Roots Picnic won't issue refunds after long delays and safety concerns
The Roots Picnic will not be giving out refunds for this year's festival after Saturday's three-hour delay in opening led to long lines, organizers told Axios on Monday.
Why it matters: Hundreds, "if not thousands," of concertgoers were expected to demand their money back, a Mann Center staffer working the event told Axios last weekend.
The big picture: Roots Picnic serves as a mecca of Philly's Black musical and cultural contributions, headlined by some of the region's most popular artists since 2008.
But some upset attendees have compared their experience at last weekend's event to the disastrous Fyre Festival.
Driving the news: The festival told Axios in a statement that no refunds would be issued because the "rain or shine event" was still "able to deliver a full day of artist performances and programming."
It comes after outraged festivalgoers took to social media to list their grievances, from long waits without access to bathrooms and water stations to complaints that the grounds were difficult to navigate for people with disabilities.
Following Saturday's weather delay, the festival was slow to communicate the new schedule and then posted the wrong one, sparking confusion among attendees about which artist was on when.
Plus: Some festivalgoers said they witnessed people faint while waiting to get into the event at the Mann Center, and long waits for paramedics to provide care.
What they're saying: At least 57 people received care during the festival, but large crowds made it challenging for paramedics to immediately reach people who needed attention, Rachel Cunningham, a spokesperson for Philadelphia's Fire Department, which staffed EMS at the event, told Axios.
The Mann Center and Live Nation Urban didn't immediately respond to Axios' requests for comment.
Between the lines: Several people also claimed on social media that they received refunds at the event. The festival didn't immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on the matter.
Catch up quick: The festival posted an apology on Instagram about Saturday's long lines to get into the event, blaming a heavy rainstorm that doused the area for making the "grounds unsafe."
The apology's comment section is disabled, but one of the top comments on another post called the festival's crowd control "the most amateur and unprofessional" they've "ever had the misfortune to experience."
Roots drummer Questlove said the event was almost canceled, but they decided to forge ahead after taking "extra time to repair the site."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tom Cruise Shares Image of Himself and Ana de Armas Ahead of 'Weekend of Action on the Big Screen'
Tom Cruise shared an image of himself with promo posters for Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning and Ana de Armas' From the World of John Wick: Ballerina 'Ballerina' arrives in theaters Friday, June 6 "Your mission, should you choose to accept it: a weekend of action on the big screen," Cruise captioned his the box office without a little friendly competition? Ahead of the Friday, June 6 release of the Ana de Armas-starring film From the World of John Wick: Ballerina, Tom Cruise shared an image of himself posing in front of a promo poster for the movie positioned beside a Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning poster. For the image, which was shared on his Instagram and X on Wednesday, June 4, Cruise, 62, posed alongside Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning director Christopher McQuarrie. Cruise's film premiered in theaters on Friday, May 23, grossing $77 million domestically and $190 million worldwide. The live-action adaptation of Lilo & Stitch proved superior, grossing $183 million domestically, according to Box Office Mojo, and earning $341.7 million globally. However, with the forthcoming premiere of Ballerina this Friday, Cruise is encouraging moviegoers to head out and enjoy as much action movie excitement as possible. "Your mission, should you choose to accept it: a weekend of action on the big screen," he captioned his post. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The Instagram account for Ballerina responded to the actor's support by writing, "Yeah, we're thinking movies are back." Moviegoers also praised Cruise for promoting both films. "No other star openly endorses OTHER movies like Tom Cruise does. The man is truly someone who loves FILM," one fan wrote. Another person who has applauded Cruise's support for the film is de Armas, 37, herself, who told Variety at its red-carpet premiere that his backing was "unbelievable." "But you know what, he supports every movie. He really wants the industry and cinema to go well and people going to the theaters. We're working together, so he got to see Ballerina and he actually really liked it. He loved the John Wicks," de Armas told Variety. De Armas and Cruise have been spotted spending time together in London multiple times since February and have upcoming projects together, the actress confirmed during a May 15 appearance on Good Morning America. "We're definitely working on a lot of things. Not just one but a few projects with Doug Liman and Christopher McQuarrie and, of course, Tom. And I'm so excited," de Armas said in May. Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning is in theaters now. From the World of John Wick: Ballerina arrives in cinemas on Friday, June 6 Read the original article on People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Left Must Reclaim Motherhood
Credit - Photo-Illustration by TIME (Source Images: Johner Images—Getty Images, Dougal Waters—Getty Images, Vera Livchak—Getty Images) 'I had no idea how much you loved being a mom,' my best friend said one day at a park meet-up 15 months after my son was born. At that point, I'd been parenting for over a year, and yet, I'd somehow forgotten to tell her how much this new life-altering experience had meant to me. In fact, one of the first things I decided after my son was born was that I wouldn't write about him or motherhood. I'd felt unable to describe the mixture of joy, rage, love, and exhaustion that consumed me because of it. More accurately, it took me years to feel comfortable with the idea that parenting wasn't a frivolous topic, and 'mother' was a word I actually wanted to be associated with. Since then, there have been other moments of motherhood dissonance. I've found myself baking a cake from scratch (which, for the record, has never turned out quite right!) or cooking a meal for my family, feeling happily domestic, when a suspicious sensation takes over, as if I might turn into a milkmaid-dress donning homesteader who has abandoned all her progressive ideals. But is enjoying cooking food for people you love a conservative endeavor? And why did it take me so long to feel ok to share my experiences as a mother? Sure, I never dreamed of becoming a parent when I was growing up, and I saw the suburbs as a heteronormative hellscape. But it's more than that—recently, it's because the cultural chasm surrounding motherhood has widened, largely because of politics. On one side of the political spectrum, conservatives have adeptly rebranded motherhood as a sanctified identity—stylized, nostalgic, and tightly wrapped in traditional values. From the rise of tradwives, to the rise of the pronatalist movement, to the homeschooling revival, conservative motherhood has become not only a lifestyle but a political aesthetic. Decorated in gingham and pastels, with references to "simpler times," right-wing influencers have woven a narrative where motherhood is both an ideal and a coveted aesthetic—one that often valorizes the nuclear family, eschews public institutions, and distrusts science. Read More: The False Escapism of Soft Girls and Tradwives Meanwhile, the left has engaged in a vital act of exposing the harsher and heavier realities of parenting. From economists like Emily Oster and writers Jessica Valenti and Angela Garbes (to name a very few), we have been shown the truth about the gender wage gap's impact on parenting, the way maternal mortality disproportionately affects Black women, and the imbalance of cognitive labor that mothers bear. Social media accounts like TikTok's @momunfiltered share stories of messy motherhoods detailing the exhaustion, the inequity, and the lack of social safety nets. These accounts have helped to destigmatize these experiences and have revealed how parenting in a country with no universal childcare, inadequate maternal healthcare, and no guaranteed paid leave becomes an act of survival for many. This truth is essential—especially in a culture that punishes mothers while feigning reverence for them. But amidst this necessary reckoning, depictions of joy and meaning have been lost. As a queer, progressive mother of two, I know this conflict intimately. I've noticed how quickly I'll make a joke about the stress of parenting, but hesitate to share when something about it feels deeply good. There's a subtle sense that taking pleasure in domesticity might be a betrayal of my values—as if nurturing children, or even enjoying something as benign as baking, plays into oppressive tropes. But why should the right own parenting and caretaking? I was most struck by the recent headline of feminist philosopher Kate Manne, who wrote a piece titled 'Don't Have Children,' where she described her daughter as her greatest joy, but simultaneously wrote that she hopes to never become a grandmother. Is that the best we can offer children and young people in our country, which is rich in money, technology, advanced medical treatments, and resources? This complete give-up cannot be the only solution. . In our efforts to dismantle the idealization of motherhood, the left has struggled to articulate a more complex view of caregiving—one that acknowledges the labor, yes, but also celebrates the connection, creativity, and sometimes radical meaning that comes with raising children. It has also left out a vision for what caregiving has the potential to be under the right leadership. As the conservative right makes motherhood its ideological stronghold, the left risks ceding not just the narrative, but the cultural and political power that comes with it. What would it mean to embrace motherhood not only as a struggle but a site of potential joy and creativity? Our elected officials could, in theory, make positive change should they choose to take on caretaking in a meaningful way. We've seen it happen elsewhere: In 2024, for instance, the UK passed a law attempting to help specifically working and low-income families by allowing access to free childcare for up to 15 hours per week for children nine months and older, and up to 30 hours for three and four year olds. This past April, Singapore added four weeks of mandatory paternity leave (other countries, including Sweden, Japan, and Norway have similar policies), which has the ability to jump-start more equitable caretaking for both parents early on. This does not solve all the issues that come with parenthood, but it's certainly a start. Leftist activists are fighting for childcare funding, reproductive justice, and equitable family leave policies. There are growing grassroots childcare collectives popping up, like Rad Dad Zine and the Parenting for Liberation network, which both model the use of mutual aid, intersectionality, and bring joy to the forefront. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw families lean on each other for pod schooling and collaborative use of resources. Despite these boots on the ground movements, we don't see our elected Democratic officials take these needs on in a meaningful way that would put people over profits. The left doesn't need to replicate the tradwife stylings, however relaxing and visually appealing it seems, but it does need its own vision—one that affirms the possibility of caregiving without erasing the hardship. To reclaim motherhood, the left must do more than critique. We must dream and share what caregiving could look like in our world of more than plenty. We must push our elected officials to champion meaningful public policies like universal childcare and paid parental leave. I've also realized that I can do a better job of making more visible the joy and radical meaning that comes not despite caregiving, but because of it. I have become more vocal in claiming the title of mother and discussing the varying ways motherhood has changed me for the better. Above all, since all moms feel so differently about each stage, day, and moment, I try to make sure that I am just sharing my point of view. Motherhood and joy are not inherently conservative. It's time for the left (and me) to reclaim this truth—and with it, to imagine a future where parenting is not a battleground but a common ground. Contact us at letters@
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
GSU's plan to demolish historic building sparks community uproar
Georgia State University's proposal to demolish an old substation within the local Martin Luther King Jr. Historic District is drawing criticism from members of the community who want to see the building preserved. Why it matters: GSU, which has the largest student population of any college in Georgia, is a major player in attracting people to Downtown, and the school wants to turn its "concrete jungle" into an integrated campus with more gathering spaces for students. Driving the news: The school hosted a public input session last week where dozens of community members and students could ask questions about the project, which would demolish Sparks Hall at 33 Gilmer St. and the former substation at 148 Edgewood Ave. The gathering quickly devolved into heated discussions between those opposed to demolishing 148 Edgewood and GSU representatives and students who backed the plan. What they're saying: Supporters, which included some Black fraternity and sorority students, said removing the building would give Greek life students a communal space to gather. The 148 Edgewood building is vacant and abuts GSU's Greek Housing area. Ashleigh Harper, vice president of the Zeta Phi Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta at GSU, told Axios that demolishing the building wouldn't diminish Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy in Atlanta. "It can't be encompassed into one [building]," she said, referring to King's legacy. "I feel like that's doing him a disservice." The other side: Opponents argued the building is part of Atlanta's history and could be incorporated into GSU's campus. "The objection to its destruction is based upon facts and experience and the longevity of this area," said David Mitchell, executive director of the Atlanta Preservation Center. "This building … represents an identity and something that's integral to understanding what the city of Atlanta is." Atlanta City Council member Liliana Bakhtiari wrote a letter in opposition to the plan, as did Georgia Trust for Historic Preservation president and CEO W. Wright Mitchell. Zoom in: GSU's plan to demolish Sparks Hall and 148 Edgewood is part of its larger, long-range plan to create a " true college town downtown." Sparks Hall would be torn down and a "Panther Quad" would rise in its place. The quad would include additional greenspace that would connect to the existing campus greenway. Plans also call for transforming part of Gilmer Street into a car-free zone, which would provide better connectivity to Hurt Park, said L. Jared Abramson, GSU's executive vice president and chief operating officer. The Edgewood building would be demolished to create outdoor community space next to the fraternity and sorority housing, Abramson told Axios, adding the building's historic significance would be commemorated. By the numbers: Abramson said it would cost $12 million for GSU to renovate the Edgewood building, which he said is about 9,000 square feet. It would cost about $1.7 million to demolish it, he said. The big picture: Abramson said GSU's plans are part of its overall work to shed its "concrete jungle" image and create a campus that encourages students to stick around Downtown. "We have determined that this is the type of experience our students need," Abramson told Axios. What's next: A GSU spokesperson told Axios the university is reviewing the feedback it received from the May 28 hearing.
