Europeans warn Iran of UN sanctions if no concrete progress on nuclear issue
The foreign ministers of the so-called E3, along with the European Union's foreign policy chief, held their first call with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi since Israel and the U.S. attacked Iranian nuclear facilities a month ago.
A French diplomatic source said the ministers had urged Iran to resume diplomacy immediately to reach a "verifiable and lasting" deal, threatening to use the so-called 'snapback' mechanism if it failed to do so.
But in a post on X, Araqchi dismissed the threat, saying he had told the ministers: "It was US that left the negotiation table in June this year and chose a military option instead, not Iran ...
"If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they lack absolutely [any] moral and legal ground."
He said talks would only be possible "when the other party is ready for a fair, balanced, and mutually beneficial nuclear deal".
The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 deal - from which the U.S. withdrew in 2018 - that lifted sanctions on Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme.
If Iran is found to be in violation of the terms, the "snapback" can be used to restore U.N. sanctions before the U.N. Security Council resolution enshrining the deal expires on October 18. The process would take about 30 days.
"The ministers also reiterated their determination to use the so-called 'snapback' mechanism in the absence of concrete progress toward such an agreement by the end of the summer," the French diplomatic source said, without specifying what this would entail.
Since the air strikes, inspectors from the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, have left Iran. While Tehran has suggested it is open to diplomacy, there are no indications a sixth round of talks with Washington will resume soon.
Even if they do, diplomats say reaching a comprehensive accord before the end of August - the deadline the Europeans have given - seems unrealistic, especially without inspectors on the ground.
Two European diplomats said they hoped to coordinate strategy with Washington in the coming days with a view to restarting talks with Iran.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Iranian lawmaker points to regional insecurity if UN sanctions are reimposed
DUBAI, July 21 (Reuters) - Iran could withhold security commitments if European states invoke a U.N. mechanism to reimpose international sanctions on the Islamic Republic, a member of Iran's parliamentary national security commission said on Monday, according to Borna news. "We have many tools in our disposition. We can withhold our commitment to security in the region, Persian Gulf and Hormuz Strait as well as other maritime areas," Abbas Moqtadaei said in reference to Tehran's potential counter-measures to the reimposition of international sanctions. He was speaking ahead of a meeting on Friday between Iranian deputy foreign ministers and British, French and German diplomats in Istanbul. The three European states, known as E3, have said they would restore international sanctions on Iran by the end of August if the country did not enter productive talks on its nuclear programme with Western powers, notably the United States. E3 countries and Iran have in recent months held inconclusive talks on Tehran's nuclear program, in parallel to indirect nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington. Israel's attack on Iran in June led to the suspension of such talks. "Europe is not in a position to endanger itself in the... Hormuz Strait when it is itself in political, economic and cultural conflicts with Russia, China and even the United States," Moqtadaei said in an interview with Iran's semi-official Borna news agency. Last week, Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson said Tehran would react to the three European states if they invoked the UN snapback mechanism, which expires on October 18. In a letter to the UN Secretary-General, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Sunday that the E3 lack the legal standing to invoke the mechanism, arguing that their stance on Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last month made them no longer participants to a 2015 nuclear deal to which the snapback mechanism is linked. The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to the nuclear pact - from which the U.S. withdrew in 2018 - that lifted sanctions on Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme. In the past, Iran has used the threat of disrupting maritime transit in the Strait of Hormuz or no longer stopping Europe-bound drug trafficking as a means to push back against Western pressures on its nuclear programme.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK needs new regulations to fix broken water industry, review says
LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Britain should overhaul its water regulatory system to create a single, powerful body, and replace current regulator Ofwat, to better protect consumers and the environment, an official report said on Monday. The Labour government ordered a review of the privatised water industry in England and Wales after record sewage spills in rivers and lakes sparked widespread anger. The sector's biggest company, Thames Water, is battling to avoid collapse under its debt pile, and has said it is likely to face 1.4 billion pounds in pollution fines and penalties over the next five years. Former Bank of England Deputy Governor Jon Cunliffe, who led the review, said the current, separate financial and environmental regulation of the sector had failed, and financial regulator Ofwat should be replaced. The review considered the creation of a new regulatory system where water companies can raise enough money through bills to rebuild their assets, investors can get long-term, steady returns, and the impact on the environment can start to improve. "Fully joined-up regulation is essential for the system to meet the demands of the future and ensure that private water companies act in the public as well as the private interest," the report said. Britain's water infrastructure needs more than 100 billion pounds ($134.18 billion) of investment in the next five years to cope with population growth and climate change, with consumers set to face bill rises of an average 36% over the period. Investors were waiting for the report for signs of how the government could reset the regulation for Thames Water, which has been fighting for survival for the last 18 months, if it is to avoid being temporarily nationalised. Environment Minister Steve Reed, who on Sunday promised to halve sewage pollution by 2030, is due to announce "root and branch" reform of the sector's regulation in a speech later on Monday, his office said. Under Cunliffe's recommendations, the new single regulator would set "minimum capital" requirements for investors and it would also be able to block changes in water ownership if they were not deemed to be in the long-term interests of the company. In order to attract investment, the report said the government should offer the regulator direction to support stability and predictability - a reference to expected returns, and potential handling of fines for sewage leaks. The review also recommended the creation of nine new regional system planning bodies responsible for developing water investment plans and directing funding, with the power to streamline existing planning processes. ($1 = 0.7460 pounds)
Sky News
36 minutes ago
- Sky News
Water wars: What difference will it make?
👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne's on your podcast app👈 The Government announces the "Reed Reforms" to fix Britain's water system, but will it make a difference? Sky News' Sam Coates and Politico's Anne McElvoy consider if customers' bills will go down and what practical changes will be made. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer meets with two world leaders later this week ahead of the parliamentary summer recess. Plus, we hear about an unexpected visitor in the Coates household.
