US retailers see surge as spending slows on Temu & Shein
A sharp deceleration has been witnessed in US consumer spending growth in April on ultra-discount Chinese retailers like Temu and Shein, as per Consumer Edge (CE), a leading provider of global consumer data-driven insights.
In the three weeks leading up to April 27, American brands including Old Navy, Ulta Beauty, Nordstrom Rack and Savers Value Village picked up a significant amount of redirected consumer dollars from former Temu and Shein shoppers.
Consumer Edge data reveals a sharp slowdown in US consumer spending growth on Temu and Shein in April 2025, amid rising US-China trade tensions and policy changes. Former shoppers redirected spending to American retailers like Old Navy and Ulta Beauty. Temu's growth fell from 50 per cent to near zero, and Shein's from 30 per cent to 20 per cent.
According to the data, Temu's US year-over-year spend growth slowed sharply in April 2025—decelerating from nearly 50 per cent growth at the start of the month to almost zero growth by the end. Shein experienced a similar deceleration; with year-over-year spend growth declining from approximately 30 per cent to around 20 per cent during the same period. This dramatic slowdown coincides with rising US-China trade tensions, the elimination of the duty-free de minimis treatment for low-value imports and a reduction in advertising spend that had previously fuelled both platforms' rapid growth.
To identify where consumers spent their money, Consumer Edge analysed shoppers who made at least two purchases at Temu or Shein in January or February 2025 but no purchases in March or April, as per the study.
"The data isn't just showing a slight dip — we're seeing a rapid reallocation of spend from these popular Chinese discount platforms, and we're able to isolate exactly who's driving it," said Michael Gunther, vice president, head of insights, Consumer Edge . "Our cohort analysis gives us the ability to track what former Temu and Shein shoppers are doing now—not just in general, but down to the specific brands seeing surges in growth among this group. The current political and economic climate, including policy shifts and pricing pressures, is causing US consumers to alter their spending behaviour drastically. Our near-real-time data shows where this significant shift in spend is landing."
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (RR)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Auto Parts Supplier Marelli Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
(Bloomberg) -- Marelli Holdings Co., the struggling auto parts supplier for Nissan Motor Co., Stellantis NV and other carmakers, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the US as it seeks to slash its debt burden and restructure under new ownership. About '80% of the company's lenders have signed an agreement to support the restructuring, which will deleverage Marelli's balance sheet and strengthen its liquidity position,' Marelli said in a statement. It added it does not expect the process to have any operational impact on its business. Marelli has received a commitment for $1.1 billion in debtor-in-possession financing from its lenders. Upon Court approval, this amount, coupled with cash generated from the company's ongoing operations, is 'expected to provide sufficient liquidity to support the company through the Chapter 11 process,' Marelli said. The auto parts supplier has been caught up in industry upheaval as electrification and automation force global carmakers to shift their strategy to cope with declining sales in key markets. One person familiar with the matter said earlier this week that global investment firm Strategic Value Partners LLC, led by Victor Khosla, will effectively become the new owner of Marelli. KKR & Co., the US-based private equity group that created Marelli in 2019 by merging its Calsonic Kansei and Magneti Marelli units, will transfer its shares to the consortium of lenders as part of the proposed deal, the person said. Representatives for KKR declined to comment. Strategic Value Partners didn't respond to an email seeking comment. Marelli, which employs more than 50,000 people, had sought unsuccessfully to restructure over the past few years as orders from customers fell. The manufacturer based in Saitama, Japan, operates around 170 facilities globally that supply lighting systems, air conditioning, electric motors, suspensions and other components to carmakers. Apart from SVP, Marelli's creditors include Deutsche Bank AG, Mizuho Financial Group Inc. and other lenders. The consortium also includes Seoul-based MBK Partners Ltd. and New York's Fortress Investment Group LLC, the person said. Marelli filed for court-led rehabilitation in 2022 and at that time, its total debt was around ¥1.1 trillion ($7.6 billion), the most ever for a Japanese manufacturer. That was since reduced to around ¥650 billion. 'After careful review of the company's strategic alternatives, we have determined that entering the Chapter 11 process is the best path to strengthen Marelli's balance sheet by converting debt to equity,' Marelli CEO David Slump said in the statement. 'Taking this action now provides access to new liquidity to fund our long-term growth and innovation pipeline.' (Updates with detail from official statement.) More stories like this are available on
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
Is America Still Worth It?
What do Sundar Pichai, Amartya Sen, Indra Nooyi, Raghuram Rajan and Arvind Krishna have in common? Apart from being global icons of Indian stock, they all polished their brains at top American universities. A PhD from MIT launched Raghuram Rajan into the upper echelons of global economic thinking, from the IMF to the RBI. Sundar Pichai's Stanford and Wharton degrees were stepping stones to becoming Google's boss. Indra Nooyi earned her MBA from Yale before reshaping PepsiCo. Arvind Krishna, who heads IBM, trained at the University of Illinois, while Nobel laureate Amartya Sen's ideas on justice and welfare economics were sharpened at Harvard. Each one is a testament to how American classrooms have shaped Indian minds that now influence the world. And it doesn't stop there. Walk through the halls of Harvard or UC San Diego, and you will find Indian names carved into the very architecture of academia. There's the Lakshmi Mittal South Asia Institute at Harvard, funding cutting-edge research on the subcontinent. Or the Narayana Murthy Fellowship at Wharton, encouraging the next generation of entrepreneurial leaders. And in sunny California, the Tata Institute for Genetics and Society is helping scientists rethink the future of human biology. Indian students and philanthropists aren't just attending US universities - they are investing in them, expanding them, and in many ways, helping define their future. But the question is what do aspiring Indian students do now in the face of American universities being under siege - not just by budget cuts or what some might call culture wars, but by a calculated political offensive? The Trump administration insists it is punishing campuses for alleged antisemitism (read pro-Gaza demonstrations) and so-called "anti-white racism" (a swipe at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives). But at its core, this is an attack on academic freedom and free expression - two pillars of higher learning that have long defined American intellectual life, no matter which of the two main parties the previous presidents belonged to or which ideological belief they subscribed to. But Trump is being Trump. He isn't making history, he's reversing it. His actions are damaging the very institutions that have been central to America's global prestige: its diplomacy, its alliances, its prestigious campuses, its free press and its cultural and scientific soft power. He isn't rebuilding a fallen empire; he's dismantling the decades-old edifice of high learning. Indian Students To Suffer And nowhere is the collateral damage felt more acutely than in the homes of Indian families who once viewed a US degree as the surest ticket to global success. President Trump's strategy is clear. By targeting elite institutions like Harvard and Columbia - places symbolic of intellectual independence and academic brilliance - the administration is striking fear into the wider academic ecosystem. Going after big names guarantees headlines while sending a chilling message to smaller, less protected universities: fall in line or face the consequences. The effects of this political theatre are already being felt on the ground. In a move that seemed bureaucratic on the surface but has far deeper implications the Trump administration has quietly instructed US embassies worldwide - including in India - to halt all student visa interview appointments. Officially, the freeze is linked to enhanced social media vetting. Embassies are now required to comb through years of online activity before granting a visa. Applicants must submit their handles dating back to 2019, with the State Department stating it will 'use all available information' in its assessments. What kind of content might raise a red flag? No one knows. But in an age where political expression and youth activism are often lived online, the message is clear: be careful what you post or risk your academic future. For thousands of Indian students, many of whom spend lakhs of rupees preparing for admission exams, shortlisting universities and securing funding, the disruption is more than an inconvenience. It is a psychological blow. Indian families plan years in advance for these opportunities. When visa appointments disappear and bureaucratic fog descends, it isn't just a delay - it is a dream deferred. The Pivot Away From The US In 2023, Indian students overtook Chinese nationals to become the largest international student group in the US, with more than 3.3 lakh enrolments. They are widely seen, even by US officials, as a pillar of the international student community: academically rigorous, culturally adaptable and socially responsible. And they are not just participants; they are contributors. International students often pay higher tuition fees, making up a crucial slice of universities' operating budgets. They are also overrepresented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, often staying on to fuel the US innovation economy. And yet, their value is being dangerously overlooked. Harvard, in particular, has become a lightning rod. The Trump administration's attempt to block it from enrolling international students - now temporarily halted by court order - has caused widespread alarm. In Indian living rooms and WhatsApp groups, parents and students alike are beginning to ask the unthinkable: is the US still worth it? Many are already pivoting. A recent analysis in the Indian media estimated a 28% drop in Indian enrolments in the US for 2025, with students increasingly turning to the UK, Europe, Australia, and Canada. These countries may not offer the same cultural dominance or depth of alumni networks, but at least for now, they don't appear to be waging war on their own universities. Understand The Nuance What makes this all the more worrying is the broader ignorance outside the US about what's really happening within its academic institutions. International policymakers and even journalists often fail to grasp the nuance of the crisis. Few have sought the views of the faculty themselves - the professors and researchers who navigate complex institutional politics, face differing levels of protection based on gender, race or visa status and are now working under a cloud of fear and uncertainty. Trump's assault on higher education is not just a domestic issue. It's a global disruption. By weaponising immigration policy and framing liberal education as a threat to national identity, the US risks alienating the very people who once upheld its intellectual dominance. It is no longer just about visas and protests - it is about whether the American classroom remains a space for free thinking and global talent. And if it isn't, others are ready to fill the void. China, for all its surveillance and control, is investing heavily in its research universities. The UK is relaxing visa rules to court more Indian and African students. Even countries like Germany and the Netherlands are angling to offer English-language programmes and attract top talent from Asia. America's loss may well be their gain. The Shift Is Already Underway In the years to come, the world may see fewer Sundar Pichais, Indra Nooyis, Raghuram Rajans and Arvind Krishnas emerging from America's famed campuses. But perhaps we will see more Dr. Manmohan Singhs, Shashi Tharoors, and Rahul Bajajs - exceptional minds shaped by the equally esteemed institutions of the UK. Ultimately, Donald Trump's most lasting legacy may not be a law or a border wall, but the slow, silent exodus of brilliant young talent - students who once saw America as the ultimate destination, and are now looking elsewhere. That shift is already underway. An Opportunity For India As elite American universities come under political siege, India should seize the moment at home. With US campuses facing clampdowns on academic freedom, student expression and international mobility, India has a chance to position itself as a credible alternative. By investing heavily in research ecosystems, innovative education models and globally competitive institutions, India can attract not only its own aspiring scholars but also foreign talent disillusioned with the West's shifting academic climate. This isn't a far-fetched dream. India already boasts an expanding network of top-tier institutions - from the IITs and IIMs to the Indian Institute of Science and Ashoka University - and a vast pool of English-speaking faculty and students. What's needed now is visionary policy, generous research funding and a reimagining of education as a pillar of soft power. If the US is seen as closing its gates to ideas and talent, India can be the country that opens them, not just for Indians, but for the world.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's AI czar downplays risk AI chip exports could be smuggled
Trump rescinded Biden's executive order aimed at promoting competition, protecting consumers and ensuring AI was not used for misinformation. He also rescinded Biden's so-called AI diffusion rule, which capped the amount of American AI computing capacity that some countries were allowed to obtain via US AI chip imports. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads White House AI czar David Sacks on Tuesday downplayed the risk that coveted American AI chips could be smuggled to bad actors, and expressed concern that regulating U.S. AI too tightly could stifle growth and cede the critical market to China."We talk about these chips like they could be smuggled in the back of a briefcase. That's not what they look like. These are server racks that are eight feet tall and weigh two tons," Sacks said at the AWS summit in Washington."They don't walk out doors. It's very easy to basically verify that they're where they're supposed to be," he comments indicated President Donald Trump 's approach to AI could be centered on expanding markets abroad for U.S. AI chips and models. Former President Joe Biden had emphasized policies that countered risks the chips could be diverted to China and used to bolster Beijing's military."I do worry we're on a trajectory where fear could overtake opportunity and we end up sort of crippling this wonderful progress that we're seeing," Sacks said, citing a raft of bills in state legislatures seeking to regulate AI, as well as permitting challenges facing companies seeking to build the data centers that power rescinded Biden's executive order aimed at promoting competition, protecting consumers and ensuring AI was not used for misinformation. He also rescinded Biden's so-called AI diffusion rule, which capped the amount of American AI computing capacity that some countries were allowed to obtain via US AI chip imports."We rescinded that Biden diffusion rule, diffusion a bad word. Diffusion of our technology should be a good word," Sacks Trump administration and the United Arab Emirates also announced a plan last month for the Gulf country to build the largest artificial intelligence campus outside the U.S. after Biden in 2023 put in place rules that curbed most AI chip shipments to the aim at that regulation, Sacks said, "What play are we giving them? We're basically going to push them into the arms of China."He added that if, in five years, AI chips made by sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei were everywhere, "that means we can't let that happen."The need to remove hurdles to U.S. AI innovation is urgent as China has made important advances in its AI models, Sacks said. This year, the Chinese AI app DeepSeek shocked the world with its sophisticated, affordably trained model."China is not years and years behind us in AI. Maybe they're three to six months," said Sacks. "It's a very close race." The White House later said he was referring to China's AI models, adding that Chinese AI chips are one to two years behind their U.S. counterparts.
