logo
Opinion - When it comes to vacations, Democrats and Republicans think remarkably alike

Opinion - When it comes to vacations, Democrats and Republicans think remarkably alike

Yahoo23-05-2025

Democrats and Republicans don't just disagree on policy — they increasingly diverge in how they live their daily lives. From the places they eat and the cars they drive to the television networks they watch and even the names they give their children, lifestyle choices are often split along partisan lines. These differences reflect a broader and more troubling trend: political polarization is shaping not just the outcomes of our elections, but the fabric of American culture.
With the unofficial start of summer upon us, it is worth asking: Has polarization also seeped into something as apolitical as summer vacation?
To find out, the Institute of Politics at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, where we serve as director and associate director, surveyed 1,123 American adults in early May using the AmeriSpeak Panel.
For starters, partisans largely agree on a basic vacation question: how many consecutive days off work count as a 'real' vacation? Nearly half (47 percent) say it takes six or more consecutive days off work. About a third say four to five days is enough, and 12 percent say even one to three days qualifies.
More than half of Americans (55 percent) plan to take a vacation this summer, defined in the survey as at least two nights away from home. There is a modest partisan gap: 61 percent of Republicans compared to 54 percent of Democrats say they plan to travel. But when it comes to how they plan to spend that time off, Democrats and Republicans are remarkably similar.
Equal shares of both groups are planning beach trips or road trips, the two most popular vacation types in our survey. Romantic getaways and family-friendly excursions show no meaningful partisan divide either. Of course, the survey doesn't capture specific destinations — a beach vacation might mean Palm Beach for some, while Rehoboth is for others, i.e., same category, but they have very different vibes.
One area where political preferences do seem to matter is urban tourism. Democrats are more than twice as likely as Republicans to say they plan to visit a city and explore its attractions. Democrats are also slightly more likely than Republicans to choose vacations focused on outdoor recreation, like hiking or camping.
What about the 45 percent of Americans not planning a summer getaway? Democrats and Republicans give similar reasons: cost, work obligations, family responsibilities, or a preference for traveling at other times of year. One notable difference is that Democrats are twice as likely as Republicans to say they 'don't like to take vacations.'
Getting there matters, too, and most Americans feel safest behind the wheel. About 80 percent say they feel 'mostly' or 'completely' safe driving a personal vehicle, more than 20 points higher than the perceived safety of planes, trains or buses. There are no major partisan differences in how Americans view car, train or bus travel. But air travel tells a different story.
Fifty-seven percent of Americans say flying is mostly or completely safe. That includes 64 percent of Republicans and 55 percent of Democrats. This gap persists even after controlling for demographics (race, gender, income and education) and geographic region.
What explains the difference?
Americans tend to trust the government more when their own party controls the presidency. That dynamic appears to be at work here. Republicans express more confidence in the current administration and its Cabinet officials, whereas Democrats are more skeptical. That skepticism appears to extend to how safe it feels to board a plane.
To be sure, recent tragedies and problems, like the fatal mid-air collision near Reagan Washington National Airport and the ongoing air traffic control issues at Newark Liberty International Airport, further exacerbate the issue. The heavily partisan messaging among elites and Americans' growing preference for media that reinforces their views rather than challenges them, over who is to blame for these problems, almost certainly contributes to the partisan divergence in safety perceptions.
We were curious to know whether polarization had turned summer vacation into another partisan affair. The good news is that, despite a few differences, Democrats and Republicans still have common ground on the seasonal respite from the pressures of work and life.
But the societal and political problems associated with lifestyle sorting are nonetheless persistent and very real. And when our political identities become indistinguishable from our lifestyle preferences, the opportunities for meaningful interaction across the aisle shrink. That deepens cultural and affective polarization, reinforcing the divide that defines American politics today.
And let's face it: a partisan silo is a terrible vacation destination.
Mileah Kromer is an associate professor of political science at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and the director of the UMBC Institute of Politics, which conducts the UMBC Poll. She is the author of 'Blue State Republican: How Larry Hogan Won Where Republicans Lose and Lessons for a Future GOP.' Ian Anson is an associate professor of political science at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and the associate director of the UMBC Institute of Politics. He is the author of 'Following the Ticker: The Political Origins and Consequences of Stock Market Perceptions.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director
Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director

Podcaster Joe Rogan was shocked as he read billionaire Elon Musk's wild allegations against President Donald Trump on Thursday. Musk dropped a bomb on social media when he alleged Trump was in the Jeffrey Epstein files after a series of escalating back-and-forth social media messages between him and the president. This accusation occurred as part of a larger tirade against Trump and Republican leaders over the "Big Beautiful Bill." In the episode, which was recorded Thursday but released Friday, a "Joe Rogan Experience" producer interrupted the host's live interview with FBI director Kash Patel to inform him of Musk's Epstein tweet. Watch: Republicans Rally Behind Trump, Continue To Support Musk Amid 'Big, Beautiful' Brawl Rogan read the tweet out loud, "'Time to drop the really big bomb Donald Trump is in the Epstein files, that's the real reason they have not been made public, have a nice day.' "Jesus Christ," he said in shock. Read On The Fox News App "I'm not participating in any of that conversation," Patel said. "Someone should take his phone away," Rogan said as he marveled at Musk's tweet. "Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein files?" "I don't know how he would," the FBI director said, again insisting he would stay out of the feud. "What the f--- are they doing?" Rogan asked. "I understand he owns Twitter, I think it's bad for your mental health," Rogan said. "I think posting things public all day and arguing with people all day is bad for you." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful BIll because it does not include the policies he wanted," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The White House said a source familiar with the Epstein matter said it is widely known that Trump kicked Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club. The source also pointed out that the administration released the Epstein files, which included Trump's name, and nothing was new about Musk's revelation. "If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hang out with him for 6 months and say he 'loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?'" the source said. Shortly after Musk posted about Trump being in the Epstein file, Trump posted his response to Truth Social. "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress," Trump said, turning his attention to the "big, beautiful bill" that is before the Senate. "It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that." "I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" the president article source: Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director

Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests
Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump issued a blanket pardon to more than 1,500 people charged in the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection. But it still wasn't enough. Now, five Proud Boys leaders are suing the Department of Justice (DOJ) over their prosecutions and asking the government to surrender millions. The lawsuit, filed by Dominic Pezzola, Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joe Biggs, and Zachary Rehl, asks the government to pay them $100 million in restitution, despite the fact that the latter four were found guilty of engaging in a seditious 2021 conspiracy to keep Trump in power. Two years after the riot, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs and Rehl were found guilty of plotting to oppose Congress' election certification by force. Pezzola was the only one who was acquitted of seditious conspiracy but was still found guilty of assaulting police, stealing a riot shield, smashing a window breached by rioters, conspiring to impede lawmakers and police, and more. The five men filed the lawsuit Friday in Florida, putting the ball in Trump's court to either defend the prosecutions or pay an exorbitant sum at taxpayers' expense. The Proud Boys is a far-right militant organization that promotes political violence and embraces misogynistic, xenophobic, and anti-LGBTQ+ ideologies. If the DOJ decides to pay the Proud Boys members, many Democrats worry that it could symbolize the president's willingness to outwardly sanction political violence and empower extremists. In the pardon proclamation announced on Jan. 20, Trump noted that the controversial mercy 'ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.' Prior to the pardons, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs, Rehl, and Pezzola were each sentenced to 22, 18, 17, 15, and 10 years in prison, respectively. The Proud Boys members claim there was an 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.' 'A settlement would suggest that the violence of January 6 was entirely justified,' Matthew Dallek, a political historian at The George Washington University, told The Washington Post. 'It would say to the country that these Proud Boys who were convicted in a court of law, in a fair trial, were wrongfully prosecuted and victims. It just turns the entire day on its head.' The insurrection interrupted Congress' attempt to certify former President Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. After a mob stormed the Capitol, five people died in or immediately after the violence and 140 officers were assaulted. The Daily Beast has reached out to the Trump administration for comment.

Chaco region ban on oil and gas drilling being reconsidered under Trump
Chaco region ban on oil and gas drilling being reconsidered under Trump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Chaco region ban on oil and gas drilling being reconsidered under Trump

Jun. 6—The Trump administration's focus on domestic energy production has pushed the Bureau of Land Management to reconsider a rule against oil drilling in a 10-mile area surrounding the Chaco Culture National Historical Park. As Department of Interior secretary, New Mexico gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland issued an order in 2023 to prevent oil and natural gas drilling in the 10-mile radius surrounding Chaco Canyon for 20 years. The All Pueblo Council of Governors wants those protections to stay in place for the sake of protecting sacred sites in the Chaco region. But the Navajo Nation is suing to revoke the protections, arguing the withdrawal causes significant economic harm to its members. Increasing domestic energy production and mining is a Trump administration priority. On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order telling agency heads to identify actions that impose an "undue burden" on the development of domestic energy resources, particularly oil, natural gas, coal, hydropower, biofuels, critical minerals and nuclear energy resources and to make plans to revise or rescind those actions. "This will restore American prosperity — including for those men and women who have been forgotten by our economy in recent years. It will also rebuild our nation's economic and military security, which will deliver peace through strength," the order reads. Subsequently, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued an order in February essentially telling his agency to take steps to follow Trump's order, including "actions to review and, as appropriate, revise all withdrawn public lands." When it comes to Chaco, the Bureau of Land Management is following that order to review withdrawn public lands. According to an agency spokesperson, no formal decision has been made yet related to the Chaco order, which prohibits oil and gas development and exploratory mining on federal lands within a 10-mile radius of the Chaco Culture National Historic Park. "It's deeply disappointing that Trump and his administration are working to undermine our communities rather than to address the struggles and concerns that New Mexicans face every day," Haaland said in a statement. The Bureau of Land Management held a tribal consultation in late May about considering revoking the Chaco order. Ahead of the meeting, Acoma Gov. Charles Riley called for a united tribal response to keep the protections in place. Recently, the All Pueblo Council of Governors also passed a resolution reaffirming its opposition to weakening Chaco protections. "Chaco is a place that's very sacred to us," Riley said. "It contains many of our beliefs and origins. ... Many times, people don't understand our connection with these sites, whether it be Chaco, Mesa Verde, Bears Ears, things like that, many of our religious tribal leaders still go back to these places and call upon our ancestors to guide and protect our people, and that's what people don't understand." Acoma also received notice of the consultation late, only 19 days ahead of time instead of the typical 30, Riley said, giving the pueblo leaders less time to prepare, and the consultation didn't seem like a "true consultation," he said. "It just doesn't seem like this administration is listening. They hear you, but they're not listening," Riley said. 'A domino effect' As the Biden administration came to a close in January, the Navajo Nation filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against the United States, the Interior Department, the Bureau of Land Management and Haaland, arguing that she failed in her statutory obligations and fiduciary duties to the Navajo Nation when issuing the order. Navajo Nation members hold mineral rights for land in the area, and the lawsuit argues that profiting off of those mineral rights will be effectively impossible with the checkerboard of surrounding federal lands ineligible for lease. "This will result in sizable financial losses, especially relative to modest incomes that are prevalent in this isolated region, and will significantly reduce economic activity and employment in the region, further detrimentally affecting the Nation and its citizens," the lawsuit reads. The Navajo Nation repeatedly proposed a 5-mile withdrawal radius as a compromise approach to protecting Chaco. The lawsuit argues that the U.S. government never officially considered that suggestion, so it didn't encourage public consideration of it. The office of Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren did not respond to a request for comment by the Journal's print deadline. In April, the Acoma and Laguna pueblos asked to join the lawsuit as intervenors on the side of the defendants. New Mexico's all-Democratic congressional delegation have been vocal about trying to protect certain wild or culturally significant areas in the state, like the Gila and Pecos watersheds, from mining and oil and gas development. In April, Sen. Ben Ray Luján and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández led the reintroduction of a bill to make the 10-mile protected area around Chaco permanent. All five members of the delegation are cosponsors. It seems unlikely to pass in a Republican dominated Congress. "With the atmosphere of today and the push for shorter environmental reviews, the fast track of mining of uranium and oil and gas production, it really does threaten a lot of our sacred places around the country," Riley said. "And if we — God forbid — fail on Chaco, then, in my opinion, it's just a domino effect. Then, who's next? What's next?" Journal Capitol Bureau Chief Dan Boyd contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store