Tennessee bill would require temporary virtual learning option for students after school shooting
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — A Tennessee bill filed by two Democratic lawmakers would give students who survive a school shooting or other act of mass violence the option to learn and heal from home temporarily.
The bill, named the 'Student Comfort through Alternative Restorative Environments (CARE) Act' by its sponsors, Sen. Sara Kyle (D-Memphis) and Rep. Justin Jones (D-Nashville), would require public school districts to provide a virtual learning option to students for at least 31 days after an 'act of mass violence' at a school.
It comes on the heels of the deadly Antioch High School shooting last month where students returned to the building less than one week after the tragedy.
📧 Have breaking news come to you: →
'It is very traumatizing to go back to where it all started,' Kellan Tabor, a sophomore at Antioch High School said. 'They have [the cafeteria] all closed off. You can't go near the area. They're still investigating around there.'
Some Antioch High parents told News 2 they planned to keep their children home after the building reopened.
'My daughter is not going to school tomorrow, and I don't think a lot of them are,' Jennifer Hernandez, an Antioch High parent said. 'It's still too early. Even the ones who are close to graduating, I think they should give them the opportunity to either do virtual or give them their credits and allow them to stay at home with their families during this time.'
Dr. Aaron Brinen, a psychologist and assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told News 2 deciding when to return to the location of a traumatic event and resume a routine is a delicate balance.
'You don't want to start engaging in a lot of avoidance, but you also don't want to force yourself into it,' Dr. Brinen said. 'Individuals who engage in a high amount of avoidance after a traumatic event are more likely to develop PTSD because they're starting to engage in that pattern that is a part of PTSD, that avoidance of the memory and the avoidance of the things in their life that remind them of the memory.'
He added those who appear to struggle shortly after a traumatic event may be less likely to experience any long-term challenges associated with the event.
'Individuals who have a lot of intrusive memories, who are highly emotional, who are really upset after a traumatic event, those individuals are more likely to do better over the long course because they're slowly exposing themselves to those things and habituating, meaning getting used to, those things in the short run.'
When News 2 asked Dr. Brinen his thoughts on giving students a temporary virtual learning option after a tragedy like a school shooting, he said he was split.
'I like the idea of a young person being able to continue to learn, and in the short run, I think if we facilitate a lot of avoidance, I think we could set it up to make it really easy for a young person to foster unhelpful avoidance that could lead to PTSD,' Dr. Brinen said.
If the General Assembly chooses to pass this bill, Dr. Brinen said the state could conduct a study and collect data on students who returned to school when it opened, versus those who chose to learn virtually to determine the ideal amount of time districts should provide the virtual learning option.
⏩
News 2 reached out to both the Senate and House sponsors for an interview, but neither were available. It's unclear whether the state or school district would have to pay for the virtual learning option.
If the bill passed, it would go into effect during the 2025-2026 school year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom Reacts to Donald Trump's 'Unprecedented' Medicaid Move
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has expressed concern for the privacy of immigrants in his state, following reports that the Trump administration has shared Medicaid data with immigration officials. An internal memo and emails obtained by the Associated Press showed that Medicaid officials unsuccessfully sought to block the data transfer, citing legal and ethical concerns. Nevertheless, two top advisers to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered the dataset handed over to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the emails show. Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were given just 54 minutes on Tuesday to comply with the directive. "We deeply value the privacy of all Californians," Newsom's office told Newsweek in a statement. "This action by the federal government has implications for every person on Medicaid, but it is especially alarming for our immigrants and American mixed-status families who are already under relentless, indiscriminate attack by this administration. The federal government continues to instill fear across this nation and shroud its continued violation of Americans' privacy rights in propaganda." Newsweek reached out to DHS and the Department for Health and Human Services for comment via email and contact form Friday afternoon. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer granted an emergency temporary restraining order to stop President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard, on June 12, 2025, at the California... California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer granted an emergency temporary restraining order to stop President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard, on June 12, 2025, at the California State Supreme Court building in San Francisco. More Santiago Mejia/San Francisco Chronicle via AP Why It Matters Reports of increased data sharing between federal agencies for the purpose of immigration enforcement have caused concerns for several weeks. The Trump administration has said the data is vital in finding illegal immigrants who should be deported. What To Know The dataset included the information of people living in California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, D.C., all of which allow non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs that pay for their expenses using only state taxpayer dollars. CMS transferred the information just as the Trump administration was ramping up its enforcement efforts in Southern California. Newsom's office said it was concerned about how deportation officials might utilize the data, especially as federal authorities conduct immigration raids with the assistance of National Guard troops and Marines in Los Angeles. Besides helping authorities locate migrants, experts said, the government could also use the information to scuttle the hopes of migrants seeking green cards, permanent residency or citizenship if they had ever obtained Medicaid benefits funded by the federal government. CMS announced late last month that it was reviewing some states' Medicaid enrollees to ensure federal funds have not been used to pay for coverage for people with "unsatisfactory immigration status." In a letter sent to state Medicaid officials, CMS said that the effort was part of Trump's February 19 executive order titled "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders." As part of the review, California, Washington and Illinois shared details about non-U.S. citizens who have enrolled in their state's Medicaid program, according to a June 6 memo signed by Medicaid Deputy Director Sara Vitolo that was obtained by AP. The memo was written by several CMS officials under Vitolo's supervision, according to sources familiar with the process. The data includes addresses, names, Social Security numbers and claims data for enrollees in those states, according to the memo and two people familiar with what the states sent to CMS. Both people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to share details about the data exchange. CMS officials attempted to fight the data sharing request from Homeland Security, saying that complying would violate federal laws, including the Social Security Act and the Privacy Act of 1974, according to Vitolo's memo. "Multiple federal statutory and regulatory authorities do not permit CMS to share this information with entities outside of CMS," Vitolo wrote, further explaining that the sharing of such personal data is allowed only for directly administering the Medicaid program. Sharing information about Medicaid applicants or enrollees with DHS officials would violate a "longstanding policy," wrote Vitolo, a career employee, to Trump appointee Kim Brandt, deputy administrator and chief operating officer of CMS. The legal arguments outlined in the memo were not persuasive to Trump appointees at HHS, which oversees Medicaid. Four days after the memo was sent, on June 10, HHS officials directed the transfer of "the data to DHS by 5:30 ET today," according to email exchanges obtained by AP. Former government officials said the move was unusual because CMS, which has access to personal health data for nearly half of the country, does not typically share such sensitive information with other departments. "DHS has no role in anything related to Medicaid," said Jeffrey Grant, a former career employee at CMS. Beyond her legal arguments, Vitolo said sharing the information with DHS could have a chilling effect on states, perhaps prompting them to withhold information. States, she added, needed to guard against the "legal risk" they were taking by giving federal officials data that could be shared with deportation officials. A 'Concerning' Development All states must legally provide emergency Medicaid services to non-U.S. citizens, including to those who are lawfully present but have not yet met a five-year wait to apply for Medicaid. Seven states, along with the District of Columbia, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll—with full benefits—in their state's Medicaid program. The states launched these programs during the Biden administration and said they would not bill the federal government to cover those immigrants' health care costs. The Trump administration has raised doubts about that pledge. Nixon said that the state's Medicaid programs for immigrants "opened the floodgates for illegal immigrants to exploit Medicaid—and forced hard-working Americans to foot the bill." All of the states—California, New York, Washington, Oregon, Illinois, Minnesota and Colorado—have Democratic governors. As a result of his state's budget woes, Newsom announced earlier this year that he would freeze enrollment in the program. Illinois will shut down its program for roughly 30,000 non-U.S. citizens in July. The remaining states have not yet submitted the identifiable data to CMS as part of the review, according to a public health official who has reviewed CMS' requests to the states. What People Are Saying U.S. Health and Human Services spokesman Andrew Nixon told AP that the data sharing was legal: "With respect to the recent data sharing between CMS and DHS, HHS acted entirely within its legal authority—and in full compliance with all applicable laws—to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them." California Governor Gavin Newsom's office, in a statement sent to Newsweek: "Sharing Medicaid beneficiary information with the Department of Homeland Security—which is itself legally dubious—will jeopardize the safety, health, and security of those who will undoubtedly be targeted by this abuse, and Americans more broadly. "Federal law requires emergency care to be provided to all to save lives, and the federal government helps pay for it for low-income individuals, regardless of immigration status. Every state should be concerned about this data sharing and its implications for the safety and health of its communities. We will continue to vigorously defend Californians' privacy rights and explore all avenues to protect their information and safety." What Happens Next Republicans in Congress are continuing to look to limit undocumented immigrants from accessing federal programs while continuing to scrutinize whether sanctuary jurisdictions allow them to receive benefits. This article contains reporting by The Associated Press.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Kennedy is on an anti-vaxx mission to reshape federal guidelines
On Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. wrote in the Wall Street Journal that 'Vaccines have become a divisive issue in American politics,' and 'The U.S. faces a crisis of public trust.' 'Whether toward health agencies, pharmaceutical companies or vaccines themselves, public confidence is waning,' Kennedy warned. What was his solution? He abruptly fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the committee that has assured vaccine safety in the U.S. without political interference since 1964. Predictably, he is now repopulating the panel with like-minded individuals who will probably make recommendations that diverge from the mainstream medical and public health community and align with his longstanding anti-vaccine vision. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices typically includes infectious disease, immunology, medical and public health experts who develop recommendations on the use of vaccines in children and adults. These members adhere to strict conflict of interest guidelines, and the meetings are open to the public. The panel reviews data related to both new and established vaccines using a detailed, evidence-based methodology in making recommendations. This process ensures that decisions are based on data and facts and are free of political or financial interests. Kennedy's move marks a landmark victory for the modern and evolving anti-vaccine movement, which now has a front seat in the Trump administration. Today's anti-vaccine movement began percolating in 1998 with a faulty scientific report linking the measles vaccine to autism. Despite the retraction of the report and numerous scientific studies showing no support for the vaccine-autism link, this notion has gained traction and now permeates American politics, undermining basic pediatric healthcare. Over the past five years, largely due to the politics surrounding COVID-19, anti-vaccine sentiment has combusted. It is staggering to reflect on its recently growing scope. With thousands of weekly deaths and mass societal disruption from COVID-19, our nation clamored for a vaccine as a pathway to normalization. The Trump administration launched Operation Warp Speed in May 2020, with an initial investment of $18 billion to develop solutions. The nation breathed a sigh of relief when COVID-19 vaccines became available in December 2020, as our pathway out of the pandemic was before us. These feelings were reminiscent of the jubilation following Jonas Salk's development of the polio vaccine 70 years ago, which put an end to a paralytic illness that affected about 16,000 children each year in the U.S. Although some politicians may overlook this fact, both Republican and Democratic leaders lined up to promote and extol the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccination when it became available. Our nation was politically unified over the first half of the year after the vaccines became available, and we watched death rates fall. However, in April 2021, shortly after the Biden administration actively promoted COVID-19 vaccines, many Republican governors backed off from their promotion. Instead, several supported the notion that it was better to get immunity by infection rather than vaccination. Some also endorsed the practice of contracting COVID-19, followed by the use of monoclonal antibodies, rather than getting vaccinated, a strategy that was significantly more expensive and riskier. With fewer Republicans taking the vaccine, by the summer of 2021, the most significant risk factor for death from COVID-19 was not necessarily age or underlying medical condition, but whether you were a Republican or Democrat, leading to the notion of 'Red COVID.' This was 'the moment the anti-vaccine movement had been waiting for,' as it hitched itself to Republican politicians, leading to a significant spillover effect onto other vaccines. Anti-vaccine politicians, including Kennedy, received millions of dollars in campaign contributions, making routine childhood vaccinations a political issue rather than a health issue. We are now in a situation where the politicization of COVID-19 vaccines and the false attack on other vaccines now dominate news, leaving the public confused and healthcare providers frustrated. Mixed messaging from the Department of Health and Human Services, along with the tepid federal response to the measles outbreak currently affecting several states, reveals an inconsistent approach that does little to reassure citizens. Sadly, this messaging occurs when parents are questioning vaccinating their children more than ever before, and vaccination rates are declining. Now he says the justification for firing the vaccine panel's members is a lack of public confidence in federal vaccine guidance. Thus, we are in a situation where the fabricated narrative of anti-vaccine proponents with loud political bullhorns is being used to destroy a foundational scientific group that has kept us safe from vaccine-preventable diseases for decades. If new federal recommendations are implemented, it will prompt the medical and public health communities to issue their own guidelines, which may not be the same. Two weeks ago, following Kennedy's recommendation that healthy children and pregnant women should not receive the COVID-19 vaccine, this scenario played out as the CDC and prominent medical organizations issued differing guidance. This contributes to public uncertainty and will hurt children and their families, as growing numbers of unvaccinated children will needlessly be harmed, hospitalized or die from vaccine-preventable illnesses. However, that is not all that the medical and public health communities need to fear. We now regularly see the Trump administration retaliate against those who do not align with the administration's policies in law firms, universities or state governments. We can also anticipate that funding will fall for longstanding federal vaccination programs, and the Department of Health and Human Services will remove certain vaccines from mandatory insurance payment, limiting their uptake. Thus, a growing number of children will be harmed, hospitalized, and die from vaccine-preventable illnesses. As the medical community lines up to condemn the recent firings and begins to release vaccine recommendations in opposition to Health and Human Services, it needs to prepare itself to answer the question: What happens when we, and the way we practice medicine, become the next target of the Trump administration? Scott Rivkees, MD, is a pediatrician and professor of practice at Brown University. He is the former state surgeon general and secretary of Health of Florida. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Regional rail study, wrong-way driving bills among those signed into law
(Photo: Jeniffer Solis/Nevada Current) Teenagers won't be able to flip burgers at midnight. Newborns will be screened for more rare diseases. Cities will have to consider heat mitigation when drafting master plans. Those are just a few of the real-world outcomes of the hundreds of bills passed by the Democratic-controlled Nevada State Legislature and signed into law by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo. The session officially adjourned June 2 but won't truly be over until the governor signs or vetoes each bill that passed. Lombardo has until Friday to approve or reject the bills or else they automatically become law. In 2023, the first-term governor did not allow any bills to automatically become law, opting instead to take a stance on each piece of legislation that came across his desk. (Lombardo's predecessor, Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, did the same.) As of Friday morning, the Legislature's website listed 515 bills as signed and an additional four bills awaiting approval or veto. Eighty-seven bills were vetoed. Here's a look at more than a dozen bills the Nevada Current has previously covered that have now been signed into law: Working teens Teenagers will soon be prohibited from working between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. before a school day, thanks to Assembly Bill 215, sponsored by Assemblymembers Daniele Monroe-Moreno and Brian Hibbetts, a Democrat and Republican, respectively. Teachers and students pushed for the change, citing the negative impact lack of sleep has on learning, mental and social health. The new restrictions, which do include some exemptions, go into effect on Oct. 1. Regional rail group Nevada will soon form a Regional Rail Transit Advisory Working Group to assess the need for regional rail systems in Southern and Northern Nevada and look at potential funding sources for such systems. The group was created by Assembly Bill 256, sponsored by Democratic Assemblymember Selena La Rue Hatch of Reno. The working group will be composed of lawmakers, transit experts and county representatives. They are expected to deliver to lawmakers a report in July 2026 with 'an actionable plan' for achieving regional rail transit and recommendations to the 2027 Legislature. Wrong-way driving Driving on the wrong side of the road will soon be a misdemeanor crime, following the passage of Republican Assemblymember Brian Hibbetts's Assembly Bill 111. Previously, wrong-way driving was only a civil offense. Nicknamed 'Jaya's Law' after 3-year-old Jaya Brooks who died in a wrong-way crash in Las Vegas last year, AB111 was unanimously supported by lawmakers and goes into effect Oct. 1. Protections for health care providers Employees and volunteers of reproductive health care facilities, as well as their spouses, domestic partners or minor children, will soon be able to request a court order that keeps their personal information confidential on otherwise public records within the offices of county recorder, county assessor, county clerk, city clerk, Secretary of State, or Department of Motor Vehicles. Democratic Assemblymember Erica Roth's Assembly Bill 235 saw some bipartisan support in the Legislature before being signed by the Republican governor. The legislation goes into effect July 1. Right to Contraception Assembly Bill 176, sponsored by Democratic Assemblymember Selena Torres-Fossett, strengthens protections against a state or local government burdening access to contraceptive measures. Newborn screenings Nevada will expand the number of rare but treatable conditions newborn babies are screened for, thanks to Senate Bill 348, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Julie Pazina. The expansion is being funded through an increase in the fee hospitals pay the Nevada State Public Health Lab. The prior rate had been the same for more than a decade and kept Nevada behind what the federal government recommends for newborn screening. Raises for elected officials Many county elected officials will get a raise with the passage of Senate Bill 116, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Skip Daly. The bill establishes a formula to elevate the pay for the elected district attorney, sheriff, county clerk, county assessor, county recorder, county treasurer and public administrator of each county. The formula keeps those public servants' pay above the highest paid person in their office. Meanwhile, commissioner salaries across the state are also being bumped up by a set amount, followed by 3% annual increases for five years starting in 2026. The changes will go into effect in July with the new fiscal year. Foster parents People with criminal records of marijuana possession for amounts that are currently legal are now eligible to become foster parents. Democratic Assemblymember Tracy Brown-May sponsored Assembly Bill 107 for Clark County, which told lawmakers that otherwise qualified Nevadans are being needlessly turned away. The state faces a critical shortage of foster homes. Water rights Nevada will establish a Voluntary Water Rights Retirement Program that allows willing landowners to sell their water rights back to the state through the year 2035. The program was established by Assembly Bill 104 and unanimously supported. Charters behind on PERS With Senate Bill 418, the Nevada State Superintendent of Public Schools will be able to withhold a charter school's state-funded per-pupil dollars if the charter school is more than 90 days delinquent in retirement contributions to the Public Employees' Retirement System of Nevada (better known as PERS). Administrators for PERS told lawmakers a mechanism for recouping the contributions is needed because of the unique quasi-public nature of charter schools. Local input on tax abatements Companies seeking massive tax abatements will have to enter into agreements to defray the costs of the government-provided services they require. Storey County, home to the heavily abated Tesla Giga Factory, sponsored Senate Bill 69. Heat mitigation Cities and counties with populations exceeding 100,000 people must include 'heat mitigation' as part of their master plans, following the passage of Assembly Bill 96. Inmate firefighters Democratic Assemblymember Jovan Jackson sponsored a bill, Assembly Bill 321 to require the Nevada Department of Corrections to create a program to allow formerly incarcerated people to work as firefighters within the Division of Forestry. The program is expected to help recidivism rates. Medical respite care Nevada's Department of Health and Human Services will apply for a federal waiver to amend the state Medicaid plan to cover medical respite care for people experiencing homelessness. The requirement was passed in Senate Bill 54. Net proceeds of minerals The Net Proceeds of Minerals Bulletin will soon be public again. Long made publicly available by the state, a new interpretation of state law resulted in the bulletin being kept private. Assembly Bill 277 makes the bulletin public again. The bill was sponsored by Republican Assemblymember Rich DeLong and had the approval of the mining industry. Tax increment areas Senate Bill 28 creates 'tax increment areas' in which a portion of future property tax revenue can be used to pay interest on bonds used to finance affordable housing development and public transit. The bill, sponsored by the City of Las Vegas, saw some bipartisan support in the Legislature. Mental health The Medicaid reimbursement rate for mental health providers will increase through Senate Bill 353, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Marilyn Dondero Loop. Immigration guardianship Assembly Bill 460, sponsored by Assemblymember Cecelia González, streamlines the process for selecting a temporary guardian for minors prior to any immigration action. Insulin costs Assembly Bill 555 prohibits private insurance companies from charging people more than $35 for a 30-day supply of insulin. The bill, sponsored by, Democratic Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, received broad bipartisan support, with only Senate Republicans John Ellison and Robin Titus opposing. Democratic Assemblymember Joe Dalia's Assembly Joint Resolution 8, which would let voters in 2028 decide whether Nevada should establish a dedicated business court, also passed the legislative finish line. Resolutions are not subject to vetoes by the governor. AJR1 is now set to return to the 2027 Legislature for consideration. If lawmakers pass the resolution again, it will appear in front of voters on the 2028 general election ballot for final approval. A dedicated business court could entice large companies to incorporate in Nevada and settle their corporate litigation here, Dalia and other proponents of the resolution have argued. Nevada Supreme Court Chief Justice Doug Herndon announced the court would try to establish a dedicated business court on its own as early as next year. Herndon said in a statement he didn't believe AJR1 to be necessary.
