
Israel 'starving Gaza by design,' SA says at ICJ
South Africa has told the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Israel is deliberately depriving the people of Gaza of humanitarian aid and condemning an entire civilian population to starvation.
The remarks were delivered by the country's director general for international relations, Zane Dangor, on Tuesday.
Presentations
South Africa is one of 40 countries delivering remarks before the ICJ this week to gauge Israel's responsibility for the humanitarian crisis engulfing Gaza during its war against Hamas.
Israel has not sent a delegation to the hearings, which began on Monday when the United Nations' (UN) legal counsel, Elinor Hammarskjöld, told the court it was a cold fact that no humanitarian aid has entered Gaza since March.
ALSO READ: SA among 38 countries to present at ICJ hearings on Israel's actions
'Israeli impunity'
Dangor said the scale of the harms inflicted on Palestinians by Israel was laid out in detail during the hearings.
'We wish to emphasise the impunity with which Israel is inflicting these harms. Israel continues to act with impunity, as it does enjoy some form of exceptionalism from accountability to international law and norms.
'Conversely, any person or entity which seeks to hold Israel to account for its inhumane and unlawful actions is subjected to counter-measures and censure, from which the United Nations and this Court have not been spared,' Dangor said.
International community
Dangor said the international community should not accept a reality in which an entire civilian population is deliberately starved by Israel, where the United Nations is evicted and deprived of its immunities and privileges, where third states and humanitarian organisations are prevented from rendering humanitarian assistance in solidarity and fulfilment of their obligations.
'Palestinian NGOs and major aid groups have warned that Gaza is entering into famine and that 'the humanitarian aid system is facing total collapse.
'This collapse is by design. Israel's Defence Minister, Israel Katz, said on 16 April 2025, 'Israel's policy is clear – no humanitarian aid is about to enter Gaza. . . There are no preparations to enable such aid,' Dangor said.
NGO's
Dangor added that Palestinian non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and major aid groups have warned that Gaza is entering into famine and that 'the humanitarian aid system is facing total collapse'.
'Under the world's watchful eye, Palestinians across the Occupied Palestinian Territory are being subjected to atrocity crimes, persecution, apartheid and genocide. While we watch, the gaze of Palestinians is directed squarely at the international community, and this Court, whose advice is urgently being sought, for the protection of their most fundamental rights, including the right to life,' Dangor said.
ALSO READ: SA condemns Israel's bombing of hospitals in Gaza
Humanitarian law
President Cyril Ramaphosa's special advisor on legal and international affairs, Nokukhanya Jele, argued that Israel may not impose any measures specifically prohibited by international law. Humanitarian law, such as mass forced displacements, property destruction, transfer of colonial settlers, targeting schools, and even targeting the curriculum to erase the history of the Palestinian people.
'Israel cannot subject the population to collective punishment, while indiscriminately bombing civilians and civilian objects on a large scale — acts which manifestly constitute violations of its obligations as an occupying power.'
Legal obligations
Jele said the court's orders on 26 January, 28 March and 24 May 2024 constitute additional legal obligations for Israel to allow and facilitate the unimpeded passage of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, 'in full cooperation with the United Nations'.
'However, Israel has blatantly ignored these binding obligations.20 Instead, one and a half months after its legislation banning UNRWA went into effect, it has redoubled its denial of aid by imposing a nearly eight-week-long blockade on Gaza.'
SA ICJ case
In its initial application, South Africa submitted an 84-page application at the ICJ on 29 December 2023, pleading with the court to find Israel guilty of suspected genocide and order it to, among other things, halt its invasion in Gaza.
Since launching the case at the ICJ, South Africa has approached the court four times, requesting interim measures to halt Israel's attacks on the occupied territory.
Despite three orders being granted in South Africa's favour, they have had little to no impact on all forms of Israel's attacks on Palestinian life, essential services and the need for humanitarian aid.
'Human beings'
State law advisor Jaymion Hendricks said, despite attempts by Israeli officials to characterise them otherwise, Palestinians are 'human beings – they are flesh and blood'.
'Palestinian people are entitled to the same fundamental protections as we in this Great Hall of Justice. This includes the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life – 'the supreme right from which no derogation is permitted, even in situations of armed conflict.
'Furthermore, Israel is impeding the United Nations and third States from exercising their erga omnes obligations – and international solidarity – with respect to the exercise of the 'fundamental human right[s]' of the Palestinian people, which this Court held to include the right to self-determination,' Hendricks said.
ALSO READ: SA won't drop ICJ case against Israel, even if Trump waives restrictions – Dirco
'World has failed'
Hendricks said South Africa shares the UN secretary-general's view that the 'world has failed' the Palestinian people.
'The only certainty they have is that tomorrow will be worse. Therefore, we must save whatever is left of humanity by ending Israel's unlawful occupation and its intentional starving of the Palestinian population, who are being systematically brutalised and deprived of elementary considerations of humanity. Palestinians look to the world, and this Court, for an end to their enduring loss, their pain and their suffering.'
ICJ opinions
Although the ICJ's advisory opinions are not legally binding, the court believes they 'carry great legal weight and moral authority'.
In July last year, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola said the ICJ's advisory opinion on Israel's 'unlawful occupation' of Palestine confirmed South Africa's 'long-standing position' that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory remains unlawful under international law.
The ICJ, in its 83-page advisory opinion, said that Israel's actions in East Jerusalem and the West Bank amount to 'annexation' and violate the prohibition on the acquisition of territory by force.
Vital aid
Israel strictly controls all inflows of international aid vital for the 2.4 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
It halted aid deliveries to Gaza on 2 March, days before the collapse of a ceasefire that had significantly reduced hostilities after 15 months of war.
WATCH: ICJ rules Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories 'violates international law'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Dr. Nasser Al-Qudwa's urgent call for Palestinian reforms and unity as war intensifies and famine looms
Relatives of Palestinian Awda Muhammad Al-Hathalin mourn his death in the village of Umm Al-Khair in Masafer Yatta, south of Hebron. Image: Mosab Shawer/ Middle East Images / Middle East Images via AFP Former Foreign Minister of Palestine, Dr. Nasser Al-Qudwa has welcomed the final statement issued by the Two-State Solution Conference held in New York City, describing it as a milestone in the ongoing effort to resolve Israel's war on Palestine. The conference outlined a 15-month timeframe for the establishment of a Palestinian state and called for an immediate end to the war. This comes as Gaza's Ministry of Health reported that Israeli forces have killed at least 60,034 Palestinians since the war erupted in October 2023. In addition, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global hunger monitoring system, warned in a new report that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' was unfolding in Gaza. 'This declaration represents an important step toward ending the conflict and realising our people's aspirations for freedom and independence,' said Al-Qudwa in a formal statement issued after the conference. Al-Qudwa said there is a dire need to unify Gaza and the West Bank and welcomed the clear affirmation that Gaza is an inseparable part of the future Palestinian state. He underlined that reform within the Palestinian Authority is a prerequisite for restoring national unity and reviving Palestinian political agency on the international stage. 'The path to national unity must pass through uncompromising institutional reform,' he said, adding that political change across both territories must culminate in 'free and democratic general elections that restore the trust of the Palestinian citizen and renew leadership legitimacy.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Al-Qudwa also praised the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's 'pioneering and critical role' during this sensitive period, citing its steadfast support for Palestinian rights and its contribution to peace efforts. He urged Palestinian stakeholders to build on this momentum, noting that 'recognising and nurturing Saudi Arabia's role in future political discussions is vital.' Al-Qudwa also called for urgent and ongoing meetings among Palestinian leaders to adopt a unified and official stance endorsing the New York Conference's principles, particularly those concerning governance reform, elections, and Arab backing for the political process. He reiterated the importance of condemning all attacks on civilians and reaffirmed the Palestinian commitment to international law and the principle that peace cannot be achieved through occupation, displacement, or war. IOL


Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Lamola calls for more countries to ‘urgently' recognise Palestinian statehood at UN conference
The international legal and multilateral system has been turned into a blunt tool, says Lamola. International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola has urged more countries to 'urgently' recognise a Palestinian state at a United Nations (UN) conference this week that was devoted to a two-state solution. Speaking at the high-level conference in New York on Tuesday, 29 July 2025, Lamola said the recognition of Palestinian statehood was 'fundamental to restoring the credibility of the two-state solution'. 'Global attention is on this conference. There is an expectation that we will deliver an effective response to the destruction of an entire population and a peaceful path for preserving the prospect of a viable Palestinian state existing side by side with the state of Israel in peace and security. This expectation is not misplaced, and it could not be higher. 'Eighty years since the founding of the UN, this is a matter that has plagued our collective conscience. The solution lies with a tangible recommitment from all of us to the values that bind us,' said Lamola. South Africa is anti-war and prefers dialogue over violence. Global attention is on this Conference. There is an expectation that we will deliver an effective response to the destruction of an entire population and a peaceful path for preserving the prospect of a viable… — Minister: International Relations and Cooperation (@RonaldLamola) July 29, 2025 Lamola was among dozens of high-level representatives who gathered at the UN this week to promote a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. The UN General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025, after it adopted a resolution related to the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran. Both Israel and the US have boycotted the three-day meeting, chaired by France and Saudi Arabia. In a statement issued on Monday, the US State Department called the conference a 'publicity stunt' that 'will prolong the war'. The high-level meeting is taking place against the backdrop of the ever-worsening humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, as starvation grips the region as a result of Israel's restrictions on aid. On Tuesday, the leading international authority on hunger crises said that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' was unfolding in Gaza, and called for an urgent ceasefire to 'alleviate the catastrophic suffering of people' in the region. 'Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths. The latest data indicates that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City,' read the alert from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC). 🚨 #GazaStrip Alert The worst-case scenario of #Famine is rapidly unfolding in the #GazaStrip amid relentless conflict, displacements, and extremely limited humanitarian access. 📄 Read more: @TheIPCinfo #FoodInsecurity #Malnutrition — The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (@theIPCinfo) July 29, 2025 'This conference takes place at a time when we are witnessing the destruction of Gaza and its people in real time, in a brazen and wanton act of genocide in full view of the world,' said Lamola. 'South Africa continues to condemn the horrific events of 7 October 2023 where innocent Israeli citizens were killed. Despite this challenging context, in which the international legal and multilateral system has been paralysed and turned into a blunt tool, the focus today on a real path to lasting peace must prevail. 'The might is right doctrine can no longer be justified. It has led to perpetual insecurity and it justifies an attempt to eradicate the Palestinian people through killing and starvation,' he said. Lamola added that South Africa hoped the conference would 'plot a real path forward, based on concrete actions, for the creation of a Palestinian state existing peacefully and side by side with the state of Israel, along the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital'. Recognition of a Palestinian state The UN conference, which began on Monday, came days after French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise the state of Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September. Macron made the announcement in a surprise statement on X, following months of hints and hesitations over potential French recognition of a Palestinian state, according to a report from The New York Times. Speaking to delegates in New York, Lamola welcomed France's intention to recognise Palestinian statehood as 'an important step towards achieving a two-state solution'. At the opening of the talks on Monday, French Foreign Affairs Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said France was ready to fully recognise the state of Palestine at a time when the two-state solution is 'more threatened than ever'. 'Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative,' he said. According to a report from The Guardian, Barrot said that the UN conference would also serve as a platform for other European countries to recognise Palestinian statehood. On Tuesday afternoon, the UK followed France, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer announcing that Britain would recognise the state of Palestine in September if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas. My statement on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and our plan for peace including the recognition of a Palestinian State. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) July 29, 2025 Speaking at the UN on Tuesday, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK intended to recognise the state of Palestine when the UN General Assembly gathered in September. 'We will do this unless the Israeli government acts to end the appalling situation in Gaza, ends its military campaign and commits to a long-term sustainable peace based on a two-state solution,' he said. DM


Mail & Guardian
6 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
ICJ: Every country obligated by climate and other international laws to stop global warming
Sea levels are rising as a result of global warming. Photo: File Legal history was made on 23 July when the International Court of Justice (ICJ) released its advisory opinion on the The ICJ is the UN's main judicial body and is often referred to as the World Court. It has a dual role: first, to settle disputes between member states brought before it in accordance with international law and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorised organs and bodies of the UN. In the advisory opinion the 15 judges of the ICJ unanimously called for greater responsibility in climate protection and commented on the following questions: What obligations do states have under international law to ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions for states and for present and future generations? What legal consequences arise from these obligations for states that have caused significant damage through their actions or omissions? The judges unanimously determined that UN member states are obliged to do their utmost to slow down global warming. I do not wish to judge whether this decision comes too early or too late, but so far it has not been possible to curb global greenhouse gas emissions, which is why the UN warned in a report last year that current climate policy would lead to warming of more than 3°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. The ICJ has presented a non-binding decision, the details of which certainly need to be evaluated more closely. The ICJ is of the opinion, among other things, that climate protection agreements and customary international law impose binding obligations on the contracting states to ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment from greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans. It is important to mention that, in examining its arguments, the ICJ relies primarily on the reports of the The ICJ called on wealthy states to better fulfil their international obligations to curb environmental pollution, as they otherwise risk having to pay compensation to nations severely affected by climate change. It rejected arguments that governments are only bound by climate agreements such as the Although the court's opinion is not binding, it carries legal and political weight in that it can at least influence future climate litigation. For example, it pointed out the possibility that large emitters could be sued more successfully in the future, which will undoubtedly be viewed critically in wealthier regions of the world. According to the ICJ, remedial measures also include restitution — such as the reconstruction of destroyed infrastructure and the restoration of ecosystems — as well as financial compensation. The court is of the opinion that central human rights treaties, as well as the human rights recognised under customary international law, are part of the directly relevant applicable law. Furthermore, the court considers that the principle of sustainable development, which concerns the 'need to reconcile economic development with the protection of the environment', guides the interpretation of certain treaties and the establishment of rules of customary international law. This principle gives rise to the obligation to prevent significant environmental damage and to strive for a fairer distribution of the burdens of climate change obligations, including for future generations, taking into account the historical and current contributions of states. So, under international law, every country must do its best to stop global warming from exceeding the 1.5°C mark. According to the ICJ, this legal obligation arises not only from the Paris Agreement, but also from human rights, maritime law and the customary international law obligation to prevent transboundary damage. The ICJ's clarification advocates for greater coherence in international law, placing the protection of the climate system on the basis of stricter due diligence obligations. The ICJ's opinion is in line with recent statements by other international courts. These include the opinion of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 2025, the opinion of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights on the climate lawsuit brought by the association KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz against Switzerland in 2024. According to international law, the ICJ states that the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is essential for the enjoyment of other human rights. Of course, this perception could be limited by the fact that the United States, historically the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, wants to reverse its climate responsibility. In any case, the ICJ opinion is likely to change a lot in terms of the upcoming climate negotiations in Brazil in November 2025 and new climate lawsuits. UN secretary general António Guterres already sees the ICJ opinion as a victory for the planet. According to him, states must act against fossil fuels. If they fail to prevent climate damage, they could be ordered to pay reparations. But it will probably not be quite that simple. There are still some tough legal hurdles to overcome. In addition, the fight against climate change must be taken up by society as a whole and across all disciplines, including politics and economics, not only by international law. Nevertheless, the ICJ has elevated the discussion to another level. Oliver C Ruppel is professor at the Faculty of Law at Stellenbosch University, where he also heads the Development and the Rule of Law Programme, which is under the Stellenbosch Climate School. Ruppel is a member of the World Commission on Environmental Law of the International Union for Conservation of Nature, which was involved in the proceedings before the International Court of Justice that concluded last week.