Aloe Wellness by Forever Living: Summer Sips, Guilt-Free
Known globally as the largest grower and producer of aloe vera, Forever Living cultivates over 40 million aloe plants across 7,500+ acres. Their USDA and EU-certified organic farms ensure every bottle—whether Aloe Vera Gel, Berry Nectar, Mango, or Peaches—is rich in nutrients and crafted without added preservatives.
Each drink contains over 84% stabilized aloe vera gel sourced directly from Forever's sustainable plantations. The result? Clean, fruit-forward blends that boost immunity, support digestion, and taste as good as they feel. Highlights include:
Forever Aloe Vera Gel: Over 99.7% pure inner leaf gel, unflavored and perfect for daily wellness.
Berry Nectar: A cranberry-apple blend for bold, antioxidant-rich hydration.
Aloe Mango: Mango purée meets aloe in a vitamin C-rich tropical twist.
Aloe Peaches: A mellow mix of peach and grape juices ideal for the whole family.
'We're not just offering drinks; we're offering a wellness philosophy,' says Harish Singla, CSM, Forever Living Products India. 'It's about embracing clean, conscious living—bottle by bottle.'
With its vertically integrated model—from field to factory—Forever ensures traceable quality and minimal environmental impact. As a global wellness leader since 1978, Forever Living continues to blend science, nature, and sustainability into every product, making aloe a lifestyle.
Available at: www.foreverliving.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US ties: Up, close and personal
Six months ago, at the White House, President Donald Trump and Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi were describing each other as 'great' and 'dear' friends, recalling the reverberating echoes of Howdy Modi in Houston (2019) and Namaste Trump in Ahmedabad (2020), and outlined an ambitious vision of India-US relations in an over 3,000-word-long joint statement. Even as Canada rubbished Trump's call for it to become the 51st state, Nato, Japan, and South Korea wondered about the credibility of the US nuclear umbrella, and Europeans did their best to reassure a beleaguered Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv, the February visit reassured India that the Modi-Trump relationship was intact and India-US ties were on a positive trajectory. Opinion polls across the world noted that Indians were the most optimistic about Trump's second term. Bilateral trade talks began soon after. Five rounds have taken place but trade deals take long, years at times. But Trump's qualities do not include patience and subtlety. To push the Indians, he added a 25% tariff with a deadline of July 31. Also, his second term was promising to be very different from his first. In his inaugural speech, he had talked of ending wars, of leaving behind a legacy as a 'unifier and peacemaker'. It soon became clear that in addition to deploying his favourite policy tool, tariffs, to get his trade deals, his goal was the Nobel Peace Prize, preferably in the first year itself. His tactics seemed to be working. The US has announced new trade deals with the EU, UK, Japan, and South Korea, covering more than 25% of US foreign trade, though details haven't been worked out. In addition, negotiations are underway with over a dozen countries. China is playing hardball, and using its leverage to restrict exports of rare earth magnets. Canada and Mexico have their own leverage. China's tactics may be working as the US has already relaxed its export controls on H20 chips to China. On Trump's peace-President agenda, progress has been slow. The two big conflicts that Trump had promised to sort out quickly, Ukraine and Gaza, have proved difficult. Both Russian president Vladimir Putin and Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu have their own ideas about their objectives and have been stringing Trump along. However, Trump has been nominated for the peace Nobel jointly by the presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia and by PM Hun Manet of Cambodia for brokering the ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia. The White House has also highlighted his role in ending the conflicts between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia. And somewhat cheekily, for the ceasefire between Israel and Iran especially after Trump came to Israel's help by firing Tomahawk missiles and deploying B2 bombers to deliver the GBU 57 bombs on Iranian targets. Netanyahu has mollified Trump by nominating him for his role in the 2020 Abraham Accords that enabled Israel to normalise relations with the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. Putin is now scheduled to have a bilateral meeting with Trump in Alaska on August 15 but Ukraine and the Europeans are not invited. Meanwhile, secondary sanctions on Russia's oil exports have been introduced and India (collateral damage) will attract a 25% penalty, an incremental tariff on exports to the US, effective August 27. However, the India-Pakistan crisis is perhaps where Trump feels let down by his 'great friend Modi'. India was upset at Trump pre-empting the ceasefire announcement on May 10 and claiming credit that it was a 'US-brokered ceasefire'. Since then, he has repeated the claim more than 25 times adding how he prevented a nuclear war, and he employed the threat of cutting trade if they continued. Each time, it was denied by Indian foreign office and military officials, and most recently by the external affairs minister S Jaishankar and defence minister Rajnath Singh, in Parliament. Meanwhile, Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his positive role and expressed the hope that he could remain engaged and mediate on Kashmir, while nominating him for the Nobel Peace prize. Encouraged by Pakistan, Trump invited Modi to the White House on June 18 on his way back from the G-7 meeting in Canada but was turned down. Trump was presumably trying to set up a meeting with Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, who was invited to lunch the same day. With so much happening, it's easy to lose sight of the big picture. Relations between States are governed by national interests and patient negotiations. Good ties between leaders can help but cannot be the principal driver. That's why neither Modi nor Trump is going to pick up the phone to resolve their misunderstanding. The end of the Cold War provided the impetus for the shift in India-US relations when President George H W Bush (41) and PM PV Narasimha Rao took the initiative in 1992 to initiate a dialogue on nuclear issues and the first baby steps for defence cooperation were taken. Gradually, despite ups and downs, and changes in governments in both countries, the positive trajectory continued and a bipartisan consensus based on mutual trust and converging interests evolved. If the nuclear tests in 1998 marked a low point, the Strobe Talbott-Jaswant Singh dialogue, and the positive US intervention in 1999 during the Kargil conflict restored trust. The story was repeated after the attack on Indian Parliament in 2001 and during Balakot, when the US facilitated the quick release of Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman from Pakistani custody. There is a difference between backchannel diplomacy and public diplomacy. While Trump has a fondness for TruthSocial, India's geography dictates prudence. The US is larger than Trump just as India is larger than Modi, and there is life after Trump and there is life after Modi. This becomes clearer if interests are given primacy as foreign policy drivers. It also helps avoid the trap of believing one's own propaganda. The simple question is: Is it in India's national interest to sustain relations with the US. The answer should be obvious. Rakesh Sood was ambassador to Afghanistan, Nepal, and France, and served as PM's Special Envoy on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament. The views expressed are personal.
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Global plastic treaty hits standstill amid disagreement over finance
Negotiations to end plastic pollution are proving to be difficult in the Global Plastic Treaty talks being held in Geneva, European Union's environment commissioner, Jessika Roswall, said reaching a common point in the negotiation of plastic pollution is proving difficult. 'I would agree the discussions so far have been difficult,' she talks are at a standstill after the disagreement between the European Commission (EU) and the Like-Minded Countries (LMC) led by Saudi Arabia. This came after the EU refused to move discussions on finance unless the issue concerning cutting plastic production is addressed, so that they can fund 'The EU is ready to do a deal but not at any cost,' said Roswall. 'We do like plastic and we will continue to need it. However, we don't like plastic pollution, and it's time to end plastic pollution as quickly as possible.'Last week, the US team urged countries to reject the plastic production treaty, echoing President Donald Trump's sentiments around the treaty. Meanwhile, oil-producing countries focus on reducing plastic waste, as they believe cutting plastic production can lead to disruptions in echoing the LMCs in plastic waste management rather than cutting plastic production, India voiced its concern regarding the economic harm cutting plastic production could cause. It emphasised building programmes for behavioural change to eradicate the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) said in its plastic report that plastic production could triple by 2060, with the current pace of demand and use. DISRUPTIONS CAUSED BY PLASTICSAccording to the OECD's plastic report, plastic waste is projected to almost triple by 2060, with half of all plastic waste still being landfilled and less than a fifth primary plastics continuing to dominate the feedstock, recycled ones will make up 12% of all plastics by 2060, even though they grow more quickly than primary environmental impacts of plastic waste are huge. The build-up of plastic waste in aquatic environments is going to triple by 2060, with 44 million tonnes being leaked into the environment by from plastic production and waste are increasing global greenhouse gas emissions. Plastics cause 3.4% of global greenhouse emissions, which is higher than the aviation tackle the disruptions caused to health and the environment, the treaty should go beyond voluntary commitments and should focus on waste management and production the Geneva talks reach the final date, the challenge now remains whether the countries can bridge these gaps or not.- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
37 minutes ago
- First Post
US started this war, it dragged Ukraine into it, it should get out of it: Jeffrey Sachs
The Alaska summit is set for Friday with both Moscow and Washington signalling openness to a deal, a prospect that raises fears in Kyiv that any settlement could come at Ukraine's expense. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (L) is welcomed by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz upon arrival in the garden of the chancellery in Berlin to join a video conference of European leaders with the US President on the Ukraine war ahead of the summit between the US and Russian leaders, on August 13, 2025. Image- AFP Economist Jeffrey Sachs has blamed Washington for the nearly three-year-old Russia-Ukraine war, saying the United States dragged Kyiv into the conflict and must now step aside. The statement come just days before a high-stakes meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, a summit that could reshape the course of the war. Sachs argued that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy should face the reality that Trump and Putin may strike a deal, with or without Kyiv's direct involvement. The Ukrainian leader, who has not been invited to the Alaska talks is scrambling to ensure his country's interests are not sidelined. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Sunday, Zelenskyy publicly criticised Washington's silence over recent Russian strikes on Ukraine, warning that such inaction only emboldens Putin. The criticism comes amid some of the most significant Russian gains in months. According to an AFP analysis of battlefield data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War, Russian forces on August 12 seized or claimed 110 square kilometres of territory in eastern Ukraine in just 24 hours, the largest single-day advance in more than a year. Moscow's offensive has accelerated in recent weeks, with Wednesday's gains focused on a narrow but strategic section of the eastern front line. Ukrainian officials say the Russian military is preparing for further offensive operations, dashing hopes of an immediate de-escalation. In a bid to influence the upcoming Trump-Putin meeting, Zelenskyy met German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin on Wednesday, before joining French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, EU leaders and NATO chiefs for urgent online talks. They later held a second call with Trump and US Vice President JD Vance, pressing for assurances that Ukraine's sovereignty would not be compromised. Russia's foreign ministry dismissed the outreach as 'politically and practically insignificant,' accusing Kyiv and its allies of trying to 'sabotage' efforts to end the war. With inputs from agencies
