Pension Fund Exits Australia Childcare Firm After Abuse Charges
Vision Super sold its about A$3.3 million ($2.2 million) worth of G8 Education shares in early August, according to Chief Investment Officer Michael Wyrsch. The fund has also put the A$720 million company, which operates hundreds of centers across Australia, on its excluded investments list alongside tobacco companies and makers of controversial weapons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
16 minutes ago
- Business Insider
'No Place Being an Accomplice…' Microsoft Stock (NASDAQ:MSFT) Notches Up Despite Internal Tensions
Tech giant Microsoft (MSFT) is a very widely dispersed organization, particularly in its video gaming operations. Microsoft owns somewhere around 40 studios, at last report, and that can mean some tension between divisions. One of those tensions recently boiled up in the form of an open letter from Arkane Studios criticizing Microsoft for its connections to Israel. Investors were less than concerned, though, and sent shares up fractionally in Thursday afternoon's trading. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Arkane Studios, via members of the company union STJV, released an open letter calling on Microsoft to drop its support of Israel. Arkane's STJV elements joined what are known as Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) operations, as well as the No Azure for Apartheid movement, calling on Microsoft to '…stop supporting the Israeli regime.' Further, the open letter from Arkane cited concerns about the employees' 'reputation and work,' which it believes could be impacted by Microsoft's association with the Israeli government. This is not the first time such concerns have been raised. Microsoft investigated its connections therein as far back as May, reports note. Indeed, Microsoft's internal review found that it did provide the Israel Ministry of Defense (IMOD) with '…software, professional services, Azure cloud and AI services….' However, the report noted there was '…no evidence to date' that said technologies were used to '…target or harm people.' 107 Vulnerabilities for Patch Tuesday Meanwhile, reports also emerged about the recent Patch Tuesday event, in which Microsoft managed to not only find but seal up fully 107 separate vulnerabilities. This may sound like a catastrophe in the making, but Microsoft noted that none of these vulnerabilities had actually been used in the field. Microsoft plans its next Patch Tuesday for September 9, 2025. The fixes came out for Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server. Naturally, Microsoft is still recommending all users move to Windows 11 24H2, but considering that Microsoft is currently being sued over that recommendation—thanks to the upgrades in hardware that will almost certainly be required to make it happen—just how far it will go remains to be seen. Is Microsoft a Buy, Hold or Sell? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on MSFT stock based on 34 Buys and one Hold assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 23.64% rally in its share price over the past year, the average MSFT price target of $623.34 per share implies 18.94% upside potential.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ASX Ltd (ASXFF) (FY25) Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Revenue Growth and Dividend Increase ...
Operating Revenue: $1.11 billion, up 7% year-over-year. Underlying Net Profit After Tax (NPAT): Increased by 7.5%. Statutory Profit: Up by 6%. Final Dividend: $1.121 per share, fully franked, with a total dividend of $2.233 per share, up 7.4%. EBITDA Margin: Increased by 70 basis points to 62.8%. Return on Equity (ROE): Up by 60 basis points to 13.6%. Total Expenses: $460.3 million, up 7.2%. Net Interest Income: $86.8 million, up 13.2%. Listings Revenue: Stable at $208 million. Markets Revenue: $349.2 million, up 10.7%. Technology and Data Revenue: $275.6 million, up 8%. Securities and Payments Revenue: $274.4 million, up 7.4%. Capital Expenditure (CapEx): $176 million for FY25. Guidance for FY26 Expenses Growth: 14% to 19%, including ASIC inquiry costs. Guidance for FY26 CapEx: Between $170 million and $180 million. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with ASXFF. High Yield Dividend Stocks in Gurus' Portfolio This Powerful Chart Made Peter Lynch 29% A Year For 13 Years How to calculate the intrinsic value of a stock? Release Date: August 14, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points ASX Ltd (ASXFF) reported a strong financial performance for FY25 with operating revenue of $1.11 billion, up 7% from the previous year. The company declared a fully franked final dividend of $1.121 per share, reflecting a payout ratio of 85% of underlying NPAT. ASX Ltd (ASXFF) achieved an EBITDA margin increase of 70 basis points to 62.8%, with plans for further margin expansion. The company is making significant progress in its technology modernization program, including the successful launch of Release 15 for its Cash Market Trading project. ASX Ltd (ASXFF) is actively pursuing customer-driven growth opportunities, including enhancements to market quality and new data products. Negative Points ASX Ltd (ASXFF) faces increased operating expenses due to the ASIC inquiry, with an expected additional cost of $25 million to $35 million in FY26. The company is not yet where it wants to be in terms of operational risk management and resilience, necessitating the Accelerate program. There is ongoing uncertainty around the timing of interoperability between e-conveyancing platforms, impacting the Sympli joint venture. ASX Ltd (ASXFF) is experiencing higher technology expenses, driven by increased software licensing fees and costs related to technology projects. The company is under scrutiny from ASIC, which has launched a compliance assessment and inquiry into ASX Ltd (ASXFF)'s governance, capability, and risk management frameworks. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you elaborate on the spread benefit on the collateral balances and the trajectory for FY26? A: Andrew Tobin, CFO: The spread has been extending slightly, with opportunities taken at the short end of the curve. We guide to around 16 basis points for FY26, depending on the persistence of these opportunities. Q: What is your forward view on the annual listing fees, given the current market conditions? A: Andrew Tobin, CFO: The net capital added to the market has been positive, indicating a strong trend in initial and secondary fees. The roll-off profile and monthly market activity reports can help model future outcomes. Q: How do you view the sustainability of the dividend payout given the cash position and expenses? A: Andrew Tobin, CFO: The Board considers the dividend payout policy each period, currently set at 80% to 90%. With increasing amortization, the cash flow remains positive, supporting the dividend sustainability. Q: What are the potential risks for costs in FY27, especially with the ASIC inquiry? A: Helen Lofthouse, CEO: The $25 million to $35 million for the ASIC inquiry is expected to be specific to FY26. We have a transformational strategy in place, and it's not appropriate to prejudge the inquiry's outcome. Q: Can you explain the gap between market business revenue growth and volume growth? A: Helen Lofthouse, CEO: The gap is due to a mix shift and increased volume rebates. Slower performance in commodities and significant growth in rates, which have lower price points, contributed to this dynamic. Q: How do you view the potential competition in corporate listings and its impact on annual listing fees? A: Helen Lofthouse, CEO: The market is already competitive with choices among exchanges and public/private markets. Our pricing and value proposition are set within this competitive context. Q: What is the impact of the new pricing policy for clearing and settlement from July 1? A: Helen Lofthouse, CEO: The new pricing model replaces the rebate structure, with no fee changes expected for the next couple of years. It uses a building block method, commonly used for infrastructure services. Q: How should we think about the costs associated with the ASX Accelerate program? A: Helen Lofthouse, CEO: The program increases the pace of key strategic work, adding rigorous planning and delivery expertise. It's a wrap around existing plans rather than a separate set of initiatives. Q: What feedback have you received on the new pricing approach for clearing and settlement? A: Helen Lofthouse, CEO: The approach was consulted on last year, with adjustments made based on feedback. It has been reviewed by stakeholder committees and regulators, with broad comfort achieved. Q: How do you view the growth potential for the information services business? A: Helen Lofthouse, CEO: We see further growth opportunities in data, with new products launched and more in development. While we don't guide to specific growth targets, it's a key area of focus. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Australian lawyer apologizes for AI-generated errors in murder case
MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — A senior lawyer in Australia has apologized to a judge for filing submissions in a murder case that included fake quotes and non-existent case judgments generated by artificial intelligence. The blunder in the Supreme Court of Victoria state is another in a litany of mishaps AI has caused in justice systems around the world. Defense lawyer Rishi Nathwani, who holds the prestigious legal title of King's Counsel, took 'full responsibility' for filing incorrect information in submissions in the case of a teenager charged with murder, according to court documents seen by The Associated Press on Friday. 'We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred,' Nathwani told Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, on behalf of the defense team. The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday. Elliott ruled on Thursday that Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment. 'At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory,' Elliott told lawyers on Thursday. 'The ability of the court to rely upon the accuracy of submissions made by counsel is fundamental to the due administration of justice,' Elliott added. The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and non-existent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court. The errors were discovered by Elliott's associates, who couldn't find the cases and requested that defense lawyers provide copies. The lawyers admitted the citations 'do not exist' and that the submission contained 'fictitious quotes,' court documents say. The lawyers explained they checked that the initial citations were accurate and wrongly assumed the others would also be correct. The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who didn't check their accuracy. The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI. 'It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified,' Elliott said. The court documents do not identify the generative artificial intelligence system used by the lawyers. In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed $5,000 fines on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim. Judge P. Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith. But he credited their apologies and remedial steps taken in explaining why harsher sanctions were not necessary to ensure they or others won't again let artificial intelligence tools prompt them to produce fake legal history in their arguments. Later that year, more fictitious court rulings invented by AI were cited in legal papers filed by lawyers for Michael Cohen, a former personal lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump. Cohen took the blame, saying he didn't realize that the Google tool he was using for legal research was also capable of so-called AI hallucinations.
