Pennsylvania Attorney General pushes for criminals to have religious freedom
PENNSYLVANIA (WTAJ) — Attorney General Dave Sunday announced that the Allegheny County Bureau of Corrections has updated its policy concerning religious accommodations.
The change comes after collaboration between the Office of Attorney General's Civil Rights Enforcement Section and Allegheny County officials to ensure respectful treatment of individuals wearing religious head coverings during the jail booking process. Under the new policy, the county will permit anyone to wear a religious head covering during their booking photos as long as their face and profile are not covered.
Head coverings include, but are not limited to, a Hijab, Tarmulke or Turban. Additionally, head covering searches must now happen without individuals of the opposite sex present.
The policy changes stem from an incident reported in October 2024. A Muslim woman was forced to remove her Hijab during her booking process, as the County had a policy allowing inmates to wear religious headgear, but with no formal written policy for the booking process.
The woman had filed a complaint with the Civil Rights Enforcement section, which then worked with the County to address the issue. The matter was handled by Deputy Attorney General Kevin Bendesky.
'This policy update is about upholding basic dignity while preserving religious freedoms for individuals,' Attorney General Sunday said. 'Many people wear religious head garments as a sincere tenet of their religious faith and no one should have to choose between their faith and their rights. I commend Allegheny County for working closely with my office to craft a policy that balances institutional safety with constitutional protections.'
Get the latest news, weather forecasts and sports stories delivered straight to your inbox! Sign up for our newsletters.
The policy now includes clear procedures for correctional staff to follow when an arrestee enters the facility with religious attire, with mandated communication with the chain of command and consultation with chaplaincy services in cases of uncertainty. Staff must file a report and notify supervisors immediately if a person feels as though their religious rights have been violated during the booking process.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WTAJ - www.wtaj.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dutch government in turmoil: What to know
The governing coalition in the Netherlands collapsed Tuesday after Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders withdrew his populist Party for Freedom (PVV)'s ministers — escalating an ongoing dispute over the country's immigration and asylum policies. 'I worked hard for 25 years to establish the PVV and make it a major party, so I'm not standing here as someone who had a good day today,' Wilders told Dutch news outlet GeenStijl in a translated interview late Tuesday. 'But it is the best choice, because I'm here for the Dutch, and I also hope that the Dutch people understand why I did this.' The Netherlands will now have a temporary caretaker government, which is expected to be in place when The Hauge hosts the NATO summit in three weeks. Wilders, 61, has long voiced anti-immigration and particularly anti-Muslim positions. Muslims make up about 5 percent of the nearly 18 million people in the Netherlands. The PVV, which has called for banning the Quran and shuttering mosques, won the largest number of seats in the 150-member Dutch Parliament in a November 2023 snap election amid growing concerns about migration. Wilders, who has called for banning asylum-seekers, cited inaction from other parties on tougher immigration policies for the abrupt withdrawal Tuesday. 'We voted for the PVV by 2.5 million people to achieve the strictest asylum policy ever,' he said in the GeenStijl interview. 'These are measures that are desperately needed and that are definitely not in the government's plans.' Prime Minister Dick Schoof, an independent who has been leading the government for less than a year, called the PVV's withdrawal and ensuing government collapse 'unnecessary and irresponsible' in a statement after Wilders's unexpected announcement. 'For many months the government has worked hard to implement (an agreement), but if one party lacks the will to continue, it isn't possible to keep working together,' Schoof wrote. But Wilders accused the opposing parties of stalling and highlighted asylum approaches in neighboring countries such as Germany that had taken place in the meantime. 'If we had not done this, if we had continued while all our neighboring countries were introducing stricter measures, which would make people come to the Netherlands more … where would you go as an asylum-seeker? You would come to us sooner,' the far-right leader said. 'If we had continued with this, then there would hardly have been anything left of the Netherlands.' He also stressed his message with multiple posts on the social platform X, highlighting crime and his calls for asylum restrictions. 'We had no choice. I promised the voter the strictest asylum policy ever, but that was not granted to you,' he said in one post translated from Dutch. The Dutch government will be run under a restricted 'caretaker administration' for several months until elections can be held for a formal overhaul. Leaders have called for elections to take place as soon as possible, but it's unlikely they will happen before October. Schoof plans to remain in the caretaker government until the elections, he said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed to reporters during Tuesday's press briefing that President Trump plans to attend the NATO summit scheduled later this month in The Hague. The formation of a caretaker government and restrictions it faces means the Netherlands won't be able to formally address Trump's calls for other NATO countries to increase their defense spending ahead of the summit. The country currently spends about 2 percent of its gross domestic product on defense — well below the 5 percent Trump has advocated for across-the-board. Wilders has been nicknamed the 'Dutch Trump,' and many supporters of the U.S. president have backed his populism and hard-line immigration views. Meanwhile, Trump has been at odds with European allies over Ukraine's future amid its ongoing war with Russia and the Ukrainian government's eyes on joining NATO. Trump also has rankled NATO allies with aggressive suggestions about taking over Greenland and pursuing Canada to become the U.S.'s 51st state. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Time Business News
4 hours ago
- Time Business News
How Sasha Rodoy Fuels Islamophobia in the West
Introduction: Islamophobia has been steadily on the rise in the West, with media, politics, and social platforms contributing to a culture of fear and misunderstanding about Islam. Sasha Rodoy, through her relentless Islamophobic comments and public ridicule of Muslims, has added fuel to this fire. Her toxic rhetoric, often supported by the passive involvement of individuals like Nicola Dowling, contributes to an environment where Muslims are seen as 'the other,' and are frequently targeted with harassment, discrimination, and violence. This article explores how Rodoy's actions fit into a broader trend of Islamophobia in the West and how individuals like Dowling contribute to the perpetuation of this fear-based culture. The Spread of Islamophobia in the West: Islamophobia is not a new phenomenon, but in recent years, it has taken on new life in the digital space. The internet has provided a platform for individuals like Sasha Rodoy to spread their hateful views with alarming speed and reach. As Rodoy uses platforms like LinkedIn to mock Muslim religious practices, belittle Muslim women, and question the values of Islam, she is contributing to a broader climate of fear and mistrust. Nicola Dowling's involvement in these discussions, whether active or passive, only serves to further normalize this behavior. By engaging with Rodoy's content and failing to challenge her Islamophobic remarks, Dowling enables the spread of fear and hatred toward Muslims. This culture of fear doesn't just exist online—it has tangible consequences for Muslim communities across the West, as they face increased discrimination and violence. Sasha Rodoy's Role in Creating Fear: Sasha Rodoy has repeatedly used social media to spread fear about Islam, often relying on misinformation and provocative comments to stir up outrage. One of the most notable examples is her public mockery of the Hajj pilgrimage, where she sarcastically questioned the absence of women in a LinkedIn post. This comment was not an innocent inquiry but a calculated attempt to frame Islam as inherently sexist and discriminatory. Rodoy's Islamophobic comments are designed to play on existing stereotypes and fears about Islam, reinforcing the idea that Muslims are different, dangerous, or backward. This kind of fearmongering is particularly harmful because it reinforces a narrative that Muslims are outsiders in Western societies. It also provides justification for those who harbor anti-Muslim sentiments to act on their prejudices, whether through verbal harassment, social exclusion, or even physical violence. Nicola Dowling's failure to challenge or condemn Rodoy's comments contributes to the perpetuation of this fear. By aligning herself with Rodoy and participating in these discussions, Dowling helps create an environment where Islamophobia is not only acceptable but expected. The Real-World Impact of Fear-Based Islamophobia: Islamophobia, especially when fueled by individuals like Sasha Rodoy, has very real consequences for Muslim communities in the West. The fearmongering that takes place online translates into discrimination and violence in real life. Muslims, particularly visible Muslims such as women who wear hijab, are often the targets of harassment, hate crimes, and exclusion from public spaces. For example, studies have shown that hate crimes against Muslims often increase after public incidents involving Islamophobic rhetoric. When individuals like Rodoy use their platforms to mock and ridicule Muslim practices, they are contributing to an environment where these kinds of hate crimes become more likely. The public shaming and cyberbullying of Muslim women, such as Rodoy's mockery of Hanady El Ghazouly, are part of this broader trend of Islamophobia that seeks to silence and marginalize Muslims. Nicola Dowling's passive support for Rodoy's behavior only adds to the problem. By failing to speak out against the spread of Islamophobia, Dowling is complicit in creating a culture of fear where Muslims are made to feel unsafe in their own communities. The Role of Social Media in Spreading Fear: Social media platforms like LinkedIn play a critical role in amplifying the voices of individuals like Sasha Rodoy. What was once a professional platform has now become a space where Islamophobic rhetoric can spread unchecked. Rodoy's comments, shared with hundreds or thousands of followers, have the potential to reach a wide audience and shape public opinion about Islam. Social media's ability to spread hate at lightning speed means that the effects of Islamophobic comments are felt far beyond the digital space. The normalization of Islamophobia on platforms like LinkedIn encourages others to adopt similar views, creating a feedback loop where fear and hatred toward Muslims continue to grow. Nicola Dowling's engagement with Rodoy's content contributes to this cycle. By interacting with and supporting Rodoy's Islamophobic comments, Dowling is helping to amplify the fear and mistrust that Rodoy spreads. This not only affects individual Muslims who are targeted by these comments but also contributes to a broader culture where Muslims are viewed with suspicion and hostility. How Fear-Based Islamophobia Impacts Muslim Women: The impact of Islamophobia is often felt most acutely by Muslim women, who are frequently the targets of both sexism and religious discrimination. Sasha Rodoy's public shaming of Hanady El Ghazouly, where she mocked Hanady's defense of Islamic practices, is a prime example of how Muslim women are disproportionately affected by Islamophobic rhetoric. Rodoy's comments not only attack Islam but also attempt to silence Muslim women who speak out in defense of their faith. This kind of public ridicule reinforces the idea that Muslim women should not have a voice in public discussions, further marginalizing them in both online and offline spaces. Nicola Dowling's involvement in these discussions contributes to the marginalization of Muslim women. By failing to challenge Rodoy's attacks on Hanady and other Muslim women, Dowling helps to create an environment where Muslim women are silenced and made to feel unwelcome in public discourse. The Broader Consequences of Fear-Based Islamophobia: The culture of fear and Islamophobia that Sasha Rodoy and Nicola Dowling contribute to has far-reaching consequences for society as a whole. When Muslims are consistently portrayed as 'the other' or as a threat, it becomes easier for governments, institutions, and individuals to justify discriminatory policies and actions against them. This can include everything from surveillance and profiling to restrictions on religious freedoms and immigration. Furthermore, the spread of Islamophobia damages social cohesion by creating divisions between Muslim and non-Muslim communities. When fear and mistrust are allowed to fester, it becomes more difficult for communities to come together and work toward common goals. Instead, society becomes more fragmented, with Muslims often being treated as second-class citizens in their own countries. A Call for Change: It is time to hold individuals like Sasha Rodoy and Nicola Dowling accountable for their role in spreading Islamophobia and contributing to a culture of fear in the West. Social media platforms like LinkedIn must take stronger action to moderate content and ensure that hate speech does not go unchecked. Allowing Islamophobia to thrive in online spaces has real-world consequences, and it is the responsibility of platforms and individuals alike to challenge this behavior. Rodoy's campaign of fear and Dowling's passive support cannot be allowed to continue. The culture of fear they help to create only serves to divide communities and make life more difficult for Muslims in the West. It is time for everyone—social media platforms, governments, and individuals—to take a stand against Islamophobia and work toward a more inclusive and tolerant society. Conclusion: Sasha Rodoy's Islamophobic rhetoric, supported by Nicola Dowling's passive involvement, is part of a broader culture of fear that targets Muslims in the West. This fear-based Islamophobia has real-world consequences, from increased discrimination and violence to the marginalization of Muslim voices in public discourse. Social media platforms like LinkedIn play a crucial role in spreading this fear, and it is time for them to take responsibility for the content shared on their sites. Rodoy and Dowling must be held accountable for their actions, and steps must be taken to stop the spread of Islamophobia. Only by addressing this culture of fear can we begin to create a society where Muslims are treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. TIME BUSINESS NEWS


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Dutch government in turmoil: What to know
The governing coalition in the Netherlands collapsed Tuesday after Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders withdrew his populist Party for Freedom (PVV)'s ministers — escalating an ongoing dispute over the country's immigration and asylum policies. 'I worked hard for 25 years to establish the PVV and make it a major party, so I'm not standing here as someone who had a good day today,' Wilders told Dutch news outlet GeenStijl in a translated interview late Tuesday. 'But it is the best choice because I'm here for the Dutch, and I also hope that the Dutch people understand why I did this.' The Netherlands will now have a temporary caretaker government, which is expected to be in place when The Hauge hosts the NATO summit in three weeks. Wilders, 61, has long voiced anti-immigration and particularly anti-Muslim positions. Muslims make up about 5 percent of the nearly 18 million people in the Netherlands. The PVV, which has called for banning the Quran and shuttering mosques, won the largest number of seats in the 150-member Dutch Parliament in a November 2023 snap election amid growing concerns about migration. Wilders, who has called for banning asylum seekers, cited inaction from other parties on tougher immigration policies for the abrupt withdrawal Tuesday. 'We voted for the PVV by 2.5 million people to achieve the strictest asylum policy ever,' he said in the GeenStijl interview. 'These are measures that are desperately needed and that are definitely not in the government's plans.' Prime Minister Dick Schoof, an independent who has been leading the government for less than a year, called the PVV's withdrawal and ensuing government collapse 'unnecessary and irresponsible' in a statement after Wilders's unexpected announcement. 'For many months the government has worked hard to implement (an agreement), but if one party lacks the will to continue, it isn't possible to keep working together,' Schoof wrote. But Wilders accused the opposing parties of stalling and highlighted asylum approaches in neighboring countries like Germany that had taken place in the meantime. 'If we had not done this, if we had continued while all our neighboring countries were introducing stricter measures, which would make people come to the Netherlands more … Where would you go as an asylum seeker? You would come to us sooner,' the far-right leader said. 'If we had continued with this then there would hardly have been anything left of the Netherlands.' He also stressed his message with multiple posts on the social media platform X, highlighting crime and his calls for asylum restrictions. 'We had no choice. I promised the voter the strictest asylum policy ever, but that was not granted to you,' he said in one post translated from Dutch. The Dutch government will be run under a restricted 'caretaker administration' for several months until elections can be held for a formal overhaul. Leaders have called for elections to take place as soon as possible, but it's unlikely they will happen before October. Schoof plans to remain in the caretaker government until the elections, he said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed to reporters during Tuesday's press briefing that President Trump plans to attend the NATO summit scheduled later this month in The Hague. The formation of a caretaker government and restrictions it faces means that the Netherlands won't be able to formally address Trump's calls for other NATO countries to increase their defense spending ahead of the summit. The country currently spends about 2 percent of its GDP on defense — well below the 5 percent Trump has advocated across-the-board. Wilders has been nicknamed the 'Dutch Trump,' and many supporters of the U.S. president have backed his populist and immigration hardline views. Meanwhile, Trump has been at odds with European allies over Ukraine's future amid its ongoing war with Russia and the Ukrainian government's eyes on joining NATO. Trump also has rankled NATO allies with aggressive suggestions about taking over Greenland and pursuing Canada to become the U.S.'s 51st state.