Oklahoma governor apologizes for disparaging remarks, celebrates session victories
OKLAHOMA CITY — Gov. Kevin Stitt said Wednesday he had apologized to a state senator after making disparaging remarks about him and his wife last week.
Stitt also defended his choice for interim commissioner of the state mental health department, despite his lack of experience in mental health.
Stitt drew the ire of lawmakers Thursday as they worked late into the night and into the early hours of Friday morning to overturn over 40 of his vetoes.
He posted a video Thursday afternoon calling on voters to closely watch how lawmakers vote on veto overrides and said the bills he had vetoed were bad for Oklahoma.
Later in the evening as lawmakers prepared a measure to fire mental health Commissioner Allie Friesen, the governor, who had appointed and ardently supported Friesen throughout the agency's financial disarray, put out a statement that drew a senator's wife into the mix.
Sen. Paul Rosino, R-Oklahoma City, and Rep. Josh West, R-Grove, were the authors of the measure to fire Friesen. It said the Legislature had 'lost confidence' in her ability to lead the state agency.
Stitt called Friesen's firing a 'politically motivated witch hunt' and questioned if Rosino and West had something to gain by firing her.
'Josh West and Paul Rosino need to first answer what they stand to gain from Allie Friesen being removed,' he said in his Thursday statement. 'What are they trying to keep covered up? What conflicts of interest are they trying to hide? Is Senator Rosino trying to help his wife avoid responsibility for her role in the finance department there? Oklahomans deserve answers.'
Rosino, who chairs the Senate Health and Human Services Committee and co-chairs a select committee investigating the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services' finances, said Thursday his wife works as a 'low level, part-time' employee at the agency.
Stitt's statement, compounded with his video calling on Oklahomans to vote out lawmakers who voted to overturn his vetoes, led to dozens of lawmakers publicly calling Stitt out Thursday night.
House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, said Friday morning the video Stitt had posted frustrated lawmakers and disrupted 'good faith' negotiations between the Legislature and the Governor's Office.
He also said it was 'beneath the dignity of his office' to attack a senator's wife.
Senate President Pro Tem Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, said Friday he was disappointed by the governor's comments.
'You know, we all say things sometimes that we wish we could take back. But this wasn't something that was said out of context,' Paxton said Friday. 'It was something written down and approved that was put out. And in my nine years here, I've seen lots of things where there's lots of criticism of members. I've never seen something like that on a member's spouse.'
When discussing the measure to fire Friesen in the Senate, senators were unified in speaking against Stitt's comments – all but one of the senators who rose to debate the measure spoke against the statement. The Senate voted 43-1 to fire Friesen and the House voted 81-5.
But Wednesday afternoon, Stitt apologized and said 'it was my fault' for letting emotions run high.
'I do regret that. I called and apologized to him and his wife,' Stitt said. 'I let the emotions get the better of me and I should not have done that. … I'm just trying to point out any kind of conflict. We have to make sure that, you know, if you're in the pharmaceutical business, you shouldn't be running pharmaceutical bills. If you're in this industry, you shouldn't be running this bill.'
Rosino could not be reached for comment, but a Senate spokesperson confirmed he and his wife had accepted Stitt's apology.
The Republican governor also defended Rear Admiral Gregory Slavonic as his choice to temporarily fill Friesen's position as head of the mental health department.
Slavonic has a long history working in government and previously ran the Oklahoma Department of Veteran Affairs, but has no experience in mental health.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'He's not a mental health expert, he's more of a business person,' Stitt said Wednesday. 'He's somebody that I think can do the job.'
The agency needed supplemental funding from the Legislature for this budget year and has been embroiled in investigations and audits following reports of financial disarray, including being unable to make payroll.
Stitt took a victory lap as he celebrated successes from the legislative session.
He said Oklahoma is now on the path to eliminating the income tax after the Legislature passed a .25% income tax cut, with further cuts when revenue reaches specified levels.
Stitt also applauded legislation he said eliminated various fines, fees and court costs for people recently released from incarceration, a priority he mentioned during his State of the State address at the beginning of session.
Expanding apprenticeship and internship programs in Oklahoma was another victory Stitt brought up Wednesday.
'This was an amazing session,' he said. 'I thought it was one of my best sessions we've ever had in seven years.'
Reporter Ylleana Berryhill contributed to this report.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
California GOP lawmaker targets mid-decade redistricting with new bill
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) announced Monday he plans to introduce federal legislation that would prohibit mid-decade redistricting nationwide. The bill would nullify any new congressional or legislative district maps adopted by states before the next U.S. Census in 2030, including those approved as early as 2025. 'Gavin Newsom is trying to subvert the will of voters and do lasting damage to democracy in California,' Kiley said in a statement. 'Fortunately, Congress has the ability to protect California voters using its authority under the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This will also stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country.' Gov. Gavin Newsom has said he is evaluating several options for the state to pursue its own redistricting push, following efforts by Texas Republicans to revise their maps at the urging of President Donald Trump. Newsom also shared that he's working with the Legislature on a proposal that could go before voters in a special election this November. Under California law, however, the power to draw district boundaries was transferred from lawmakers to the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, an independent group that uses census data to draw the lines. The commission uses U.S. Census data to redraw state and congressional districts every 10 years. Legal experts have warned that attempting to bypass the commission through a special election could result in litigation. Kiley's statement did not address the situation in Texas, where Republican lawmakers are moving ahead with their redistricting plans. If approved, the new Texas maps could potentially give Republicans the chance to gain up to five congressional seats in the 2026 midterm elections. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Hochul tells Dems to play dirty
With help from Amira McKee YOU STARTED IT: She wants to be the gerrymanderer-in-chief. Gov. Kathy Hochul hosted six lawmakers from Texas at the Capitol this morning — and while gracing them with some good ol' northern hospitality, she also effectively told the Empire State's good government groups to go to hell. The Texas Democrats were fleeing the Lone Star State to prevent their state Legislature from having the quorum necessary to push forward a Trump-led redistricting measure, which would give the state five more Republican congressional seats. The visit to Hochul's backyard showcased how the governor is playing a key role in escalating the political arms race to redraw congressional maps around the country, POLITICO's Bill Mahoney reports. After greeting the Texans in Albany with a breakfast of eggs, bacon and sausage, Hochul held a press conference with them in the Capitol's Red Room — where she slammed New York's own redistricting process for not being partisan enough and embraced the full-fledged gerrymandering of New York's congressional districts. 'I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back,' Hochul said, when asked if she would change or disband New York's independent redistricting committee. 'Republicans take over the Legislature? They can have at it. But until then, we're in charge.' 'All due respect to the good government groups, politics is a political process,' she added. Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie agreed: 'It's very difficult to say play fair when your opponents are playing dirty and using every toolbox to undermine democracy.' Hochul wants legislators to start a process of approving a constitutional amendment to let New York make changes to its own congressional lines. But that's a lengthy process and wouldn't impact the maps any sooner than the 2028 election — even if the amendment is approved by voters and the new lines aren't challenged in court. 'We're sick and tired of being pushed around when other states don't have the same aspirations that we always have,' the governor said. Mayoral candidate and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who authored the 2012 state constitutional language now restricting New York Democrats' abilities to quickly respond to Texas, wasn't totally on board with Hochul's hardball efforts. 'I think what Texas is doing is grossly political and just gross gerrymandering and is one of the reasons why the public turns off on government,' Cuomo said at an unrelated campaign event in Manhattan. 'It could also have a dramatic effect if it goes beyond Texas. But to pass it, to do it here, you would need a couple of years. ... So my guess is, by the time you could actually do it, it would be irrelevant.' The six Texas House Democrats — whose colleagues also fled to Illinois on Sunday — said today they were just stopping through Albany and planned to continue on their journey to meet with Democratic governors from other states. They wouldn't say where they're headed next and refused to reveal if they plan to remain outside the Lone Star State until Aug. 19, when Texas' special session concludes. If they don't, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has the power to call another special session immediately after the current one to bring up the redistricting bill again. 'To run to states like New York and Illinois to protest redistricting, it's kind of like running to Wisconsin to protest cheese. It's just kind of outrageous,' Abbott said in response to the lawmakers Albany visit today. 'New York and Illinois are two hallmark states that have already done redistricting to eliminate Republicans.' Hochul's naked embrace of Democratic gerrymandering in response to the Texas GOP's own effort was condemned by New York Republicans in the state Legislature and Congress, including Rep. Elise Stefanik, who's considering challenging Hochul for governor. 'The Worst Governor in America needs to be reminded that she conveniently forgot to tell the unlawful out-of-state radical Democrats at today's desperate press conference that she lost not once, but TWICE in her effort to illegally draw gerrymandered lines in New York to rig our Congressional elections and suppress the will of the voters,' Stefanik said on X. John Kaehny, executive director of the good government group Reinvent Albany, described Hochul's move as trying to justify destroying the village to save it — which will really just undermine democracy. 'The state of New York motto is Excelsior, which means, 'Ever Upwards,' not, 'We'll Race Texas to The Bottom and Disenfranchise Large Swaths of New York Voters,'' he told Playbook. 'Gerrymandering is without a doubt one of the most devastating ways to essentially nullify the votes of huge numbers of people, and that's the opposite of democracy.' — Jason Beeferman FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL 'THE SAFEST BIG CITY': Mayor Eric Adams touted falling crime rates today in Brooklyn, dubbing last month 'the safest July in our subway system in recorded history.' Adams, a retired NYPD captain, won his 2021 campaign in large part on the promise that he would make a pandemic-ravaged New York City safer. Now, as New Yorkers' public safety insecurities endure, he's returning to crime statistics — in the face of his abysmal performance in recent polls. 'New York City is grieving this week after the tragic loss of four innocent lives — including an NYPD officer — in a senseless shooting in Midtown,' Adams said in a statement. 'As we mourn, we must also find ways to turn our pain into purpose; it's the least we can do to honor the victims. While this incident will forever be a stain on our city, it happened against the backdrop of a larger, more hopeful picture — one where the brave men and women of the NYPD continue to drive down crime.' The first seven months of 2025 saw the fewest shooting incidents and shooting victims in recorded history, according to July crime statistics put out by the NYPD today. The department's seven major crime categories, including murder and robbery, are down 5.6 percent overall from last year. While Adams has blamed media coverage for lingering fears over public safety, a POLITICO analysis found overall crime in the city is yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. The mayor and NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch told reporters today that they attribute their progress, in part, to the administration's focus on illegal gun removal and gang takedowns. Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor who leads the field in recent polls, has offered different policy prescriptions from the mayor when it comes to policing. Their divergent views have become a centerpiece in the race in the aftermath of a mass shooting that killed an NYPD officer in Midtown Manhattan last week. Mamdani has distanced himself from his previous calls to 'defund the police,' but his future with the nation's largest police force remains a delicate matter. Adams took aim at Mamdani today for his calls to disband the NYPD's Strategic Response Group, the controversial unit responsible for policing protests and responding to major public disturbances — including the mass shooting. 'We just have a philosophical difference in the principles of public safety, and there's a reason crime is down and jobs are up, and idealism collides with realism when you are saving the lives of people,' Adams said at his press conference on the stats. — Amira McKee IF YOU PAY THEM, THEY WILL COME: Cuomo unveiled a public safety proposal of his own today — it's designed to retain and attract more NYPD recruits. The former governor proposed offering new recruits a $15,000 signing bonus and then layering in additional retention bonuses throughout their tenure. He floated the idea of recruiting retired cops to rejoin the force, allowing them to collect their pension and a salary. Cuomo also proposed a city-run scholarship fund that would offer a full ride to officers without a bachelor's degree. Sweetening the pay — which would cost $250 million over five years — and offering other perks would help the city hire 5,000 more police officers, Cuomo said. 'It's time to build a new New York City based on what we are dealing with and what we've learned,' Cuomo said. The former governor also devoted a significant portion of his press briefing to attacking Mamdani and poring over the state legislator's past support for defunding the police. Mamdani has said during his campaign he would maintain funding for the department while creating a new Department of Community Safety that would handle tasks like mental health emergencies. 'Either you were telling the truth then or you're telling the truth now, but you cannot justify those two statements,' Cuomo said. The former governor further separated himself from the 33-year-old democratic socialist by proposing to expand the Strategic Response Group, a controversial NYPD unit, and continuing to have it handle protests. Mamdani has proposed disbanding the unit and creating a new one designed to respond to emergencies like the Midtown mass shooting last week. — Joe Anuta ON YOUR RIGHT: Adams is planning to do a fireside chat next week with the conservative Manhattan Institute as he seeks support on the right for his longshot independent reelection effort. 'Governing in NYC,' a conversation between Adams and Manhattan Institute President Reihan Salam, is set for Aug. 14 at the Hilton Midtown. The prominent think tank welcomed Adams' 2021 election as a change from the de Blasio years. But even as the institute's scholars have written extensively about the mayor — both positively and negatively — Adams has largely kept his distance from his conservative backers. The institute has been an intellectual force behind attacks on DEI initiatives and gender identity protections. Adams is also mending fences with an old friend on the right, the Trump-friendly radio host Sid Rosenberg, the Daily News reported Friday. We'll be watching to see if newly minted Manhattan Institute fellow Danielle Sassoon shows up, after she resigned as acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, rather than comply with the Department of Justice's order to drop the corruption case against Adams. — Jeff Coltin AROUND NEW YORK — STATEN ISLAND 4 MAMDANI: Democratic leaders in New York City's most conservative borough are backing Zohran Mamdani over Andrew Cuomo. (New York Post) — NY POST TAKES LA: The New York Post will launch a new daily newspaper in Los Angeles called 'The California Post' in early 2026. (Axios) — 'BASIC DECENCY': Hochul responded to Texas Sen. Ted Cruz after he criticized her for wearing a head covering to the funeral of a slain Muslim NYPD officer. (New York Times) Missed this morning's New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.
2 hours ago
Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?
When Democratic lawmakers fled Texas to try to prevent the Republican-led Legislature from redrawing the state's congressional districts, it marked the latest episode in a long national history of gerrymandering. The word 'gerrymander" was coined in America more than 200 years ago as an unflattering means of describing political manipulation in legislative map-making. The word has stood the test of time, in part, because American politics has remained fiercely competitive. In many states, like Texas, the state legislature is responsible for drawing congressional districts, subject to the approval or veto of the governor. District maps must be redrawn every 10 years, after each census, to balance the population in districts. But in some states, nothing prevents legislatures from conducting redistricting more often. In an effort to limit gerrymandering, some states have entrusted redistricting to special commissions composed of citizens or bipartisan panels of politicians. Democratic officials in some states with commissions are now talking of trying to sidestep them to counter Republican redistricting in Texas. If a political party controls both the legislature and governor's office — or has such a large legislative majority that it can override vetoes — it can effectively draw districts to its advantage. One common method of gerrymandering is for a majority party to draw maps that pack voters who support the opposing party into a few districts, thus allowing the majority party to win a greater number of surrounding districts. Another common method is for the majority party to dilute the power of an opposing party's voters by spreading them among multiple districts. The term dates to 1812, when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state Senate districts to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some thought an oddly shaped district looked like a salamander. A newspaper illustration dubbed it 'The Gerry-mander' — a term that later came to describe any district drawn for political advantage. Gerry lost re-election as governor in 1812 but won election that same year as vice president with President James Madison. Not under the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 2019 case originating from North Carolina, ruled that federal courts have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: 'The Constitution supplies no objective measure for assessing whether a districting map treats a political party fairly.' The Supreme Court noted that partisan gerrymandering claims could continue to be decided in state courts under their own constitutions and laws. But some state courts, including North Carolina's highest court, have ruled that they also have no authority to decide partisan gerrymandering claims. Yes. Though it's difficult to challenge legislative districts on political grounds, the Supreme Court has upheld challenges on racial grounds. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the high court said the congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting strength of Black residents. The court let a similar claim proceed in Louisiana. Both states subsequently redrew their districts. Statisticians and political scientists have developed a variety of ways to try to quantify the partisan advantage that may be attributable to gerrymandering. Republicans, who control redistricting in more states than Democrats, used the 2010 census data to create a strong gerrymander. An Associated Press analysis of that decade's redistricting found that Republicans enjoyed a greater political advantage in more states than either party had in the past 50 years. But Democrats responded to match Republican gerrymandering after the 2020 census. The adoption of redistricting commissions also limited gerrymandering in some states. An AP analysis of the 2022 elections — the first under new maps — found that Republicans won just one more U.S. House seat than would have been expected based on the average share of the vote they received nationwide. That was one of the most politically balanced outcomes in years.
