logo
Two local court advocacy programs for children are revived with legislative funding

Two local court advocacy programs for children are revived with legislative funding

Yahoo6 days ago

An equal justice statue stands outside the doors of the Minnehaha County Courthouse in Sioux Falls. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight)
Three years after lawmakers put $1 million toward advocacy efforts for children in the court system statewide, two revived nonprofits are starting to support children again.
Volunteers with local Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) programs advocate for children who've been removed from their families and placed in state care due to suspected abuse and neglect. The volunteers meet with the children and other contacts, such as teachers, therapists and caseworkers. They also write reports to judges about the children's needs, strengths and interests.
'This process is crucial as it gives the child a voice in the legal proceedings concerning their welfare,' said CASA state director Sara Kelly in an emailed statement.
Over 330 CASA volunteers worked with 658 children in 37 counties last year, according to the state Unified Judicial System. Most of the state's 1,049 active cases involving CASA last year — with or without a volunteer — were in the Sioux Falls and Rapid City areas.
This is the first time in 16 years that the state has operated CASA organizations in all of its circuit courts. The Sixth Circuit, in central South Dakota, and the Fifth Circuit, representing northeastern South Dakota, closed in 2009.
Federal cut to children's advocacy funding 'abandons American children,' says SD nonprofit leader
Gloria Hutson, in Aberdeen, was hired to lead the reestablished Fifth Circuit CASA in November last year. She told the state CASA Commission at its Wednesday meeting that three counties within her 10-county jurisdiction have a high case volume: Brown, Walworth and Spink counties.
'The focus these last six months has been on building a solid, sustainable structure while building deep community roots,' Hutson said.
Walworth County has a 'disproportionate' number of cases for its population, and many involve the Indian Child Welfare Act, Hutson said. The federal Indian Child Welfare Act sets minimum standards for efforts to reunite tribal children in the state's custody with their families. Walworth county is adjacent to the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River reservations.
As of the end of April, Walworth County had 25 pending cases involving 52 children. Brown County had 32 cases involving 58 children and Spink County had three cases involving three children.
Fifty-seven cases were active in the Fifth Circuit last year, and none of the children had CASA representation, according to UJS. Through April this year, the circuit had 61 pending cases involving 117 children, Hutson said.
Most of those children still do not have CASA volunteers advocating for them. Fifth Circuit CASA has eight volunteers so far, two of whom are advocating for three children. All the children are younger than 2 years old.
Laurie Gill, a former state Department of Social Services secretary who now works with Maxwell Strategy Group, leads CASA for the Sixth Circuit. Gill's firm was hired to lead the nonprofit, and Gill said the contract was renewed recently by the nonprofit's board of directors.
Sixth Circuit CASA, which represents 14 counties in central South Dakota, including Hughes County and the state capital city of Pierre, intends to train 10 volunteers this year. The first will be sworn in and assigned cases by June, Gill said.
Thirty-nine cases were active in the Sixth Circuit last year. There were 45 pending cases involving 94 children at the end of April, Gill said. Most are in the Pierre/Fort Pierre area.
The 2022 funding from the Legislature was a result of lawmakers learning about the holes in South Dakota's CASA coverage, after loosening a requirement to appoint advocates for abused and neglected children in the court system. Lawmakers on the state budget committee approved funding to help restart the two shuttered programs and help existing CASA programs expand.
The Fifth and Sixth Circuit organizations have each received $120,000 so far.
Another $143,715was awarded to most other CASA programs.
The need for volunteers remains one of the biggest challenges for CASA nonprofits across the state, leaders told the commission. Since last year's report, the number of volunteers has dropped from 330 statewide to 318.
National CASA guidelines require one staff member to supervise a maximum of 30 volunteers. Each volunteer is assigned one case at a time, typically staying with a case until it's resolved.
The Sioux Falls CASA reports 333 children currently on the waiting list to be represented by a volunteer. The Seventh Circuit CASA in Rapid City reports 455 children on its waiting list.
The 2022 Legislature appropriated $1 million to the Unified Judicial System to award South Dakota CASA nonprofits with grants to rebuild or expand. About $384,000 – less than 40% of the funds – have been spent so far:
$120,000 to the Fifth Circuit CASA in Aberdeen
$120,000 to the Sixth Circuit CASA in Pierre
$58,400 to the Southeast CASA in Yankton
$40,835 to the First Circuit CASA in Mitchell
$25,000 to the East Central CASA in Brookings
$15,000 to the Sioux Falls Area CASA
$2,000 to the Seventh Circuit CASA in Rapid City
$2,480.47 in miscellaneous expenses

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ongoing Canadian wildfires color skies in northern U.S. regions
Ongoing Canadian wildfires color skies in northern U.S. regions

UPI

time12 minutes ago

  • UPI

Ongoing Canadian wildfires color skies in northern U.S. regions

1 of 2 | The sky shows colors of red and orange as the sun is blocked by clouds behind the Statue of Liberty after sunrise in New Jersey on this past Thursday, March 29. Parts of the Northeast were blocked by clouds from seeing a partial solar eclipse Saturday morning. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 2 (UPI) -- Several states across the American landscape were expected Monday to see and feel the effects of smoke that has billowed outward from wildfires that continue to burn across Canada, such as in the provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The effect was already evident in Montana, Minnesota, the Dakotas, Wisconsin and Michigan on Saturday, as skies grew hazy over some of the states that line up along the United States' northern border. However, by Sunday morning the smoke traveled around a thousand miles, over Illinois, Ohio and Indiana to South Carolina, which led to a sunrise that was hued red. The smoke is expected to continue its spread throughout the week. Weather forecasters expect hazy sunsets Monday in East Coast cities such as Boston and New York due to its lofty presence. In addition to smoky skies, air quality alerts have been issued in many impacted locations. According to the American Lung Association, where such alerts have been issued, "It is unhealthy to breathe and can be especially harmful to sensitive groups, including children, older adults, and people with lung diseases like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease."

Elon Musk's Companies Just Hit Rock Bottom in New Reputation Rankings
Elon Musk's Companies Just Hit Rock Bottom in New Reputation Rankings

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's Companies Just Hit Rock Bottom in New Reputation Rankings

Today, in metrics that Elon Musk's enterprises are fully eating dirt: A new Axios Harris Poll of the US's 100 most visible companies showing Tesla and SpaceX, collapsing in reputation. The poll seeks to divine positive consumer sentiment and trust among large companies — and Musk's are crashing, due in no small part to widespread disapproval of Musk's role in the Trump administration, a sentiment that continues to grow across all political affiliations. This isn't a shocking development, but even so, the numbers paint an astonishingly swift fall from grace. In the 2021 poll, Tesla was eighth place in reputation ranking, putting it ahead of brands like Costco, Apple, and Toyota. But along the way, the automaker has since tripped on the staircase up, and come crashing backwards. Last year, Tesla fell all the way down to 63rd place — and now, in 2025, it's plunged to rock-bottom-95th, where it's keeping company with the likes of Meta, Wells Fargo, and UnitedHealth Group. Toyota, it's worth mentioning, has leapfrogged Tesla to 4th place, with five other car companies ahead of the EV automaker. Per Axios, Tesla also placed dead last in "character," and ranked nearly as poorly in areas like "ethics" and "citizenship." SpaceX is hardly better off. In 2021, Musk's aerospace company was sitting pretty at 5th place, but this year it tumbled to 86th. That puts it right alongside a scandal-plagued Boeing, at 88th. SpaceX isn't a consumer facing company like Tesla, so the reputation hit theoretically isn't so material to their future. But the polling data showed a worrying 28.7 percent difference between Republican and Democrat respondents, the outlet reported, which could certainly be a liability down the line if political fortunes swing out of their favor. X (formerly Twitter) also features here — embarrassingly — with a 98th place finish — but it's always done poorly, even before Musk's takeover. Again, this astonishing fall from consumers' good graces can be laid at the feet of Musk, who has alienated consumers on both sides of the aisle with his role in the Trump administration. Through his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, Musk has laid waste to the federal government by firing tens of thousands of government employees, cutting off hundreds of billions of dollars in spending, and tampering with American's Social Security. His personal conduct was likely no less repulsive to those same consumers, including his willingness to engage in (ostensibly) performative Nazism, and his regular sharing of racist conspiracy theories. Beyond poor polling numbers, these actions have had material consequences for his businesses. Musk's actions catalyzed a global "Tesla Takedown" protest movement, with Tesla dealerships and cars regularly targeted with vandalism. The automaker's annual sales declined for the first time in 2024, and have fallen in the first quarter of 2025 by 37 percent in Europe and 9 percent in the US. Its net income during this period, meanwhile, has slid by 71 percent. In a rare moment of self-reflection, Musk himself has admitted that his time in DOGE has incurred some pretty nasty blowback on his businesses. And if this new poll is anything to go by, their reputations are going to need feats of veritable necromancy to recover. More on Musk's business acumen: A Longtime Tesla Bull Dumped His Stock, Predicting a Total Collapse Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

After DOGE firings White House asks new job seekers to write Trump loyalty essays, from lawyers to janitors
After DOGE firings White House asks new job seekers to write Trump loyalty essays, from lawyers to janitors

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

After DOGE firings White House asks new job seekers to write Trump loyalty essays, from lawyers to janitors

After a months-long freeze on hiring new federal employees and the Elon Musk-led DOGE cuts to the government workforce, the Trump administration is ready to resume civil service hiring — as long as the applicants answer a few essay questions about their level of loyalty to the president and his mission. The Office of Personnel Management last week quietly published a memorandum authored by Vince Haley, the White House's head of domestic policy that was addressed to the head or acting head of every agency across the entire executive branch. According to the White House's directive, a copy of which was reviewed by The Independent, anyone applying for a civil service position at entry level or above — including such jobs as nurses, janitors, economists and lawyers, among others — must respond to a series of essay questions before they can even be considered for an interview. The 'merit hiring plan' lays out in detail how to implement a January executive order signed by Trump to 'prioritize recruitment of individuals committed to improving the efficiency of the Federal government, passionate about the ideals of our American republic, and committed to upholding the rule of law and the United States Constitution.' The plan also seeks to prevent anyone who is 'unwilling to defend the Constitution or to faithfully serve the Executive Branch' from being employed in the civil service. One question asks applicants about their 'commitment to the Constitution and the founding principles of the United States,' while another question asks applicants to state how they would 'help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities' and to 'identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives' that they find significant to them. They must also explain how they'd help implement these orders or initiatives. If applicants write answers that are satisfactory enough to land them an interview, the memorandum also states that they must participate in an 'executive interview' with a political appointee from 'agency leadership' who will evaluate their 'organizational fit and commitment to American ideals.' For civil service experts and good-government advocates, the new applicant screening process is setting off alarm bells. Adam Bonica, a Stanford University political scientist who publishes the 'On Data and Democracy' newsletter on Substack, wrote on Sunday that the White House's directive 'signals a profound departure from a cornerstone of American democracy: the non-partisan, merit-based civil service' and looks to implement Project 2025 efforts to deconstruct the nonpartisan civil service in favor of a return to the 'spoils system' that was in place until the late 1800s. 'A merit-based civil service that took generations to build is being dismantled via memo,' he charged. The new hiring guidelines aren't the only way Trump and his allies are upending the nonpartisan system that was set up to govern federal hiring in the wake of President James Garfield's 1881 assassination by a disgruntled office seeker. Shortly after he returned to power in January, Trump signed an executive order that ordered agencies to reclassify career employees who work on policy matters into a new 'schedule' that strips them of nearly all civil service protections. The directive largely re-implements an October 2020 order Trump signed to establish what was then called 'Schedule F' and was set to be comprised of any federal worker in 'confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating positions.' That broad category includes most of the government's non-partisan experts such as scientists, doctors, lawyers and economists, whose work to advise and inform policymakers is supposed to be done in a way that is fact-driven and devoid of politics. Combined with the more than 100,000 open positions created by the massive number of firings and resignations across the entire executive branch during Trump's first few months back in power, these new policies could allow the administration to recruit an equal number of MAGA devotees who would eventually acquire protection from removal by future administrations. Max Stier, president of the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service, told Axios on Monday that it looks like the administration is 'emptying the shelves of the existing nonpartisan expert civil servants' and 'restocking' those same shelves with 'loyalists.' Jeri Buchholz, a former head of HR at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, told the outlet that traditional federal hiring, by law, was meant to 'focus on the knowledge, skills and abilities required for the position.' She said the Trump White House's required questions are by contrast 'philosophical' and 'not even aptitude related,' making them difficult to square with the 'merit hiring plan,' especially since it purports to require agencies to speed up hiring decisions. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Independent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store