logo
Pope Leo XIV: No tolerance for any form of abuse in Catholic Church

Pope Leo XIV: No tolerance for any form of abuse in Catholic Church

Pope Leo XIV has said there should be no tolerance in the Catholic Church for any type of abuse sexual, spiritual or abuse of authority -- and called for transparent processes to create a culture of prevention across the church.
Leo made his first public comments about the clergy sex abuse scandal in a written message to a Peruvian journalist who documented a particularly egregious case of abuse and financial corruption in a Peruvian-based Catholic movement, the Sodalitium Christianae Vitae.
The message was read out loud on Friday night in Lima during a performance of a play based on the Sodalitium scandal and the work of the journalist, Paola Ugaz.
It is urgent to root in the whole church a culture of prevention that does not tolerate any form of abuse - neither of power or authority, nor abuse of conscience, spiritual or sexual abuse, Leo said in the message. This culture will only be authentic if it is born of active vigilance, of transparent processes and sincere listening to those who have been hurt. For this, we need journalists.
Leo is well aware of the Sodalitium scandal, since he spent two decades as a missionary priest and bishop in Peru, where the group was founded in 1971. The then-Bishop Robert Prevost was responsible for listening to the Sodalitium's victims as the Peruvian bishops' point-person for abuse victims and helped some reach financial settlements with the organisation.
After Pope Francis brought him to the Vatican in 2023, Prevost helped dismantle the group entirely by overseeing the resignation of a powerful Sodalitium bishop. The Sodalitium was officially suppressed earlier this year, right before Francis died.
Now as pope, Leo has to oversee the dismantling of the Soldalitium and its sizeable assets. The Vatican envoy on the ground handling the job, Monsignor Jordi Bertomeu, read out Leo's message on Friday night, appearing alongside Ugaz on stage.
In the message, Leo also praised journalists for their courage in holding the powerful to account, demanded public authorities protect them and said a free press is an common good that cannot be renounced.
Ugaz and a Sodalitium victim, Pedro Salinas, have faced years of criminal and civil litigation from Sodalitium and its supporters for their investigative reporting into the group's twisted practices and financial misconduct, and they have praised Leo for his handling of the case.
The abuse scandal is one of the thorniest dossiers facing Leo, especially given demands from survivors that he go even farther than Francis in applying a zero-tolerance for abuse across the church, including for abusers whose victims were adults.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'It would not be America': Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops
'It would not be America': Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

'It would not be America': Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops

Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops (Image via Getty) Martina Navratilova, the famous former tennis player, spoke up on August 14, 2025, on her X account. She shared how upset she was with President Donald J. Trump. Trump had taken over the Washington, D.C. , police force and brought in 800 National Guard troops, saying the move was needed to fight rising violent crime in the city. But crime was actually at a low. Navratilova shared a Rolling Stone report and wrote plainly: 'He would love nothing more than an excuse to open fire on protesters.' She once said, calling out Trump's policy, 'I were now still in that same position and I had to go live somewhere, it would not be America, because it's not a democracy at the moment' Martina Navratilova reacts to Trump's police takeover and protests One of the all-time greats, Martina Navratilova, renounced her former nation and is now a United States citizen. She achieved 18 Grand Slams overall and won her first at Wimbledon in 1978 against Chris Evert. Under Section 740 of the DC Home Rule Act, President Trump signed an executive order on August 11, 2025. He said violent crime was surging and took temporary control of the Metropolitan Police Department. He also sent in 800 National Guard soldiers to the capital. But news outlets like PolitiFact and local officials, including Mayor Muriel Bowser, said crime had actually gone down since 2023. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Get Paid Instantly for Your Car [Sell Now] Cars24 - Sell Your Car Sell Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola Studies found violent crime dropped by about 26–35 per cent in recent years. In response, many residents took to the streets. They called the military move harsh and anti-democratic. Against this backdrop, Navratilova's warning rang out: she said Trump looked for any excuse to silence or harm protesters. Her words echoed the concern many felt. Also Read: 'More than any American Culture': Martina Navratilova once shared how Chris Evert's Catholic upbringing shaped her tennis image Martina Navratilova on moving to the U.S. under Trump's rule Martina Navratilova, who moved to America in 1981, also spoke recently about immigration. In a BBC interview, she said if she had to choose a country to live in today under President Trump, she would not pick the U.S. She said it no longer felt like a democracy. Many people, she pointed out, are deported for not fully supporting Trump's agenda or simply for not 'kissing the ring.' Martina Navratilova said that when she left her home at 18, she did not know if she would ever see her parents again. Now, looking back, she questions whether she could have made that move under Trump's policies. Her words suggest deep concern about where America is heading. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

Russia Claims New Ukraine Gains Ahead Of Putin-Trump Summit
Russia Claims New Ukraine Gains Ahead Of Putin-Trump Summit

NDTV

time5 hours ago

  • NDTV

Russia Claims New Ukraine Gains Ahead Of Putin-Trump Summit

Russia said on Thursday its troops had captured two new settlements in eastern Ukraine on the eve of a summit between President Vladimir Putin and US counterpart Donald Trump. The defence ministry said Russian forces captured the village of Iskra and the small town of Shcherbynivka in Ukraine's Donetsk region, which the Kremlin claimed to have annexed in September 2022. Shcherbynivka is near the mining town of Toretsk, captured by Russian troops in February, and Kostiantynivka -- one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. The Russian army has accelerated its gains in recent months. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday conceded that Russian forces had advanced by up to 10 kilometres (six miles) in a narrow section of the front line near the coal mining town of Dobropillia. The Russian army's gains on Tuesday were the biggest for a single 24-hour period in over a year, according to an AFP analysis of data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW). In southern Russia, 13 people, including two children, were injured Thursday in a Ukrainian drone attack that damaged around 10 residential buildings in Rostov-on-Don, regional governor Yuri Sliusar said on Telegram. The Russian military claimed to have shot down 268 Ukrainian drones and four glide bombs in 24 hours. In Ukraine, the air force said Russia had fired two missiles and 45 drones at Ukrainian territory overnight. Two people were injured in the northern Sumy region and one in the Kherson region, according to local authorities. Putin and Trump are to meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit which the Kremlin said would focus on "the resolution of the Ukraine crisis".

Free speech clash: Supreme Court allows Mississippi's law requiring age verification for minors; tech giants oppose mandate
Free speech clash: Supreme Court allows Mississippi's law requiring age verification for minors; tech giants oppose mandate

Time of India

time6 hours ago

  • Time of India

Free speech clash: Supreme Court allows Mississippi's law requiring age verification for minors; tech giants oppose mandate

US Supreme Court (AP image) The US Supreme Court on Thursday declined to temporarily block a Mississippi law that requires age verification and parental consent for minors to use social media platforms. The law, aimed at protecting young people from potential online harm, will remain in effect while legal challenges continue. It is one of several measures passed by US states to curb the influence of social media on children. NetChoice – a group representing companies including Facebook, Instagram , Reddit, X and YouTube had asked the Supreme Court to halt the law after the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals allowed its enforcement. A lower court had earlier blocked the law, ruling it likely violated the First Amendment. US District Judge Sul Ozerden said the measure was overly broad and that parents already have other ways to monitor their children's online activity. The Supreme Court did not explain its decision. However, Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that while the law may be unconstitutional, NetChoice had not proven that enforcing it during the court battle would cause enough harm to justify halting it. NetChoice attorney Paul Taske called the ruling a 'procedural delay' and expressed confidence the group would ultimately prevail in protecting free speech rights. 'Although we're disappointed with the Court's decision, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment − not just in this case but across all NetChoice's ID-for-Speech lawsuits," Taske said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo Mississippi officials defended the law, saying it targets platforms that allow predators to contact minors. They cited a case in which a 16-year-old boy took his own life after he met someone on Instagram who threatened to expose their sexual encounter unless he paid $1,000. The state also argued that blocking the law conflicted with the Supreme Court's earlier decision to uphold a Texas law requiring age verification for pornographic websites. NetChoice maintains the law infringes on free speech by forcing all user, including adults to provide personal information to access online platforms. "Social media is the modern printing press − it allows all Americans to share their thoughts and perspectives,' Taske said. 'Just as the government can't force you to provide identification to read a newspaper, the same holds true when that news is available online.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store