
Bring on the BNPL regulation, but let's get it right!: By Willem Wellinghoff
The rapid expansion of Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) services has undeniably reshaped the consumer credit landscape, offering a flexible and accessible payment method that caters to diverse lifestyles. However, this growth has simultaneously brought into sharp focus the imperative for suitable regulation. While further regulation is welcome in the wake of the Consumer Credit Act review, it must strike a delicate balance to safeguard consumers without stifling innovation and the UK's competitiveness.
We mustn't forget that BNPL serves as an inclusive payment method, empowering individuals to manage their finances by spreading payments in a way that suits their needs. This aspect of inclusivity, allowing consumers a wider choice in how they pay for goods and services, remains a vital requirement. The emotional connection consumers feel to BNPL, stemming from its ability to provide informed choice and accountability, is also a key factor in its enduring appeal.
However, the inherent lending essence of BNPL, despite its "payment method" perception, necessitates a strong focus on consumer protection. Government initiatives including introducing affordability checks and granting consumers the right to complain to the Financial Ombudsman from 2026, are significant steps towards improving perceptions of this newer form of borrowing. The new regulations will ensure a consistent standard across the industry, fostering greater consumer confidence and fairer access to refunds.
Regulation sweet spot
The challenge lies in ensuring regulation is proportionate. An overly stringent approach risks phasing out an important product in the market, hindering the very inclusivity that BNPL provides.
In particular this could be an issue in the payments ecosystem where offering BNPL through orchestration might even potentially be considered as a form of credit broking which would require payment service providers and orchestrators to potentially enhance their regulatory permissions to include consumer credit activities, and be subject to additional onerous rules.
The UK's National Payments Vision emphasises continued growth and innovation, and any regulatory framework must align with this. The balance required between managing innovation, suitability tailored to individual needs, and robust regulation is a complex tightrope walk. Companies like Ecommpay are already operating with a strong compliance and regulatory lens in our product design, recognising the need for emotionally empowering choices for consumers.
The maturing BNPL market now offers a diverse array of solutions, and for e-commerce merchants, the key is to collaborate with payment providers who can offer a comprehensive range of credit options. Solutions like Visa Instalments, which leverage existing card infrastructure and eliminate the need for additional credit checks, can significantly improve checkout performance, especially in high-value sectors such as travel and luxury goods. These instalment solutions, whether interest-free or low-cost, provide greater financial flexibility for customers.
Empowering payments and protecting customers
Ultimately, however, the future of BNPL lies in a nuanced approach to regulation. While the core emphasis must be on affordability, transparent reporting to credit reference bureaus, and recognising vulnerability in consumers who might overextend themselves, this must not come at the expense of choice and innovation or restricting merchants' ability to offer payment methods that customers have come to use and trust.
The goal is to cultivate an environment where BNPL continues to be an inclusive and empowering payment method, while simultaneously ensuring robust consumer protection and maintaining the UK's competitive edge in the global payments ecosystem. Payment providers, by staying abreast of the evolving regulatory landscape and offering diverse, compliant solutions, will be instrumental in achieving this delicate balance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
26 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels
Number 10 had been locked in crisis talks with backbenchers after some 126 MPs within the party signed an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. On Thursday night, sources said a deal was being thrashed out between leading rebels and the Government as it seeks to head off the prospect of Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat in a crunch vote next week. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. If the legislation clears its first hurdle, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. However, concessions offered by the Government to save the Bill from defeat are understood to include a commitment that those currently receiving Pip will continue to get the allowance. This would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but fresh changes such as these would leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find more money elsewhere. Rebels had also been calling for the Government to row back on a freeze in the health element of universal credit, which was expected to lead to a £450 real decline in support for some 2.2 million existing claimants. The Government had earlier said it was listening to suggestions to improve the legislation amid concerns about the swift timetable of the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' led by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. Speaking in the Commons earlier, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to demonstrate 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He said there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' The Tories described the expected concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'

Leader Live
26 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels
Number 10 had been locked in crisis talks with backbenchers after some 126 MPs within the party signed an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. On Thursday night, sources said a deal was being thrashed out between leading rebels and the Government as it seeks to head off the prospect of Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat in a crunch vote next week. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. If the legislation clears its first hurdle, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. However, concessions offered by the Government to save the Bill from defeat are understood to include a commitment that those currently receiving Pip will continue to get the allowance. This would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but fresh changes such as these would leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find more money elsewhere. Rebels had also been calling for the Government to row back on a freeze in the health element of universal credit, which was expected to lead to a £450 real decline in support for some 2.2 million existing claimants. The Government had earlier said it was listening to suggestions to improve the legislation amid concerns about the swift timetable of the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' led by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. Speaking in the Commons earlier, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to demonstrate 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He said there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' The Tories described the expected concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'


Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump wins tax breaks for US with threat of ‘revenge' raid on foreign business
Donald Trump has extracted tax breaks for US companies after threatening to impose a 'revenge' levy on foreign businesses that moved money out of the US. G7 countries are to abandon plans to make US companies pay a minimum level of corporation tax in return for Mr Trump dropping the threat of 'revenge tax'. Scott Bessent, the US Treasury secretary, said that he has asked both houses of the US Congress to remove a Trump's tax proposal, known as Section 899, from the budget bill after an agreement with the other G7 countries. Section 899 is part of Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax and spend bill, and would have enabled the US president to retaliate against countries that harm American interests with 'discriminatory' tax policies by taxing any money taken out of the country. The power threatened to be hugely costly to British businesses. Some of Britain's biggest companies, including AstraZeneca, BAE and Barclays, have significant operations in the US that could be at risk of being targeted. Fears had mounted that the powers could be used on the UK as a way of forcing Sir Keir Starmer to water down or abolish Britain's digital service tax, which applies to US tech giants. On Thursday night, Mr Bessent wrote on X: 'After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests. 'President Trump paved the way for this historic achievement. On January 20, the President issued two executive orders instructing [the US] Treasury to defend US tax sovereignty, and as a result of President Trump's leadership we now have a great deal for the American people.' Mr Bessent said the G7 had agreed not to impose what is known as OECD Pillar 2 on US companies. That refers to a 15pc minimum corporate tax rate, which was agreed in principle by 140 countries to be imposed on companies with global revenues of more than €750m (£639m). The idea was to stop multinationals shunting profits from one country to another to take advantage of lower tax rates. Economists complained that it would be only a matter of time before the minimum rate was hiked, locking countries into ever-higher taxes, globally enforced. Joe Biden was an enthusiastic backer of a global minimum rate of corporation tax. Mr Bessent said: 'By reversing the Biden administration's unwise commitments, we are now protecting our nation's authority to enact tax policies that serve the interests of American businesses and workers.' Mr Trump had claimed that the tax deal 'not only allows extraterritorial jurisdiction over American income but also limits our nation's ability to enact tax policies that serve the interests of American businesses and workers'.