UK police chiefs call for ban on social media for under 16s
Senior UK police officers have called for the government to ban children under 16 from social media, amid claims the platforms are 'fuelling and enabling' crime.
In the most recent development in the moral panic that has gripped the media since Netflix's Adolescence was released, four of the most senior policing figures in the country told The Times Crime and Justice Commission that further controls on social media platforms were necessary for public safety, national security and young people's mental health.
Sarah Crew, chief constable of Avon and Somerset and the National Police Chiefs' Council lead on rape and serious sexual offences, told the Times that social media platforms were putting children at risk of exploitation and abuse. 'Young people are by their nature vulnerable, and this gives those perpetrators who would want to do harm a really direct channel,' she said.
'It's like the American west in the 1850s – there was a lot happening, and it was expanding quickly, but there was little regulation and law enforcement and codification … It sets norms in people's minds about what's acceptable and what's not.'
Crew went on to liken the situation to a crisis like the Covid pandemic 'where all parts of the state and society and the voluntary sector came together and said: 'Right this is a real problem'.'
Maggie Blyth, acting chief constable of Gloucestershire and the national police lead for violence against women and girls, claimed that social media was 'a significant threat not just to our children and young people but also to our society.' Blyth added: 'We are seeing young people acting out violence and behaviour like strangulation because they see it online. There are horrific things that are being normalised.'
Blyth supported a ban alongside other measures such as improved education for children about the dangers of social media, noting that Australia 'are ahead of the game', referring Australia's decision to ban social media for under-16s last year.
Another chief constable, Tim De Meyer of Surrey police, said he is positive that social media is 'fuelling and enabling crime', arguing a ban for under 16s was crucial. 'It just seems to me to be an absolute no-brainer that there should be much greater restrictions.'
Matt Jukes, the police head of counter-terrorism, pointed to the fact that 20% of those arrested for terrorist offences last year were children. 'Terrorist groups are now able to radicalise, to share instructions, to share their ideologies,' he told the commission. 'The feature which has been driven most by the internet and by online radicalisation has been the emergence of young people in all of that casework.' Jukes added that the Online Safety Act, which has introduced additional safeguards for children and created new requirements for social media companies to actively remove illegal content from their platforms, does not provide adequate protection, saying it was 'necessary' but 'not sufficient'.
Finally, Neil Basu, a former assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan police, is also keen on banning social media for children. 'I hear a lot of arguments that there is no connection between violent imagery and people committing violence. I don't believe that for a moment after 30 years of policing … The idea that that has no effect seems utterly facile to me. So ban it, yes, and 16 seems reasonable to me.'
According to a United Nations study, the idea is not so facile. The UN found that there is 'no clear evidence' that social media leads to more violent behaviour. 'Violent radicalization generally entails a number of tools and should be seen in the context of other communication platforms and significant social factors, such as the political, social, cultural, economic and psychological causes.'
When asked whether the government would consider a ban on under-16s using social media platforms, Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, told the Times' commission earlier this year that 'nothing can be off the table.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
AP PHOTOS: Brazil's Cavalhadas festival celebrates the Holy Spirit
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Woman tortured and raped by evil ex for 13 years finally escaped after meeting kind stranger
Michael Christie terrorised Emma Louise Goddard after meeting her when she was just 15-years-old. A woman who was raped and tortured by her sick ex during his 13-year reign of terror finally escaped after breaking down to a stranger in the street. Vile Michael Christie, 52, brutally attacked Emma Goddard, 36, for over a decade before she found the courage to leave him. The mum said she had "accepted" the abuse as part of her daily life until a kind local woman asked her about her black eyes. Speaking to the Record, Emma-Louise revealed the chance encounter led to the woman persuading her to phone the police. She said: "The abuse had been going on so long that I was just going through the motions. I has accepted it as part of my life. "But a woman stopped me in the street one day after noticing my black eyes and asked me if I was okay. "I guess I was just ready to open up. I told her everything and handed me her phone so I could call the police and woman's aid. "He was arrested that night." Speaking on her horror ordeal at the hands of Evil Christie, Emma-Louise said: "I was just a teenager when I met him. He made sure I was very quickly estranged from my friends and family as he took control of my life. Then he started the sexual and physical abuse. "He would rape me when I was sleeping and then continue doing so when I woke up. "He was constantly attacking me and the neighbours would hear and phone the police but he had me under his spell and I never said anything when they arrived." "I was completely terrified and so isolated that I just felt powerless." Emma-Louise suffered a broken collar-bone, fingers and toes at Christie's hands but said two episodes of abuse terrified her more than any others - when she was locked up and separately subjected to a torture method known as waterboarding. She continued: "We were living in a flat in Clydebank in the winter of 2010, but he got some work in Thurso cutting down Christmas trees. "So he decided to lock me up for four days and he wouldn't let me have a phone, so I was trapped in there. "I didn't have much food and was completely terrified. If I had some sort of medical emergency I would have had no way of getting help. "Another day in 2014, he attacked me and I was sure he was going to kill me. "He used handcuffs to chain me to a radiator in the bathroom and stuck a towel over my face and poured water over it. "I've since learned this is called waterboarding. At the time, I thought I was about to die." Emma-Louise said Christie would even force her to move to different addresses when neighbours noticed something was wrong to avoid attention of the cops. But after he was arrested, Emma-Louise faced an agonising wait for justice due to delays in the case going to court amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Christie was finally found guilty in April this year after a trial in Glasgow where he was convicted of multiple rapes and assault to severe injury and permanent disfigurement between 2003 and 2016. The brute was sentenced to 16 years in i n prison on May 12. Reacting to the sentence, Emma-Louise said: "It took a long time for him to be convicted but thankfully he was given a long sentence by the courts. "But the ordeal he put me through was far more punishing and I need to live with the trauma for the rest of my life. "People like him don't care about the consequences of their actions, but I hope any women reading this who are being abused realise that it just takes one phone call - like the one I made the day I met that woman - and everything can change." Detective Chief Inspector Jennifer McCulloch, of Ayrshire CID said: 'We acknowledge the sentencing of Christie, who will now face the consequences of actions. 'We remain committed to thoroughly investigating those responsible for these types of crimes and bringing them to justice. 'Any form of sexual abuse is a serious criminal offence and is a priority for Police Scotland. We encourage anyone with concerns about abuse, or a potential victim, to contact police immediately.'
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
'We're happy to have this fight': Trump administration leans into California protests
President Donald Trump's immigration agenda has met a groundswell of opposition in Los Angeles, the country's second-largest city. At least 56 people have been arrested so far in massive protests against the administration's immigration raids in the city Friday. The demonstrations have spilled over onto one of the region's largest freeways, and federal authorities are facing criticism after they arrested, and apparently injured, a prominent labor leader. In response, the White House has threatened to arrest California's governor and mobilized Marines to support National Guard troops in defending federal property — even though state officials say they don't want the assistance and are now suing the administration. For the White House, this scene — Trump battling a blue state over his signature issue — is a win. It's a nationally watched saga of the sort that has long defined his career: a made-for-TV moment. 'We're happy to have this fight,' a White House official said, emphasizing that politically, the administration sees it as a winning issue. Democrats and immigration activists have broadly blasted the Los Angeles operation as illegal and inhumane and insisted that it's all about politics — and not about sound public policy. 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' former Vice President Kamala Harris, a Los Angeles resident who ran against Trump last year, wrote in a statement. But Trump allies argue that it's simply Trump carrying out the hard-line immigration agenda that was the centerpiece of his campaign. NBC News spoke with four White House officials, in addition to other Trump supporters, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. 'This is what America voted for, period,' a Trump adviser said. 'This is the America First focus that got the president elected and is driven by nothing else than what he promised American voters.' 'Look at the violence, the attacks on law enforcement,' the adviser added. 'If Democrats want to support that, let them. This is why we win elections and they do not.' Trump advisers also pointed to the fact that the president's immigration policies continue to get high marks in most public polling. A CBS/YouGov poll conducted just before the Los Angeles immigration raids found that 54% of respondents approved of the administration's ' program to deport immigrants illegally.' Those numbers help clarify why the administration and more broadly congressional Republicans are politically comfortable leaning into support of the raids over vocal opposition from critics — and a persistent threat of legal challenge. 'I know there's no question places like California have thumbed their nose at the American people and decided they want to be a sanctuary for criminals,' Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said Monday, adding, 'I think he's exercising exactly what he said he'd do and what people elected him' to do. Trump advisers say the president also points to the fact that he got more votes in California in 2024 than in his previous campaigns, even though he still badly lost the heavily Democratic-leaning state. The administration's response to the protests does seem to have one eye on the reaction in conservative media, a space increasingly dominated by pro-Trump influencers. Some of those influencers have been posting from the protests — most notably Phil McGraw, a well-known Trump supporter better known as 'Dr. Phil,' who embedded with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents during the Los Angeles raids, as he did during similar immigration raids in Chicago this year. The Trump adviser, asked about McGraw's involvement, said: 'This is an important moment in American history. People have a right to see it in a way not unfairly skewed by a biased mainstream media.' The adviser wouldn't elaborate on how McGraw, whose presence was first reported by CNN, was able to have front-line access to the federal immigration operations. A spokesman for McGraw didn't respond to a request for comment. Republicans more broadly also see the fight as a political winner and say Democrats are functionally taking the bait on an issue in which polling has given Trump an advantage. 'I think it is a symptom of how far left this party has done when you have major Democrats standing on the side of illegal aliens that are torching vehicles,' Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis told Fox News on Monday. 'It is one of the reasons the Democratic Party is struggling so much nationally,' he added. Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and former Trump administration official, said the raids shouldn't be a surprise because immigration is a 'legitimate issue' the voters have signaled they care about. 'There is no political upside in defending or denying the images of burning cars, rioters and looting and the destruction,' he said of Democrats. 'A feeling that things have spun out of control in California and that government can't effectively govern. … It has changed the conversation from illegal immigration to a breakdown in society.' Still, there has been some disagreement — at least in public messaging — about how far to push in going after California Democrats, a break between what may be politically popular with the base and what's politically realistic. The clearest example centers on the Trump administration's authorizing the deployment of National Guard troops over the opposition of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have argued that inserting National Guard troops will inflame tensions and potential violence — a response that has led Trump to signal he would consider arresting Newsom if he were to continue what the administration considers to be his interference. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to his 'border czar,' Tom Homan. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity. But I do think it would be a great thing.' While detaining Newsom would no doubt please Trump's MAGA base, White House officials privately say it's not currently in the cards. 'It's not being actively planned or considered,' a senior White House official said. 'But anyone who breaks federal law puts themselves at risk of being arrested. That's just a basic fact.' A second White House official said that if either Newsom or Bass, a former Democratic congresswoman, do something at odds with federal immigration law, they could be detained. But the official also acknowledged that the optics of arresting California officials amid an immigration fight they believe most Americans support could backfire with some Republican voters because, at the moment, it doesn't appear they have actually broken any immigration laws. The official said there isn't some grand strategy to deploy National Guard troops in blue cities across the country; the administration is simply waiting to see whether other protests get out of control. Meanwhile, Newsom has leaned into the threats, practically daring the administration to arrest him rather than focusing on the protesters. 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me,' Newsom told MSNBC on Sunday. Referring to Homan, he added: 'That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' On Monday, California sued the Trump administration, arguing that Trump's federalizing the state's National Guard is 'unlawful.' 'Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion,' Democratic state Attorney General Rob Bonta said. 'The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president's authority under the law — and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.' Trump supporters have lined up behind him, with some even offering to head to Los Angeles to help, despite having no law enforcement experience. 'Preparing to deploy … to Los Angeles,' vocal Trump supporter Benny Johnson said on X. He followed up with a post to his 3.7 million followers showing him wearing military-style gear with his name on it. The increasingly contentious political fight over Los Angeles, administration officials admit, is no longer about just deporting those with criminal records, which was Trump's main pitch to voters on the campaign trail. On Monday, an MSNBC host asked Homan whether everyone ICE has arrested as part of the Trump administration's immigration efforts had criminal records, and he had a blunt response. 'Absolutely not,' he said.
