
Should cruise ship passengers be charged a tourist tax to visit Scotland?
Locals in Shetland's main town and port of Lerwick are undecided on whether a tax would be a good thing in order to pay for infrastructure investment, as ITV News Scotland Reporter Louise Scott reports
Words by Scotland Reporter Louise Scott and Scotland Producer Stephanie Docherty
The Scottish government is exploring the idea of giving local councils the power to charge a levy for cruise ships.
After bringing in the Visitor Levy Act last year, which allows a tax to be charged on certain overnight stays, some have argued the principle should apply to those visiting by cruise ship.
A public consultation is now seeking views on the benefits and problems a cruise ship levy could bring.
Cruise tourism is on the rise in Scotland, particularly across the islands, where it has become a major industry, creating jobs and providing a boost to the economies of the small communities.
Last year, there were around 1,000 cruise visits into Scottish ports, which brought 1.2 million passengers - an increase of almost 400,000 compared to five years ago.
The sector is particularly important in islands like Shetland, where cruise passengers now account for around 20% of all visitors.
Locals in its main town and port of Lerwick are mixed about whether a tax would be a good thing in order to pay for infrastructure investment, as many are worried it could hinder the crucial business opportunities the cruises provide.
Ross Manson is the co-owner of No 88 Kitchen and Bar in the town, and he has adapted his business's opening hours to tie in with the cruise ship timetables and even the nationalities of its passengers.
"Each of the different cruises brings different people, different numbers and different spend, so over the time that we've been open, we have tried to learn from the previous year and then put that into action this year to be able to adapt," he told ITV News.
"We can have a massive difference on spend and what they are spending on, depending on the country they are from. An ideal cruise boat is when it's filled with American tourists and docked just outside the restaurant."
Mr Manson and other hospitality businesses have calculated that there are a maximum of 150 seats in the town's restaurants or cafes at any one time, so when some cruises carry 3,000 passengers, this can create a problem.
"There's a lot of people that can leave a bit disappointed that they've not managed to get a seat or a table in the restaurants or cafes," he added.
Mr Manson believes a cruise ship tax could be positive if the money was used to improve the local infrastructure around the island, including transport, public toilets and Wi-Fi, which are all under strain when a large cruise comes in.
He said: "I think it would maybe stop people coming off that didn't have an interest in seeing the place or experiencing it. And definitely, I think the money should be spent on facilities that would improve the local areas. There is no point in you paying a cruise ship levy and then the money disappears into something that no one ever sees."
Lerwick has a population of around 7,000, so when a big cruise docks, it means that number rises by another 50%, which is why many local people decide not to come into town on those days as the streets, shops, cafes and roads are too busy.
The local council leader, Emma Macdonald, says it is a difficult balance between ensuring Shetland continues to be a popular tourist destination and meeting the needs of the local community.
"It is really important that we do have a good industry around cruise ship visitors, but we've also got to keep in mind that they can't have an impact on the services that people rely on day in and day out," she said.
"We don't want anything to happen that will make people choose not to put Shetland on their itinerary, because that's not good for the Port Authority and that's not good for the businesses who rely on that tourism."
The local council is looking at all options, including a point of entry levy, which would involve all visitors to Shetland paying one small fee, no matter how they travel or how long they stay.
Ms Macdonald added: "I think it's not looking likely that it (the visitor levy) will make sense for us as a small local authority. We just don't get enough people to make the level of burden on our small businesses worthwhile.
"It's thought that a point of entry levy that is maybe administered by Loganair or North Link Ferries, might make that kind of bureaucracy around it much easier. So we think that that is something that's worth looking at. But obviously, all these options are still out there.
"We don't want people not to be able to afford to come here. Shetland is a beautiful place to come. I think it's just all about balance of making sure that we fully understand what we're doing."
The British Port Authority says it has serious concerns and is against any form of cruise ship levy being introduced in the UK.
The Director of Policy & External Affairs at the British Ports Association, Mark Simmonds, said: "It is alarming to see the Government pressing ahead with a consultation on plans that have no clear aims.
"Local levies in parts of Scotland will alarm and confuse cruise industry planners, who book visits years in advance, and threaten growth and investment across Scotland as vessels tend to call in multiple ports.
"To raise any significant revenue, a levy would need to be set at a level that would very likely deter cruise ships calling in Scotland.
"The net result would be a loss to the Scottish economy with no real boost to council coffers.
"The ports and cruise industries are both open to engaging with national and local governments to solve specific issues and always have been.
"A new tax on a successful and growing industry will simply make Scotland less attractive to calls in what is a highly competitive and mobile market."
The Scottish Government Finance Secretary, Shona Robison, said: 'The tourism sector is a crucially important part of the Scottish economy and cruise visits are increasing.
"The consultation will help to inform the Scottish Government's decision over whether or not to bring forward legislation, and it is really important that we hear from a wide variety of voices on this matter.
"We want to hear from those with views and knowledge in this area, including local authorities, those involved with the cruise ship sector, ports, island communities, those involved with tourism, and others, including businesses large and small."
The consultation is open to the public until May 30.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: Trump-Musk bust-up smolders
LONDON, June 5 (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today Donald Trump's hotly anticipated meetings with the leaders of the world's two other biggest economies ended up being sideshows compared to his online bust-up with billionaire backer Elon Musk. It's Friday, so today I'll provide a quick overview of what's happening in global markets and then offer you some weekend reading suggestions away from the headlines. Today's Market Minute * White House aides scheduled a call between Donald Trump and Elon Musk for Friday, Politico reported, after a huge public spat that saw threats fly over government contracts and ended with the world's richest man suggesting the U.S. president should be impeached. * U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping confronted weeks of brewing trade tensions and a battle over critical minerals in a rare leader-to-leader call on Thursday that left key issues to further talks. * China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise. The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for the trade war. * By any measure, the recent resilience of U.S. stocks is remarkable, with Wall Street powering through numerous headwinds to erase all its tariff-fueled losses and move into positive territory for the year. Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever explains why the rally may still have some juice left in it. * There are some tentative early signs that weak thermal coal prices are starting to boost import demand among Asia's heavyweight buyers China and India. Read Reuters Columnist Clyde Russell to find out more. Trump-Musk bust-up smolders For markets trying to navigate everything from creeping signs of labor market weakness to the latest European Central Bank easing, the spat between the U.S. president and the world's richest man proved more than a distraction. It remains to be seen if it overshadows the May payrolls report later on Friday. The extraordinary sparring match drew in other major political and business figures and included potentially seismic accusations and threats. In turn, the share price of Musk's Tesla .TSLA plummeted almost 20% at one point, dragging Wall Street stock indexes and crypto tokens deep into the red. The public feud appeared to cool off somewhat overnight and allowed stock futures to regain some lost ground. But the fact that the spat overshadowed the other major events of the day was another marker of this administration's unpredictability. The substance of the row was over Trump's "one big beautiful" fiscal bill that Musk thinks is a "disgusting abomination" due to the amount of spending. The bill, which has yet to be passed by the Senate, is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt over the next decade, based on CBO estimates. The vast bulk of this will likely be incurred over the next four years. In the background, the call between Trump and China's President Xi Jinping delivered no breakthroughs in the trade row apart from warmer words and an agreement to resume talks. The Oval Office meeting with Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz was relatively positive about trade and diplomatic issues. Earlier in the day, the ECB cut rates again as expected and suggested that there may be a pause at its next meeting and that it could be near the end of its easing cycle now that 'real' inflation-adjusted rates are back near zero. The euro hit a six-week high on Thursday regardless, although it gave back those daily gains today. Rising weekly U.S. jobless claims, meantime, cast a shadow over today's release of the May employment report. Consensus forecasts are for a slowdown in payroll growth to 130,000. Treasury yields , which ebbed and flowed all day on the conflicting signals from the trade meetings and stock gyrations, are back hovering at the week's lows ahead of the jobs report. Even though Federal Reserve officials continue to signal caution about the uncertain outlook ahead, markets are now priced for a resumption of Fed cuts by September. Into the already confusing mix, the Treasury released its annual report on potential currency manipulation overseas, adding Switzerland and Ireland to its watchlist, which already includes China, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam. The list likely carries more heft than usual amid multiple tense trade negotiations. Markets assume the U.S. may pressure other countries to let their currencies appreciate versus the dollar as part of deals to avert severe tariffs being re-imposed next month. The Swiss National Bank responded on Friday by saying it would intervene in currency markets where necessary to keep inflation on track. Intervention to cap a super-strong franc has been a critical monetary tool used over the past decade and may need to be tapped again now that Swiss inflation has returned negative just as the SNB's key interest rate is set to return to zero in June. Elsewhere, China's yuan slipped against the dollar while falling to a near two-year low versus its major trading partners on Friday as the Trump-Xi call fell short of many expectations. Stock markets overseas were mixed on Friday as Wall Street remained on edge and the U.S. jobs report loomed. In the euro zone, first-quarter GDP was revised higher to show twice the growth originally estimated: 0.6% quarter-on-quarter, leading to an annual rate of 1.5%. India's central bank cut key rates by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points to 5.5%, its steepest cut in five years. It also slashed its cash reserve ratio - funds that banks are required to hold - by 100 bps to 3% in a surprise move aimed at boosting lending and speeding up policy transmission. In single stocks, Tesla shares recovered around 5% in Frankfurt on Friday, having closed down 14% in New York yesterday amid the Trump-Musk spat. It lost about $150 billion in market value yesterday, which caused the erstwhile member of the 'Magnificent Seven' megacaps to drop to ninth in the list of most-valuable firms behind Broadcom and Berkshire Hathaway. Broadcom's shares (AVGO.O), opens new tab, however, fell 4% in extended trading overnight as its forecast-beating earnings seemed to underwhelm the Street. In Bank of America's weekly tally of fund flows, U.S. stocks saw outflows of $7.5 billion, the third week of exits, while European shares saw inflows of $2.6 billion, the eighth week of inflows. Weekend reading suggestions * 'BLUE BONDS': European countries should seize the moment to boost the size and liquidity of jointly-issued euro sovereign debt, and a solution could be to replace a proportion of the stock of national bonds with senior Eurobonds, or 'blue bonds'., opens new tab So says a 'working document' from Peterson Institute senior fellow and former IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard in a paper jointly written with Citadel's Angel Ubide. * NUCLEAR BLIND SPOTS: United Nations nuclear watchdogs appear to have lost track of some critical elements of Iran's nuclear activities since U.S. President Donald Trump ditched a 2015 deal that imposed strict restrictions and close supervision by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Reuters Francois Murphy and John Irish report on key blind spots that include not knowing how many centrifuges Iran possesses or where the machines and their parts are produced and stored. * OCEAN ECONOMY: Trade in the global 'ocean economy', opens new tab hit as much as $2.2 trillion in 2023, about 7% of total world trade, but this trade is increasingly threatened by climate change and environmental problems, the United Nations trade and development arm UNCTAD showed in a report this week. The ocean economy grew faster than the world economy at large in the five years to 2020 and an estimated 100 million jobs depend on it. * 'TRUMP DOCTRINE': The emerging foreign policy under President Donald Trump resembles a 'look the other way' doctrine, opens new tab or a 'none of our business' doctrine, argues former George W. Bush State Department official Richard Haass on Project Syndicate. "The U.S. sought to change the world, annoying some and inspiring others. Those days are gone, in some ways for better, but mostly for worse. The US has changed. It is coming to resemble many of the countries and governments it once criticized." * MAGNETIC FEW: A small team in China's Ministry of Commerce decides the fate of the global auto industry, one rare earth magnet export permit at a time. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a key component in electric vehicle motors, and it added them to an export control list in April as part of its trade war with the United States. Reuters' Laurie Chen and Lewis Jackson show how it falls to the Bureau of Industrial Security and Import and Export Control, part of China's Ministry of Commerce, to review export permits for the rare earth magnets, vital for car motors, wind turbines and even U.S. F-35 fighter jets. * FINANCE AND AI: Artificial intelligence advances in the financial sector, opens new tab offer enhanced data analysis, risk management and capital allocation, but there are problems too, according to a paper on CEPR's VoxEU website. As AI systems become more widespread, they introduce challenges for regulators tasked with balancing the benefits of innovation with the need for financial stability, market integrity, consumer protection and fair competition. * DRONE ATTACK: Ukraine's 'Operation Spider's Web', opens new tab last weekend used smuggled drones to attack bomber aircraft deep inside Russia, and the 'remarkable event' could affect the future of conflict, argues Council on Foreign Relations fellow Michael Horowitz. The attack "clearly shows that even targets deep in a country's territory could now be at risk". * IMF EUROPE: The case for closer European economic integration, opens new tab has become more compelling as external challenges multiply, according to Alfred Kammer, director of the International Monetary Fund's European Department. Stressing the need for the completion of the single market, Kammer said capital markets integration has been too slow and that cross-border flows have been frustrated by persistent fragmentation. "If history is a guide, Europe can turn adversity to advantage." * ALPINE TRUSTS: Liechtenstein is examining tightening control of scores of Russian-linked trusts abandoned by their managers under pressure from Washington. Reuters' John O'Donnell and Oliver Hirt cite sources in reporting that the country, one of the world's smallest and richest, is home to thousands of low-tax trusts, hundreds with links to Russians. Chart of the day Supply chain stress ticked up in May, data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York said on Thursday. The bank noted that its Global Supply Chain Pressure Index for May rose to 0.19 from -0.28 in April, only the second time it stood in positive territory this year and the highest reading since the 0.20 seen in August of last year. Although the index remains subdued compared to the post-pandemic surge, growing concerns about the impact of the tariff war - particularly the impact of China's restrictions on rare earth and minerals exports on the global auto industry - will ensure policymakers keep a close eye on these pressures for any signs of re-emerging inflation. Today's events to watch * U.S. May employment report (8:30 AM EDT), April consumer credit (3:00 PM EDT); Canada May employment report (8:30 AM EDT) Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.


Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's tax bill is undermining the foundations of global finance
For decades, investors have been able to rely on a simple truth: the US bond market is a safe place to put money. When wars broke out, economies crashed or other calamities struck, money flowed into US Treasuries, as Washington's bonds are known, to protect wealth. As a result, the US has been able to rely on a ready supply of investors willing to fund the country's ever-increasing appetite for tax cuts and public spending. Investors wanted US debt and the federal government was only too happy to provide it. Not even half a year into Donald Trump's presidential term, however, decades of orthodoxy are being turned on their head. 'The US has generally benefited from demand for Treasuries from overseas investors. It's viewed as the global risk-free asset,' says John Stopford, a fund manager at Ninety One. 'The concern is that a lot of those beliefs or tenets about the US are being called into question, in terms of how reliable, how safe an investment are US Treasuries?' Offshore investors, battered by volatility and bewildered by uncertainty since Trump took office, are becoming increasingly wary of the US bond market. Returns have suffered as Trump's trade policies have weakened the dollar and the president's planned debt splurge has raised questions about just how sustainable US borrowing really is. The latest flash point is Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill, which the Congressional Budget Office said would add $2.4 trillion (£1.8 trillion) to the deficit over the next decade. Elon Musk might have hogged the headlines this week with his outbursts against the bill but investors and traders are airing the same concerns, especially as higher deficits mean the US treasury will be asking them to buy more and more of its bonds. 'We're seeing it in the asset management community, some insurance funds, some pension funds, and foreign investors overall as well. It's just more caution in the buying, rather than a full-blown 'sell everything',' says Gennadiy Goldberg, head of US rates strategy at TD Securities. A crisis in the US bond market, or even just a slow ebbing of investor confidence and faith, could be the most profound and revolutionary legacy of Trump's second term. The US market and its currency might no longer offer the safe haven against risk, nor the anchor for markets worldwide. An end of this financial exceptionalism would mean higher borrowing costs for the US and pose a challenge to the entire American economy model. Moody's became the last major credit rating agency to strip the US of its gold-plated borrower status last month and analysts have raised the prospect of Trump facing his own ' Liz Truss moment ' as investors baulk at his spending plans. For now, concern is centred around where all this fiscal ill-discipline will leave the US in the 2030s and beyond. So investors are shying away from longer-dated Treasuries with terms such as 10, 20 or 30 years, and parking their money in shorter-term bonds that mature in one or two years. 'I see investors who are even cautious about the five to 10-year space,' Goldberg says. If this caution turns to panic, then a meltdown – with worldwide consequences – isn't out of the question. 'If there was a big deleveraging that happened – and there was a big source of selling, whether it's from foreign investors or hedge funds or levered investors or basis investors – it could potentially overwhelm the system,' Goldberg says. Foreign investors are also having to contend with a big drop in the US dollar, which is reducing their returns. 'It's fine to see bond yields rise if the currency is stable or appreciating. That's not what we're seeing at the moment. We're seeing bond yields rise in the US, and actually the currency, on a broad basket, is about 10pc down from its highs last year,' says James Ringer, a Schroders fund manager. The lack of buyers and the potential glut of bonds raises the possibility, or 'tail risk', that the market could cease to function properly. 'That would mean sellers overwhelming buyers,' says Goldberg. This could drive a sharp surge in rates and force an emergency intervention from the Federal Reserve. 'That is the risk going forward – that the system is unable to function if something goes wrong,' he adds. At the moment, there's little prospect of a panicked sell-off – mainly because investors have so few genuine alternatives. America's star may be on the wane but it is still the brightest light in the sky. 'The US is absolutely a mass market in terms of marketable debt. The second and third closest markets are an order of magnitude smaller, so that makes it really difficult for a lot of these investors to really get away from dollars,' says Goldberg. 'There's just no place for them to go.' But equally, with Trump at the helm, nobody is ruling anything out. 'Even if it's a tail risk or something that's unlikely, because it's there at the back of people's minds, potentially they do begin to change their behaviour,' Stopford says. 'They do begin to think, 'OK, well, I should have less exposure to the US, I should have less exposure to the dollar, I should be looking for alternatives that are safer, more reliable.' 'That's not bond vigilantes speculating. That's just people making rational decisions based on concerns about risk.' Scott Bessent began the week by telling the world: 'The United States of America is never going to default. That is never going to happen.' were meant to reassure. But the sheer fact that the US treasury secretary had to spell out something that has been taken for granted for decades highlights the fact that the fundamentals of the US financial system have been shaken. Whether they go on to crumble depends on what Trump does next.


STV News
13 minutes ago
- STV News
Planning applications backlog as council struggles to recruit staff
Concerns have been raised over the amount of time it is taking to process planning applications in Glasgow. Glasgow has the second highest cost per planning application in Scotland, a report has found. The local authority charges £12,259 while the Scottish average sits at £6,679 per application. Despite this a backlog of cases is building up, leading to concerns about applications being dealt with in time, members of the city's scrutiny committee heard. During the meeting, councillor Ken Andrew, who chairs the planning committee, told fellow councillors that the council was struggling to recruit and maintain staff in their planning department. Councillor Andrew also said that this was causing an increase in the amount of time it was taking to review applications. There are two types of applications, local applications which can be anything from a shop front, a house extension or a change of property use of less than 5000 sq m of new floorspace and major or national application which is generally bigger than the thresholds already listed. Local applications generally have a two month determination timescale and if discussions are going well the council can agree an extension for making a decision. However, if there hasn't been an agreement about an extension of time to determine then the applicant can submit an appeal called an appeal against non-determination. Major or national applications generally have the same principles but the council has four months to reach an outcome before the applicant can appeal. During a recent scrutiny committee councillor Ken Andrew explained some of the difficulties. He said: 'My understanding is that what has been happening in planning is that the planning team have struggled both to recruit and maintain staff. 'A decision was made to restructure how the planning function was managed to try and keep hold of the staff we had managed to recruit. 'What we have seen is this blip and this increase in the amount of time it has taken to get planning applications through and in front of the committee so it is an issue that is being managed. 'I am sure it will be interesting for the committee to get a better level of information than I am able to give you here.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country