logo
WHO calls for maternal vaccine, monoclonal antibody to protect babies against RSV

WHO calls for maternal vaccine, monoclonal antibody to protect babies against RSV

Hans India30-05-2025
New Delhi: The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday recommended all countries to use both maternal vaccine and a monoclonal antibody to protect babies against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) -– the leading cause of acute lower respiratory infections in children globally.
While the maternal vaccine -- RSVpreF -- can be given to pregnant women in their third trimester to protect their infant, the long-acting monoclonal antibody -- nirsevimab -- can be administered to infants from birth, just before or during the RSV season, stated the recommendations, published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record (WER).
'Every year, RSV causes about 100,000 deaths and over 3.6 million hospitalisations in children under the age of 5 years worldwide. About half of these deaths occur in infants younger than 6 months of age,' the WHO said.
"The vast majority (97 per cent) of RSV deaths in infants occur in low- and middle-income countries where there is limited access to supportive medical care, such as oxygen or hydration," it added.
Although RSV causes mild symptoms similar to the common cold, including runny nose, cough, and fever, it can lead to serious complications. This can include pneumonia and bronchiolitis -– in infants, young children, older adults, and those with compromised immune systems or underlying health conditions.
Both RSVpreF and nirsevimab were recommended by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation (SAGE) for global implementation in September 2024. In addition, the maternal vaccine received WHO prequalification in March 2025, allowing it to be purchased by UN agencies.
While the vaccine can be given during routine antenatal care, nirsevimab is given as a single injection of monoclonal antibodies that starts protecting babies against RSV within a week of administration. It lasts for at least 5 months and can cover the entire RSV season in countries with RSV seasonality.
The global health body recommends that infants receive a single dose of nirsevimab right after birth or before being discharged from a birthing facility. If not administered at birth, the monoclonal antibody can be given during the baby's first health visit.
If a country decides to administer the product only during the RSV season rather than year-round, a single dose can also be given to older infants just before entering their first RSV season, the WHO said.
The greatest impact on severe RSV disease will be achieved by administering the monoclonal antibody to infants under 6 months of age. However, there is still a potential benefit among infants up to 12 months of age, it added.
'RSV is an incredibly infectious virus that infects people of all ages, but is especially harmful to infants, particularly those born premature when they are most vulnerable to severe disease,' said Dr Kate O'Brien, Director of Immunisation, Vaccines, and Biologicals at WHO.
'The WHO-recommended RSV immunisation products can transform the fight against severe RSV disease, dramatically reduce hospitalisations, and deaths, ultimately saving many infants lives globally,' O'Brien added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Focus on rabies control, not stray dog population
Focus on rabies control, not stray dog population

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Focus on rabies control, not stray dog population

The current debate about whether stray dogs in Delhi should have a home on the street or be rounded up into pounds has generated strong feelings on all sides. Regardless of which way a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court rules, the fundamental challenge remains curbing of rabies, the disease reported to be responsible for the death of the six-year-old which sparked this debate. Removing the roughly million stray dogs from Delhi's streets will only reduce rabies cases and deaths by less than 2% nationwide. A more productive public health approach would be to focus on rabies rather than stray dogs. India has had enormous success in infectious disease control through vaccinations, examples being smallpox, polio, maternal tetanus and most recently, Covid-19. The country can then surely make significant progress towards the World Health Organization (WHO)'s goal of zero rabies deaths by 2030 without eliminating the 60 million stray dogs in India. But we are far from that goal. India accounts for one in three rabies deaths globally and over two-thirds in Asia. According to WHO data, there are an estimated 18,000-20,000 deaths from rabies each year in India. In comparison, China, which has 40 million stray dogs, reported an average of only 433 rabies cases per year between 2015 and 2021. The number of rabies deaths has declined from 3,300 in 2007 to fewer than 300 deaths in 2020. How did China manage to control rabies without killing its stray dogs? It adopted a one-health approach to rabies control, ensuring close coordination between the human and animal health departments, widening access to post-exposure vaccines (rabies is the only infectious disease that can be addressed using a vaccine post-exposure to the virus), expanding vaccination of all stray dogs and improving surveillance of all dog bites and rabies. China administers approximately 12-15 million rabies vaccine doses every year, at a cost of about $1 billion. India's rabies control programme is poorly funded and, unlike other disease control programmes, straddles two ministries — health and animal husbandry. With poor coordination, the programme has been a failure as evidenced by the rising numbers of rabies cases. A few municipalities like Mumbai and Goa have successfully reduced rabies cases and deaths, but nationally, rabies control has been a failure. The issue pits the right of humans to live safely without getting bitten or attacked against that of most dogs who do not bite anyone. The deaths of children and the elderly due to dog attacks is painful and unacceptable. It is also unacceptable that we consign millions of dogs to a painful death in dog pounds and shelters. For many human communities, strays are part of the community without a designated pet owner. They provide security against outsiders, protection from wild animals, and are generally fed by multiple households. In many instances, most stray dogs exist because of the support of people across the country, and not just because of a small group of urban, well-heeled animal lovers. It will be impossible to get community participation to control rabies if people view the government's programme as an effort to kill their dogs. Taking this approach in a country with deeply ingrained respect for all life, we may achieve control of neither stray dog population nor of rabies. The seeds of the current situation were sown by the poorly conceived Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2001 (updated in 2023) which prevents rabid dogs from being euthanised. Rabid dogs can only be isolated until they die, often a painful death. Even dogs that bite people can be removed from an area after a lengthy investigation and bureaucratic process, which all but ensures that the dog remains in the area. These laws have likely caused an increase in bites and rabies and have diminished public support for stray dogs. In the name of love for animals, the leadership that pushed through that act without much debate has created an untenable situation that forces us to choose between human and animal life. A public health solution that puts the focus on rabies and dogs that attack humans is far more likely to succeed. In the short term, we must replace the misguided ABC rules with a more common-sense set of guidelines that allow removal of biting and rabid dogs from communities. In the longer term, India should aim to remove all dogs from streets with the aim of eliminating all rabies deaths and ensuring that both humans and dogs are protected. Ramanan Laxminarayan is president of the One Health Trust. The views expressed are personal.

Gaza's Other Crisis—Not Enough Clean Drinking Water
Gaza's Other Crisis—Not Enough Clean Drinking Water

Hindustan Times

time8 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Gaza's Other Crisis—Not Enough Clean Drinking Water

In Gaza, the problem isn't just the daily struggle to find food . It is also finding enough clean water to drink. Most of the enclave's water facilities have been damaged or destroyed in nearly two years of war. Residents trek long distances and queue for hours to fill up jerrycans with groundwater from wells for washing and with desalinated water distributed by water trucks for drinking. Families ration how much water they drink and sometimes drink the groundwater, even though it is often contaminated by seawater or sewage. It is common for people to go days without washing themselves. Some have resorted to using seawater. Soap is a rare commodity, with infectious diseases spreading rapidly. 'We drink one cup of water a day,' said Iman Masri, a mother of four, who is currently sharing a tent with 24 family members on land owned by her family near the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis. Her family gets most of its drinking water from a water truck that comes by the camp roughly every other day. Their washing water comes from a nearby well. The dishes often pile up and the bathroom becomes unusable. Taking a shower is a luxury, and the family gets rashes from the lack of hygiene, she says. 'Sometimes when the trucks don't come, we drink water from the well,' said Masri, who said the water is making them sick. 'My kids get diarrhea.' Residents of Gaza are currently using far less water than the World Health Organization's emergency standard of 15 liters of water per person a day on average for drinking and washing—with people in some areas using as little as two liters a day. Israel has taken steps to allow more food and better water access as international criticism grows. More aid trucks are coming in, and Israel recently said it would reconnect Gaza's main desalination plant to its electricity grid, four months after it cut it off as a way to pressure Hamas. Israel also turned a water pipeline back on from Israel to northern Gaza earlier this month. Residents and humanitarian workers say a lot more needs to be done faster to address the crisis. The enclave relied on three sources of water before the war: groundwater wells, seawater desalination plants and water pipelines from Israel. All have been severely affected by the war, which began after Hamas's deadly attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Israel has imposed restrictions on imports of fuel, spare parts and other supplies. Three water pipelines from Israel, which used to supply around 13% of Gaza's water before the war, have worked only sporadically since the start of the war because of frequent damage. The wells and desalination plants have either been damaged, lack spare parts and chemicals to treat the water or are located in areas where the Israeli military has told people to leave. Fuel and electricity—for water-delivery trucks, to run the well pumps and to power the actual plants—is in critically short supply, while some 255 of the 392 water wells are either inoperable or out of reach, according to Unicef, the United Nations children's agency. Unicef and other aid groups supply the water needs for the equivalent of 1.4 million people a day in Gaza, which has a population of 2.1 million. The amount of water extracted from wells fell by 70% from levels pumped out during a cease-fire period earlier this year, because there isn't enough fuel to run the pumps. 'It is mostly used for cleaning, but people are now resorting to that water for cooking and drinking,' said Tess Ingram, a spokeswoman for Unicef who was recently in Gaza. 'People are washing in the sea.' Depending on the area, drinking water is sometimes available free or for a modest sum. Some well owners share their groundwater at no cost, but not all do. Filling a 600-gallon tank with nondrinking water costs the equivalent of $300, said Raneem Junina, a resident of Gaza City. To ease the water shortage, the United Arab Emirates is funding the construction of new, 4-mile water pipelines that will link desalination plants on the Egyptian side of the border to the area of Al Mawasi in southern Gaza, a major population center, with the goal of meeting the water needs of around 600,000 people a day, according to the Emirati state-run news agency WAM. The project is being developed in coordination with Egyptian and Gaza authorities, it said. But that will take time to complete, and Gaza's already dire humanitarian situation has worsened significantly since the end of a cease-fire in March. With rising hunger-related deaths and food insecurity, experts say the enclave is sliding into famine. The crisis was precipitated by Israel's decision to ban all food and other aid from entering the Gaza Strip from March to May, as a way to pressure Hamas to release the remaining hostages and to prevent aid from falling into the hands of the group, Israeli officials said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Israel has no starvation policy for Gaza. Supplies stockpiled during the cease-fire gradually ran out. Access to clean water became much harder, with soap too becoming increasingly difficult to get hold of. 'Here in Gaza, we suffer from many things, but the most important thing is the water crisis,' said Balsam Khalaf, a widow who lives in Gaza City with her daughter. 'A person can endure a little hunger. But water, we can't survive without it.' Khalaf says she spends hours every day queuing in the summer heat for water that rarely lasts more than half a day. One of her most prized possessions is a bottle of shampoo. She said a single bottle can sell for as much as $100 in the city's market, if it can be found at all. Write to Margherita Stancati at

Gaza's other crisis—not enough clean drinking water
Gaza's other crisis—not enough clean drinking water

Mint

time10 hours ago

  • Mint

Gaza's other crisis—not enough clean drinking water

In Gaza, the problem isn't just the daily struggle to find food. It is also finding enough clean water to drink. Most of the enclave's water facilities have been damaged or destroyed in nearly two years of war. Residents trek long distances and queue for hours to fill up jerrycans with groundwater from wells for washing and with desalinated water distributed by water trucks for drinking. Families ration how much water they drink and sometimes drink the groundwater, even though it is often contaminated by seawater or sewage. It is common for people to go days without washing themselves. Some have resorted to using seawater. Soap is a rare commodity, with infectious diseases spreading rapidly. 'We drink one cup of water a day," said Iman Masri, a mother of four, who is currently sharing a tent with 24 family members on land owned by her family near the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis. Her family gets most of its drinking water from a water truck that comes by the camp roughly every other day. Their washing water comes from a nearby well. The dishes often pile up and the bathroom becomes unusable. Taking a shower is a luxury, and the family gets rashes from the lack of hygiene, she says. 'Sometimes when the trucks don't come, we drink water from the well," said Masri, who said the water is making them sick. 'My kids get diarrhea." Residents of Gaza are currently using far less water than the World Health Organization's emergency standard of 15 liters of water per person a day on average for drinking and washing—with people in some areas using as little as two liters a day. Israel has taken steps to allow more food and better water access as international criticism grows. More aid trucks are coming in, and Israel recently said it would reconnect Gaza's main desalination plant to its electricity grid, four months after it cut it off as a way to pressure Hamas. Israel also turned a water pipeline back on from Israel to northern Gaza earlier this month. Residents and humanitarian workers say a lot more needs to be done faster to address the crisis. The enclave relied on three sources of water before the war: groundwater wells, seawater desalination plants and water pipelines from Israel. All have been severely affected by the war, which began after Hamas's deadly attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Israel has imposed restrictions on imports of fuel, spare parts and other supplies. Three water pipelines from Israel, which used to supply around 13% of Gaza's water before the war, have worked only sporadically since the start of the war because of frequent damage. The wells and desalination plants have either been damaged, lack spare parts and chemicals to treat the water or are located in areas where the Israeli military has told people to leave. Fuel and electricity—for water-delivery trucks, to run the well pumps and to power the actual plants—is in critically short supply, while some 255 of the 392 water wells are either inoperable or out of reach, according to Unicef, the United Nations children's agency. Unicef and other aid groups supply the water needs for the equivalent of 1.4 million people a day in Gaza, which has a population of 2.1 million. The amount of water extracted from wells fell by 70% from levels pumped out during a cease-fire period earlier this year, because there isn't enough fuel to run the pumps. 'It is mostly used for cleaning, but people are now resorting to that water for cooking and drinking," said Tess Ingram, a spokeswoman for Unicef who was recently in Gaza. 'People are washing in the sea." Depending on the area, drinking water is sometimes available free or for a modest sum. Some well owners share their groundwater at no cost, but not all do. Filling a 600-gallon tank with nondrinking water costs the equivalent of $300, said Raneem Junina, a resident of Gaza City. To ease the water shortage, the United Arab Emirates is funding the construction of new, 4-mile water pipelines that will link desalination plants on the Egyptian side of the border to the area of Al Mawasi in southern Gaza, a major population center, with the goal of meeting the water needs of around 600,000 people a day, according to the Emirati state-run news agency WAM. The project is being developed in coordination with Egyptian and Gaza authorities, it said. But that will take time to complete, and Gaza's already dire humanitarian situation has worsened significantly since the end of a cease-fire in March. With rising hunger-related deaths and food insecurity, experts say the enclave is sliding into famine. The crisis was precipitated by Israel's decision to ban all food and other aid from entering the Gaza Strip from March to May, as a way to pressure Hamas to release the remaining hostages and to prevent aid from falling into the hands of the group, Israeli officials said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Israel has no starvation policy for Gaza. Supplies stockpiled during the cease-fire gradually ran out. Access to clean water became much harder, with soap too becoming increasingly difficult to get hold of. 'Here in Gaza, we suffer from many things, but the most important thing is the water crisis," said Balsam Khalaf, a widow who lives in Gaza City with her daughter. 'A person can endure a little hunger. But water, we can't survive without it." Khalaf says she spends hours every day queuing in the summer heat for water that rarely lasts more than half a day. One of her most prized possessions is a bottle of shampoo. She said a single bottle can sell for as much as $100 in the city's market, if it can be found at all. Write to Margherita Stancati at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store