LINE BREAKING NEWS: Lineage, Inc. Stock Significantly Declines After IPO on Customer Downturn -- Investors with Losses are Notified to Contact BFA Law before September 30 Class Action Deadline
Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) and certain of the Company's senior executives and directors for potential violations of the federal securities laws.
If you invested in Lineage, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/lineage-inc-class-action-lawsuit.
Investors have until September 30, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of investors who purchased stock pursuant and/or traceable to Lineage's registration statement for its initial public offering held on or about July 25, 2024. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and is captioned City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Lineage, Inc., et al., No. 2:25-cv-12383.
Why Was Lineage Sued Under the Federal Securities Laws?
Lineage is a cold storage focused real estate investment trust ('REIT'). Through its Global Warehousing Segment, Lineage owns and operates hundreds of temperature-controlled storage facilities used by companies to store food and other perishable products.
As alleged, Lineage's IPO documents touted its 'consistent cold chain demand,' which purportedly provided Lineage 'with strong cash flows even during periods of broader economic stress.' The IPO documents also represented that the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic had 'accelerated trends that . . . have the potential to be growth engines for the industry in coming years.'
In truth, Lineage was allegedly in the midst of a sustained downturn, as its customers destocked excess inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and also shifted to leaner inventories on a go-forward basis and as more cold-storage supply came on line.
Events Following the IPO
On February 26, 2025, Lineage announced its fiscal Q4 2024 financial results, revealing that customers had been 'unwinding' previously 'overbuil[t]' levels of inventory, returning to a 'more normal seasonal pattern' that was expected to 'continue moving forward.' Lineage conducted its IPO at $78 per share. Since the IPO, the price of Lineage stock has fallen dramatically, to lows near $40 per share—approximately half the IPO price.
Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/lineage-inc-class-action-lawsuit.
What Can You Do?
If you invested in Lineage you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.
All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.
Or contact:
Ross Shikowitz
ross@bfalaw.com
212.789.3619
Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?
BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named 'Elite Trial Lawyers' by the National Law Journal, among the top '500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers' by Lawdragon, 'Titans of the Plaintiffs' Bar' by Law360 and 'SuperLawyers' by Thomson Reuters. Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.'s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.
For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tandem Diabetes (NASDAQ:TNDM) Exceeds Q2 Expectations But Stock Drops 17%
Diabetes technology company Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) reported Q2 CY2025 results topping the market's revenue expectations , with sales up 8.5% year on year to $240.7 million. The company expects the full year's revenue to be around $1 billion, close to analysts' estimates. Its GAAP loss of $0.78 per share was significantly below analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy Tandem Diabetes? Find out in our full research report. Tandem Diabetes (TNDM) Q2 CY2025 Highlights: Revenue: $240.7 million vs analyst estimates of $237.1 million (8.5% year-on-year growth, 1.5% beat) EPS (GAAP): -$0.78 vs analyst estimates of -$0.39 (significant miss) Adjusted EBITDA: -$1.85 million vs analyst estimates of $2.34 million (-0.8% margin, significant miss) The company reconfirmed its revenue guidance for the full year of $1 billion at the midpoint Operating Margin: -21.5%, down from -13.9% in the same quarter last year Sales Volumes rose 5% year on year, in line with the same quarter last year Market Capitalization: $1.01 billion Company Overview With technology that automatically adjusts insulin delivery based on continuous glucose monitoring data, Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) develops and manufactures automated insulin delivery systems that help people with diabetes manage their blood glucose levels. Revenue Growth Examining a company's long-term performance can provide clues about its quality. Any business can have short-term success, but a top-tier one grows for years. Over the last five years, Tandem Diabetes grew its sales at an impressive 19.5% compounded annual growth rate. Its growth beat the average healthcare company and shows its offerings resonate with customers. We at StockStory place the most emphasis on long-term growth, but within healthcare, a half-decade historical view may miss recent innovations or disruptive industry trends. Tandem Diabetes's annualized revenue growth of 12.4% over the last two years is below its five-year trend, but we still think the results suggest healthy demand. Tandem Diabetes also reports its number of pump shipments, which reached 21,000 in the latest quarter. Over the last two years, Tandem Diabetes's pump shipments averaged 2.9% year-on-year growth. Because this number is lower than its revenue growth, we can see the company benefited from price increases. This quarter, Tandem Diabetes reported year-on-year revenue growth of 8.5%, and its $240.7 million of revenue exceeded Wall Street's estimates by 1.5%. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 4.8% over the next 12 months, a deceleration versus the last two years. This projection is underwhelming and suggests its products and services will see some demand headwinds. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report one of our favorites growth stories. Adjusted Operating Margin Adjusted operating margin is one of the best measures of profitability because it tells us how much money a company takes home after subtracting all core expenses, like marketing and R&D. It also removes various one-time costs to paint a better picture of normalized profits. Tandem Diabetes's high expenses have contributed to an average adjusted operating margin of negative 7.9% over the last five years. Unprofitable healthcare companies require extra attention because they could get caught swimming naked when the tide goes out. It's hard to trust that the business can endure a full cycle. Analyzing the trend in its profitability, Tandem Diabetes's adjusted operating margin decreased by 15.6 percentage points over the last five years. The company's two-year trajectory also shows it failed to get its profitability back to the peak as its margin fell by 1.6 percentage points. This performance was poor no matter how you look at it - it shows its expenses were rising and it couldn't pass those costs onto its customers. Tandem Diabetes's adjusted operating margin was negative 13.2% this quarter. Earnings Per Share Revenue trends explain a company's historical growth, but the long-term change in earnings per share (EPS) points to the profitability of that growth – for example, a company could inflate its sales through excessive spending on advertising and promotions. Tandem Diabetes's earnings losses deepened over the last five years as its EPS dropped 34.2% annually. We tend to steer our readers away from companies with falling EPS, where diminishing earnings could imply changing secular trends and preferences. If the tide turns unexpectedly, Tandem Diabetes's low margin of safety could leave its stock price susceptible to large downswings. In Q2, Tandem Diabetes reported EPS at negative $0.78, down from negative $0.47 in the same quarter last year. This print missed analysts' estimates. Over the next 12 months, Wall Street expects Tandem Diabetes to improve its earnings losses. Analysts forecast its full-year EPS of negative $3.09 will advance to negative $1.00. Key Takeaways from Tandem Diabetes's Q2 Results It was encouraging to see Tandem Diabetes beat analysts' revenue expectations this quarter. On the other hand, its EPS missed and its sales volume fell short of Wall Street's estimates. Overall, this was a softer quarter. The stock traded down 17% to $12 immediately after reporting. Tandem Diabetes may have had a tough quarter, but does that actually create an opportunity to invest right now? If you're making that decision, you should consider the bigger picture of valuation, business qualities, as well as the latest earnings. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free. Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exact Sciences (NASDAQ:EXAS) Reports Strong Q2 But Stock Drops 15.2%
Diagnostic company Exact Sciences Corporation (NASDAQ:EXAS) reported Q2 CY2025 results exceeding the market's revenue expectations , with sales up 16% year on year to $811.1 million. The company's full-year revenue guidance of $3.15 billion at the midpoint came in 1.7% above analysts' estimates. Its non-GAAP profit of $0.22 per share was significantly above analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy Exact Sciences? Find out in our full research report. Exact Sciences (EXAS) Q2 CY2025 Highlights: Exact Sciences will pay $75 million in cash (plus up to $700 million in additional payments) to secure the rights to Freenome's blood-based screening tools for colorectal cancer. Exact will also pay royalties up to 10% and $20 million annually for the next three years in joint R&D costs Revenue: $811.1 million vs analyst estimates of $773.1 million (16% year-on-year growth, 4.9% beat) Adjusted EPS: $0.22 vs analyst estimates of $0.05 (significant beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $138.2 million vs analyst estimates of $108.7 million (17% margin, 27.2% beat) The company lifted its revenue guidance for the full year to $3.15 billion at the midpoint from $3.10 billion, a 1.8% increase EBITDA guidance for the full year is $465 million at the midpoint, above analyst estimates of $437.4 million Operating Margin: -0.3%, up from -3.8% in the same quarter last year Free Cash Flow Margin: 5.8%, down from 10.2% in the same quarter last year Constant Currency Revenue rose 16% year on year (12.4% in the same quarter last year) Market Capitalization: $8.93 billion 'The Exact Sciences team continues to build momentum, advancing our mission through earlier detection,' said Kevin Conroy, chairman and CEO. Company Overview With a mission to detect cancer earlier when it's more treatable, Exact Sciences (NASDAQ:EXAS) develops and markets cancer screening and diagnostic tests, including its flagship Cologuard stool-based colorectal cancer screening test. Revenue Growth A company's long-term performance is an indicator of its overall quality. Even a bad business can shine for one or two quarters, but a top-tier one grows for years. Thankfully, Exact Sciences's 21.1% annualized revenue growth over the last five years was excellent. Its growth beat the average healthcare company and shows its offerings resonate with customers. We at StockStory place the most emphasis on long-term growth, but within healthcare, a half-decade historical view may miss recent innovations or disruptive industry trends. Exact Sciences's annualized revenue growth of 13% over the last two years is below its five-year trend, but we still think the results suggest healthy demand. We can better understand the company's sales dynamics by analyzing its constant currency revenue, which excludes currency movements that are outside their control and not indicative of demand. Over the last two years, its constant currency sales averaged 13.3% year-on-year growth. Because this number aligns with its normal revenue growth, we can see that Exact Sciences has properly hedged its foreign currency exposure. This quarter, Exact Sciences reported year-on-year revenue growth of 16%, and its $811.1 million of revenue exceeded Wall Street's estimates by 4.9%. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 11.8% over the next 12 months, similar to its two-year rate. Despite the slowdown, this projection is noteworthy and indicates the market is forecasting success for its products and services. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report one of our favorites growth stories. Operating Margin Operating margin is an important measure of profitability as it shows the portion of revenue left after accounting for all core expenses – everything from the cost of goods sold to advertising and wages. It's also useful for comparing profitability across companies with different levels of debt and tax rates because it excludes interest and taxes. Although Exact Sciences broke even this quarter from an operational perspective, it's generally struggled over a longer time period. Its expensive cost structure has contributed to an average operating margin of negative 29.8% over the last five years. Unprofitable healthcare companies require extra attention because they could get caught swimming naked when the tide goes out. It's hard to trust that the business can endure a full cycle. On the plus side, Exact Sciences's operating margin rose by 29.2 percentage points over the last five years, as its sales growth gave it operating leverage. Zooming into its more recent performance, however, we can see the company's margin has decreased by 16.6 percentage points on a two-year basis. If Exact Sciences wants to pass our bar, it must prove it can expand its profitability consistently. Exact Sciences's operating margin was negative 0.3% this quarter. Earnings Per Share Revenue trends explain a company's historical growth, but the long-term change in earnings per share (EPS) points to the profitability of that growth – for example, a company could inflate its sales through excessive spending on advertising and promotions. Although Exact Sciences's full-year earnings are still negative, it reduced its losses and improved its EPS by 33.1% annually over the last five years. The next few quarters will be critical for assessing its long-term profitability. In Q2, Exact Sciences reported adjusted EPS at $0.22, up from negative $0.06 in the same quarter last year. This print easily cleared analysts' estimates, and shareholders should be content with the results. Over the next 12 months, Wall Street is optimistic. Analysts forecast Exact Sciences's full-year EPS of negative $0.33 will flip to positive $0.73. Key Takeaways from Exact Sciences's Q2 Results Exact Sciences will pay $75 million in cash and make up to $700 million in additional payments to secure the rights to Freenome's current and future blood-based screening tools for colorectal cancer. Exact will also pay sales royalties up to 10% and $20 million annually for the next three years in joint research and development costs. So do we think Exact Sciences is an attractive buy at the current price? The latest quarter does matter, but not nearly as much as longer-term fundamentals and valuation, when deciding if the stock is a buy. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
9 minutes ago
- CNBC
Firefly Aerospace prices shares at $45, above the expected range
Firefly Aerospace priced shares in its IPO at $45 on Wednesday, above its expected range. The Texas-based rocket maker will debut on the Nasdaq Thursday under the ticker symbol "FLY." The offering raised $868 million and values the company at about $6.3 billion. Firefly filed its initial prospectus in July and upped its IPO range this week to $41 to $43 a share, from an initial range of $35 to $39. The space technology sector has seen rising investor interest over the last few years as billionaire investors such as Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos put their money behind SpaceX and Blue Origin, respectively. So far this year, space technology companies Voyager Technology and Karman Holdings have gone public. The broader IPO landscape has also seen major public debuts this year from Figma, CoreWeave and Circle as the market for public offerings reopens following a prolonged drought. Firefly creates lunar landers, rockets and space technology, and won a $177 million contract with NASA last month. Earlier this year, the company successfully landed its lunar lander known as Blue Ghost on the moon. The company has worked with key defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin and L3Harris. Northrop Grumman invested $50 million in Firefly earlier this year. For the quarter that ended in March, Firefly reported a net loss of about $60.1 million, widening from $52.8 million in the year-ago period. Revenue jumped sixfold to $55.9 million from $8.3 million. Its backlogged totaled about $1.1 billion.
