logo
Letters to the Editor: voting, parking and mining

Letters to the Editor: voting, parking and mining

Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the new electoral law proposals, replacing car parks with cycle lanes, and the Santana gold mine develoment. Former MP condemns electoral law proposals
From 1990 until 1999 I was a member of Parliament's electoral law select committee.
During those nine years a wide range of changes and reforms to electoral law were proposed. At no time did anyone propose changes remotely as retrograde as those that the current government is progressing. Had they done, they would have been opposed by all political parties, left wing or right wing.
Western democracies usually seek to make voting as easy as possible, or alternatively compulsory, to ensure governments are elected validly and have the moral authority to govern.
This government's changes are voter suppression, pure and simple. Those affected are likely to be a mix of young, poor, brown and transient.
Furthermore, with one exception, all elections since MMP began in 1996 have been surprisingly close. The 110,000 people who may now be disenfranchised are enough to affect the result, and therefore the will of the nation.
We should all be deeply concerned. A wrong move
I am alarmed to see the coalition government following the American example of making voter enrolment more inconvenient.
Justice officials say closing enrolments ahead of advance voting could result in lower turnout and reduce confidence in the electoral system. Those voters who are either working long hours or irregular hours will be most affected by the cancelling of same-day election enrolment.
In America over the last 20 years the conservative Republican Party in various states has consistently made it more difficult for working people and minorities to vote. The need to prove your permanent address has been used to disqualify minority voters as America has moved toward becoming a more authoritarian society.
Cancelling same-day enrolment is a move in the wrong direction. Trumpism is not a good look in our electoral system. Our electoral system is too important for democracy to be changed casually.
Any changes to the electoral systems, even minor ones, should be agreed across parties. Just winning an election should not give political parties the right to alter the electoral system. A great risk
I write in profound concern upon realising the extent of voter restrictions this government is considering.
Total disenfranchisement for prisoners was sadistic in my opinion, certainly not aiding return to normal life, but to read of universal restrictions for enrolment beggars belief.
Or, rather, it confirms that the really needy of New Zealand are also of the same great risk, even should they understand that asking for special votes is possible, though these will be well scrutinised.
In particular, the proposed "ability to check enrolment details with data from other government agencies" surely jeopardises privacy, while "greater use of digital communication" has obvious drawbacks, to those without required means (probably mostly elderly) or are not familiar or comfortable with voting process, until now having face-to-face communication with poll clerk or returning officer.
Universal emancipation is a vital necessity of an enlightened society, a fact of which this government seems unwilling to ensure. Heavy machinery and losing your car park
How would anyone like to have large machinery working about 4m from where he/she was studying for examinations or resting? That happened when the Dunedin City Council worked underground on the Albany St pipes.
Now a few DCC personnel have decided to rob about 60 much needed Albany St car parks from right outside the numerous student flats and businesses. This cycle lane is being forced on to those who don't want it. How many cyclists will use it? Cyclists appear to ride anywhere at all, and few appear to keep to the cycle lanes.
I have spoken to several present tenants who are surprised and angry to hear their parks will be taken. Where will students' families or shuttle buses park when they need to move students in and out of their student flats? Where will the students, who own cars, park their cars? Most flats and hostels do not provide sufficient parks for all cars and some have no parking areas at all.
These people have agreed to waste local money ruining Albany St businesses and living areas. How would each feel if their livelihoods (or streets in which they live) were to be treated in this offhand way? The RMA is there to allay mine concerns
The development of the Santana gold mine in the Bendigo area, the site of significant gold mining over 100 years ago, has generated a lot of media coverage, most of which appears to be opposed.
Our current principle planning document clearly allows consenting authorities to provide consents for the activities with conditions which should allay the concerns of opposition groups and individuals. These conditions could require the applicant to avoid, remedy or mitigate real or perceived adverse effects on a whole host of values.
These could include amenity, visual, natural beauty, landscape, protection of flora and fauna etc.
The applicant has the choice of accepting such conditions, appealing them, or choosing not to proceed.
This process has the significant advantage of providing environmental and amenity value protection and allowing the activity to proceed . This is entirely consistent with the purpose of this current principle planning document (the Resource Management Act). Manic Monday
I guess Monday is a day to stir the pot and get people to react with hopefully more good letters to the editor. Two letters got me thinking, so here goes.
Lynne Newell (28.7.25): discussing a world event may not be top of the list of council duties but I think it's relevant. Councillors are our chosen representatives just as parliamentarians are. No-one lives in a bubble.
Tony Vink (28.7.25): you are looking through rose-tinted glasses when it comes to Israel. They remind me of the wolf dressed in sheep skin.
Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@odt.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House says Trump open to meeting Putin and Zelenskyy
White House says Trump open to meeting Putin and Zelenskyy

NZ Herald

time2 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

White House says Trump open to meeting Putin and Zelenskyy

The phone call came after US envoy Steve Witkoff met Russian leadership in Moscow earlier in the day for talks described by the Kremlin as 'productive' – with Trump's deadline looming to impose fresh sanctions over Russia's war in Ukraine. 'Great progress was made!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, adding that afterwards he had briefed some European allies. 'Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come,' he said. Minutes later, however, a senior US official said that 'secondary sanctions' were still expected to be implemented in two days' time. Trump, who had boasted he could end the conflict within 24 hours of taking office, has given Russia until Friday to make progress towards peace or face new penalties. Three rounds of Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul have failed to make headway on a ceasefire, with the two sides far apart in their demands. Russia has escalated drone and missile attacks against its pro-Western neighbour to a record high and accelerated its advance on the ground. 'A quite useful and constructive conversation took place,' Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov told journalists, including AFP, after the three-hour meeting with Witkoff. The two men exchanged 'signals' on their positions, Ushakov said, without elaborating. Zelenskyy confirmed his call with Trump and confirmed European leaders had taken part, although he didn't name them. Sanctions threat Trump has voiced increasing frustration with Putin in recent weeks over Russia's unrelenting offensive. The White House has not officially outlined what action it would take against Russia, but Trump has previously threatened to impose 'secondary tariffs' targeting Russia's key trade partners, such as China and India. On Wednesday, Trump ordered steeper tariffs on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. The move would aim to stifle Russian exports, but would risk significant international disruption. Trump said on Tuesday he would await the outcome of the Moscow talks before ordering any economic sanctions. 'We're going to see what happens,' he told reporters. 'We'll make that determination at that time.' Without explicitly naming Trump, the Kremlin on Tuesday slammed 'threats' to hike tariffs on Russia's trading partners as 'illegitimate'. Russia's campaign against Ukraine since February 2022 has killed tens of thousands of people, destroyed swathes of the country and forced millions to flee their homes. Moscow has demanded that Ukraine cede more territory and renounce Western support if it wants the fighting to stop. Kyiv is calling for an immediate ceasefire, and Zelenskyy last week urged his allies to push for 'regime change' in Moscow. Nuclear rhetoric The Witkoff visit came as Moscow-Washington tensions are running high. Trump said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be moved following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, and that they were now 'in the region'. Moscow then said that it was ending a self-imposed moratorium on nuclear-capable intermediate-range missiles, suggesting that it could deploy such weapons in response to what it alleged were similar US deployments within striking distance of Russia. Ukrainian emergency services reported on Wednesday that at least two people were killed and 12 others wounded in Russian shelling of a holiday camp in the southern Zaporizhzhia region. -Agence France-Presse

Full video: Trump speaks on Apple investment, Russia moves
Full video: Trump speaks on Apple investment, Russia moves

1News

time2 hours ago

  • 1News

Full video: Trump speaks on Apple investment, Russia moves

US President Donald Trump is speaking from the Oval Office after signing an executive order to place an additional 25% tariff on India for its purchases of Russian oil. That brings the combined tariffs imposed by the United States on its ally to 50%. He is also discussing a US$600 billion investment from tech company Apple in production within the US. The tariffs comes after Russian President Vladimir Putin held talks with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow this morning, days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face severe economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. The tariffs would go into effect 21 days after the signing of the order, meaning that both India and Russia might have time to negotiate with the administration on the import taxes. ADVERTISEMENT Trump's moves could scramble the economic trajectory of India, which until recently was seen as an alternative to China by American companies looking to relocate their manufacturing. China also buys oil from Russia, but it was not included in the order signed by the Republican president.

Eighty years after Hiroshima, Japan debates military expansion and pacifism
Eighty years after Hiroshima, Japan debates military expansion and pacifism

NZ Herald

time4 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Eighty years after Hiroshima, Japan debates military expansion and pacifism

The destruction of the two cities was followed by Japan's submission days later, ending its decades of brutal conquest. However, the bombings also announced a more terrifying age in which human innovation could spark death and destruction on a previously unimaginable scale. As the flattened city of Hiroshima was rebuilt, it dedicated itself to promoting peace. Survivors of the atomic bombing have campaigned for a world free of nuclear weapons. But 80 years on, that dream is fading. Three of Japan's neighbours – Russia, China and North Korea – are nuclear powers, and Tokyo depends on the American nuclear umbrella to protect it. With tensions in the Pacific heightening and firsthand memories of nuclear devastation waning, more Japanese are questioning the national commitment to peace at all costs. Why did Japan go all-in on pacifism after World War II? The Americans forced it to. The Imperial Japanese Armed Forces' harsh invasion of much of Asia, its shock attack on Pearl Harbour and its willingness to sacrifice a generation of young soldiers for the empire, made the victorious Americans adamant that the country should never again wage war. Japan's so-called 'peace constitution', drafted by the Americans who occupied the country for nearly seven years, forever renounced war. Its Article 9 has been interpreted to mean that Japan should never possess a military with offensive capabilities. In return, the US promised to defend Japan should it come under attack. The security treaty made Japan a beneficiary of the theory of nuclear deterrence, in which the fear of nuclear retaliation is thought to deter a first-strike attack. So why does Japan have a military? To take into account these constitutional limitations, Japan's military is called the Self-Defence Forces. It cannot take on combat roles in international conflicts. That hasn't stopped Japan from expanding its arsenal to counter potential threats from Asian neighbours such as China that, in turn, worry about Japan's rearmament, given its wartime record. If budget hikes continue, Japan will soon be among the world's top military spenders. All of this modern hardware is supposed to be only for defensive purposes, although a debate in Japan about its global military profile has been getting louder. What do Japanese think of their country's rearming? While many in the older generations worry about Japan's waning commitment to pacifism, younger Japanese tend to be more sanguine. Supporters of a military expansion say Japan shouldn't be forced into a defensive crouch forever, especially with security threats ratcheting up in the Pacific. In addition to superpower jousting, Japan has territorial disputes with China, Russia and the two Koreas. They worry that the US may not always be a constant security guarantor for Japan, especially under President Donald Trump, who has criticised Japan for relying too heavily on the presence of US military bases. And with first-hand memories of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki disappearing, most Japanese are now removed from the kind of searing testimony that underwrote the country's pacifist, non-nuclear stance. Nippon Kaigi, an ultra-nationalist political bloc that aims to revise Article 9 of the constitution, has significant support among lawmakers from the governing Liberal Democratic Party. Amending the constitution was once unthinkable; it's now a political talking point. What about nukes? Nihon Hidankyo, a group representing atomic bomb survivors, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last year for its campaign to rid the world of nuclear weapons. However, Japan has never signed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. In 2023, Fumio Kishida, then the Prime Minister of Japan, whose family is from Hiroshima, supported a statement at a Group of Seven summit he hosted in the city that implied nuclear deterrence might bring its own kind of peace. Kishida's stance reflects a growing feeling in Japan that while nuclear weapons are dangerous and their eradication is a noble ideal, the real world also requires deterrence and robust defence. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Hannah Beech Photograph by: Chang W. Lee ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store