US politicians lobby Trump to penalise Ireland if it passes Occupied Territories Bill
The bill will ban the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land.
The Government said there is a narrow legal basis, based on an advisory opinion from the UN's top court, to ban the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements.
The Government has said this is being done to comply with the International Court of Justice, which said last year that countries should "take steps to prevent trade or investment relations" that maintain illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land.
US anti-boycott law
On Thursday, New York congresswoman Claudia Tenney, along with 15 other lawmakers, wrote to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent asking that he investigate whether Ireland's proposed law violates US anti-boycott law.
The letter urges the Department of the Treasury to conduct a formal review under Section 999 of the Internal Revenue Code and consider adding Ireland to the list of countries that require or may require participation in international boycotts against the US or its allies.
If added to the list, there is the potential that American citizens or businesses in Ireland would be subject to additional tax reporting rules.
In a statement, Ms Tenney said that the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement was "anti-Israel" and would "economically isolate America's closest ally in the Middle East". She said the Irish legislation "aligns with the global BDS movement, which seeks to delegitimise Israel and create legal uncertainty for US companies operating abroad".
Ireland's proposed boycott is a blatant attempt to isolate and delegitimise Israel on the world stage.
"This proposed boycott is discriminatory, dangerous, and would violate US law.
"The Treasury Department has the duty to enforce the law, protect American businesses, and hold countries accountable when they promote foreign boycotts against our allies. The US will not stay silent while our allies are targeted by hostile political agendas,' said Ms Tenney.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
12 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Putin-Trump summit: what we know so far
US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, are set to hold talks in a bid to end the war in Ukraine, triggered by Russia's February 2022 invasion. Mr Trump has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace - after boasting he could end the war in 24 hours - though multiple rounds of peace talks, phone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough. Here is what we know about the summit so far: When? Both sides have confirmed preparations for a summit are underway and that a meeting could take place next week - though no firm date has been set. Mr Trump said Wednesday that a face-to-face meeting with Mr Putin could occur "very soon". "They would like to meet with me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing," he then said yesterday, speaking of both Mr Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Mr Putin said yesterday, "both sides showed interest" in a US-Russia top-level meeting, while Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said "next week has been set as a target date." Will Zelensky be involved? Mr Zelensky is pushing to make it a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Mr Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. Mr Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, proposed a trilateral meeting when he held talks with Mr Putin earlier this week, but the Russian leader has appeared to rule out meeting his Ukrainian counterpart. "I have nothing against it in general, it is possible, but certain conditions must be created for this. But unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions," Mr Putin told reporters yesterday. At talks in Istanbul in June, Russian negotiators said a Putin-Zelensky meeting could only take place at the "final phase" of negotiations, once the two sides had agreed terms for peace. Asked if Mr Putin had to meet Mr Zelensky as a prerequisite for their summit, Mr Trump said: "No, he doesn't." Where? There is no confirmed venue yet. The Kremlin's Mr Ushakov said both sides have agreed the place "in principle", but did not name a host, while Washington rejected reports that a venue had been agreed. Mr Putin named the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a potential contender, calling the Gulf state "one of the quite suitable places". Turkey - which hosted three rounds of Ukraine-Russia talks this year - is also in the running, as is Saudi Arabia, where US officials held separate talks with Russian and Ukrainian diplomats in February and March. China has been mentioned in media reports as a possible venue, amid speculation both Mr Trump and Putin could travel there in early September, with Xi Jinping playing host. The Kremlin last month did not rule out such a meeting. Ukraine's allies and NATO members - like Finland, where Mr Putin and Mr Trump met for a summit in 2018 - are seen as unlikely candidates. The International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Mr Putin, which obligates members to detain the Russian leader if he visits their country, could also restrict possible venues. Negotiating positions Despite the flurry of diplomacy and multiple rounds of peace talks, Russia and Ukraine appear no closer to agreeing an end to the fighting. Mr Putin has rejected calls by the United States, Ukraine and Europe for an immediate ceasefire. At talks in June, Russia demanded Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, demanded Ukraine commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said it will never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged it would have to try to secure the return of land captured by Russia through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. Kyiv is also seeking security guarantees from its Western backers, including the deployment of foreign troops as a peacekeeping contingent to enforce any ceasefire.
Irish Examiner
41 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
'More unbearable suffering': Condemnation of Israel's new plans for Gaza
The Israeli government's plan for a full-scale military takeover of Gaza will cause more deaths and suffering and must be halted immediately, the United Nations Human Rights Chief Volker Turk said on Friday. Israel's political-security cabinet approved a plan early on Friday to take control of Gaza City, as the country expands its military operations despite intensifying criticism at home and abroad over the devastating almost two-year-old war. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday that Israel intended to take military control of the entire Gaza Strip, but the plan announced on Friday stopped short of this. On Friday, Mr Turk said: "The Israeli government's plan for a complete military takeover of the occupied Gaza Strip must be immediately halted. It runs contrary to the ruling of the International Court of Justice that Israel must bring its occupation to an end as soon as possible, to the realisation of the agreed two-State solution and to the right of Palestinians to self-determination. "On all evidence to date, this further escalation will result in more massive forced displacement, more killing, more unbearable suffering, senseless destruction and atrocity crimes. The war in Gaza must end now. And Israelis and Palestinians must be allowed to live side by side in peace. "Instead of intensifying this war, the Israeli government should put all its efforts into saving the lives of Gaza's civilians by allowing the full, unfettered flow of humanitarian aid. "The hostages must be immediately and unconditionally released by Palestinian armed groups. Palestinians arbitrarily detained by Israel must also be immediately and unconditionally released." After Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to take over Gaza City, Turkey's foreign ministry condemned it and called on the international community and US Security Council to act to prevent the plan's implementation. The ministry also said Israel must immediately halt its war plans, agree a ceasefire in Gaza, and start negotiations for a two-state solution. Turkey said each step by Israel's government to continue what it called Israel's genocide and occupation of Palestinian lands dealt a heavy blow to global security. Israel has repeatedly rejected accusations of carrying out genocide in its war in Gaza. Hamas described the Israeli government's plan to take control of Gaza City as a 'new war crime', warning the operation would cost it 'dearly'. According to Agence France-Presse (AFP), the group said in a statement: "The Zionist cabinet's approval of plans to occupy Gaza City and evacuate its residents constitutes a new war crime that the occupation army intends to commit against the city. "We warn the criminal occupation that this criminal adventure will cost it dearly and will not be an easy journey." Meanwhile, German chancellor Friedrich Merz has said his country will not authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza 'until further notice'. The move by Germany, which had previously stopped short of tougher lines against Israel's government taken by some of its European Union allies, appears likely to further isolate Israel over the military takeover plan which has been condemned by supporters of Israeli hostages still held in Gaza. British prime minister Keir Starmer said Israel is 'wrong' to approve plans to occupy Gaza City saying the new offensive will 'bring more bloodshed'. 'The Israeli government's decision to further escalate its offensive in Gaza is wrong, and we urge it to reconsider immediately," he said. 'This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages. It will only bring more bloodshed.' Spain and the Netherlands have also condemned the Israeli government's decision to escalate its military occupation of Gaza.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump deadline for Russia arrives
Ukrainian soldiers have expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as Donald Trump's deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing arrived and he eyed a possible meeting with Vladimir Putin to discuss the conflict. The US president's efforts to pressure Mr Putin have so far delivered no progress. Russia's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armour while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace. Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 620-mile front line from north-east to south-east Ukraine. It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out into the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages. Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine's northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk. In the Pokrovsk area, one commander said Moscow is not interested in peace. 'It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,' Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told the Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military. 'I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that, it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,' he said. In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia's invasion. 'We are on our land, we have no way out,' he said. 'So we stand our ground, we have no choice.' Donald Trump is hoping for a meeting with Vladimir Putin (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP) Mr Trump said on Thursday that he would meet Mr Putin even if the Russian president will not meet his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent's biggest conflict since the Second World War. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said: 'Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process. 'Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia's side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West.' Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to end the conflict. He said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow 'to negotiate on behalf of Europe', or 'we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent'. Mr Orban, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe's concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent's interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative. 'This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,' he said. 'This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.'
