logo
Line-up announced for South Facing Festival in Crystal Palace Park

Line-up announced for South Facing Festival in Crystal Palace Park

Yahoo04-05-2025

South Facing Festival has announced an all-day hip-hop event featuring Busta Rhymes, Redman, and Big Daddy Kane.
The event, set for August 15, 2025, at Crystal Palace Park, promises a day of performances from some of the biggest names in hip-hop.
Busta Rhymes, known for his rapid-fire delivery and chart-topping hits, will headline the festival.
Rap icon Busta Rhymes brings legendary energy to Crystal Palace Bowl (Image: Busta Rhymes) The rapper, who has been a significant figure in the hip-hop scene since the release of his debut album 'The Coming' in 1996, is expected to deliver a high-energy set filled with classic anthems and deep cuts.
With 11 Grammy nominations and a legacy of lyrical excellence, Busta Rhymes' performance is anticipated to be a highlight of the festival.
Joining Busta Rhymes on the stage will be Redman, a New Jersey rapper known for his funk-infused style and sharp punchlines.
Redman first gained recognition in the early '90s after mentorship from EPMD and has since released a string of gold and platinum albums.
His raw lyricism and energetic delivery have made him a staple in the hip-hop industry.
Big Daddy Kane, a Grammy Award-winning rapper and a member of the rap group the Juice Crew, is also part of the line-up.
Known for his influence and skill in the hip-hop world, Big Daddy Kane's song 'Ain't No Half-Steppin' was ranked #25 on Rolling Stone magazine's list of The 50 Greatest Hip-Hop Songs of All Time.
Chali 2na, known for his work with Jurassic 5 and Ozomatli, will also be performing.
His deep baritone voice and dynamic stage presence have made him a fan favourite.
The festival will also feature performances from Supa Dupa Fly, HHBITD, Don't Flop, and Hip Hop Chip Shop DJs.
South Facing Festival is a multi-day, open-air event held each summer in the Crystal Palace Bowl.
The festival offers a variety of street food and drink options and is easily accessible from London and the South East via various train and bus routes.
Announcements for this year have included performances from Nile Rodgers & CHIC, Basement Jaxx, Skepta's Big Smoke festival, Flackstock, and Mogwai.
Previous years have seen performances from Grace Jones, Damian Marley, Supergrass, Sleaford Mods, The English National Opera, Richard Ashcroft, Becky Hill, Bombay Bicycle Club, Jungle, and Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds.
Tickets for the hip-hop event will go on sale on Friday, May 2, at 10am.
The festival organisers have promised more acts will be announced in the coming weeks.
The South Facing Festival is known for its diverse line-up and unique open-air setting.
The Crystal Palace Bowl, where the festival is held, has a rich history and has hosted numerous iconic performances over the years.
The festival is not just about music.
It also offers a range of food and drink options, including street food, craft ale, and a rum shack.
The festival is easily accessible from various parts of London and the South East, thanks to the multiple train and bus routes that service the area.
The Crystal Palace (TfL Overground and National Rail), Penge West (TfL Overground and National Rail), and Gipsy Hill (National Rail) stations all provide convenient access to the festival grounds.
The announcement of the hip-hop event has generated excitement among fans, who are eagerly awaiting the chance to see some of the biggest names in the industry perform live.
With more acts yet to be announced, the South Facing Festival is shaping up to be a highlight of the summer festival season.
For more information and to purchase tickets, visit the South Facing Festival website.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Orgasmic Meditation' Leaders Convicted of Forced Labor Charges
‘Orgasmic Meditation' Leaders Convicted of Forced Labor Charges

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Orgasmic Meditation' Leaders Convicted of Forced Labor Charges

Two leaders of a women's wellness start-up that promoted sexual empowerment through 'orgasmic meditation' were convicted Monday of using psychological abuse, surveillance, indoctrination, and intimidation to coerce employees into forced labor. Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz, the former CEO and former head of sales at the once-buzzy San Francisco venture OneTaste, were found guilty by a jury after a five-week trial in federal court in Brooklyn. More from Rolling Stone Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Countersuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds Dismissed Sean Combs' Ex Testifies Cassie Lawsuit Was Like 'Reading My Own Story' Sean Combs Trial: Second Mistrial Motion, 'Freak-Off' Audio and Peek Inside Mogul's Bank Accounts During the trial, prosecutors said the victims in the case worked long hours, performing highly degrading sex acts and manual labor for little or no compensation, because they believed that if they did not, they would 'lose their entire source of support, community, spirituality, and identity.' Three witnesses testified that they were coerced into becoming a 'handler' for OneTaste investor Reese Jones, who was also Daedone's boyfriend. The victims told jurors they were required to live with the investor, perform demeaning sex acts at his direction, and provide domestic labor such as cooking for him. The defense countered that no physical force or restraint was ever used and that OneTaste's spiritual teachings were protected by the First Amendment. They said any suggestion that Daedone and Cherwitz 'brainwashed' their employees was a violation of their right to religious freedom. 'We are deeply disappointed in today's verdict. We maintain our clients' innocence and look forward to continuing this fight on appeal. This case raised numerous novel and complex legal issues that will require review by the Second Circuit. We find inspiration in our clients, Nicole and Rachel, who have shown incredible strength throughout this entire process,' defense lawyers Jennifer Bonjean, Ceila Cohen, and Michael Robotti said in a statement sent to Rolling Stone. Daedone and Cherwitz each face up to 20 years in prison for the convictions. They're due to be sentenced in late September. 'The jury's verdict has unmasked Daedone and Cherwitz for who they truly are: grifters who preyed on vulnerable victims by making empty promises of sexual empowerment and wellness only to manipulate them into performing labor and services for the defendants' benefit,' Joseph Nocella, Jr., the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, said in a statement. 'I commend the witnesses who testified at trial notwithstanding the trauma that they experienced at the defendants' direction. It is my hope that the just conclusion of this process will bring them closure, and that future charlatans think twice about exploiting human beings in this manner.' Christopher G. Raia, assistant director of the FBI's New York field office, said in a statement that he hopes the verdict sends a 'clear message' that 'controlling your labor force by relying on lies, manipulation, and abuse is a crime.' Daedone, who founded OneTaste in 2004, has stated she drew inspiration from the traditional teachings of yoga and Buddhism when she started her company. On Monday, she brought up her 'spiritual' objectives when she addressed her supporters outside the courthouse. 'There is nothing but the spiritual aim that I set out for, and that's the liberation of all people, and the liberation of women. I'll do that wherever I am,' she said, according to The New York Times. OneTaste, which enjoyed some mainstream popularity in the mid-2010s, spread its teachings at various locations in New York, Los Angeles, Denver, Austin, and London, prosecutors said. The company offered hands-on classes on 'orgasmic mediation,' also known as OM, which centered on the practice of reaching new levels of intimacy and enlightenment through the stroking a woman's genitals for extended periods of time. The company generated revenue by providing courses, coaching, OM events, and less-publicized courses in other sexual practices in exchange for a fee, prosecutors said. Daedone became somewhat of a celebrity in the wellness field during her heyday. She delivered a TED Talk that went viral and attracted attention and promotion from celebrities including Gwyneth Paltrow and Khloé Kardashian. But OneTaste later became the subject of several exposés and documentaries alleging the group exploited its employees and participants. According to a Bloomberg Businessweek investigation published in 2018, OneTaste morphed from a glamorous, Silicon Valley-backed start-up into a sinister enterprise described by some as a for-profit sex cult. 'In some members' experiences, the company used flirtation and sex to lure emotionally vulnerable targets. It taught employees to work for free or cheap to show devotion. And managers frequently ordered staffers to have sex or OM (orgasmic meditation) with each other or with customers,' the piece reported. During the trial, multiple other witnesses testified that they were coerced by Daedone and Cherwitz into performing various sex acts with OneTaste's potential clients and investors. The coercion involved threats of termination, demotion, ostracism, and financial and spiritual ruin, they testified. In 2017, Ms. Daedone sold OneTaste for $12 million, prosecutors said. The former website now directs visitors to The Eros Platform, a community that still promotes it affiliation with Daedone, Cherwitz and and their Orgasmic Meditation practice. The Eros Coaching Collective still advertises a three-session OM training package for $525. Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up

Taylor Swift & Scooter Braun's Feud: A Timeline
Taylor Swift & Scooter Braun's Feud: A Timeline

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Taylor Swift & Scooter Braun's Feud: A Timeline

When Taylor Swift first slammed Scooter Braun in a Tumblr post heard 'round the world, nobody was prepared for one of the biggest feuds in music history to unfold over the coming years — much less the reverberations it would cause in the industry for years afterward. More from Billboard Chris Stapleton's 'Traveller' Turns 10: An Oral History of the Transformational Country Album Marc Nathan, Longtime Promotion and A&R Exec, Dies at 70 Las' Lap: Legacy Experience Celebrates Music, Artistry and Cultural Influence of R&B Though officially beginning in 2019 — when the pop star first put former label boss Scott Borchetta on blast for selling her catalog to the SB Projects founder — the story actually starts over a decade prior, when Swift was simply a 15-year-old aspiring singer-songwriter. In 2005, she inked her first record deal with then-new Nashville company Big Machine Records, signing over the ownership of her first six studio albums' masters. Thirteen years later, Swift wanted out. After her deal with Big Machine ended, the Grammy winner signed a new contract with Republic Records in 2018. And though she made sure to thank Borchetta 'for guiding me through over a decade of work that I will always be so proud of' in an Instagram post announcing the transfer, Swift also made a pointed allusion to why she'd decided to leave: 'It's also incredibly exciting to know that I'll own all of my master recordings that I make from now on. It's really important to me to see eye to eye with a label regarding the future of our industry.' It would only take a few months for the diplomacy to end, with Borchetta selling Big Machine — including Swift's catalog — for upwards of $300 million in June 2019. On the same day, the 'Shake It Off' singer came forward with a scathing statement taking issue not just with her former business partner for selling her work to someone else, but to whom exactly he'd sold it: Braun. As it turned out, Swift wasn't exactly a fan of the music manager — who is known for representing Justin Bieber, Ariana Grande and more — and their subsequent feud would go down in history books and inspire ongoing conversations about artist rights, private equity and the value of re-releasing music for years to come. From Braun's fateful purchase to Swift's Taylor's Version re-recording project and the star finally purchasing her masters back, a lot has happened in the clash of these two music industry titans. Keep reading to see a detailed timeline of how everything played out below. It was announced on June 30, 2019, that Braun's Ithaca Holdings agreed to acquire Borchetta's Big Machine Label Group in a blockbuster deal backed by the massive global investment firm the Carlyle Group. The deal topped $300 million and also included Big Machine Music, the music publishing operation. 'The idea of Scott and I working together is nothing new, we've been talking about it since the beginning of our friendship,' Braun said in a statement. 'I reached out to him when I saw an opportunity and, after many conversations, realized our visions were aligned. He's built a brilliant company full of iconic songs and artists. Who wouldn't want to be a part of that? By joining together, we will create more opportunities for artists than ever before, by giving them the support and tools to go after whatever dreams they wish to pursue.' The deal was financed by the Carlyle Group's Carlyle Partners VI Fund, alongside Braun and Ithaca Holdings. The company also announced that Carlyle would remain a minority shareholder in Ithaca and continue to support the combined company's growth strategy with Carlyle Group global consumer, media and retail team head Jay Sammons remaining on Ithaca's board. Borchetta would acquire a minority interest in Ithaca and join its board while remaining president and CEO of BMLG. The label previously lost Swift to Universal Music Group's Republic Records in 2018, but still retained her catalog. Other artists on their roster at the time included Florida Georgia Line, Thomas Rhett, Reba McEntire, Rascal Flatts, Brantley Gilbert, Lady Antebellum, Cheap Trick and Jennifer Nettles. In a letter posted to Tumblr shortly after the announcement, the megastar outlined why she was so upset with the new development. She said that she learned of the deal 'as it was announced to the world,' but according to a Billboard source, her team had known about the acquisition since June 25, 2019, when Big Machine held a shareholders meeting to discuss the deal. Her father, Scott Swift, also owns a small stake in Big Machine (about 4%). Braun is buying out his stake, as well as those of other minority shareholders. Swift went on to share that the deal made her revisit all of the times she was allegedly bullied by Braun and his clients. 'Like when Kim Kardashian orchestrated an illegally recorded snippet of a phone call to be leaked and then Scooter got his two clients together to bully me online about it,' she said. 'Or when his client, Kanye West, organized a revenge porn music video which strips my body naked. Now Scooter has stripped me of my life's work, that I wasn't given an opportunity to buy. Essentially, my musical legacy is about to lie in the hands of someone who tried to dismantle it.' She also went on to question Borchetta's loyalty, saying that he knew how Swift felt about Braun. The Big Machine label founder/CEO penned a letter titled, 'So, It's Time for Some Truth,' also posted June 30, 2019. He shared that he texted Swift the night before the deal went public: 'I guess it might somehow be possible that her dad Scott, 13 Management lawyer Jay Schaudies (who represented Scott Swift on the shareholder calls) or 13 Management executive and Big Machine LLC shareholder Frank Bell (who was on the shareholder calls) didn't say anything to Taylor over the prior 5 days. I guess it's possible that she might not have seen my text. But, I truly doubt that she 'woke up to the news when everyone else did.'' Borchetta also disputed Swift's claim that he'd proposed she ''earn' one album [master] back at a time, one for every new one [she] turned in.' '100% of all Taylor Swift assets were to be transferred to her immediately upon signing the new agreement,' he wrote, sharing a scan of a response to a proposal between Swift's management team and her attorney Don Passman, named 'TS Proposal' and dated Aug. 15, 2018. In the document, BMLG agreed that 'Upon execution [of a new contract], BMLG shall assign to TS all recordings (audio and/or visual), artwork, photographs and any other materials relating to TS which BMLG owns or controls.' Swift's team was asking for a new seven-year contract, while BMLG wanted a 10-year deal. He also responded to Swift's comment about fighting back tears every time Braun's name was brought up: 'Was I aware of some prior issues between Taylor and [Braun client] Justin Bieber? Yes….Scooter was never anything but positive about Taylor.' Demi Lovato took to her Instagram Story on July 1, 2019, to defend Braun ('I'm always gonna stay loyal to my team'), as did his most famous long-term client, Bieber, whom Swift had also called out in her Tumblr post for 'bullying' her with Braun via a post on the 'Baby' singer's Instagram. Bieber's post on June 30, 2019, started off as an apology to Swift: 'First of all i would like to apologize for posting that hurtful instagram post, at the time i thought it was funny but looking back it was distasteful and insensitive,' he wrote in the caption of a throwback photo. He also took full responsibility and stressed that Braun 'didn't have anything to do with it and it wasn't even a part of the conversation in all actuality he was the person who told me not to joke like that.' But as the post went on, Bieber began to accuse Swift of the bullying. 'As the years have passed we haven't crossed paths and gotten to communicate our differences, hurts or frustrations. So for you to take it to social media and get people to hate on scooter isn't fair. What were you trying to accomplish by posting that blog? seems to me like it was to get sympathy u also knew that in posting that your fans would go and bully scooter.' Other celebrities spoke out in Swift's favor. For one, Halsey posted a heartfelt note sharing her point of view: 'Taylor Swift is a huge reason why I always insisted to write my own music. I believed if she did it (in a way that made my teeth ache like cold water and my heart swell and my eyes leak) than I should too. Cause that's how to make someone feel. To drag it from the pits of your heart. To offer it on a platter and say 'take some but take kindly.' She deserves to own the painstaking labor of her heart.' 'It turns my guts that no matter how much power or success a woman has in this life, you are still susceptible to someone coming along and making you feel powerless out of spite,' she continued. 'It speaks volumes to how far we have to come in the music industry.' Hall also responded, accusing Braun of being 'an evil person who's only concern is his wealth and feeding his disgusting ego.' He went on to say, 'I believe he is homophobic & I know from his own mouth that he is not a Swift fan.' Kahn, a frequent director of Swift's music videos, added: 'I feel terrible for Taylor. This is the record business at it's most ruthless and shady. She is genuinely one of the nicest people ever and does not deserve this. She should own her work.' Yael Cohen, who was married to Braun at the time (the couple divorced in 2021), took to Instagram June 30, 2019, to defend her husband: 'Your dad is a shareholder and was notified, and Borchetta personally told you this before it came out. So no, you didn't find out with the world.' She went on to address Swift's bullying comment, 'Girl, who are you to talk about bullying? The world has watched you collect and drop friends like wilted flowers. My husband is anything but a bully, he's spent his life standing up for people and causes he believes in.' A spokesperson for Swift denied that her father Scott knew of the deal in advance, telling People, 'Scott Swift is not on the board of directors and has never been. On June 25, there was a shareholder phone call that Scott Swift did not participate in due to a very strict NDA that bound all shareholders and prohibited any discussion at all without risk of severe penalty.' Swift's attorney, Don Passman, stepped into the battle with a statement on July 2: 'Scott Borchetta never gave Taylor Swift an opportunity to purchase her masters, or the label, outright with a check in the way he is now apparently doing for others.' Passman almost never comments on artists' deals, so it was an unusual move for him to speak out on the case at all. He declined to comment beyond the statement to Billboard. Despite the back-and-forth regarding Swift's masters, Braun took a moment to congratulate the singer on the release of her seventh studio album, Lover. 'Regardless of what has been said the truth is you don't make big bets unless you are a believer and always have been,' he tweeted. 'Brilliant album with #Lover. Congrats @taylorswift13.' In an exclusive interview with CBS This Morning to promote Lover, her first album with Republic Records, Swift announced a plan to circumvent Braun's purchase of her masters altogether by re-recording each of her first six albums. During the sit-down, she also shaded Borchetta's choice to sell her masters to Braun, saying, 'I knew he would sell my music, I knew he would do that. I couldn't believe who he sold it to. Because we've had endless conversations about Scooter Braun, and he has 300 million reasons to conveniently forget those conversations.' After months of simmering tension, Swift's dispute with Braun and Borchetta reached a new level on ahead of the 2019 American Music Awards. In a viral post across her social media platforms, the superstar accused Braun and her former label boss of refusing to allow her to use any songs from her back catalog in her performance at the award show, where she was set to be honored as artist of the decade. Additionally, Swift claimed the two men were denying use of her older hits in a previously unannounced Netflix documentary about her life, and claimed 'any other recorded events I am planning to play until November of 2020 are a question mark.' In an unsigned press release posted to their website shortly after Swift's statement, the singer's former label refuted her claims. Big Machine denied keeping her from performing at the AMAs or blocking the Netlfix special — without directly addressing the use of her past hits in either — and fired back an allegation that Swift 'has admitted to contractually owing millions of dollars and multiple assets to our company.' Halsey, Selena Gomez, Gigi Hadid and more pals and peers of Swift once again took to social media to stand by her. 'My heart is so heavy write now,' Gomez posted on Instagram. 'It makes me sick and extremely angry. (I [don't] mind if there may be retaliation) this is my opinion. It's greed, manipulation and power.' 'This is just mean. This is punishment. This is hoping to silence her from speaking about things by dangling this over her head,' Halsey wrote on her Story, while Hadid stated, 'Scott and Scooter, you know what the right thing to do is — Taylor and her fans deserve to celebrate the music!!' Swift's publicist, Tree Paine, promptly issued a statement doubling down on Swift's claim that Borchetta 'flatly denied the request for both American Music Awards and Netflix' before adding, 'Please notice in Big Machine's statement, they never actually deny either claim Taylor said last night in her post.' Paine's statement also accused Swift's former label of 'trying to deflect and make this about money' and retaliated by maintaining that 'a professional auditor has determined that Big Machine owes Taylor $7.9 million dollars of unpaid royalties over several years.' Though Swift was not mentioned by name, a representative for Big Machine said in a statement to Billboard that the company has 'agreed to grant all licenses of their artists' performances to stream post show and for re-broadcast on mutually approved platforms.' 'It should be noted that recording artists do not need label approval for live performances on television or any other live media,' the statement continues. 'Record label approval is only needed for contracted artists' audio and visual recordings and in determining how those works are distributed.' Swift went on to perform a number of her old songs at the AMAs, including 'Love Story,' 'I Knew You Were Trouble' and 'Shake It Off.' She seemingly alluded to her ownership battle by wearing a men's button-down printed with the names of her first six album titles at the beginning of her performance, singing a snippet of 'The Man.' In an open letter to Swift posted on Instagram, Braun revealed that he and his family had received 'numerous death threats' since the pop star's statement about the AMAs. 'I assume this was not your intention but it is important that you understand that your words carry a tremendous amount of weight and that your message can be interpreted by some in different ways,' he continued in the post. 'While disappointed that you have remained silent after being notified by your attorney 4 days ago of these ongoing threats, I'm still hopeful we can fix this.' During her Woman of the Decade interview with Billboard, Swift said, 'Every week, we get a dozen synch requests to use 'Shake It Off' in some advertisement or 'Blank Space' in some movie trailer, and we say no to every single one of them. And the reason I'm rerecording my music next year is because I do want my music to live on. I do want it to be in movies, I do want it to be in commercials. But I only want that if I own it.' 'It's going to be fun, because it'll feel like regaining a freedom and taking back what's mine,' she said of the re-recording process. 'When I created [these songs], I didn't know what they would grow up to be. Going back in and knowing that it meant something to people is actually a really beautiful way to celebrate what the fans have done for my music.' While accepting the Woman of the Decade honors at Billboard's Women in Music event, Swift touched on her feud with Braun. 'Lately there's been a new shift that has affected me personally and that I feel is a potentially harmful force in our industry, and as your resident loud person, I feel the need to bring it up,' she said at the ceremony. 'And that is the unregulated world of private equity coming in and buying up our music as if it is real estate. As if it's an app or a shoe line. This just happened to me without my approval, consultation, or consent. After I was denied the chance to purchase my music outright, my entire catalog was sold to Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings in a deal that I'm told was funded by the Soros Family, 23 Capital, and the Carlyle Group. Yet to this day none of these investors have ever bothered to contact me or my team directly. To perform their due diligence on their investment. On their investment in me. To ask how I might feel about the new owner of my art. The music I wrote. The videos I created. Photos of me, my handwriting, my album designs. And of course, Scooter never contacted me or my team to discuss it prior to the sale or even when it was announced. I'm fairly certain he knew exactly how I would feel about it though. And let me just say that the definition of the toxic male privilege in our industry is people saying, 'But he's always been nice to me,' when I'm raising valid concerns about artists and their rights to own their music. And of course he's nice to you. If you're in this room, you have something he needs. The fact is that private equity is what enabled this man to think, according to his own social media post, that he could buy me. But I'm obviously not going willingly. Yet the most amazing thing was to discover that it would be the women in our industry who would have my back and show me the most vocal support at one of the most difficult times, and I will never, ever forget it. Like, ever.' Watch her speech on Billboard's YouTube channel. Using multiple barometers employed by music industry investors, Billboard estimated in February 2020 that the price of Swift's first six albums was anywhere from $400 million to $450 million, roughly double what Braun paid for them three months prior. In April 2020, Swift informed her fans via Instagram stories that her 'former label is putting out an 'album' of live performances of mine tonight.' 'I'm always honest with you guys about this stuff so I just wanted to tell you that this release is not approved by me,' Swift continued of the project, Live From Clear Channel Stripped 2008. 'It looks to me like Scooter Braun and his financial backers, 23 Capital, Alex Soros and the Soros family and The Carlyle Group have seen the latest balance sheets and realized that paying $330 MILLION for my music wasn't exactly a wise choice and they need money. 'In my opinion…Just another case of shameless greed in the time of Coronavirus,' the star concluded. 'So tasteless, but very transparent.' Ye, at the time still known as Kanye West, went on a tweeting spree in September 2020 proclaiming that 'all artists must be free' and referring to the music industry as 'modern day slavery.' He then brought Swift's dispute with Braun into the discussion. 'I'M GOING TO PERSONALLY SEE TO IT THAT TAYLOR SWIFT GETS HER MASTERS BACK. SCOOTER IS A CLOSE FAMILY FRIEND,' the rapper tweeted. In August 2019, Swift told Good Morning America's Robin Roberts when exactly she'd be able to start legally rerecording her old music. 'Yeah, that's true and it's something that I'm very excited about doing, because my contract says that starting November 2020 — so next year — I can record albums one through five all over again,' she said at the time. 'I'm very excited about it. I just think that artists deserve to own their own work. I just feel very passionately about that.' Sure enough, on the first day of November 2020, Swifties took to social media to celebrate with the hashtag #TaylorIsFree. According to a note Swift posted to Twitter on Nov. 16, 2020, and confirmed to Billboard by a source, Shamrock Holdings purchased the star's Big Machine Label Group catalog from Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings. The sale marked the second time in 17 months ownership over Swift's first six albums had changed hands. Swift posted to X that once Braun decided to sell her masters, his 'team' had asked her to sign a non-disclosure agreement before she could even 'bid on [her] own work.' 'My legal team said that this is absolutely not normal, and they're never seen an NDA like this presented unless it was to silence an assault accuser by paying them off,' she added at the time. 'He would never even quote my team a price. These master recordings were not for sale to me.' She also wrote that she'd originally been open to a partnership with Shamrock after the sale went through, but ultimately decided against it after learning that Braun would 'continue to profit off my old musical catalog for many years' under the new terms. 'Scooter's participation is a non-starter for me,' she added in her post. On April 9, 2021 — nearly two years after Swift first called out Braun for the sale of her masters — the pop star dropped Fearless (Taylor's Version), the first of her six planned re-records. Complete with never-before-heard Vault tracks and collaborations with other artists, the project was a massive success and ended up topping the Billboard 200 for two weeks. 'This process has been more fulfilling and emotional than I could've imagined and has made me even more determined to re-record all of my music,' she wrote in a note to fans prior to the album's release. 'I hope you'll like this first outing as much as I liked traveling back in time to recreate it.' In June 2021, Braun reflected on the immediate aftermath of his acquisition of Swift's catalog in an interview with Variety. 'I regret and it makes me sad that Taylor had that reaction to the deal,' he told the publication. 'All of what happened has been very confusing and not based on anything factual.' 'I don't know what story she was told,' he continued. 'I asked for her to sit down with me several times, but she refused. I offered to sell her the catalog back and went under NDA, but her team refused. It all seems very unfortunate. Open communication is important and can lead to understanding. She and I only met briefly three or four times in the past, and all our interactions were really friendly and kind. I find her to be an incredibly talented artist and wish her nothing but the best.' Swift soon followed up Fearless with Red (Taylor's Version) in November 2021. In addition to topping the Billboard 200, the project earned Swift her eighth No. 1 hit on the Hot 100 with 'All Too Well (10 Minute Version),' which also set a record by dethroning Don McLean's 'American Pie' for longest song to top the chart. Braun again reflected on his dispute with Swift in a 2022 interview with MSNBC. 'When I was buying [Big Machine], I actually said to that group, 'If at any point [Swift] wants to come back and be a part of this conversation, please let me know, because I wouldn't do this deal,'' he said. 'I was shown an email — which has now been made public now — where she stated that she wanted to move on that negotiation and wasn't interested in doing that deal anymore.' The mogul later continued, 'I think Taylor has every right to re-record. She has every right to pursue her masters, and I wish her nothing but well, and I have zero interest in saying anything bad about her. I've never said anything bad about her in the past, and I won't start to now. The only thing I disagree with is weaponizing a fanbase.' While speaking to NPR in September 2022, Braun opened up about the 'important lesson' his experience with Big Machine and Swift taught him: 'I can't put myself in a place of, you know, arrogance to think that someone would just be willing to have a conversation and be excited to work with me,' he said. The entrepreneur went on to emphasize how important it has been for him since the debacle with Swift to make sure he has conversations with everyone involved ahead of major business moves — something he says he didn't have the chance to do when purchasing Big Machine, as he was under a strict NDA that forbade him from contacting any of the artists on the label's roster before the sale. 'The regret I have there is that I made the assumption that everyone, once the deal was done, was going to have a conversation with me, see my intent, see my character and say, great, let's be in business together,' Braun added to NPR. 'And I made that assumption with people that I didn't know.' The third album in Swift's discography became her third re-release on July 7, 2023, with the pop star unveiling Speak Now (Taylor's Version) a couple months after announcing it at an Eras Tour show. The LP spent two weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard 200. When Swift dropped 1989 (Taylor's Version) in October 2023, it quickly became her most successful re-record to date. Spending six weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard 200, the LP was the star's first to outperform its original counterpart in first-week sales, taking home 1,359 million in comparison to 1989's 1.287 million in 2014. While speaking to TIME for her 2023 Person of the Year interview, Swift said that her dispute with Braun was one of two springboards for where her career is now (the other being her feud with Ye and Kim Kardashian). 'With the Scooter thing, my masters were being sold to someone who actively wanted them for nefarious reasons, in my opinion,' she told the publication at the time. 'I was so knocked on my a– by the sale of my music, and to whom it was sold. I was like, 'Oh, they got me beat now. This is it. I don't know what to do.'' Swift also described the situation with Braun has 'having my life's work taken away from me by someone who hates me.' 'My response to anything that happens, good or bad, is to keep making things,' she added. 'Keep making art … But I've also learned there's no point in actively trying to quote unquote defeat your enemies. Trash takes itself out every single time.' Five years after their feud first exploded into the public eye, Braun turned some heads by posting about Swift on his Instagram Story. Sharing a TMZ article about the pop star's beach vacation with boyfriend Travis Kelce, Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, the businessman wrote, 'How was I not invited to this?!? #laughalittle.' Just before that, he also posted about watching Max's documentary about their feud — Taylor Swift vs Scooter Braun: Bad Blood — which had premiered two months prior. 'I finally watched it…,' he simply wrote, sharing a screenshot of the project's poster. 'You'd think after his previous posts about her he'd learn by now,' an industry source told Billboard of Braun's activity at the time. 'It's like he's obsessed.' After Swift endorsed Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential election, Republican opponent Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social, 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT.' In response, Braun reshared the twice-impeached ex-POTUS' post on Instagram Stories and wrote, 'Shake it off Donald … Kamala 2024.' At long last, Swift was able to buy back the masters to her first six albums, purchasing them from Shamrock Capital almost five years after the firm first bought them from Braun. Revealing the news in a letter on her website, the singer called it her 'greatest dream come true' and noted that she felt 'forever grateful' to Shamrock for how negotiations were handled. 'I'm trying to gather my thoughts into something coherent, but right now my mind is just a slideshow,' she also wrote. 'A flashback sequence of all the times I daydreamed about, wished for, and pined away for a chance to get to tell you this news. All the times I was thiiiiiiiis close, reaching out for it, only for it to fall through. I almost stopped thinking it could ever happen, after 20 years of having the carrot dangled and then yanked away. But that's all in the past now.' Shortly after Swift announced that she'd bought back her masters, Braun shared a succinct response with Billboard: 'I am happy for her.' Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart

Scooter Braun Shares How ‘Deeply Unfair' Backlash to Taylor Swift Feud Turned Out to Be a ‘Gift'
Scooter Braun Shares How ‘Deeply Unfair' Backlash to Taylor Swift Feud Turned Out to Be a ‘Gift'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Scooter Braun Shares How ‘Deeply Unfair' Backlash to Taylor Swift Feud Turned Out to Be a ‘Gift'

Now that Taylor Swift has bought back the masters to her first six albums, Scooter Braun is reflecting on his part in the yearslong back-and-forth he ignited by purchasing the singer's catalog from Scott Borchetta back in 2019. While speaking about the feud during an episode of The Diary of a CEO posted Monday (June 9), the music mogul began by sharing how he'd originally had high hopes for his relationship with the 'Fortnight' singer after he bought Big Machine Label Group from Borchetta for a reported $300 million six years ago, gaining ownership of Swift's back catalog in the process. Shortly afterward, the pop star shared a Tumblr post calling the sale her 'worst case scenario,' accusing Braun of 'incessant, manipulative bullying' over the years and including a screenshot of a post from Justin Bieber featuring Braun and Kanye West with the caption, 'Taylor swift what's up.' More from Billboard Taylor Swift & Scooter Braun's Feud: A Timeline Kylie Minogue Joins Prestigious '21 Club' at London's O2 Arena Kevin Parker Previews New Tame Impala Music During Barcelona DJ Set Braun says that he was 'shocked' when he read Swift's post. 'When I bought Big Machine, I thought I was going to work with all the artists on Big Machine,' Braun recalled on the podcast. '[Taylor] and I had only met three or four times. One of the times, it was years earlier, it was really a great engagement. She invited me to her party. We respected each other.' 'In between that time since I'd seen her last, I started managing Kanye West,' he continued. 'I managed Justin Bieber. I knew she didn't get along with them. This is where my arrogance came in. I had a feeling she probably didn't like me because I managed them, but I thought once this announcement happened, she'd talk to me, see who I am, and we'd work together. Then this Tumblr comes out, and it says all of this stuff, and I was just shocked.' The involved parties would spend the next few weeks disputing details of how the deal went down — including whether or not Swift found out about the purchase only as it was publicly announced, which she claimed in her post — with Braun later writing in an open letter of his own that he was 'disappointed' in the 14-time Grammy winner for having 'remained silent' despite his family receiving 'numerous death threats' amid the debacle. Swift would later announce plans to re-record her old albums, while the retired manager eventually sold her catalog again to Shamrock Holdings. 'I couldn't fix the relationship that I didn't have, but then I was able to figure out, 'You know what? We'll sell it,'' Braun said of selling to Shamrock on The Diary of a CEO. 'In the world of streaming, the re-records will only help the old catalog as much as they help the new catalog. Both will get a bump. I showed how everyone can be a winner here, and I was able to sell the catalog and — I don't want to go into too much detail, but it's now come out very factually that I did offer it [to Taylor] … multiple times in that process. They said no, I sold to someone else, washed my hands of it and moved on.' Swift has also previously addressed Braun's alleged offers to sell her catalog back to her, though she recalls it much differently. According to the 'Karma' artist, his team had asked her to sign a non-disclosure agreement before she could even 'bid on [her] own work.' 'He would never even quote my team a price,' Swift wrote in a post on X at the time. 'These master recordings were not for sale to me.' Billboard has reached out to Swift's rep for comment. In any case, the musician walked away from negotiations and hammered away at her Taylor's Version re-recording project, releasing highly successful new versions of Fearless, Speak Now, Red and 1989 between 2021 and 2023. Everything came full circle at the end of May 2025, when Swift announced that she'd finally been able to acquire her old catalog from Shamrock, about which Braun told Billboard at the time, 'I am happy for her.' On the podcast, Braun reiterated that he only hopes for the best for Swift. 'I can't worry about everyone's niece being mad at me,' he quipped. 'What I gotta do is show up for my niece, and I gotta show up for my friends and my family. I wish everyone involved, across the board, whether I know them or not, good wishes.' Even so, the businessman confessed that the fallout was hard on his mental health and personal life, especially as he was going through a tough time with then-wife Yael Cohen that would eventually lead to a divorce. 'When something happens to you that feels deeply unfair, and you can't fix it, then you've really got to look at everything and realize the role you played in this or that, who you want to be,' Braun said of his disagreement with Swift. 'Everything in life is a gift,' he added. 'Having that experience allows me to have empathy for people I worked with. I never knew what it was like to be on the global stage like that. I never knew what criticism like that felt like.' Watch Braun's full interview on The Diary of a CEO above. Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store