AI threatens entry-level lobs? Tech openings for new grads have already been halved, says report
This shift can be attributed to companies using AI to automate junior-level tasks and giving them an incentive to delay or reduce early-career hiring. However, experts warn that while this may cut costs in the short term, it could weaken the leadership pipeline in the years ahead, Fortune reported.
Kenneth Kang, a computer science graduate, spent his first year after college applying for more than 2,500 jobs, out of which he only got 10 interviews.
'It was very devastating,' he told Fortune. 'Honestly, I thought that having a 3.98 GPA, getting recognition letters, and having an interesting experience in the past, perhaps I could get a full-time job offer easily. But that was not true.'
Kang eventually got an offer from Adidas, where he had interned the previous summer, after more than 10 months of endless job applications.
This instance shows that the traditional corporate career path, which once began from entry-level roles with on-the-job training is becoming less common. Companies are increasingly expecting new hires to arrive with skills and experience that were once taught on the job.
AI is fueling this trend by efficiently handling tasks typically performed by junior employees such as data cleaning, summarization, and basic quality assurance. Shrinking opportunities: Data from Handshake, a Gen Z-focused career platform, shows that entry-level job postings for traditional corporate roles dropped by about 15 per cent last year.
Struggling interns: The number of internships converting to full-time offers is also at a five-year low. In 2023–24, only 62 per cent of interns received full-time offers, according to the National Association of Colleges and Employers. Hybrid interns converted at even lower rates than those who were in person.
While companies may benefit from short-term cost savings by reducing entry-level hiring, experts warn that this could lead to a significant skills gap in the future as after some point, the companies run out of experts.
'If a lot of firms are cutting, cutting, cutting at the entry level, there's a fear that they might actually miss out on the talent that's going to create their pipeline going forward, that's going to become the managers, executives, etc.,' Tristan L. Botelho, associate professor of organizational behavior at Yale School of Management, told Fortune.
Stella Pachidi, a senior lecturer in technology and work at King's Business School mirrored Botelho's thoughts by stating, 'Everyone is just focused on the current efficiencies and not necessarily thinking further about the future.'
The rise of AI is also influencing academia, as both professors and students have realized that the majority of work performed in some university courses can be assisted, if not nearly totally automated, by AI.
Students were some of the first to realize that ChatGPT is capable of writing essays and summarizing long texts. But while AI tools may help students to lighten their academic load, professors told Fortune they were worried about the prospect of a generation lacking critical skills and traditional education.
Forture said citing a study from MIT that LLM (large language model) use can reduce neural engagement and harm learning among students, especially younger users. The study also found that ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and 'consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
From reach to resonance: Advertisers chase attention, not inventory
Mumbai: Former WPP chief Martin Sorrell didn't mince words earlier this year when he said, 'It's ludicrous that 250,000 people are still working in media planning and buying when all of that can—and will—be done algorithmically." At an industry event, he added, 'You won't rely on a 25-year-old media planner. You'll rely on an algorithm." Sorrell was not just sounding off. His remarks reflect a broader shift already reshaping marketing playbooks, moving away from media weight and toward measuring attention. For years, marketers counted what they bought. Now, they are asking what was actually seen, and what effect it had. From exposure to effectiveness At Godrej Consumer Products Ltd, that shift is already under way. 'What I care about is not how much time she (consumer) spends on a medium, but when I advertise in that medium, how much visibility I get for my advertising. That's where efficiency lies," said Ashwin Moorthy, the company's chief marketing officer for India. Godrej has brought media planning and creative work in-house. Its own allocation tool, called Mash, tracks outcomes, not just output. 'Now it's about owning outcomes," Moorthy said. 'If a brand doesn't do well, the creative team here tweaks it immediately. They care about what happens after the ad is on air." Moorthy said the real advantage is speed. 'You're not wasting two months negotiating with agencies. You're spending that time creating work." The message is clear. Buying inventory is no longer enough. Nor is waiting on brand recall surveys. Agencies under pressure Advertising agencies are reacting. At WPP, attention has become a central metric, said Amin Lakhani, president of client solutions at WPP Media South Asia. 'We're not just selling media anymore. We're selling growth," he said. Lakhani said attention scores are embedded into WPP's audience tools. These are used to determine which formats and placements lead to actual engagement. 'It's about measurable interest. If a consumer scrolls past without noticing, that's not media. That's waste," he said. WPP is also investing in modular creative work. Formats are adjusted for different audience types based on real-time behaviour. 'One format won't work everywhere anymore," Lakhani said. A generation that scrolls The problem is most visible with younger audiences. Gen Z users scroll quickly, often skipping ads before they even load. 'Gen Z doesn't hate ads. They just ignore most of them," said a senior media buyer at a global agency, speaking on condition of anonymity. She said many clients no longer ask how many people saw their ad. They ask how many watched it with intent. 'That's now a standard question in reviews," she said. 'Especially from tech and FMCG brands." The shift is straining agencies that still operate on volume-driven models. Attention over inventory Sorrell, now executive chairman at S4 Capital, believes the cost of planning and creative will continue to fall. AI will accelerate that. 'In just one campaign, we might produce 1.5 million assets for a client like Amazon," he said. 'With AI, you can do 10 times that. But only if you charge per asset, not per hour." Sorrell predicts flatter agency structures and more client control. 'Most agencies don't want to share data or lose control. But control is already lost. The client has it," he said. To him, media today isn't about presence. It's about performance. Reshaping the chain Moorthy at Godrej said the decision to go in-house was driven by accountability. 'If it's your own people, they care if something fails. They tweak it fast. You can't afford to wait for an agency debrief." WPP is also moving towards what it calls 'attention-to-outcome" planning. According to Lakhani, many brands now use attention data to tweak campaigns in-flight. 'If it's not working, we kill it fast. That wasn't the case even two years ago." Tejinder Gill, managing director at digital marketing company The Trade Desk India, said advertisers are beginning to recognise that visibility alone is not enough. 'We're seeing fatigue among consumers who are bombarded with repetitive ads," he said. 'It's not about visibility alone. It's about resonance." He said brands need better signals across platforms. 'By tapping into omnichannel insights, brands can adjust creative and frequency in real time, not after the campaign is over," Gill said. From reach to recall Billions of digital impressions are logged each month in India. But if fewer than half are seen, what is the actual return? 'You might be on the world's biggest platforms. But if no one notices your ad, what's the point?" Moorthy asked. Lakhani echoed the concern. 'We're reworking our entire stack to measure interest, not inventory," he said. 'That's where clients are headed. We have to be there before they ask." Sorrell's comments may have sounded like provocation, but across India's ad industry, they are beginning to look more like a prophecy.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Gamblers Now Bet on AI Models Like Racehorses
Now that AI developers are getting paid like pro athletes, it's fitting that fans are placing big bets on how well they're doing their jobs. Gamblers Now Bet on AI Models Like Racehorses On Kalshi, Polymarket and other sites where people wager 'predictions' on real-world events, gamblers lay down millions each month on their picks for AI's top model. The AI arms race is playing out in plain sight on social media, ranking sites and obscure corners of the internet where enthusiasts hunt for clues. The constant buzz makes the topic appealing for wagers, though not every scrap of information is meaningful. Foster McCoy made $10,000 in a few hours in early August by betting against the success of OpenAI's GPT-5 release. The 27-year-old day trader noticed people were misreading an online ranking site that appeared to hype GPT-5, so he put $4,500 on its competitor, Google's Gemini, to be 'Best AI This Month.' As more bettors fell in line with his call, he cashed out. That's just another day for McCoy, who has traded $3.2 million on Kalshi since the start of 2025—making $170,000. He's part of a growing contingent of bettors making hundreds of trades a week on AI markets, on a range of wagers such as 'Best AI at the end of 2025,' 'AI regulation becomes federal law this year,' and 'Will [Chief Executive] Sam Altman be granted an equity stake in OpenAI this year?' Trading volume across AI prediction markets has surged to around $20 million this month. Kalshi, the only platform currently available in the U.S., is seeing 10 times the volume on AI trades compared with the start of the year, a spokesman says. Each bet, or 'contract,' is priced in cents to reflect the odds: McCoy bought thousands of Gemini contracts at around 40 cents, meaning it had a 40% chance of winning. If the bet had settled and Gemini won, McCoy's 40 cents would become a dollar. If Gemini lost, McCoy would lose it all. But much of the action happens before the final outcome. As more people piled into the Gemini bet, the contract price rose. McCoy sold when it had reached 87 cents. It's like betting on a sports match, only with the option to cash out when the odds rise in favor of your bet. 'You're just betting against what the other guy knows,' says McCoy, who credits his success to 'being chronically online.' He trades from home on a triple-monitor setup tuned to the holy trinity of AI betting: X, Discord and LMArena, a leaderboard where people rate AI model performance in blind tests. Social-media beefs can be gold for gamblers. After GPT-5's debut, a flurry of Elon Musk posts claiming the superiority of his xAI Grok chatbot sent the 'Grok to Win' market up more than 500% within hours. Before long, it had fallen nearly all the way back down. Rishab Jain, a Harvard undergraduate, tracks back-end updates and obscure X posts to anticipate new AI model launches. Bettors end up down rabbit holes hunting for more obscure tidbits. Harvard undergraduate Rishab Jain often scans X accounts of lesser-known researchers. The day before GPT-5's release, OpenAI's Sam Altman posted an image of the Death Star from 'Star Wars.' When a researcher from Google's DeepMind replied with an image of the killer globe under attack, Jain read it as a sign of confidence from Gemini's makers. Jain also scrapes source files from Google's apps and monitors public GitHub repositories tied to its products, looking for back-end changes that might signal a soon-to-be-released Gemini model. 'I'm almost obsessively up-to-date with what's going on in this world,' Jain says. 'Google has so many products that need to integrate a new model before it officially launches, and you can see those changes happening in the back end if you know where to look.' Since starting in June, he has won $3,500. Strategies vary. Some bet on the big industry players, others buy low on less-known or soon-to-be-updated models. Some compare odds on Kalshi and Polymarket to find arbitrage opportunities in the odds. As volume for these AI trades continues to grow, the incentive for good information will only increase, and the squeeze on casual bettors will get tighter, says Robin Hanson, a professor of economics at George Mason University. 'When you have better information in these kinds of markets, you can make better decisions,' Hanson says. 'If you know a little more, you make more money.' For now, the markets still draw a mix of sharks like McCoy and Jain along with casual bettors. 'I'm just a dude that likes tech and has some time and money,' says James Cole, a 35-year-old who recently shut down a company he founded. 'I'm speculating with mostly instinct and 10 minutes of research.' He says he's up for the year…so far. Write to Ben Raab at Gamblers Now Bet on AI Models Like Racehorses
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Building trust and confidence for agentic Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant promise-it's reshaping our lives right now. From diagnosing diseases to powering personalised learning and even orchestrating moments of commerce, AI's capabilities are unlocking new frontiers in productivity and human potential. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency As we look ahead, there's no question that AI will be a driving force behind the commerce of tomorrow - enabling seamless, secure, and intelligent experiences that are only beginning to take shape. Yet, this future hinges on a crucial factor: trust. According to recent research from the Institute for the Future and Visa, global trust in AI companies has declined to 53%, down from 61% just five years ago. The path forward is clear: to truly realise AI's promise, we must close the trust gap and ensure these technologies are built responsibly, transparently, and with the interests of people at their core. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Struggling With Tinnitus? This May Surprise You Tinnitus Experts Undo Enabling Intelligent Commerce As we shared in our recent "Commerce of Tomorrow, Today" report, the next era of commerce will be driven by intelligent, interconnected experiences. Consumers are using AI to discover products, compare prices, and make purchases with unprecedented ease. The rise of commerce driven by agentic AI innovations-where AIpowered virtual assistants act on our behalf to shop, negotiate, and buy-will require new levels of authentication, verification, and trust. These agents will need to not only understand our preferences but act transparently and ethically as extensions of ourselves. Live Events Data, Intellectual Property Trust in AI begins with trust in how data is handled. Visa's global payments network is built on the responsible use of data-to prevent fraud, enhance security, and deliver value to our clients and consumers. Our data platform is one of the most sophisticated and secure in the world, and we take our stewardship responsibilities seriously. As AI systems become more powerful, companies must elevate their approach to data privacy and intellectual property. It's imperative to obtain consent, safeguard personal data, and prevent misuse. Implementing AI Responsibly The rise of agentic AI demands a new approach to technology deployment. Historically, the "move fast and break things" mentality has driven rapid innovation-but with AI, especially in sensitive domains like payments, healthcare, and news, safety and responsibility must come first. Empowering Consumer Control Building this responsible approach to AI requires putting the right infrastructure in place. Through our Visa Intelligent Commerce APIs, we're creating a framework where consumers maintain granular control over their data and AI interactions. Central to this approach is our use of data tokens, which create a secure layer between consumer information and AI systems. This allows for personalised, intelligent experiences without exposing sensitive personal data-giving consumers the benefits of AI-powered commerce while maintaining full control over their information. We're also working across the entire payments ecosystem-merchants, financial institutions, technology partners, and regulators-to establish industry standards for AI-driven commerce that prioritise consumer protection from the ground up. Rather than retrofitting privacy into existing systems, we're building these principles into the foundation of next-generation commerce infrastructure. This includes collaborating with policymakers to develop frameworks governing how AI agents interact with payment systems, what authentication is required for autonomous transactions, and how consumer rights are protected as commerce becomes increasingly automated. Trust for Future of Commerce Closing the AI trust gap is not a solo endeavor-it's a collective responsibility. As AI becomes more pervasive and more autonomous, we must define what we want these systems to do-and, just as importantly, what we do not want them to do. Governance, oversight, and continuous engagement are essential to shaping a future where AI expands, rather than erodes, human potential. (The author is President, Technology, at Visa. He will be speaking at The Economic Times World Leaders Forum in New Delhi)
