuries or deaths. Fortunately, those in turn were triggered by some immigration raids on work sites as the Trump administration seeks to step up the pace of deportations of unauthorised immigrants. And then on the actual same day as the military parade and the nationwide protests on that morning, a man stalked and killed these state legislators at their homes in the middle of the night. And again, this is in the context of there's been quite a bit of political violence recently. In fact, it was the eighth anniversary on Saturday of a shooting at a congressional baseball game that seriously injured several Republican lawmakers eight years ago. And we've seen a recent rash of political violence. You can look to the January 6th riot. You can look to the recent anti-Israel violence that has been quite severe in many cases. And so, you know, I think there's a real climate of fear around American politics right now. There's a real sense among, you know, lawmakers and judges that they need to be constantly under guard and that it's not necessarily safe to go about your business if you're engaged in the work of power in this country. So it all feels like a very tense and frightening time, both in the U.S. and around the world.
Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Molly, the protesters say Donald Trump is acting as an authoritarian and they don't want a king, they don't need a king and they don't want a dictator. Do you think the threat against democracy is real? Is he really an authoritarian leader? Because his supporters would say that Donald Trump is simply enacting the policies that he actually took to the election.
Molly Ball: That's right. And the line from the administration is that it's actually the protesters who are anti-democratic because the voters spoke in November. That was the voice of democracy. It is Trump who is fulfilling that will of the voters. Now, the administration has lost quite a lot of court cases, and his critics would say that's because he's tried to do a lot of things that are according to the courts illegal, whether it's the high profile deportations that have been in error or have been constitutionally questionable, legally questionable. A variety of executive actions that this administration has taken that courts have questioned, including the worldwide tariffs that were undertaken under a sort of emergency authority. So there's a lot of questions about, and this was true in his first term as well, whether this administration is overreaching its constitutional authority and whether he has the right to do many of the things that he's done. The political energy in the country may have shifted a bit, that it may be the protesters who sort of have the wind at their back politically. We've seen Trump turn unpopular in quite a lot of polls, even on issues where he once had an advantage like immigration and the economy. And so, you know, the next big expression of democracy on the calendar is the next congressional elections a year and a half from now. And I think that's when we'll know sort of where the will of the people lies.
Sam Hawley: And we have seen Trump turn around on some of his immigration deportations, right? He paused raids on farms, on hospitality workers, so is he getting the signal that he's maybe going too far?
Molly Ball: I think there are conflicting camps within the White House and immigration in particular is a source of a lot of contention within and among Donald Trump's conservative base. So I would hesitate to say definitively that he's going in one direction or another. You know, on Friday, he did make expressions of sympathy to the farmers whose workers are being snatched from the fields. And then just a few hours later, he issued another vow to deport every last illegal immigrant residing in America. So and there's still quite a lot of people in his administration who believe he needs to push forward with that. So, you know, there have been threats to send troops into more American cities if there are more protests that the administration believes need to be quelled by federal authorities. So I think we don't yet know where this is all heading. And on issues like immigration, on issues like foreign policy, where we've again heard sort of conflicting messages about where the administration stands on what Israel has done in attacking Iran. I think it's not quite clear where he intends to go on a lot of these issues. And we're at sort of an inflection point.
Sam Hawley: Yeah. And you mentioned the Democrats, the California governor, of course, Gavin Newsom, he's been getting a fair bit of airtime. He could be a presidential nominee in the future. Are the Democrats seizing this moment, do you think?
Molly Ball: You know, the Democrats continue to be quite unpopular, even as the electorate seems to sour on Trump a little bit. I think there's a feeling that the energy is largely outside institutions like political parties. You know, the Democrats have rallied behind Newsom in part because there's a feeling that the congressional leadership in Washington has not been up to the task of opposition to Trump. And, you know, I was in Los Angeles and spent some time with Governor Newsom and interviewed him while the unrest was unfolding. But what you hear from the people in the streets is that they're not there on behalf of the Democratic Party. They see themselves as there on behalf of a movement of opposition. But I think it remains to be seen whether Democrats can seize this moment because they are in such disarray and they do sort of lack for strong leadership. So I do think that Governor Newsom has seized this moment, but in part it's simple desperation on the part of Democrats because they just haven't seen anyone else sort of step up in that role.
Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Molly, tell me, with the protests in LA and the "No King" protests across the country, do you sense there is a shift, that this could be some sort of turning point? That more people are willing to take to the streets to oppose the president?
Molly Ball: It's certainly possible. I try not to make predictions as a political reporter. I try to cover events as they unfold. But I do think there is a sense that that political energy may have shifted a bit. And it comes at a rather crucial time for Trump's legislative agenda as well. The Congress is currently working quite hard to pass the bill that includes most of his tax policies. You know, it does have the potential to be a moment that we look back on and say that was the point at which this second term of Trump, which came out of the gate, which with such furious energy and with Elon Musk tearing away at the federal bureaucracy and so forth, that this is when that energy sort of started to reverse and run in the other direction.
Sam Hawley: Molly Ball is a senior political correspondent at the Wall Street Journal. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead and Adair Sheppard. Audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

At the G7 summit, Donald Trump says Iran would 'like to talk' about de-escalation
At the G7 summit, Donald Trump says Iran would 'like to talk' about de-escalation

ABC News

time18 minutes ago

  • ABC News

At the G7 summit, Donald Trump says Iran would 'like to talk' about de-escalation

Donald Trump says he believes Iran would "like to talk" about possible paths to de-escalation of the conflict with Israel and that the parties "should talk immediately". "They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before," he said at the G7 summit in Canada. "They have to make a deal and it's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war. "They should talk and they should talk immediately before it's too late." The comments came after reporting by Reuters and the Wall Street Journal that Iranian officials had reached out to the United States via intermediaries to signal it was ready to discuss de-escalation. Tehran has asked Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Oman to press Mr Trump to use his influence on Israel to agree to an immediate ceasefire in return for Tehran's flexibility in nuclear negotiations, according to Reuters. The comments from Mr Trump came as Israel and Iran stepped up the attacks in the four-day aerial war. Iranian state media warned the country was preparing to launch "the largest most intense missile attack in history on Israeli soil". "It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like Netanyahu," Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi posted on X, formerly Twitter. "That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country was on a "path to victory" in its Operation Rising Lion, which was launched four days ago. "No wonder Iranians want to end the war, they are being hit," he said. The United States president was also asked what it would take for his country to get involved in the conflict militarily, to which the Mr Trump replied: "I don't want to talk about that anymore." "We've always supported Israel. We have for a long period of time, strongly. And Israel is doing very well right now," he said. Mr Trump has consistently said the Israeli assault could end quickly if Iran agrees to US demands that it accept strict curbs to its nuclear program. In Canada, leaders from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the US, along with the European Union, are convening in the resort area of Kananaskis in the Canadian Rockies for the G7 summit. Australia has been invited to be there and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will meet with Mr Trump on Tuesday (local time). With the escalating Israel-Iran conflict, the event in Canada is seen as a vital moment to try to restore a semblance of unity among democratic powerhouses. In an early sign that they may struggle to reach agreement on key issues, a US official said Mr Trump would not sign a draft statement calling for de-escalation of the Israel-Iran conflict, according to Reuters. CNN is also reporting Donald Trump does not intend to sign the statement, but that the European leaders spearheading the document are still working on the language and "held out hope" the US president would come around. Other diplomats remained hopeful too, saying the conflict would come up in bilateral meetings throughout the summit and a senior European diplomat echoed those comments, saying Mr Trump was yet to make a decision, Reuters added. The draft statement reportedly commits to safeguarding market stability, including energy markets, and says Israel has the right to defend itself. CNN is reporting the statement also says Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said all G7 leaders had agreed they had "to find a way to de-escalate the situation' in the Middle East. Mr Starmer said he had spoken to Mr Trump about the issue, adding: "The risk of the conflict escalating is obvious, I think, and the implications, not just for the region but globally, are really immense, so the focus has to be on de-escalation.' Mr Trump met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney today and, while fielding questions about the Middle East conflict and trade, he used the moment to lament Russia's exclusion from the G7. "It was a big mistake," he said. "Putin speaks to me. He doesn't speak to anybody else … he's not a happy person about it. I can tell you that he basically doesn't even speak to the people that threw him out, and I agree with him." ABC/Reuters/AP

What's not being discussed at G7 as Trump shapes agenda
What's not being discussed at G7 as Trump shapes agenda

News.com.au

time42 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

What's not being discussed at G7 as Trump shapes agenda

Gender equality, climate change, biodiversity, poverty, health, gay rights and more -- the list of issues missing at the Canada G7 from past summits is long. The G7 gathering has been carefully planned to ensure US President Donald Trump agreed to attend at all and Canada is keen to avoid a public dust-up. Official agenda items are the global economic outlook and energy security, with organizers naming priorities as critical mineral supply chains and AI adoption, as well as "international peace and security." Last year's Group of Seven summit in Italy, when Joe Biden was US president, ended with a joint declaration promising better ties with Africa, action on poverty, and determination to tackle "the triple crisis of climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss." Such subjects are almost totally absent at the G7 talks this year in order to placate Trump, said John Kirton of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto. "There's no point in putting them on the agenda if the Americans will just refuse to discuss them. And if you put too many of them on, Trump wouldn't even come," he said. Kirton added that the schedule was also crowded out by crises from Ukraine to the Middle East, with G7 nations increasingly concerned with defense spending rather than development aid. For the G7 -- founded 50 years ago by the world's leading economies at the time -- such a lurch in priorities poses major questions about the club's purpose and future. But, for the Trump administration, the group is just returning to its original function of promoting global economic stability and growth. "Canada knows its audience and if it wants a unified outcome of this year's G7 leaders summit then it should stick close to traditional G7 values while avoiding controversial topics," said Caitlin Welsh of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. - 'Retreat' from world problems - The impact on the ground has alarmed many campaigners who say the G7 reduction of foreign aid is hitting millions of world's poorest, threatening food supplies, water, education and health. "The G7's retreat from the world is unprecedented and couldn't come at a worse time," said Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar. 'Rather than breaking from the Trump administration's cruel dismantling of USAID and other US foreign assistance, G7 countries like the UK, Germany and France are instead following the same path." Oxfam calculated that G7 nations, which provide three-quarters of all official development assistance, are cutting aid by 28 percent between 2024 and 2026. No joint communique is expected at the end of the summit on Tuesday to avoid the potential failure for all members to agree on the text. But there is one way that the non-US members of the G7 are fighting back -- discreetly. An unexpected item on the agenda is to "boost collaboration to prevent, fight and recover from wildfires." The wildfire issue "allows us to talk about climate change without saying it directly because we know that unfortunately not everyone likes it," a Canadian official speaking anonymously told AFP. Both Canada and the United States are increasingly affected by major forest fires -- worsened by climate change -- including blazes that burnt down swathes of Los Angeles earlier this year. Professor Kirton said the wildfires agenda tactic was "clever rather than sneaky." "They saw wildfires as a point of entry, and one that would work with Donald Trump." Kirton highlighted that wildfires are currently causing damage across the US states of North and South Carolina, both Trump heartlands. "That's getting into his MAGA base," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store