Israeli ambassador urges MCD to participate in its global tenders for infra projects
The countries share a 'strong relationship based on friendship, cooperation, and mutual respect', Singh said as Azar paid a visit to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD).
The meeting, which went on for around an hour, was also attended by MCD Commissioner Ashwani Kumar. Deputy Mayor Jai Bhagwan Yadav, Leader of the House Pravesh Verma, Standing Committee Vice Chairperson Sundar Singh, additional commissioners, and other senior civic officials.
At the meeting, discussions were held on improving civic services related to health, education, parks, solid waste management and others with the help of Israel's expertise. 'With Israel being a technologically advanced country, this kind of exchange of ideas and experiences will further strengthen the functioning of the corporation,' said Kumar.
'The ambassador asked us to participate in the global tenders they would issue for infrastructure projects in Israel, as they need manpower post the destruction caused by the war,' Singh said.
After the meeting, Singh posted on X, 'Had a fruitful meeting with the Ambassador of Israel and his delegation on key municipal and civic issues such as waste management, urban planning, and innovation in public services.'
After the meeting, civic officials said, Azar appreciated Delhi's cultural heritage and civic infrastructure, and extended an invitation to the Mayor to visit Israel to witness its advanced technology and innovations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
17 minutes ago
- United News of India
LS passes Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 by voice vote
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) Amid noisy protests by Congress and Opposition members, the Lok Sabha today passed the Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024, by voice vote after a brief discussion. When the House reconvened at 2 PM after second adjournment, presiding officer Sandhya Rai called for the proceedings of the House. However, the Opposition members had already entered the Well of the House raising slogans. Amid the din, Union Minister for Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbanand Sonowal moved 'The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 for consideration and passing. Despite the uproar, Sonowal said the Bill ensures greater safety at sea, robust protection of marine environment, faster response to emergencies and comprehensive welfare for the seafarers. It streamlines compliance, boosts tonnage under the Indian flag and enhances India's bankability as a maritime trade hub. He called the Bill as progressive, advanced and modern and said India has emerged as the largest supplier of Merchant Shipping Act 1958 presently governs merchant shipping in India and implements certain international maritime organisation convention. However, the present Act is outdated since it does not provide for some of the critical obligations under the international convention that have been adopted by India, he added. The Act is no longer adequate to realize the country's developmental vision and address the contemporary challenges of the maritime sector. He said that additionally the 1958 Act prioritises regulation over enablement and as a result does not adequately represent the bankability of India as a maritime trade hub aligning the domestic law with international best practices. "The focus of the Bill is increasing India's bankability in maritime sector." The Bill seeks to replace the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The Bill provides for temporary registration to unregistered vessels which are to be recycled in India. The Bill instead requires all vessels to be registered regardless of type of propulsion or weight. It expands the definition of vessels to include types such as mobile offshore drilling units, submersibles, and non-displacement crafts. The Bill adds that a foreign vessel chartered by an Indian person may be registered as an Indian vessel. This will apply where the ownership is intended to be transferred to the charterer after a specified period. The Bill states that the central government may create a new body to regulate security of vessels and ports. Amid the din, Captain Brijesh Chowta while discussing on the Bill termed it as a "landmark bill". He said, the Bill will modernize the country's maritime, create jobs and encourage foreign investments. Moreover, Mukeshkumar Chandrakaant Dalal too supported the Bill. The Bill was passed even as the Opposition chaos continued. After the Bill was passed, Sandhya Rai adjourned the House for the day. UNI RBE RB
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
UCLA faces uncertainty as Trump suspends $584 million in federal grants over civil rights probe
The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) is facing a major funding crisis after the Trump administration formally suspended $584 million in federal research grants, nearly twice the previously estimated amount. The move follows findings by the US Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division that UCLA violated civil rights laws by failing to address alleged antisemitic incidents on campus. This marks the first time a public university has had its federal research funding halted under the administration's growing scrutiny of higher education institutions. The implications are far-reaching, potentially disrupting scientific research, faculty-led projects, and student programs across multiple departments. Allegations tied to campus protests and civil rights protections According to the Justice Department, the suspension follows a civil rights probe that concluded UCLA acted with 'deliberate indifference' in allowing a hostile environment for Jewish and Israeli students. The investigation cited incidents during the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests, when demonstrators allegedly blocked access to classes and other facilities. The federal government said UCLA's handling of these events violated both the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo The university has denied wrongdoing but agreed to a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and one Jewish professor who filed a lawsuit claiming their civil rights were violated. Chancellor Julio Frenk described the situation as a critical moment for the university. 'If these funds remain suspended, it will be devastating for UCLA and for Americans across the nation,' he said in a statement, highlighting the university's role in conducting 'groundbreaking research.' Funding cuts impact major research bodies The suspended grants span several federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Energy. These funds play a central role in supporting advanced research, scientific innovation, and faculty development. James B. Milliken, the newly appointed president of the University of California system, criticised the funding cuts, arguing that they do not serve the stated purpose of addressing antisemitism. 'The extensive work that UCLA and the entire University of California have taken to combat antisemitism has apparently been ignored,' he said, adding that the loss of funding threatens research that 'saves lives, grows our economy, and fortifies our national security. ' The university has agreed to enter talks with the administration in an effort to resolve the matter. As part of the lawsuit settlement, UCLA will contribute $2.3 million to eight organisations focused on combating antisemitism and supporting Jewish students. It has also established an Office of Campus and Community Safety and introduced new policies for managing on-campus protests. A pattern emerging across universities The administration's action against UCLA follows a similar approach taken with Columbia University. Last month, Columbia agreed to pay $200 million to settle allegations of violating federal antidiscrimination laws. That agreement restored more than $400 million in research grants. Officials have indicated that the Columbia settlement may serve as a model for how the federal government addresses comparable issues at other universities. The Trump administration's strategy appears to tie institutional accountability directly to research funding, using financial pressure to enforce compliance with federal civil rights standards. What this means for students and campus life While the legal and administrative outcomes continue to unfold, the immediate consequences for students are less abstract. The suspended funds support a range of university functions, including student fellowships, lab work, faculty-led research opportunities, and programs that many students rely on for academic and career development. A prolonged freeze could limit student access to research roles, delay ongoing projects, and reduce campus resources in the coming academic terms. For those in fields tied to federally funded research, particularly STEM and public health — the uncertainty introduces new challenges in an already competitive environment. UCLA has said it remains committed to maintaining a safe and inclusive campus for all students. As negotiations with the federal government proceed, the university community, especially its student body, is bracing for further clarity on how the situation will affect academic programs in the months ahead. (with AP inputs) TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Logjam over SIR: Rijiju says House can't discuss EC's functioning, Congress counters
Parliament saw little legislative business Wednesday as the Opposition attempted to bring up the SIR in Bihar and the government said rules and precedent do not allow for a debate on the Election Commission, which is conducting the exercise. Lok Sabha was adjourned within minutes of its proceedings getting underway. Rajya Sabha proceedings were adjourned until 2 pm soon after it commenced. The RS was later adjourned for the day after the passing of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill by voice vote. Opposition parties have repeatedly sought a discussion during this Parliament session on the SIR exercise. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, during the second half of LS, told the Opposition that the government is 'very open to take up for discussion any matter'. 'On the issue of SIR which they are disturbing the House (on) from day one, we all know the matter is under the consideration of the Supreme Court and is sub-judice. Under Rule 186 (8), any matter can be discussed in the House only if it does not relate to a matter which is under adjudication by a court of law…' he said. In the past, he said, it had been clearly established in LS that matters 'falling under the domain of the Election Commission cannot be discussed'. 'The House cannot have a discussion on the working of an autonomous body like the Election Commission. Do you want to break the rules established by this House? Do you want to throw out the provisions of the Constitution of India?' he said. Deputy Leader of Congress in LS Gaurav Gogoi said: 'Just to jog the memory of the BJP-led NDA government — Parliament has a long history of discussing electoral reforms and functioning of the EC… There is ample precedent,' he said, citing debates in 1961, 1981 and 1991, among others. Congress MP Manish Tewari said the Rijiju was 'absolutely wrong' and that the House had 'discussed many times' in the past the 'conduct of the Election Commission'. In RS, after ministers laid papers on the table of the House, and an obituary was read out for former J&K governor Satya Pal Malik, Deputy Chairman Harivansh said he would not admit 35 notices received under Rule 267. MPs can seek discussions on urgent matters under Rule 267. '…none of these notices are in adherence to the rules as enunciated in the past…' Harivansh said, sparking protests. Harivansh appealed to members to let the House function during Zero Hour. With the MPs not relenting, the Deputy Chairman adjourned the proceedings till 2 pm. After the House reconvened, members of the Opposition tried to raise a point of order. Bhubaneswar Kalita, who was then chairing Rajya Sabha, said he would allow a point of order only when there was order in the House. He asked all the members to return to their seats. Leader of Opposition in RS Mallikarjun Kharge said: 'When members from this side raise a point of order then you say that the House is not in order. There, they are giving speeches. And, you are allowing them. This is unfair, untenable…' To this, the leader of House J P Nadda said: 'Sir, those who create disorder in the House have no right to raise point of order. If you are so interested, obey the rules accordingly, otherwise the Chair's direction is final.' When Opposition MPs were called to speak on the Bill, they either did not go back to their seats and forfeited their chance, or tried to raise SIR issue. Kalita said nothing would go on record and moved to the next speaker.
