Stunning, $14M fairy-tale estate could stand in for a Disney castle — and now it's getting a big discount
A Disney-esque castle in the Midwest just got a $500,000 price cut.
In 1869, King Ludwig II of Bavaria commissioned a castle in the remote reaches of the Alps, long after such fairy-tale residences had any utility to modern monarchies. The fantastical dream of Germany's Neuschwanstein Castle found a devotee in the late Deon Heiner, whose Wyoming castle hit the market in April 2024.
Heiner's extravagant home, first priced at $14 million, is newly available for $13.5 million, Mansion Global reported.
5 An aerial of the 9,470-square-foot home in Bedford, Wyoming.
Ken Speakman
5 The home's tallest turret rises 100 feet into the air.
Ken Speakman
The 9,470-square-foot castle, located in Bedford, Wyoming, comes with towers, turrets, ramparts and lookouts worthy of a princess.
Heiner, a businessman in the construction industry, built the five-bedroom, seven-bathroom brick castle in 1992. Just the process of laying the 1 million bricks was necessary to build up the original home took eight years, according to Cowboy State Daily.
The castle, which Heiner reportedly modeled after Neuschwanstein Castle, has all the dressings of a royal seat – turrets on the corners, stone balconies, cast-iron windows and vaulted ceilings. There's even an underground tunnel system with secret entrances, according to the listing.
The tallest turret, accessed by a stainless steel spiral staircase, reaches 100 feet into the air, offering 360-degree views of rural forest and mountains.
5 Large windows throughout the property let in natural light.
Ken Speakman
5 The enchanted property sits on 37 acres.
Ken Speakman
5 The copper rooftops have developed a green patina over the years.
Ken Speakman
The property's listing agent, Patty Speakman of Compass, told The Post that she imagines the home's next owner will enjoy its relative seclusion, unique architecture and sweeping vistas.
'It sits on the top of the hill, and you've got views in every direction,' Speakman said. 'It's just a beautiful location.'
Despite the exterior's romantic design, the estate's 40 rooms enjoy the benefit of modern amenities, like large windows that let in ample light and imported stone floors with in-floor heating.
There's also a secure vault room, a rampart greenhouse, a game room and a gym.
The 37 wooded acres upon which the castle sits include walking and biking trails, according to the listing, and a brick perimeter encloses the expansive grounds.
Should the castle's next owner find themselves unable to traverse the property's facsimile moat, they can always access the home in one other way — via its helipad.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
This $10M brutalist English mansion once held a Cold War-era secret
This recently listed brutalist mansion comes with an explosive history. The $10 million property in England resides in the footprint of a Cold War-era torpedo testing site. The listing, held by Daniel Killick of Savills, was first reported by Mansion Global. 12 The mansion was built in the footprint of the domed torpedo testing facility. Savills 12 A man stands in the domed laboratory atop a mechanical arm, which was used to test underwater explosives. Alamy Stock Photo The two-story home makes up part of the blast-proof concrete wall encircling a sunken grassy courtyard, evoking a cross between ancient ruins and a lunar base. A brutalist modern architectural firm, Norman & Dawbarn, was charged with transforming the historic building into a family residence in the early 2000s. The resulting crescent-shaped, low-lying abode is light, airy and spacious. A visitor to the property between the 1950s and 1993 would have been greeted with a far more imposing edifice. The former military testing site was built around a massive circular water tank measuring 151 feet across — about the size of an Olympic swimming pool — with a domed copper roof to deter spies. Norman & Dawbarn made ample use of materials like concrete, aluminum and copper, according to the brokerage, in an ode to the home's former life. The firm's brutalist style can be found in the property's bold geometric lines, curved walls and utilitarian layout. 12 The home's brutalist design pays homage to the site's militaristic past. Savills 12 Midcentury-modern touches accent the interiors, including the dynamic front door and metallic stairs. Savills 12 Natural light flows into the large reception rooms. Savills 12 The heavy use of concrete and metal gives the interiors a raw quality. Savills 12 The stark, metallic kitchen. Savills 12 An upstairs bedroom. Savills 12 A utilitarian bathroom. Savills The first floor features a metallic kitchen and three reception rooms. The open floor plan is bathed in natural light from an abundance of large, rectangular glass windows. Curving metal staircases connect to the second floor, consisting of six bedrooms, all with ensuite bathrooms. The 10,113-square-foot residence also features two subterranean levels that haven't been resorted since the Cold War days, Killick told Mansion Global. Raw remnants of the site, including a section of empty tank and winding tunnels, can be accessed through a basement door, according to a previous Daily Mail profile of the property. 12 One of the unfinished subterranean floors. Savills 12 The property is surrounded by lush gardens. Savills 12 The home sits 'in the heart' of London's 1,100-acre Bushy Park, according to Savills. Savills 'It is a privilege to bring this incredible home to market and to be involved with the sale of one of south west London's most significant houses,' said Killick in a statement. The 1.3-acre gated property also boasts a rare location. Just past the property's red brick wall is the 1,100-acre Bushy Park, London's second largest royal park.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?
Apple and Disney are both huge players in the entertainment sector. The question is, when it comes to Apple vs. Disney stock, which is the smarter investment? This guide will walk you through the ins and outs of both and whether or not you should buy Apple or Disney. Find Out: Read Next: Apple has consistently outperformed Disney in terms of revenue and profit margins. As of recent earnings reports, Apple boasts higher revenue figures, driven primarily by even its relatively soft iPhone sales, the services segment and expanding product ecosystem. Here are some key considerations when it comes to investing in Apple stock: Stock price: $203.64 Market cap: $3.01 trillion 52-week high: $260.10 52-week low: $169.21 Dividend yield: 0.51% Discover More: Disney has faced some headwinds lately, particularly in its streaming division and theme park operations. While its streaming service, Disney+, has gained traction, the company's financials have struggled to maintain profitability in its direct-to-consumer segment. Here are things you should consider as an investor: Stock price: $113.91 Market cap: $203.06 billion 52-week high: $118.63 52-week low: $80.10 Dividend yield: 0.88% For investors and stockbrokers seeking stability, strong cash flow and a proven growth trajectory, Apple appears to be the better overall buy. Its financial strength, diverse revenue sources and ability to innovate make it a compelling choice. However, for those willing to take on more risk in hopes of a turnaround story, Disney could present a long-term value opportunity if its streaming and entertainment segments regain and keep momentum. When comparing Apple and Disney stock, there are a few main factors to consider. Apple's growth strategy revolves around innovation, subscription-based services, and emerging markets. With new product launches for everything from MacBook Air M4 and iPhone 16s and expansion into artificial intelligence, Apple is well-positioned to sustain its revenue growth and remain a strong buy because of how it has been performing. Furthermore, its substantial cash reserves allow for aggressive stock buybacks and dividend payouts, making it an attractive investment. Disney's long-term growth potential hinges on its content dominance and the recovery of its theme parks. While the company owns valuable intellectual property, including Marvel, Star Wars and Pixar, competition in the streaming industry remains fierce. Still, analysts project an average stock price target of about $130 in 2025. The success of Disney+ and other streaming ventures will play a crucial role in the company's future performance, but its stock still comes in with a buy recommendation. Neither of these stocks could be considered a bad buy, but factor in your risk tolerance before investing in one company's stock over the other. That said, if you can only invest in one of these companies, Apple is considered more reliable and currently a better value than Disney. Yes, in general, Apple stock (AAPL) is often considered a stronger investment compared to Disney stock (DIS), especially for those seeking stability and proven growth. In many analysts' opinions, Apple's strong financial performance, diverse revenue streams and consistent innovation have led to significant returns for investors, whereas Disney stock may be undervalued due to relying on the Walt Disney Company's theme park attendance and box office performance. Editor's note: Company stock information is accurate as of Jun 3, 2025, and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ad-Supported Streaming Reaches 100 Million Subscriptions, Antenna Finds
The adoption of ad-supported tiers is on the rise, with Antenna finding that ad-supported streaming hit a total of roughly 100 million subscriptions at the end of the first quarter of 2025, up from 53 million two years prior. Per the new report from the research firm, 65% of ad-supported subscriptions in the U.S. were made up of new users, compared to 23% that were 'win backs,' who previously subscribed to a service, canceled, and resubscribed to the ad-supported tier, and 11% that were 'traders,' who switched from an ad-free tier. Hulu had the largest share of ad-supported plans in the first quarter at 24%, followed by Peacock at 22%, Netflix at 15%, Paramount+ and Disney+ at 14% each, Max at 8% and Discovery+ at 3%. When looking more closely at Netflix, Antenna found that 44% of ad-supported subscribers were new users, compared to 69% for all other streamers. Meanwhile, about 40% were traders who switched from an ad-free tier and 16% were win backs, compared to 6% and 25% for the rest of the streamers, respectively, while 16% were win backs, compared to 25%. The new data comes as both Nielsen and the streamers themselves offered their own updates about the state of their ad-supported progress during upfronts week in May. Disney reported a total of 164 million monthly active users globally across Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+, up from 157 million in January. Meanwhile, Netflix surpassed 94 million monthly active users. Amazon's Prime Video claimed an audience of more than 130 million in the U.S. alone, up from 115 million previously, with a 37% increase in monthly viewing hours. When combining the streamer with Amazon's other owned and operated entertainment properties such as Twitch, MGM Studios, Wondery and Amazon Music, the tech giant's entertainment portfolio reaches an average monthly ad-supported audience of more than 300 million. NBCUniversal noted its entire portfolio reaches 286 million people a month, with 95% of that being ad-supported. Peacock has nearly 100 million monthly active users, according to Comcast. Paramount ad chief John Halley told TheWrap that the company reaches a total of 115 million ad-supported viewers per month across its streaming footprint. Warner Bros. Discovery, which has a total of 122.3 million direct-to-consumer subscribers globally across Max, Discovery+ and traditional HBO cable subscriptions, did not break out its ad-supported viewership for Max, but said the base in the U.S. has doubled in the past year, with roughly half of new subscribers choosing that option. Per Nielsen, ad-supported platforms across the media landscape accounted for 72.4% of TV viewing in the first quarter of 2025, compared to 27.6% for ad-free platforms. Cable and broadcast made up roughly 28.9% and 28.7% of ad-supported viewing, respectively, while streaming accounted for the remaining 42.4%. The post Ad-Supported Streaming Reaches 100 Million Subscriptions, Antenna Finds appeared first on TheWrap.
