logo
What is an assisted living facility — and how does it differ from a nursing home?

What is an assisted living facility — and how does it differ from a nursing home?

Boston Globe17-07-2025
What is an assisted living facility and how is it different from a nursing home?
Assisted living residences are nonmedical facilities that provide older adults with housing, meals, and support for daily activities like dressing, bathing, and medication. They promote independence while offering a safety net of care.
'[Assisted living] is often the next logical step in the continuum of care for adults who don't need complex medical treatment but would benefit from daily support in a setting that values independence, freedom of choice, and quality of life,' said Brian Doherty, president and CEO of Massachusetts Assisted Living. 'Assisted living also provides structure and support for individuals with cognitive impairment, memory loss, or Alzheimer's disease through specialized memory care units.'
Unlike nursing homes, which provide round-the-clock care for individuals with significant medical needs, assisted living residences offer a more homelike environment. Residents typically live in private or semiprivate apartments and receive help with activities of daily living — such as bathing, dressing, grooming, and mobility.
Advertisement
Nursing homes are licensed and inspected by the state Department of Public Health. Assisted living residences are certified by the Executive Office of Aging & Independence (AGE), which does not require the same level of clinical staffing or oversight.
Advertisement
'[Assisted living residences are] very loosely regulated,' said Malka Young, an aging consultant and director of Allies in Aging JFS Elder Care Solutions.
Young says each facility varies by the level of care that's needed. The care involves one wellness nurse, which can only provide first aid.
'The one nurse is responsible for the well being of each person in the community. They can't give injections, they can't take blood pressure, so there's not really any medical services,' she explained.
What are the different types of aging services?
Managed long-term care programs include:
Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (
Senior Care Options (
Aside from aging at home, options for long-term care include:
Senior housing (includes public, privately-owned subsidized, and congregate and supportive housing)
Continuing Care Retirement Communities are sometimes known as a life plan community, where
independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing care are offered.
Assisted living residences provide meals, housekeeping, and help with personal care, but charge separately for additional services like medication management or assistance with bathing and memory care.
Rest Homes / Residential Care Facilities are considered a healthcare facility, though they offer basic care, not skilled nursing, and are often included in MassHealth coverage.
Nursing/skilled-nursing and rehabilitation facilities operate under a medical model, offering care typically covered by Medicaid or long-term care insurance and could include memory care units.
How much does it cost — and who pays?
The average monthly cost for assisted living in Massachusetts is nearly $10,000, or $300 a day, depending on location, room type and level of care, according to
'Each person is given an individual care plan, and sometimes you have up to one hour of care and if you need help with your medications, then that's an additional fee,' Young said.
Nursing homes are more expensive, often exceeding $13,000 per month, but may be partially covered by Medicaid if the resident qualifies financially.
Health insurance only covers assisted living facilities if someone has long term care insurance.
'I'll have couples come to me and they'll have a million dollars, and they think they have a lot of money, but that's really not a lot of money if someone's in their late 70s or even early 80s,' Young said.
Related
:
Advertisement
Gabriel House served a high number of low-income seniors.
More than 75 percent of its residents are enrolled in Medicaid, state officials have said, and it charges significantly less than a typical assisted living facility does for private-paying patients. Built in 1964, Gabriel House had been the subject of several complaints from family members about living conditions, the Globe
Subsidies also depend on potential tax credits, the median income of the community and what they offer
.
'Gabriel House in Fall River was mainly for people who were on veterans benefits or MassHealth,' Young explained. 'But there's a subgroup of regular assisted livings that depended on how the building itself was financed, they're called tax credit units.'
Robin Lipson, secretary of AGE, raised the possibility that facilities that heavily dependent on government housing or Medicaid payments, 'should be regulated or supported in a different way' from those that rely on private payers.
Michelle Woodbrey, co-owner of 2Sisters Senior Living Advisors, serving families across New England, said assisted living facilities that support lower income seniors are rare to find and 'often don't provide high levels of care.'
'If you're on MassHealth and can't pay privately, a nursing home is typically your only option, and there are very few exceptions,' she said.
Each year, Woodbrey said, more people are falling into a growing gap: they don't meet the high medical threshold for nursing home care, but can't afford assisted living or home care services.
' . . . someone can't just move into a nursing home because they're out of money. There's this group of people who fall between the cracks. Gabriel House served many of those people.'
Advertisement
How do you know that the one you've selected is high quality?
Young suggests people consider how long staff has been there in a high-turnover job market, if there's an on-site chef , and what types of activities and length of stays are offered.
'Ask about the staff's education,' she advises. Also,some programs, will highlight they have a resident committee and they vote on what they want. Well, that means they don't have any staff or professional input.'
Sarah Rahal can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

25 states file legal brief defending Trump ban on youth sex change procedures
25 states file legal brief defending Trump ban on youth sex change procedures

American Press

time2 minutes ago

  • American Press

25 states file legal brief defending Trump ban on youth sex change procedures

On Monday, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill joined 24 other Republican attorneys general in backing President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at halting federal funding for sex change procedures on minors, marking the state's latest push in a broader legal fight over transgender care. Three days earlier, Massachusetts filed a brief joined by 19 states challenging the same executive order. The states argue the order is unconstitutional, discriminatory, and violates the Spending Clause by tying federal health funds to ideological conditions. The Massachusetts-led brief contends that the order jeopardizes care for transgender youth, strips states of medical decision-making authority, and undermines long-standing Medicaid protections. The suit seeks a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction against implementation. The attorneys general defending the Trump order, led by Alabama's Steve Marshall, filed amicus briefs in the 4th and 9th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, supporting Trump's order and urging the courts to overturn preliminary injunctions issued earlier this year in lawsuits out of Washington and Maryland. The Alabama-led briefs argue that continuing to fund such procedures violates both medical ethics and constitutional principles. 'Even though President Trump is in office, common sense and constitutional principles are under constant assault by radical leftist groups like the ACLU,' said Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, who is leading the coalition. Marshall accused the ACLU of pushing courts to 'force taxpayers to fund sex-change procedures on children.' Murrill, who has been an outspoken critic of so-called 'gender-affirming' care for minors, did not release a separate public statement, but her participation in the brief underscores Louisiana's alignment with a growing number of Republican-led states that seek to limit access to such treatments. In recent years, Louisiana's Legislature has passed bans on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors. According to the coalition's legal filings, the brief draws on findings from Alabama's discovery in a now-dismissed challenge to its own ban on 'gender-affirming' care, where Marshall's office claimed to uncover a coordinated effort to remove age restrictions from national medical guidelines — a move he described as politically motivated rather than science-based. The Alabama-led team argues that federal funding for 'gender-affirming' care is based on 'discredited standards' and that such medical interventions for minors have irreversible consequences. 'The evidence says otherwise,' Marshall said. 'These harmful interventions have lasting consequences for vulnerable children.' The Alabama-led brief was filed in both the 9th Circuit and 4th Circuit federal courts of appeal. Louisiana was joined by attorneys general from Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming in addition to Louisiana. The filings are part of a broader conservative legal strategy seeking to bolster state laws banning so-called 'gender-affirming' care while reinforcing Trump-era federal policy that frames such care as medically unnecessary and ideologically driven.

Trump administration wants to end abortion coverage through Veterans Affairs
Trump administration wants to end abortion coverage through Veterans Affairs

Boston Globe

time32 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump administration wants to end abortion coverage through Veterans Affairs

Amy Friedrich-Karnik, director of federal policy at the Guttmacher Institute, said in a statement that the change would cut off millions of veterans and their families from services. Advertisement 'Veterans have historically faced significant barriers to reproductive health care, and with the current patchwork of abortion bans and restrictions across the country, these barriers are even steeper today,' she said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Veterans Affairs, which provides health coverage for veterans and their dependents, did not include abortion in its coverage until 2022. President Joe Biden's administration added it months after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and state abortion bans began kicking in. The Biden changed allowed the VA to provide abortion even in states where it was banned. The VA says in its proposal that allowing abortion is legally questionable because Congress has not specifically allowed it. The policy change would also bring the VA's coverage into line with other federal health care plans — including Medicaid and the TriCare coverage for active military members and their families — which exclude abortion in most cases. Advertisement The VA said in its filings that about 100 veterans and 40 dependents obtain abortions using the benefits each year — far below the projection the department made in 2022 of a total of 1,000 a year. The conservative law firm Alliance Defending Freedom called on the VA to drop abortion coverage in a letter last month, saying the cost or providing abortion takes other health resources away from veterans.

Trump administration wants to end abortion coverage through Veterans Affairs
Trump administration wants to end abortion coverage through Veterans Affairs

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump administration wants to end abortion coverage through Veterans Affairs

President Donald Trump's administration is calling to remove abortion coverage from the list of medical benefits for veterans and their families, saying it's not needed. The Department of Veterans Affairs posted the proposed rule change on Monday and opened a public comment period on it that runs through Sept. 3. The department said in its proposal that it wants to ensure it 'provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families.' The department says it would still provide abortion in life-threatening circumstances — something state laws allow, even in places where bans are in place. But critics of the change note that abortion would not be provided when pregnancies are the result of rape or incest. Amy Friedrich-Karnik, director of federal policy at the Guttmacher Institute, said in a statement that the change would cut off millions of veterans and their families from services. 'Veterans have historically faced significant barriers to reproductive health care, and with the current patchwork of abortion bans and restrictions across the country, these barriers are even steeper today," she said. Veterans Affairs, which provides health coverage for veterans and their dependents, did not include abortion in its coverage until 2022. President Joe Biden's administration added it months after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and state abortion bans began kicking in. The Biden changed allowed the VA to provide abortion even in states where it was banned. The VA says in its proposal that allowing abortion is legally questionable because Congress has not specifically allowed it. The policy change would also bring the VA's coverage into line with other federal health care plans — including Medicaid and the TriCare coverage for active military members and their families — which exclude abortion in most cases. The VA said in its filings that about 100 veterans and 40 dependents obtain abortions using the benefits each year — far below the projection the department made in 2022 of a total of 1,000 a year. The conservative law firm Alliance Defending Freedom called on the VA to drop abortion coverage in a letter last month, saying the cost or providing abortion takes other health resources away from veterans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store