Authorities investigate reason Mexican navy ship crashed into Brooklyn Bridge
Authorities are piecing together what happened when a Mexican navy ship struck the Brooklyn Bridge, killing two people, over the weekend.
Marine experts have said the tide and water conditions in the narrow passage were to blame, while the mayor of New York and police have argued the captain of the ship lost control due to mechanical issues.
Meanwhile, in a statement distributed to US media, a spokesperson for the city's Office of Emergency Management said the Cuauhtemoc was headed in the wrong direction and it never intended to sail under the bridge.
Here's what we know.
Onlookers were horrified as they saw the navy training ship crash into the bridge at full speed.
The vessel collided with the underside of the bridge and the mast snapped away as it drifted toward the promenade, where footage shows onlookers fleeing as it inched closer.
Sailors could also be seen on the rigging of the damaged mast but no-one fell into the water, authorities said.
Nineteen people were injured in the collision.
One of the victims was 20-year-old cadet America Yamilet Sanchez, who fell from one of the ship's masts, the Associated Press confirmed.
Videos show heavy traffic in the area at 8:20pm, about the time of the incident.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum expressed regret at the loss of the two crew members.
"Our solidarity and support go out to their families," Ms Sheinbaum said on social media platform X.
The ship was on a promotional tour and was destined for Iceland.
The causes of the crash are yet to be confirmed but the National Transportation Safety Board is investigating.
New York Police Department Special Operations Chief Wilson Aramboles said an initial report suggested the pilot of the ship lost power due to a mechanical problem, though officials cautioned that information was preliminary.
At the time of the crash, the ship was moving through turbulent waters.
The tide had just turned and a fast current was heading up the East River as wind set in.
In the heavily trafficked New York Harbour, narrow channels, strong winds, and whirlpool eddies — circular currents that move against the flow — all contribute to a challenging passage.
Sal Mercogliano, a former merchant mariner who has powered multiple ships through the harbour, told the Associated Press all those "worst-case scenarios" — the ship's height, a strong current, heavy wind and the absence of a more controlled tugboat escort — all contributed to the tragedy.
"The prudent thing would've been to leave two hours earlier, when the tide was going out. That would've been the ideal time," said Mr Mercogliano, who writes a widely followed shipping blog.
"But I don't think they ever envisioned that their engine would've propelled them into the bridge."
Videos show a tugboat was close to the Cuauhtemoc at the time of the crash.
Tracking data from Marine Traffic and eyewitness videos show that the tugboat, the Charles D. McAllister, gently nudged the vessel as it backed astern into the channel but dropped off before the vessel turned.
Seconds later, as the ship continued drifting in the wrong direction, the tugboat tried to overtake the vessel but arrived too late to wedge itself between the fast-moving ship and the Brooklyn riverbank.
McAllister Towing, the company that would have operated the tug and been responsible for any docking pilot aboard, declined to comment.
Following last year's crash in Baltimore, Mr Mercogliano said port authorities there tightened rules to require a tug escort and slower speeds for vessels sailing through the harbour entrance past the partially collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge.
But the ship that caused that collision, the Dali, was 50 times heavier than the Cuauhtemoc.
Mr Mercogliano said investigators would evaluate whether the Mexican crew performed the recommended safety checks prior to their departure.
Typically, that involves testing the engine's propellers, rudder and propulsion six to 12 hours in advance to make sure everything is working properly and nothing is left to chance.
"It's not like your car where you're just throwing your shifter," he said.
The 142-year-old Brooklyn Bridge did not suffer serious damage.
Cargo and modern warships generally avoid the area due to the low height of the bridges in New York Harbour.
This is not the first time, however, that a ship has crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge.
According to The New York Times, in 1921, the Edward J. Lawrence struck the bridge as the schooner was being towed beneath the central span.
Some 10 years later, a freighter struck a steel beam on the bridge, damaging three of the ship's masts.
The captain blamed what he characterised as an abnormally high tide.
In 1986, a South Korean freight ship scraped the underside of the bridge, destroying one of the ship's radars.
The damaged ship was moored at Pier 35 in lower Manhattan and a stream of people, including investigators and crew, were seen disembarking the vessel.
The vessel is being assessed, and the coastguard has established a 46-metre safety zone around it.
A report from the National Transportation Safety Board could take months.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
12 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Bi-curious, cuck': Ex's brutal view of Diddy
An ex girlfriend of Sean 'Diddy' Combs has told a New York jury the star described himself as polyamorous and into 'voyeurism' as he liked to watch his partner sleep with other men. But she thought of the star more as a 'cuck' and someone potentially with repressed bisexual leanings. Giving testimony anonymously in Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial on Tuesday, US time, 'Jane' also said that she loved the music mogul but he did at times beat her. Also on Tuesday his legal team scored a victory with a possible witness now not allowed to take the stand. Combs has denied all the charges against him. Jane, who dated Combs up until his 2024 arrest is the second witness at the musician's trial to give evidence while keeping their identity secret. This is usually because of the sensitivity and personal nature of the evidence they are giving. Earlier, his ex-staff member 'Mia' also gave evidence alleging Combs raped and physically abused her. ' I would use the word cuck' Jane told the jury on Tuesday that Combs had told her he was into 'voyeurism' to explain why he enjoyed watching his female partner sleeping with male sex workers, reported the New York Post. But 'I would use the word cuck for him, more so,' she said. Jane explained that she had looked into the term, derived from 'cuckold,' which means a man who has an unfaithful wife. 'I was just trying to deep-dive all the reasons why [cucks] derived so much pleasure watching their woman be with other men'. She added that cucks 'could also have a lot of bi-curiosity that they're too ashamed to experience themselves, so they use the woman to venture out in this curiosity instead of actually doing the act themselves'. Polyamory Combs' lawyer Teny Geragos asked Jane 'What term did he use?' to describe his sexual proclivities. 'Polyamorous,' Jane responded. At first she said, she didn't mind as she assumed polyamory would mean all his partners would be treated 'evenly'. But Combs began to frustrate her when appeared to favour one woman and that 'looked like a monogamous relationship', she said. Another ex, Cassie Ventura, had earlier said at the trial that drug-fuelled sex sessions where she would have sex with male escorts were called 'freak offs'. But by the time Jane took part in them they were called 'hotel nights'. Teny Geragos, a lawyer for Combs asked Jane if she tried to be sexy for the Bad Boy Records founder during their 'hotel nights'. 'I don't think I tried, I think I did, and I was,' Jane responded. 'Because you're a beautiful woman,' Mr Geragos said. 'Thank you,' Jane replied. 'Do you love him?' Jane was also asked by the defence if 'you love him currently' referring to Combs. 'Yes,' said Jane. Previously, Jane had said Combs choked, kicked and punched her and then expected her to have sex with a male escort the same night. Before the forced sex-session, the mogul pressured Jane to take an ecstasy pill, saying, 'take this f***ing pill, you're not gonna ruin my f***ing night' and then told her to start having sex with the sex worker, despite her objections. The alleged incident was claimed to have taken place on June 18, 2024. That was a few months after Combs' homes were raided by federal officers in March and a few months before he was ultimately arrested in September for allegedly coercing women to have sex with male sex workers. On Tuesday, Combs' defence team scored a small legal victory when the judge overseeing the trial said prosecutors could not call a psychologist back to the stand. Dr Dawn Hughes testified earlier in the trial for the government. The defence team had hoped to bring back Dr Hughes to explain why domestic violence victims stay with their abusers. She could have helped blunt the defence argument that many of Combs' accusers could not have been fearful of the star because they remained either in a romantic or work relationship with him after his alleged attacks.

News.com.au
4 days ago
- News.com.au
NEWS OF THE WEEK: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs accuser sues Harvey Weinstein for sexual assault
Crystal McKinney, a former model, accused the disgraced movie mogul of sexually assaulting her and a friend at a hotel in New York City in 2003. The lawsuit against Weinstein was first filed anonymously on 28 February. It claimed that a modelling company executive set up a meeting for McKinney to "discuss a potential business opportunity" with Weinstein one evening on the pretence that meeting Weinstein would allow McKinney to "make it big". In her lawsuit, she alleged that the executive told her, "Don't f**k him until he puts you in a movie'.

ABC News
4 days ago
- ABC News
How Harvey Weinstein's New York rape and sexual assault retrial unfolded
Harvey Weinstein has admitted in an interview he "acted immorally" but maintained his innocence at the end of a six-week retrial in New York. Warning: This story contains details about sexual abuse that readers may find distressing Weinstein, the former Hollywood honcho turned #MeToo outcast, is charged in New York with raping Jessica Mann in 2013 and forcing oral sex on Miriam Haley and Kaja Sokola, separately, in 2006. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges and faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted. As Weinstein awaits his verdict in New York for a second time, here is how the past six weeks unfolded. Weinstein is on trial again after a New York state appeals court threw out his 2020 convictions, citing irregularities in the original proceedings. In particular, it included evidence from women whose charges were not part of the case. The former movie industry titan's 23-year prison sentence for the initial conviction was thrown out, but he remains imprisoned for separate offences in California. Miriam Haley returns to the courtroom at before Harvey Weinstein's retrial in state court in Manhattan on Friday, May 2. ( AP: John Angelillo/Pool ) Miriam Haley, who also goes by Mimi Haley, was the first accuser to take the stand. She also testified in Weinstein's first trial. Born in Finland and raised in Sweden, Ms Haley, 48, is a former entertainment producer now working in advertising. She met Weinstein through a mutual connection. She alleges Weinstein assaulted her after inviting her to stop by his apartment. She had worked briefly as a production assistant on the Weinstein-produced TV show Project Runway, and his company had booked her a flight to Los Angeles the next day to attend a movie premiere. She testified Weinstein backed her into a bedroom and pushed her onto a bed, holding her down as she tried to get up and pleaded: "No, no — it's not going to happen." Ms Haley and two of her friends testified she told them soon after that Weinstein had sexually assaulted her. She maintains she was never interested in any sexual or romantic relationship with Weinstein but still wanted his help professionally. Weinstein's lawyer, Jennifer Bonjean, questioned why Ms Haley would agree to go to Weinstein's apartment after being put off by some of his prior behaviour, including what she described as him barging into her home as he sought to persuade her to go to Paris with him. Ms Haley said she thought it would be "weird" to refuse the invitation to his Manhattan loft, since his company had paid for the LA flight she was taking the next day. Ms Haley stayed in continued, sporadic contact with Weinstein for about three years afterward, according to testimony and documents. At times, she asked him for work, premiere tickets and financial backing for an online TV show she was trying to launch. "The other stuff is neither here nor there. It doesn't mean that I wasn't sexually assaulted," Haley said. Ms Bonjean also queried her about her continued interactions with Weinstein and his assistants, about her frequent travels and famous acquaintances at the time, and her 2020 lawsuit against Weinstein. It ended in a $US475,000 ($730,000) settlement. Kaja Sokola Kaja Sokola arrives at Manhattan Criminal Court before Harvey Weinstein's trial on Wednesday, May 14, 2025. ( AP: John Angelillo/Pool ) Former model Kaja Sokola was the second accuser to testify in the retrial. Prosecutors spoke to her privately in 2020, but her claim was never told to the jury in the original trial. The Polish-born 39-year-old is a psychotherapist and author who recently launched a film production company. She sued Weinstein after industry whispers about his behaviour toward women became a chorus of public accusations in 2017. Ms Sokola eventually received $US3.5 million ($5.4 million) in compensation. The criminal charge stems from one instance when Ms Sokola maintains Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in a Manhattan hotel in May 2006. Ms Sokola began modelling at 14 but told jurors she was always more interested in acting, so she was hopeful when she was introduced to Weinstein at a New York nightclub in 2002 and he invited her to lunch to talk about acting. Instead, he steered her to his Manhattan apartment and told her to take her clothes off, saying that actors had to be comfortable disrobing in films, she testified. Ms Sokola took off her blouse and followed him into a bathroom because, she said, "I was 16 years old, and I was alone with a man for the first time, and I didn't know what else to do." She said she told Weinstein she objected to what was happening, but that he put his hand inside her underwear and made her touch his genitals. Ms Sokola said she saw Weinstein's eyes — "black and scary" — staring at her in a bathroom mirror as it happened. Afterward, she said, he told her to keep quiet, saying he had made Hollywood careers and could help her acting dreams come true. In 2006, Weinstein arranged for her to be an extra for a day in the film The Nanny Diaries, and he separately agreed to meet Ms Sokola and her visiting elder sister. After the three chatted, Ms Sokola said, Weinstein told her he had a script to show her in his hotel room, and she went up with him. There, she said, Weinstein pushed her onto a bed and stripped off her boots, her stockings, her underwear, and something indelible. "My soul was removed from me," she testified. She said he held her down while ignoring her pleas of "please don't, please stop, I don't want this." Ms Sokola said she tried to push him away but was no match against Weinstein's physical heft. She rejoined her sister but said nothing about being assaulted. Ms Sokola said she didn't want to tell her sister that Weinstein had treated her with such disrespect, she testified. Throughout a day of questioning, Weinstein's lawyer Mike Cibella suggested Ms Sokola hadn't told the full story of her interactions with Weinstein. He repeatedly asked whether she invited Weinstein up to a New York apartment — and into the bedroom — where she was staying in 2005. She denied it. Mr Cibella also presented Ms Sokola's journal, which she had kept for an alcohol abuse program, where she names at least two people who had sexually assaulted her, neither one of them Weinstein. She testified she didn't write about him because she couldn't come to terms with it at the time, and her sponsor was in the film business and knew who Weinstein was. Jessica Mann Jessica Mann arrives at state court in Manhattan for before the start of Harvey Weinstein's trial on Thursday, May 22, 2025. ( AP: Spencer Platt/Pool ) Jessica Mann was the last of the three accusers to testify in the retrial. She also spoke at the 2020 trial. Ms Mann, a cosmetologist and hairstylist, said she met Weinstein at a party in late 2012 or early 2013, when she was 27 and had recently moved to LA to try to launch an acting career. She said he took an interest in her ambitions, and they had a few follow-up meetings that alternated between professional talk and boundary-pushing, particularly a request for a massage that Ms Mann said she reluctantly gave him. Weinstein invited her to an Oscars bash that Ms Mann, new to Hollywood glitz, attended in her high-school prom dress. She said she wasn't attracted to Weinstein and initially refused his first sexual advance, but eventually succumbed to him performing oral sex because Weinstein said he would not let her leave until she let him "do something." Although she felt confused and "defiled," she then agreed to consensual encounters with the then-married man, she said. Partly, she worried about the professional consequences of alienating a powerful producer who had just dangled the prospect of movie roles. She also recalled thinking that "if I was in a relationship, maybe it would feel different," and that "maybe he did like me." In March 2013, she travelled to New York with a friend. After they made plans for breakfast with Weinstein, he showed up early and got a room at Ms Mann's hotel, over her protests, she said. Weeping on the witness stand, she said she went upstairs with Weinstein to try to avoid a public argument and told him, "I don't want to do this," but he shoved the door shut as she tried to leave. After Weinstein demanded she undress and grabbed her arms, she said, she "just gave up." Ms Mann said he then had sex with her — after, she believes, injecting himself with an erection-promoting drug that she later found in the bathroom trash. Ms Mann described Weinstein grabbing, dragging, forcefully undressing and raping her in a Beverly Hills, California, hotel room around the beginning of 2014, after she told him she was dating someone else. After leaving he defence table Ms Mann aimed a finger at her eyes and then at him. It prompted lawyer Arthur Aidala to request a mistrial, also complaining she shouldn't have been asked about the LA rape as Weinstein wasn't charged with it. During questioning, Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala noted she accepted party invitations, dinners and rides from Weinstein and underscored the fact that she continued to see the producer after he allegedly raped her. Mr Aidala also zeroed in on her testimony that she tried to reject Weinstein's first sexual advance but ultimately pretended to enjoy it. Ewa Sokola Ewa Sokola arrives to Harvey Weinstein's court case in New York, Tuesday, May 6, 2025. ( AP: Seth Wenig ) Kaja's Sokola sister Ewa Sokola met with Kaja and Weinstein the day of the alleged assault, she told jurors. Prosecutors have said it happened after Weinstein arranged for Ms Sokola to be an extra in the film The Nanny Diaries and met her visiting older sister, whom she was trying to impress. "She was proud of knowing him," her sister, cardiologist Dr Ewa Sokola, told jurors. She said the three of them met in a hotel lobby, chatted about Italian movies and the heavy-set Weinstein's heart health, and then he and the model left the table together. Kaja Sokola was tense when she returned about a half-hour later — "like somebody waiting for the result of an exam" or the Oscars — but didn't say anything about the alleged sexual assault, Dr Sokola told jurors. She said she was shocked to learn about the claim over a decade later, when she read about it in a magazine article. Christine Pressman Christine Pressman, a friend of Miriam Haley, testified she was told long ago about the sexual assault. "She had zero interest in dating him or sleeping with him," Ms Pressman said, describing Ms Haley as "distraught" when she later disclosed the alleged sexual assault. Ms Pressman said she advised against turning to police. "I said, 'Harvey Weinstein is the king of New York. He's extremely powerful. You are not. You're here on a tourist visa. Just let it go,'" the former model, musician and actor recalled. She teared up as she added that she now knows her guidance "was wrong." Under questioning from Ms Bonjean, Ms Pressman acknowledged that at some point before the alleged assault, she suggested Ms Haley date Weinstein. Ms Pressman later explained that she had been frustrated by her friend's taste in men — guys who were lanky, cerebral "and broke," as Ms Pressman put it. Elizabeth Entin Elizabeth Entin, pictured at the 2020 trial. ( AP: Craig Ruttle ) Elizabeth Entin, Ms Haley's former roommate, said a shaken Ms Haley told her that month that Weinstein had forcibly performed oral sex on her. Echoing her testimony at the first trial, Ms Entin said she suggested Haley call a lawyer, but her friend seemed disinclined. Elizabeth Perz Elizabeth Perz, an ex-aide for Weinstein, told the jury she kept a list of female "friends of Harvey" to invite to events and sometimes considered them a special category for guest lists. "A 'friend of Harvey' was a woman that he'd meet at events or parties or festivals or — somewhere," she said. The then-married Weinstein asked his assistants to invite these women to events, Ms Perz said. Jurors were shown a roster of well over a dozen names, which Ms Perz said was kept in the office at Weinstein's company. The names were broken down by geography, such as "LA Friends" or "Cannes/Etc/all invites." One "LA Friends" entry was Jessica Mann. Helga Samuelsen Helga Samuelsen shared a New York apartment with Kaja Sokola. Ms Samuelsen testified one evening the doorbell rang, Ms Sokola answered it and there was Weinstein. Ms Sokola previously said Weinstein had not spent time at their apartment. Ms Samuelsen recalled Weinstein and Ms Sokola went into a bedroom, closed the door and emerged about a half-hour later, when Ms Sokola saw Weinstein out. Ms Samuelsen said she never spoke to Ms Sokola about the visit. Having met Weinstein briefly in summer 2005, she later sought his help as she tried to launch a music career. He made some introductions and invited her to write a never-used movie score, Ms Samuelsen said, and she formed a New York-area cabaret act around 2019 with a woman close to him. Ms Samuelsen now works in insurance in her native Denmark. Talita Maia Talita Maia pictured at the 2020 trial. ( AP: Seth Wenig ) Talita Maia gave testimony via transcript read by court employees. Ms Maia and Ms Mann were roommates and friends in 2013 but later fell out. According to Ms Maia, Ms Mann never mentioned in those days that Weinstein had hurt her in any way. Both Ms Maia and another witness, Thomas Richards, met up with Ms Mann and Weinstein shortly after Ms Mann has said she was raped. Both witnesses testified that they saw nothing amiss. The two sides took very different tones in their closing arguments. Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, veered into folksy jokes and theatricality — sometimes re-enacting witnesses' behaviour — as he contended that his client engaged in a "courting game," not crimes. Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg, as direct as Mr Aidala was discursive, urged jurors to focus on Weinstein's accusers and their days of gruelling testimony. "This was not a 'courting game,' as Mr Aidala wants you to believe. This was not a 'transaction,'" she told jurors. Mr Aidala argued everything that happened between the ex-producer and his accusers was a consensual, if "transactional," exchange of favours. The attorney accused prosecutors of "trying to police the bedroom" and zeroing in on the man seen as "the poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement." Mr Aidala depicted the former studio boss as a self-made New Yorker, while painting Weinstein's accusers as troubled and canny "women with broken dreams" who plied him for movie opportunities and other perks, kept engaging with him for years and then turned on him to cash in on his #MeToo undoing. All three received compensation through legal processes separate from the criminal trial. Ms Blumberg countered that Weinstein interpreted a sexual "no" as a cue to "push a little bit more, and if they still say no, just take it anyway." She argued that his accusers stayed in friendly contact with Weinstein because they were trying to work in entertainment, and they feared their careers would be squashed if they crossed him. "He chose people who he thought would be the perfect victims, who he could rape and keep silent," the prosecutor said. "He underestimated them." Although Weinstein did not take the stand, he spoke out in an interview aired by FOX5 television on Friday as the jury considered six weeks of testimony. "But never illegal, never criminal, never anything." Weinstein pointed to comments from Mr Aidala, who suggested the three women who testified against him at trial "had four million reasons to testify, as in dollars." The jury is made of seven women and five men who began deliberating on Thursday. After two days they are yet to reach a verdict. One juror has been replaced with an alternate after they fell ill. Another juror asked to be removed because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an "unfair and unjust" way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later denied a defence request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he was the youngest on the 12-person panel. Deliberations will continue on Monday.