What the Tech: TSA airport warning
If you fly, there is a good chance your phone, tablet, or computer will need recharging at some point.
Free charging stations are a welcome sight for travelers. You'll find them in airport terminals, hotel lobbies, and under seats at the gate. Just plug in your phone, recharge, and you're good to go. In a recent Facebook post, TSA warned travelers that these convenient ports could carry a hidden risk.
The government has issued a warning about a threat known as 'juice jacking.' This is a type of cyberattack where criminals could potentially rig USB charging ports to install malware on your phone or steal personal data while you're charging.
So, how likely is this to happen?
Technically, it's possible. USB cables are designed not only to supply power but also to transfer data. That's why you can move photos from your phone to a computer with a cable. In theory, a bad actor could modify a public USB port to compromise your device. However, the odds of this happening at an airport or hotel are extremely low. In fact, there has never been a confirmed case of juice jacking occurring in the real world.
One reason is that modern smartphones include built-in protections. If you plug your device into a computer or an unfamiliar accessory, you'll see a pop-up asking whether you trust the connection. If that message appears when you're using a public port or shared charging station, the safest choice is to select 'Don't Trust.'
Still, federal agencies say it's smart to be cautious. You can read the warning from the FCC here:
TSA Juice Jacking Warning
To stay safe, consider these tips while traveling:
Use your own charging block and plug into a standard electrical outlet
Bring a portable battery or power bank to charge on the go
Buy a USB data blocker or charge-only cable, which allows power to flow but blocks data transfer
Never leave your phone unattended while it charges in a public place
In my opinion, plugging in a cable to charge a phone using an outlet on the wall carries a much bigger risk than a 'Juice Jacked' charging station. Unattended phones can be stolen, and what happens frequently is that people walk away and go to the gate, forgetting the phone is plugged in.
One more safety note: if you bring a portable power bank, be sure to pack it in your carry-on bag. The FAA prohibits lithium-ion batteries from being stored in checked luggage or overhead bins because they can overheat or catch fire.
The biggest threat at the airports? Logging on to what you think is a secure public WiFi network when it is, in fact, a network set up by a cybercriminal. Connecting to those networks runs the risk of having malware installed on your phone.
While juice jacking may not be a widespread threat, it is always better to be safe than sorry, especially when it comes to your personal information.
But in terms of things to worry about on your next trip, just remember to keep your phone and portable batteries with you.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Tyrant
7 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Video Explores How 1920s Filmmakers Pulled Off Death-Defying Stunts Without Dying — GeekTyrant
A new video from Lost in Time dives into some of the wildest and most iconic movie stunts from the silent film era. This is a behind-the-scenes look at how legends like Buster Keaton, Harold Lloyd, and Charlie Chaplin pulled off seemingly impossible feats of physical comedy and danger… without modern safety gear or visual effects. 'In this video we're breaking down how they pulled off the craziest stunts in the 1920s from Hollywood legends Buster Keaton, Charlie Chaplin and Harold Lloyd. I have made 3D animations showing exactly how each scene was filmed, and it is amazing how creative they were back then.' And those animations really drive it home. Watching them reveals just how much thought and trickery went into making these death-defying moments is fascinating. This is just a reminder that the roots of modern movie magic were built with brains, not just bravery.


Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
Navy veteran's $500M defamation lawsuit against Associated Press advances with first hearing
Zachary Young's high-stakes defamation lawsuit against the Associated Press continues to inch along in Bay County, Florida, as the U.S. Navy veteran seeks to clear his name. Young successfully sued CNN for defamation earlier this year after saying the network smeared him by implying he illegally profited from helping people flee Afghanistan on the "black market" during the Biden administration's disastrous 2021 military withdrawal. When covering the trial in January, Associated Press media reporter David Bauder wrote that "Young's business helped smuggle people out of Afghanistan." Young's legal team has said that the Associated Press article "went even further than CNN's falsehoods," and the veteran is seeking nearly $500 million in a defamation suit against the AP. On Monday, Young's legal team responded to the AP's motion to dismiss the suit. The AP had insisted Young's complaint is "without merit" and unjustly challenges the outlet's free speech rights, but the Navy veteran's legal team believes the motion failed to address "core issues." "It does not dispute that the term 'human smuggling' implies criminal conduct, nor does it offer any valid explanation for its use of that term, even though a court previously ruled that Mr. Young committed no crime. AP's own Stylebook defines 'smuggling' as illegal," Young's attorney, Daniel Lustig, wrote. "Dozens of AP articles reflect that usage. Just days before this filing, AP published a story about a man sentenced to 25 years in prison for 'smuggling people,' reinforcing that understanding," Lustig continued. "Even after receiving notice, AP refused to retract or revise the statement, not even to use a more accurate term such as 'evacuate' or 'rescue.'" Young's attorney believes the most "notable" part of the AP's motion to dismiss is that it never denied that "smuggling" refers to a criminal act. "Instead, it argues that the statement, in context, was not defamatory. That is not a defense, it is a concession. Under Florida law, if a statement is reasonably capable of a defamatory meaning, it is a question for the jury, not one to be resolved on a motion to dismiss. AP's attempt to invoke the anti-SLAPP statute to shield such a statement is both legally unsupported and fundamentally flawed," Lustig wrote. Young's legal team has also filed a motion to amend the complaint to include punitive damages. The 242-page filing suggested this case "exemplifies the very scenario in which punitive damages are warranted to punish and deter such consciously indifferent conduct by a media organization." On Tuesday, each side appeared for the first hearing in front of 14th Judicial Circuit Court Judge William S. Henry, who also presided over the CNN trial. The Case Management Conference, conducted over Zoom, was largely procedural and offered a chance for each party to explain why respective motions should be heard. Judge Henry scheduled the next hearing for July 3. He is expected to rule on both the AP's motion to dismiss and Young's amended complaint. The AP has referred to the lawsuit as "frivolous" in past statements to the press.


Motor 1
12 minutes ago
- Motor 1
Ford Is Taking On Pikes Peak With This Insane Mustang Mach-E
Ford is finally doing it. After taking an electric van and an electric truck to Pikes Peak in back-to-back years, the Blue Oval is now going to attack the iconic hill climb with a Super Mustang Mach-E. Ford provided very few details about the wild-looking electric vehicle. It's clearly a Mustang Mach-E in style, but it rides much lower to the ground. It has an utterly bonkers rear wing hanging over an equally ridiculous rear diffuser. Sandwiched between the two massive aero elements are the crossover's tri-bar taillights and a perforated insert. Photo by: Ford The front of the EV has a massive front splitter that matches the audaciousness of the rear, and it looks much flatter and wider than the production Mach-E. If this is like Ford's other Super EVs, this is likely a Mach-E body on top of a dedicated racing chassis. Ford says the EV can create 6,125 pounds of downforce, surpassing the other two. The SuperVan 4.2 created 4,400 lbs of downforce, while the SuperTruck made 6,000 lbs . We don't know how much power the Super Mach-E is making, but if it's like the other two, it should have 1,400 horsepower on tap and three electric motors. This year's Pikes Peak International Hill Climb is on June 22. When Ford campaigned the SuperVan, it set a new record , beating the previous one by nearly 37 seconds. Ford didn't say if it wanted to break another one this year. Check Out More Ford News: Here's the 2026 Ford F-150 Lobo Totally Undisguised A Supercharged V-8 Ranger Raptor R Exists, But Not From Ford Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Ford Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )