logo
Teenager pleads guilty to murder of Vyleen White in case that sparked Queensland's ‘adult crime, adult time' laws

Teenager pleads guilty to murder of Vyleen White in case that sparked Queensland's ‘adult crime, adult time' laws

The Guardian22-07-2025
A teenager has pleaded guilty to murdering a grandmother in an attack that helped spark landmark law reforms.
The 16-year-old boy was charged after Vyleen Joan White, 70, was fatally stabbed in a suspected carjacking outside a Redbank Plains shopping centre, west of Brisbane, in February 2024.
White's death helped inspire youth justice reforms, with Queensland's Liberal National government introducing controversial 'adult crime, adult time' laws after winning the 2024 election.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Tough youth justice laws ushered in by the LNP ensure juveniles face adult sentences for more than 30 offences.
Police alleged White was killed during the theft of her 2009 model Hyundai Getz hatchback.
The 16-year-old was charged with murder and unlawful use of a motor vehicle plus three counts of stealing.
The juvenile, who cannot be named for legal reasons, pleaded guilty to all the charges in Brisbane supreme court on Tuesday.
White's family members in court did not audibly react to the guilty pleas by the youth, who appeared on Tuesday wearing a green jumper and black pants.
Prosecutor Chris Cook sought a pre-sentence report by 3 November and a 12 November sentencing.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Defence barrister Matthew Hynes agreed to the dates.
Justice Lincoln Crowley remanded the teenager in custody.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aussie worker is SACKED after calling his non-binary colleague 'he' instead of 'they'
Aussie worker is SACKED after calling his non-binary colleague 'he' instead of 'they'

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Aussie worker is SACKED after calling his non-binary colleague 'he' instead of 'they'

A worker has been fired from his high-paying job after he referred to his non-binary colleague as 'he' instead of 'they'. The Perth man, 63, claimed wrongful dismissal and the case went to the Fair Work Commission, following an incident in February in which he introduced his younger co-worker at a leadership training course. It's understood the legal dispute began when the non-binary employee told their older male colleague they wanted to be referred to as 'they', and the pronoun would be written on their name badge. After the Perth man called his colleague 'he', another colleague corrected him. The 63-year-old then apologised to his younger co-worker — a biological male who identified neither as a man nor a woman. Following the exchange, relations between the colleagues remained cordial throughout the training day, The West Australian reported. The Perth man was later told by his manager that a formal complaint had been made and he was required to submit a written apology. He refused and it's understood he said no one could be ordered to call a colleague 'they'. The 63-year-old later told a Fair Work hearing that if one person had the right to use a particular pronoun, then another person had the right not to. His decision not to apologise led to further backlash from his younger co-workers, who had sided with their non-binary colleague. In March, the company launched an investigation, culminating in the Perth man's contract being terminated. He claimed his dismissal was unlawful, sought legal advice, and shared his intention to take the matter to Federal Court. The case went to the Fair Work Commission and the man was told he risked being subjected to social backlash if the matter was heard in open court. He subsequently reached a confidential settlement with his former employer. The identities of the 63-year-old man and the non-binary employee, and the name of their employer, are not publicly available information, however details of the case were leaked when lawyers discussed the implications of the case. Lawyers have said there did not appear to be a legal right for someone to be called 'they' or 'them' within the workplace, and it was up to individual companies to dictate pronoun convention. It is understood that the company who employed the 63-year-old and his non-binary colleague did not have a pronoun policy. The case is unusual because motivations were not linked with religion. The Perth man's refusal to submit a written apology was not connected to faith, but to a belief he was being forced into accepting a position on gender politics.

Mason: 'Probably acceptable 1% of prisoners are innocent'
Mason: 'Probably acceptable 1% of prisoners are innocent'

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Mason: 'Probably acceptable 1% of prisoners are innocent'

Currently, there are 8234 prisoners in Scotland's prisons, with one per cent representing 82 prisoners. But when approached by The Herald on Sunday Mr Mason, who represents Glasgow Shettleston, appeared to backtrack on his argument. "It is not appropriate for one innocent person to be in prison or one guilty person to be out free in society. But we live in an imperfect world where I suspect in every country some people are wrongly imprisoned and some are wrongly free. So it is a question of trying to get the balance right," he said. READ MORE: His original view was made in correspondence with campaign group Justice for Innocent Men Scotland (JIMS). The group wrote to MSPs following concerns raised by advocate Thomas Leonard Ross KC that the interpretation by the courts of laws around the admissibility of evidence – brought in to protect the privacy and dignity of complainers in sexual offence cases – were risking the right of the accused to a fair trial. Mr Ross told The Herald last month: "How can it be said that someone has had a fair trial when it's been proved that the complainer lied about something important in the course of the inquiry and that was not allowed to be introduced as evidence? "There are serious concerns that people are not getting a fair trial when they are not being given the opportunity to provide evidence which might support their innocence." The situation revolves around what evidence is allowed to be heard in open court before a jury. There are strict rules about what evidence can be heard in court in rape trials (Image: Jamie Simpson) Sometimes known as "rape shield" laws, specific provisions to regulate the use of sexual history evidence were first introduced in Scotland by the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1985. These provisions were later repeated in sections 274 and 275 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. In response to concerns about their operation, the provisions in the 1995 Act were replaced by new sections 274 and 275 in 2002. After Mr Ross's intervention in The Herald the JMIS campaign group wrote to MSPs seeking to highlight the concerns he raised including over rules around the admissibility of evidence in sexual offence cases. "Sections 274 and 275 routinely block the defence from raising crucial facts about accusers, including prior false claims, mental health concerns, or motivations for fabrication," they wrote. "At the same time, prosecutors are free to attack the accused's character at will." Thomas Leonard Ross (Image: PA) Mr Mason wrote back to the campaigners saying he took their point that "a few people who are innocent have been found guilty by the courts and are wrongly imprisoned" but went on to argue that "the much greater problem is guilty men who have been let off by the courts and who should be in prison but are not". He then referred to the case of the former Scotland striker David Goodwillie. A civil court found in 2017 that the footballer and his former teammate David Robertson raped Denise Clair, but no criminal charges were filed against the pair. In February this year it was reported that legal aid has been approved to fund an application for the private prosecution of Mr Goodwillie for rape. Mr Mason added: "We need to get a better balance, especially in rape cases so that more men are found guilty and are punished." Independent MSP John Mason (Image: Andrew Milligan) In further correspondence on the same day Mr Mason expanded on his views before claiming: "You ask how many innocent people in prison is acceptable. As I said we are trying to get a balance in all of this. "I would have thought that one percent of prisoners being innocent is probably acceptable but 20% would not be. The counter argument would be how many guilty people is it acceptable to escape conviction?" He went on to say he would welcome approaches from constituents concerned about wrongful convictions and would look into the cases. The Herald on Sunday approached Mr Mason for a further explanation. "In an ideal world all the innocent people should be free and outside prison while all the guilty ones should be inside or punished in other ways. So in one sense it is not acceptable for one innocent person to be inside or one guilty person to be outside," he said. "However, we do not live in an ideal world. Witnesses lie in court, some people get a much better lawyer than others, judges can make mistakes, and juries can be swung by emotions or other factors. "So I am afraid that we are never going to have a system which gets every case absolutely right. We have to live with the reality that 0.1% or 1% or 10% of cases might end up in the wrong result. "So I think as a society we are trying to get the balance right… not having too many innocent people in jail and not having too many criminals escaping conviction." He added: "When it comes to rape and other sexual offences, the perpetrators are almost always men and the victims are almost always women. There has been a long running feeling that too many men who are guilty of these offences are getting off because there is little corroboration and the bar in a criminal court is too high. "Previous discussions have included whether the need for corroboration could be amended and I think this has happened to some extent. But I remain of the view that we have not got the balance right in rape cases and too many guilty men are escaping. "One example in recent years has been David Goodwillie. I feel the women were let down in this case and when my team Clyde FC signed him for the second time I stopped attending their games and have not been back since. "So while I would be sympathetic to anyone who is in prison and is innocent, and if it is a constituent I would be happy to get involved, I do not think the main problem we face in our criminal justice system is having too many innocent people in jail." Elaine Buckle, 60, of Pembrokeshire, whose husband Brian, 53, spent five and a half years in prison following a wrongful conviction, was shocked by Mr Mason's views. Elaine and Brian Buckle (Image: Elaine Buckle) "I don't agree with John Mason at all and as far as I can see he has no understanding of what it is like to be accused, convicted and to spend time in prison for something you haven't done," Ms Buckle, a supporter of the group JMIS, told The Herald. She added that her family had been left devastated by her husband's wrongful conviction. "Brian still struggles with his time in prison and suffers flash backs," she said. She added that before he went to prison he had had a highly paid job as a construction manager but now struggled with post traumatic stress syndrome as a result of his wrongful conviction and imprisonment and was unable to look for work. Read more: Mr Buckle was wrongly convicted in 2017 of 16 counts of historical child sex abuse and sentenced to 15 years in prison. However, a subsequent trial with new forensic evidence led to his conviction being quashed. In the Commons, the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has described Mr Buckle's case as a 'grave miscarriage of justice.' There have been longstanding concerns about the low conviction for rape than other crimes. Conviction for rape cases involving a single complainer is 24% compared to the overall conviction rate for all crime is 86%. Speaking to The Herald last month, Mr Ross said it was misleading to compare conviction rates for different types of crime. "In a murder case there might be 15 sources of evidence, from eyewitnesses, DNA, finger prints in murder cases, while in a rape case just there is very often only one source of evidence – namely the person making the complaint. "So it's entirely unsurprising that there are lower conviction rates for rape than murder." A Scottish Government spokeswoman has previously said: 'Everyone has the right to a fair trial and to appeal against a conviction or sentence. There are well-established rules on what evidence can be led in sexual offences trials, and clear routes to challenge how these are applied.'

See why footy fans are accusing NRL trainer of the lowest act of the season: 'Ban him for a year!'
See why footy fans are accusing NRL trainer of the lowest act of the season: 'Ban him for a year!'

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

See why footy fans are accusing NRL trainer of the lowest act of the season: 'Ban him for a year!'

Penrith Panthers trainer Corey Bocking has been accused of robbing the Gold Coast Titans of a win over his team with an act of 'pathetic sportsmanship' on Saturday. The Titans had scored five tries in 25 minutes to take a 26-24 lead late in regular time when Bocking ran in front of Gold Coast kicker Jayden Campbell as he attempted a conversion. Campbell missed the kick after having to re-set himself. Had he converted, the score would have been 28-24 with just four minutes to play. Instead, Penrith star Nathan Cleary was able to boot a two-point conversion in the last minute of regular time to take the match to golden point, with his teammate Blaze Talagi scoring a try in extra time to seal the 30-26 win. To add insult to injury, footage from Fox Sports' coverage of the match showed Bocking appearing to smile as he ran past Campbell after ruining his preparation for the shot at goal. Afterwards, Titans coach Des Hasler said he didn't know whether the incident cost his team the game - but fans had no such doubts. Furious fans like this one vented their fury on social media after the Panthers won the match in extra time, with many saying the trainer robbed the Titans of a win 'Titans robbed. Panthers trainer running right in front of Jayden Campbell as he's about to kick is disgusting. Panthers should be DQ'd from that result for clear blatant interference,' one wrote on X. 'Ban the trainer for 12 months, fine Penrith, and dock them the two competition points. Absolutely pathetic sportsmanship and it's not the first time they've done it. Send a clear message that it won't be tolerated,' another added. 'Whatever happens here, the Titans have been absolutely dudded. Fox will wax lyrical about Cleary, but Campbell should have had a conversion attempt from in front,' a third said. 'Great kick by Cleary but Penrith trainer running across the conversion line like he did negates anything from this game. He knew what he was doing, no excuses,' added another. Asked about the incident after the match, Hasler said, 'Did it cost us the game? I don't know. 'He will get breached. That's the only thing that's going to come out of it.' Penrith coach Ivan Cleary insisted that Bocking's actions were not deliberate. 'He was in the wrong place at the wrong time. We had a sub and I changed it at the last minute,' he said. 'He was trying to communicate with the bench for a late change. It was an honest mistake. He apologised straight away.' Another Penrith trainer was caught in an underhanded act earlier this year. Shane Elford was busted wetting the football in Penrith's 30-all draw with North Queensland in May, in an attempt to make the ball harder to handle for the opposition just before the Panthers kicked off. A video taken by a fan showed Elford pouring water from a bottle onto the Steeden seconds before Dylan Edwards put boot to ball. Cowboys coach Todd Payten said his coaching staff had spotted the trainer doing the same thing throughout the contest. 'He did it before every kick-off,' Payten said. The win over the Titans gave the Panthers an eighth consecutive victory to leave the four-time defending premiers on 29 competition points, just one behind the fourth-placed Warriors. In an ominous omen, Penrith have made the grand final on all five occasions (2003 and 2020-2024) they have previously won eight in a row. They were cruising at halftime but Gold Coast had other ideas. Brimson sent centre Brian Kelly in before Campbell intercepted a Cleary pass to race 90m and get the 16th-placed Titans on the board. Campbell was at it again to step and weave his way through and hooker Sam Verrills dived over from dummy-half. Minutes later Phil Sami finished off a Brimson bust and the lead had been cut to two. Sami was in again after Penrith muffed a Kieran Foran bomb and Gold Coast led with six minutes to play. 'I thought they showed a lot of character,' Hasler said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store