
How a stronger US dollar will affect Middle East start-up funding
The expected strengthening of the US dollar as President Donald Trump returns to office for another four-year term will have a mixed effect on start-up funding in the Middle East, according to analysts. The dollar has been volatile in recent weeks as tariff threats from Mr Trump and a reciprocal approach by those threatened by levies continue to dominate headlines. Early this year, the currency jumped to a two-year high, and Mr Trump's policies of proposed domestic tax cuts and tariffs are expected to restore the competitiveness of US manufacturing and further fuel these gains. The US Federal Reserve has also indicated that it will be more cautious in cutting interest rates this year to help curb inflation. For start-ups in the Middle East, the impact will be mixed. Countries that have their currencies pegged to the dollar, such as those in the Gulf, will feel a minimal effect. For venture capitalists, the region's stable inflation and robust economic growth are more attractive than volatile markets in the wider Mena. 'For economies that have their currencies pegged to the US dollar, like the GCC for example, the impact will be much smaller than other countries,' says Mohamed Hussain, an investment adviser. 'But for countries that have a floating or flexible currency, like Egypt, the impact is expected to be bigger.' The Egyptian pound has been devalued by about 70 per cent since 2022, and inflation has reached over 25 per cent since January 2023. While the devaluation could make investments in the country more affordable and perhaps even more attractive, the economic situation could also be a deterrent for investors. 'Although investors could find it attractive to invest in such markets, because of cheaper valuations and cheaper operational costs, it's important to remember that most of these companies would still need to operate in their local market,' Mr Hussain says. 'So, in most cases, their revenue will be in local currency, which could be a disadvantage, and therefore for these companies, it's important to consider revenue diversification.' According to Mr Hussain, investors are looking for exponential growth. This means that start-ups need to increase profit margins while keeping costs constant. In flexible currency markets, this can be challenging since costs constantly fluctuate. 'Investors are looking to maintain solid profitability and sustainability of the company in US dollar terms, which can be challenging in such markets,' he says. Milkup, a young Egyptian AgriTech start-up that recently graduated from 500 Global MENA, wants to start generating revenues before raising funds. It aims to approach Egyptian VCs since its operations are locally based, but it also believes that fund-raising rounds in the country would be considered too small for outside investors. 'GCC investors are looking for a $600,000-$700,000 round, where they will participate with two or three entities,' says Mohammed Nasser, co-founder of Milkup. 'If you ask them to give you $50k, it's not really within their remit. This is a counter intuitive challenge that Egyptian start-ups are facing at the moment, because they're so cheap, because operating costs are so cheap, finding a suitable venture capitalist partner from the GCC is ironically a bit of a challenge, because the amounts we're raising are so low.' Despite this, Egypt still ranked third in the Mena region in terms of start-up funding last year, mainly because of its large market size, according to data platform Magnitt. In 2024, start-ups in the country raised $329 million, with Saudi Arabia first ($750 million), followed by the UAE ($613 million). Start-ups in Lebanon raised $510,000 last year, a 54 per cent decrease compared to the previous year, according to Wamda. Investment challenges are leading many start-ups, such as Swvl, Podeo, Intella and Sideup, to relocate abroad, setting up their headquarters in the Gulf, particularly in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Some are moving their entire teams, while others are maintaining back offices where operations and talent costs are cheaper. Avo Manjerian, co-founder at Schedex in Lebanon, is now piloting his start-up in the UAE and plans to enter the market in the second quarter of this year. The company, which was set up in 2020, offers automated employee management and shift scheduling software as a service. With the local economy hit with hyperinflation, banking restrictions and more recently the war between Hezbollah and Israel, he is now prioritising sales and profitability. 'It is very difficult to fundraise because Lebanon is considered a very high-risk country,' he says. 'You're in a war zone and this is why we stopped fund-raising. We didn't even think about it from the start of the year and instead we focused on sales and growth,' Mr Manjerian says. 'We were growing 40 per cent month over month, then when the war came suddenly, we woke up and saw that our revenue decreased 80 per cent overnight.' Mr Manjerian aims to fundraise later this year after the UAE expansion. Looking ahead into 2025, Magnitt expects increased funding in the region as interest rates cool down. If the Fed implements additional rate cuts, it could encourage more investment into riskier asset classes, such as start-ups. 'What we've seen globally and in the region in the last few years, is a pull-out of investments in venture capital towards other asset classes, and we expect that as interest rates come down, we're going to be seeing the bottoming out of the venture capital slowdown, and more appetite for investments,' says Philip Bahoshy, chief executive of Magnitt. International capital accounts for about 30 per cent to 40 per cent of venture funding, and investors like SVC, Jada Funds of Funds, Dubai Future District Funds (DFDF) and Mubadala, among others, are some of the main drivers for investments in the region, he says. 'The reality is that it's still stimulated at a local perspective.' Mr Hussain also agrees that local investments are helping build and develop the region's start-up ecosystem, since seasonal investors can pull out their money and leave anytime. 'Despite anything that is happening in the short term, if the belief in the long term is that the region is going to grow and that there is opportunity here, which is the case, then investors will continue to invest in the region,' he says.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Khaleej Times
7 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
White House Chief of Staff's phone hacked; US opens probe
US federal authorities are investigating an effort to impersonate White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. The report said Wiles had told associates that some of her cellphone contacts had been hacked, allowing the impersonator to access private phone numbers. The incident affected her personal phone, not her government phone, the report said. The Journal reported that in recent weeks, senators, governors, top US business executives and other figures received messages and calls from a person who claimed to be Wiles, citing the people familiar with the messages. The White House has struggled with information security. A hacker who breached the communications service used by former Trump national security adviser Mike Waltz earlier this month intercepted messages from a broad swathe of American officials, Reuters reported recently. And late last year, a White House official said the US believed that an alleged sweeping Chinese cyber espionage campaign known as Salt Typhoon targeted and recorded telephone calls of "very senior" American political figures. As Wiles is a key Trump lieutenant and a lynchpin of the White House's operation, the content of her personal phone would be of extraordinary interest to a range of foreign intelligence agencies and other hostile actors. Wiles has reportedly been targeted by hackers at least once before, in the final months of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. At the time, hackers alleged by US authorities to be acting on behalf of Iran approached journalists and a political operative with a variety of messages sent to and from Wiles, some of which were eventually published.


Arabian Business
7 hours ago
- Arabian Business
Washington appeals court puts a stay on trade court's decision on tariffs
A federal appeals court in Washington has temporarily paused the Wednesday ruling of a trade court and reinstated President Donald Trump 's tariffs on Thursday – at least until June 9 when it hears the administration's arguments. The US Court of International Trade had earlier ruled that Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing the duties and ordered an immediate block on them. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will consider the Trump administration's appeal and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. President Trump has used federal emergency power to impose tariffs on most of the US's trading partners – including additional tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico – with the hope that the US will get concessions from them. In its ruling, the trade court said that only Congress had the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and not the president. It added that by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address threats during national emergencies, the president had exceeded his authority. In its appeal on Thursday, the Justice Department said the trading court's order was 'rife with legal error' and that it hamstrings the President's efforts 'to eliminate our exploding trade deficit and reorient the global economy on an equal footing'. Trump wrote a long post on his social media platform, Truth Social, calling it a 'country-threatening decision'. 'The US Court of International Trade incredibly ruled against the United States of America on desperately needed Tariffs but, fortunately, the full 11-Judge Panel on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has just stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade,' said the President. 'The ruling by the US Court of International Trade is so wrong, and so political! Hopefully, the Supreme Court will reverse this horrible, country-threatening decision, QUICKLY and DECISIVELY. Backroom 'hustlers' must not be allowed to destroy our Nation! 'The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs. In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around D.C. for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other Countries that are treating us unfairly. If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power – The Presidency would never be the same!' While most world leaders chose to be diplomatic in their reaction to the trade court ruling, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed it, saying it was 'consistent with Canada's longstanding position' that Trump's tariffs were 'unlawful, as well as unjustified'. The Liberty Justice Center, the non-profit group representing five small businesses that sued over the tariffs, said the appeals court's temporary stay was a procedural step. Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel for the center, said the appeals court would ultimately agree with the small businesses that faced irreparable harm of 'the loss of critical suppliers and customers, forced and costly changes to established supply chains, and, most seriously, a direct threat to the very survival of these businesses.'


Zawya
8 hours ago
- Zawya
Trump's tariffs to remain in effect after appeals court grants stay
A federal appeals court temporarily reinstated the most sweeping of President Donald Trump's tariffs on Thursday, a day after a U.S. trade court ruled that Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing the duties and ordered an immediate block on them. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington said it was pausing the lower court's ruling to consider the government's appeal, and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. Wednesday's surprise ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade had threatened to kill or at least delay the imposition of Trump's so-called Liberation Day tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners and additional tariffs on goods from Canada, Mexico and China. The latter was related to his accusation that the three countries were facilitating the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. The trade court's three-judge panel ruled that the Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address threats during national emergencies. Senior Trump administration officials had said they were undeterred by the trade court's ruling, saying they expected either to prevail on appeal or employ other presidential powers to ensure the tariffs go into effect. Trump has used the threat of charging U.S. importers costly tariffs for goods from almost every other country in the world as leverage in international trade talks, a strategy the trade court's ruling would upend. The trade court ruling had not interfered with any negotiations with top trading partners that are scheduled in the days ahead, Trump's administration said. Trump himself wrote in a statement shared on social media that he hoped the U.S. Supreme Court would "reverse this horrible, Country threatening decision" of the trade court, while lambasting the judicial branch of government as anti-American. "The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs," Trump wrote on Thursday evening. "If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power — The Presidency would never be the same! This decision is being hailed all over the World by every Country, other than the United States of America." Many U.S. trading partners offered careful responses. The British government said the trade court's ruling was a domestic matter for the U.S. administration and noted it was "only the first stage of legal proceedings." Both Germany and the European Commission, the European Union's executive arm, said they could not comment on the decision. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the trade court's finding was "consistent with Canada's longstanding position" that Trump's tariffs were unlawful. Financial markets, which have whipsawed in response to the twists and turns in Trump's chaotic trade war, reacted with cautious optimism to the trade court ruling, though gains in stocks on Thursday were largely limited by expectations that the court's ruling faced a potentially lengthy appeals process. Indeed, analysts said broad uncertainty remained regarding the future of Trump's tariffs, which have cost companies more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher costs, according to a Reuters analysis. Some sector-specific tariffs, such as on imports of steel, aluminum and automobiles, were imposed by Trump under separate authorities on national security grounds and were unaffected by the ruling. The Liberty Justice Center, the nonprofit group representing five small businesses that sued over the tariffs, said the appeals court's temporary stay was a procedural step. Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel for the center, said the appeals court would ultimately agree with the small businesses that faced irreparable harm of "the loss of critical suppliers and customers, forced and costly changes to established supply chains, and, most seriously, a direct threat to the very survival of these businesses." A separate federal court earlier on Thursday also found that Trump overstepped his authority in using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for what he called reciprocal tariffs of at least 10% on goods from most U.S. trading partners and for the separate 25% levies on goods from Canada, Mexico and China related to fentanyl. That ruling was much narrower, however, and the relief order stopping the tariffs applied only to the toy company that brought the case. The administration has appealed that ruling as well. UNCERTAINTY PERSISTS Following a market revolt after his major tariff announcement on April 2, Trump paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive, and the trade court's ruling on the tariffs and the uncertainty of the appeals process may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing into deals, analysts said. "Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs - which can't exceed 15% for the time being," said George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers. The trade court ruling would have lowered the overall effective U.S. tariff rate to about 6%, but the appellate court's emergency stay means it will remain at about 15%, according to estimates from Oxford Research. That is the level it has been since Trump earlier this month struck a temporary truce that reduced punishing levies on Chinese goods until late summer. By contrast, the effective tariff rate had been between 2% and 3% before Trump returned to office in January. Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and sneakers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen. Drinks company Diageo and automakers General Motors and Ford are among those that have abandoned forecasts for the year ahead. Non-U.S. companies including Honda, Campari , Roche and Novartis have said they are considering moving operations or expanding their U.S. presence to mitigate the impact of tariffs. (Reporting by Summer Zhen, Samuel Indyk and Sarah Marsh; Additional reporting by Luc Cohen, Doina Chiacu, Nicholas P. Brown and David Ljunggren; Writing by Joseph Ax, Jonathan Allen, Dan Burns and Barbara Lewis; Editing by Catherine Evans, Giles Elgood, Nick Zieminski, Matthew Lewis and Leslie Adler)