Raytheon's GhostEye perfectly tracks high-speed cruise missile, completes live-fire test
The system detected and tracked a high-speed cruise missile and guided a Patriot Advanced Capability-2 (PAC-2) Guidance Enhanced Missile-T (GEM-T) to defend against the surrogate threat, according to Raytheon.
The milestone is the latest in a rigorous U.S. Army test program, advancing towards fielding the 360-degree, full-sector radar, according to the company.
Tom Laliberty, president of Land and Air Defense Systems at Raytheon, this most recent test represents a significant milestone for both Raytheon and the Army, demonstrating the combat-proven PAC-2 GEM-T interceptor with the transformational LTAMDS radar, a GhostEye family of radars."LTAMDS will further enhance Patriot's unmatched air defense capabilities, helping the Army and customers around the globe defend against increasingly complex threats."
LTAMDS has three antenna arrays – a primary array on the front, and two secondary arrays on the back. They work together, detecting and engaging multiple threats from any direction at the same time.
The company revealed that this was the latest in a series of LTAMDS live-fire events highlighting the capabilities of the advanced 360-degree radar and its integration with the Army's Integrated Air and Missile Defense architecture.The LTAMDS program is executing to an aggressive schedule, with multiple radars being utilized for simultaneous testing and integration at various Raytheon and USG test locations, according to the company.
Live fire ensures combat-proven effector's performance with LTAMDS, as per Raytheon.
Raytheon revealed that tests have increased in complexity to stress the radar and prove its capabilities against real and representative threat sets. Throughout, LTAMDS has met complex objectives and showcased the performance of the radar. The program is expected to achieve Milestone C, the official transition from development to production, in second quarter of FY2025.
International interest in LTAMDS is strong, with more than a dozen countries requesting information and receiving briefings, according to the company.
In August 2024, Raytheon was awarded a U.S. Army contract valued at more than $2 billion to deliver radars for the U.S. and Poland. With this Foreign Military Sale, Poland is the first international customer to add LTAMDS to their air and missile defense architecture, according to a press release.
In January, the company was also awarded a $529 million contract to supply the Netherlands with a Patriot air and missile defense system fire unit and related equipment. This contract supports the replenishment of a Patriot fire unit donated to Ukraine.
The direct commercial sales contract includes a single fire unit consisting of a radar, launchers, command and control stations, and other support equipment.
Raytheon, which is a leading provider of defense solutions to help the U.S. government and its allies, has developed new technologies and enhanced existing capabilities in integrated air and missile defense, smart weapons, missiles, advanced sensors and radars, interceptors, space-based systems, hypersonics and missile defense across land, air, sea and space.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Macquarie to Buy Stake in Portuguese Hospital Group Luz Saude
Macquarie Group Ltd. is set to buy a minority stake in Portuguese hospital operator Luz Saude SA, outbidding rivals CVC Capital Partners Plc and KKR & Co., according to people familiar with the matter. Sydney-based Macquarie agreed to purchase about 40% of Luz Saude from Fidelidade-Companhia de Seguros SA, a Portuguese insurer controlled by Chinese conglomerate Fosun International Ltd, said the people, who asked not to be named because the information is confidential. The deal could be signed in the coming days and would give Luz Saude an enterprise value of more than €1 billion, one of the people said.
CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
Chocolate, skincare and timepieces: What 39% tariffs on Swiss goods mean for U.S. consumers
U.S. buyers of Swiss products, from luxury watches and skincare to artisan chocolates, could soon face sharp price rises if negotiators are unable to strike a deal to avert 39% tariffs due to come into effect on Thursday. The announcement last week that Switzerland faces one of the highest U.S. tariff rates in the world stunned many politicians, analysts and businesses, who had thought the country was close to negotiating a deal similar to those of the European Union and U.K., which got baseline rates of 15% and 10% respectively. The U.S. has a hefty trade deficit with Switzerland, totaling $38.3 billion in 2024. The Swiss government points out that the gap is in part because of the latter's status as the world's biggest center of gold refining, with huge quantities of the precious metal passing through the country for processing before it is sent around the world. Both gold and silver were exempted from the White House's "reciprocal tariff" policy launched in April. The U.S. is also a major importer of Swiss pharmaceuticals, an industry that has been mired in confusion over the tariff rates it will face, and medical devices. Pharma products are currently exempt from the 39% levies, though sector-specific tariffs may yet come under the U.S.'s separate Section 232 investigation. But consumers will mostly be familiar with the Alpine country's high-end products, from Rolex watches to premium skincare and beauty products. Sales could be rocked if the 39% tariffs remain in place for an extended period — something Swiss negotiators are currently scrambling to avoid, as economists warn of a massive hit to growth, jobs and stocks. The U.S. was the biggest overseas market for Swiss watches in 2024, with exports totaling 4.37 billion Swiss francs ($5.4 billion), according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. To qualify as Swiss-made, at least 60% of a watch's production cost must be Swiss-based, while its technical development must be conducted in the country. "Swiss watches have long been a cornerstone of the U.S. market, and a 39% tariff would be a real shake-up," Paul Altieri, founder and CEO of online resale platform Bob's Watches, told CNBC. "Suddenly, every import would carry a hefty extra cost, and dealers would face tough choices — absorb the tariff, eat into margins, or pass it on to customers. You'd likely see longer lead times as brands and retailers realign logistics, and higher sticker prices across the board." The retail price of a Rolex Submariner could jump from $10,000 to nearly $14,000, he noted. For Swiss watch businesses, a 39% tariff would be "devastating," Jean-Philippe Bertschy, head of Swiss equity research at Vontobel, told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe" on Tuesday. "They increased the prices already in spring by an average of 5 to 10%, I think another hit will be quite difficult for the U.S. consumer for sure, especially for the entry into the mid-segment level." In a research note, Vontobel flagged Swatch as vulnerable to a tariff hit, with shares falling 2.3% on Monday. "For the luxury watches, for the brands like Rolex, Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet, you have some long waiting lists. So I think it's going to be more comfortable for these companies to increase the prices," Bertschy continued. "You have very limited measures to take. You can, of course, increase efficiencies and to try to do some other measures to counter U.S. tariffs, but overall, very challenging for the industry." Consumer goods giant Nestlé is one of Switzerland's biggest firms. The company says that it faces a minimal direct impact from tariffs because it produces more than 90% of what it sells in the U.S. locally. That's generally the case for consumer staples such as instant coffee or bottled water which are high-volume, low-ticket items, James Edwardes Jones, managing director of consumer research at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe." Its popular Nespresso coffee brand, known for at-home coffee machines and capsule pods, could, however, be among those goods exposed to higher rates and therefore price hikes. "In Nestle's case specifically, Nespresso is all manufactured in Switzerland and then exported around the world, so it seems likely that will be caught in a small way," Edwardes Jones added. Nestle did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for comment on the impact of Swiss levies. The company does not specify the level of its U.S. sales for Nespresso, but its half-year results showed North America grew at a "strong double-digit rate." Switzerland's world-renowned beauty and skincare products could also be subject to price hikes as brands not included in a pharmaceutical tariff exemption look to offset higher import costs. That could be most notable for companies that pride themselves on Swiss production, such as caviar-based anti-aging skincare brand La Prairie, spa supplier Valmont and nail care business Mavala, none of which responded to CNBC's request for comment. "While Swiss firms can generally weather a 10-15% tariff without major margin erosion or demand loss, 39% sets the bar much higher," Lombard Odier said in a Monday note. Lausanne-headquartered Galderma, whose products include injectable aesthetics and Cetaphil facewash, meanwhile, said that it does not produce in Switzerland and is currently largely excluded from global tariffs under pharma exemptions. However, its large production capacity in the European Union, U.K. and Canada could be subject to higher levies, potentially hitting consumer costs. Higher import duties are also seen pushing up the price of luxury goods, including Richemont-owned high-end jewelry brands Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels. BofA Securities said in a note Tuesday that 7% of Richemont's input costs would be exposed to higher Swiss tariffs, likely adding to higher consumer prices. "Price increases would be the most obvious way to mitigate the headwind," the analysts wrote. Richemont did not respond to CNBC's request for comment on the 39% rate, however it flagged in its first-quarter earnings that tariffs could lead to "increased prices," which could impact consumer demand. Lombard Odier noted that a "small fraction" of luxury exports could see demand for their products increase with price, but broadly price hikes were set to hurt consumer demand. Roger Wehrli, director of Swiss chocolatiers' manufacturing association Chocosuisse, said a 39% tariff rate would be passed on via prices and cause a steep loss of U.S. business for many of the group's members. The recent appreciation of the Swiss franc against the U.S. dollar, which causes imports to become more expensive, means the effective price increase would be closer to 55%, he noted. The main impact will be on small- and medium-sized businesses that are unable to utilize U.S. production sites like big multinationals can, Wehrli said. Industry juggernauts Lindt & Sprüngli and Barry Callebaut already have factories stateside, while smaller Chocosuisse members such as Camille Bloch and Läderach produce exclusively in Switzerland. "There's another specific problem with producing in the United States," Wehrli continued. "If you want to label your chocolate as Swiss then it has to be produced in Switzerland. That's a quality sign in the international market, so you will more or less lose your customers if it's not Swiss origin anymore," Wehrli told CNBC. These rules of origin forced Toblerone, owned by U.S. group Mondelez International, to change its packaging in 2023 to refer to itself as being "established in Switzerland" rather than "Swiss chocolate" after it moved some of its production from the Swiss capital Bern to Slovakia. CNBC has contacted Mondelez for comment on the impact of tariffs on Toblerone in the U.S.
Fox News
8 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump lifts veil on US submarines in warning shot to Kremlin in 'clever' repositioning move
President Donald Trump broke with decades of strategic silence when he publicly revealed the repositioning of U.S. nuclear-powered submarines in a thinly veiled warning to Russia. The announcement — targeted at Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman and former President Dmitry Medvedev after his latest nuclear threats — sent shockwaves through the defense world not just for its provocation, but for the sheer fact that it was said out loud. Presidents have long moved military assets like aircraft carriers and bombers to signal resolve. But submarines, especially the covert, nuclear-powered kind, are rarely mentioned. "We rarely, if ever, talk about submarine movements unless there's been an undeniable accident," Gene Moran, a former Navy captain and Pentagon strategic advisor, told Fox News Digital. Plenty of other military assets — Patriot batteries, aircraft carriers, even B-52 bombers — are deployed publicly to send a diplomatic message. But this time, the secretive nature of the nuclear submarine positioning may have been the reason for the choice. "Submarine deployments are unverifiable," said Moran. "That's what gives them strategic value, but also what makes this announcement clever — if you're aiming for a headline." Vice Admiral Mike Connor, former commander of U.S. submarine forces, said Trump's statement may have sounded bold, but was in fact consistent with long-standing doctrine. "He didn't really give away too much," Connor, who now serves as CEO of maritime tech company ThayerMahan, told Fox News Digital. "It's generally understood, by our potential adversaries, that our submarines are out there, have been out there for 60-plus years, and are able to strike pretty much where they want, when they want, if needed." "It's a more gentle message done this way," Connor added. "It's not really in your face. It's just a reminder of what already exists." The president was vague in revealing his plans, only announcing that nuclear submarines would be positioned in the "appropriate regions" following Medvedev's accusations that he was escalating the war. Trump told reporters Sunday the submarines are "already in the region, where they should be." Moran said Trump may have simply aligned a routine rotation with a strategic message. "It doesn't cost anything," he said. "But if you do it repeatedly, it begins to reveal where your thresholds are. That has long-term consequences." He also cast doubt on the depth of coordination behind the announcement. "Submarines don't just move at the snap of a finger." Matthew Shoemaker, a former defense intelligence official, echoed that point. "It's certainly unusual to announce it from an operational perspective," he said, "which means this is primarily about sending a message to the Russians rather than trying to achieve a military goal." Meanwhile, Trump's frustration with Putin has grown in recent weeks amid stalled negotiations to end the war, prompting him to scale back the deadline for Russia to agree to a peace deal this week. Trump's disclosure of the submarine presence puts additional pressure on Russia to come to the negotiating table, according to Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer and director of the Hudson Institute think tank's Center for Defense Concepts and Technology. "We have used very sparingly submarines to try to influence adversary behavior before, but this is pretty unusual, to do it against a nuclear-powered adversary like Russia in response to a nuclear threat by Russia," Clark told Fox News Digital Monday. "So I think this is trying to essentially push back on Russia's frequent and long-standing threats to use nuclear weapons in part of the Ukraine conflict." Mark Cancian, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, believes it's more likely that two already-deployed U.S. submarines were repositioned rather than any new vessels dispatched. "At any one time there are about a dozen U.S. submarines deployed," he said. "We probably just moved two of them to different spots. There hasn't been any report of new submarine sailings — you'd have heard about that." Retired Navy Capt. Todd Sawhill, who served as a targeting expert with the Joint Staff and U.S. Central Command, said there's precedent for moving submarines in response to tensions — but rarely is it spoken of this openly. "It is atypical to have a sitting president telegraph it so plainly," Sawhill said. "It's consistent with Trump's desire to direct-message, so in that sense it's not surprising. But it's not how these things are usually done." Experts agree that once a U.S. submarine leaves port, it becomes difficult — though not impossible — for adversaries to track. "These are very tightly controlled pieces of information," Cancian said. "The U.S. has good confidence that deployed submarines aren't being followed — though we've been wrong before." Shoemaker noted that geography plays a significant role. "The closer one gets to an adversary's shores, the more likely they can find and track our subs," he said. "So it depends on where exactly these subs are sent near Russia." Moran added that both sides exaggerate their tracking capabilities. "It's easy to claim you know where your adversary is. But with modern submarines, that's a very difficult task." Connor also pointed to a recent case that underscored the low-profile potency of submarines. "A few weeks ago, there was a strike on Iranian nuclear weapon component manufacturing sites," he said. "There was a lot of noise about the fact that some Air Force planes flew from the U.S. and struck two deeply buried targets. And it was more or less a side note that a submarine — who knows which one or where it was —struck 30 targets at the same time." "It's a capability that's always there, not often used and doesn't need to be talked about too overtly to be effective." But unlike the Iran strikes, it appears improbable that the submarines dispatched in response to increased tension with Russia would see the same kind of action, according to Clark. That's because the U.S. hasn't directly intervened militarily to back Ukraine, and the locations where these submarines operate are not best suited to launch attacks against Russian adversaries since the cruise missiles would go over NATO countries like Romania, Clark said. "It's unlikely to be a cruise missile attack that we threaten or even conduct," Clark said. "I think it's much more likely that we will be using attack submarines to sort of convey to the Russians that we can hold important targets of their own at risk if they do decide to escalate." Asked whether Russia might respond with its own maneuvers, Shoemaker was unequivocal: "Yes, almost certainly. Russia routinely and historically likes to do comparable responses to American actions." Moran pointed to a recent example from last year: "Russia moved ships near Cuba, and we responded by surfacing a submarine in Guantanamo Bay. That's a case of operational schedules aligning with an opportunity to send a message." But such cat-and-mouse signaling carries risk. "Missteps can be made. Things can be misinterpreted," Moran warned. "We've been here before." Connor agreed that the oceans will remain a chessboard of silent signaling. "Both countries have the freedom to operate as they would like in international waters," he said. "They've done that for decades and will likely continue to do so." The move appears to be part deterrence, part diplomacy. "[Trump] is showing annoyance with Russia's unwillingness to negotiate seriously on Ukraine. But more significantly, he's pushing back on Russia's nuclear saber-rattling — a pattern that's existed since the beginning of the war," said Cancian.
