logo
Asian stocks rally after Trump tariffs hit court hurdle

Asian stocks rally after Trump tariffs hit court hurdle

West Australian3 days ago

Asian shares and Wall Street futures have climbed in Asia after a US federal court blocked President Donald Trump's Liberation Day tariffs from going into effect, sending the dollar up on safe haven currencies.
The Manhattan-based Court of International Trade ruled that Trump overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from nations that sell more to the United States than they buy.
The White House quickly appealed the decision, and could take it all the way to the Supreme Court if needed, but in the meantime it offered some hope that Trump might back away from the highest tariff levels he had threatened.
"We're just trying to work out what it might mean basically but obviously the market is doing a knee-jerk reaction," said Ray Attrill, head of FX strategy at NAB.
"So this may be an absolute storm in a teacup or potentially something more significant."
MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan edged up on Thursday, awaiting the opening of Chinese markets.
Japan's Nikkei index jumped 1.5 per cent to 38,263.36. American's largest ally in Asia has been appealing to Trump to cancel the tariffs he has ordered on imports from Japan and to also stop 25 per cent tariffs on steel, aluminium and autos.
The ruling also pushed the US dollar sharply higher against the Japanese yen. It was trading at 146.06 yen early Thursday, up from 144.87 yen late Wednesday.
Australia's ASX gained 0.3 per cent to 8,418.90.
In South Korea, the Kospi surged 1.4 per cent to 2,707.77. Shares also were helped by the Bank of Korea's decision to cut its key interest rate to 2.5 per cent from 2.75 per cent, to ease pressure on the economy.
S&P 500 futures climbed 1.5 per cent, while Nasdaq futures rose 1.8 per cent. The latter had already been lifted by relief over earnings from Nvidia, which beat sales estimates.
The chipmaker and AI darling also projected strong revenues for the current quarter, sending its shares up 4.4 per cent after hours.
That news helped offset a Financial Times report the White House had ordered US firms that offer software used to design semiconductors to stop selling their services to Chinese groups.
The New York Times separately reported the United States had suspended some sales to China of critical US technologies, including those related to jet engines, semiconductors and certain chemicals.
The news of the court decision hit traditional safe havens, lifting the dollar 0.8 per cent on the Swiss franc to 0.336. It gained 0.6 per cent on the Japanese yen to 145.76 yen, while the euro dipped 0.5 per cent to $US1.1230.
Yields on 10-year Treasuries rose three basis points to 4.51 per cent and markets further shaved the chance of a Federal Reserve rate cut anytime soon.
Minutes of the last Fed meeting showed "almost all participants commented on the risk that inflation could prove to be more persistent than expected" due to Trump's tariffs.
A rate cut in July is now seen as just a 22 per cent chance, while September has come into around 60% having been more than fully priced a month ago.
In commodity markets, gold slipped 0.9 per cent to $US3,259 an ounce .
Oil prices extended a rally begun on supply concerns as OPEC+ agreed to leave their output policy unchanged and as the US barred Chevron from exporting Venezuelan crude.
US crude firmed 47 cents to $US62.31 per barrel.
with AP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woollahra's $10.6m failed sale offers a lesson in contract law
Woollahra's $10.6m failed sale offers a lesson in contract law

The Age

time39 minutes ago

  • The Age

Woollahra's $10.6m failed sale offers a lesson in contract law

But behind the scenes, the $1.06 million deposit owed on the exchange was fast becoming a matter of contention given claims Jabbour's first cheque bounced, and the sale was later secured by a bank transfer of $100,000. That equates to less than 1 per cent of the purchase price. As Longhurst pursued his buyer for the outstanding amount, Gibson claimed she only became aware Jabbour had paid a fraction of the deposit until more than six weeks after the deal was due to settle, by which time they had already given Jabbour more time to finance her purchase, and the market had started its downward trajectory. Gibson further claims she enlisted Longhurst on a 1.1 per cent commission, but that he reduced that by $16,000 after he broke the non-disclosure agreement by emailing his database with the bullish sale price. The commission was never paid. The details behind the failed sale are set to be contested in the Supreme Court in coming months after Gibson launched legal proceedings in a bid to recoup her losses against Jabbour, Longhurst, and the agency's director, Michael Pallier. Like Longhurst, Jabbour declined to comment for this story, so it remains unknown why she didn't complete on the sale, although their defences in the matter have been lodged with the court. Pallier said he is included in the summons purely because he is the Sotheby's licensee, and had nothing to do with the sale. But Pallier did back his leading agent Longhurst, ranking him among Sotheby's – and Sydney's – top sales guns. Longhurst's own purchase of an almost $27 million home in Vaucluse recently made headlines in The Australian Financial Review, given it was the former home of Telstra executive director Maxine Brenner and her husband, founder Jodee Rich. Longhurst has form when it comes to selling high-end houses on a minimal deposit. Two years ago, he set a then-house price record in Paddington of $14 million when he sold the historic double terrace Brompton to Monte Carlo-based art adviser Richard Thompson. But Thompson never settled on the purchase, and the seller Jacqueline Bailey was left with less than a 5 per cent deposit and the need to move back into the house before she relisted it a year later. It eventually sold last September after what was ultimately a more than 18-month campaign, and for nearer to $12.5 million. The binding nature of a sale contract and the 10 per cent deposit that is owed (regardless of what is agreed as an initial deposit) was most famously laid bare by Hollywood star Toni Collette and her former husband, musician Dave Galafassi in 2011 when they exchanged to buy a Paddington terrace for $6.35 million. In Supreme Court proceedings that followed it was revealed that they later pulled out of the deal because they did not have the money. The sellers Industrie Clothing co-founders Nick and Susie Kelly later resold the house for $5.5 million, and sued Collette and Galafassi for the difference. The celebrity former couple not only had to forfeit their 10 per cent deposit, but more than $600,000 in damages.

It's hard to admit, but we can all learn something from Elon Musk
It's hard to admit, but we can all learn something from Elon Musk

Sydney Morning Herald

time39 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

It's hard to admit, but we can all learn something from Elon Musk

This is not something I ever imagined I'd find myself saying, but I think we could all learn something from Elon Musk, particularly when it comes to money habits and ideology. I know, I know. At first glance, it's difficult to see what any of us normal people who pay mortgages, fly economy and budget for groceries each week have in common with the world's richest living individual, but stay with me. This week, Musk announced that after four months of serving as the unofficial BFF of President Donald Trump he is going to say goodbye to Washington and is stepping down from his role as a top government adviser. Like so many friendships between the mega-rich, it looks like the two have had an ideological falling out over … yep, you guessed it, money. As you'll no doubt remember, Musk has been a key fixture of the White House since Trump's return thanks to his role as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he and a bunch of young and extremely inexperienced tech bros (who called themselves 'Muskrats' due to their idolisation of the Tesla CEO) attempted to cut down on 'wasteful' government spending. This included things like slashing 300,000 government jobs and cutting funding to research programs aimed at raising US literacy rates in schools. When the Tesla CEO began talking about his plans for DOGE in October last year during the presidential campaign, Musk said the agency would be able to find 'at least $US2 trillion ($3.1 trillion)' in cuts – a third of the entire US federal budget – which he saw to be 'a target-rich environment for saving money'. Challenging ourselves is essential if we want to understand our reasons for spending or saving the way that we do, and to get better at it. By January, Musk had wound that estimate back, saying that $US2 trillion would be the 'best-case outcome', and that more likely, the cuts would be closer to the tune of half of that figure – $US1 trillion. This number, he said, would still be 'an epic outcome'. Now that he's on his way out, Musk is saying his final DOGE cuts figure is actually closer to $US175 billion (though audits suggest the true figure is far less than this). In terms of delivering Trump the 'savings' that were promised, it really is the Temu version showing up on his doorstep.

It's hard to admit, but we can all learn something from Elon Musk
It's hard to admit, but we can all learn something from Elon Musk

The Age

time39 minutes ago

  • The Age

It's hard to admit, but we can all learn something from Elon Musk

This is not something I ever imagined I'd find myself saying, but I think we could all learn something from Elon Musk, particularly when it comes to money habits and ideology. I know, I know. At first glance, it's difficult to see what any of us normal people who pay mortgages, fly economy and budget for groceries each week have in common with the world's richest living individual, but stay with me. This week, Musk announced that after four months of serving as the unofficial BFF of President Donald Trump he is going to say goodbye to Washington and is stepping down from his role as a top government adviser. Like so many friendships between the mega-rich, it looks like the two have had an ideological falling out over … yep, you guessed it, money. As you'll no doubt remember, Musk has been a key fixture of the White House since Trump's return thanks to his role as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he and a bunch of young and extremely inexperienced tech bros (who called themselves 'Muskrats' due to their idolisation of the Tesla CEO) attempted to cut down on 'wasteful' government spending. This included things like slashing 300,000 government jobs and cutting funding to research programs aimed at raising US literacy rates in schools. When the Tesla CEO began talking about his plans for DOGE in October last year during the presidential campaign, Musk said the agency would be able to find 'at least $US2 trillion ($3.1 trillion)' in cuts – a third of the entire US federal budget – which he saw to be 'a target-rich environment for saving money'. Challenging ourselves is essential if we want to understand our reasons for spending or saving the way that we do, and to get better at it. By January, Musk had wound that estimate back, saying that $US2 trillion would be the 'best-case outcome', and that more likely, the cuts would be closer to the tune of half of that figure – $US1 trillion. This number, he said, would still be 'an epic outcome'. Now that he's on his way out, Musk is saying his final DOGE cuts figure is actually closer to $US175 billion (though audits suggest the true figure is far less than this). In terms of delivering Trump the 'savings' that were promised, it really is the Temu version showing up on his doorstep.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store