Former Thai PM Thaksin Gives Testimony in Lese-majeste Case
Thailand's former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra yesterday took the stand in a Bangkok court to defend himself against royal defamation charges that threaten to curtail his influence in Thai politics.
The former leader has been charged with lese-majeste and computer crimes stemming from a 2015 interview that he gave with a South Korean newspaper, and has been barred from leaving Thailand without permission until the case is resolved.
Thaksin faces up to 15 years in prison if he is convicted under Thailand's harsh lese-majeste law, which criminalizes criticisms of the king and the royal family.
Speaking to reporters after yesterday's hearing, Thaksin's lawyer Winyat Chatmontree said that the court would hand down its verdict on August 22 – two years to the day that Thaksin returned to Thailand from more than 15 years in self-exile. 'We are confident that we will receive justice,' Winyat said, as per Reuters.
The case is just one of a series of legal challenges facing Thaksin and his daughter, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, whose government hangs by a thread after the leak in mid-June of an embarrassing phone call with Cambodia's equally influential former leader, Hun Sen. During the call, which discussed the ongoing border dispute between the two nations, the Thai leader appeared to side with Hun Sen and accused a Thai general of being 'completely aligned' with her political opponents.
On July 1, the same day that Thaksin's trial opened in Bangkok, Paetongtarn was suspended by the Constitutional Court, pending an ethics probe into her conduct during the call with Hun Sen. The national anti-corruption body has also announced a similar investigation, and the Bhumjaithai party, which withdrew from Paetongtarn's coalition after the call was leaked, has pledged to seek a vote of no-confidence in her government.
In addition to the current lese-majeste case, Thaksin also faces legal scrutiny for the circumstances surrounding his return to the country – in particular, that he faked an illness in order to avoid serving a single night of a lengthy corruption sentence in prison.
This flurry of legal cases marks an abrupt end to the truce between Thaksin and Thailand's conservative political establishment, and a resumption of the political struggle between the two camps. For years, the establishment had sought to extirpate his influence, and pro-Thaksin governments were removed both via military coups (against Thaksin in 2006 and his sister Yingluck Shinawatra in 2014) and rulings by politically pliant courts.
However, after the May 2023 general election, which saw the opposition Move Forward Party (MFP) win a plurality of seats on a threateningly progressive platform, Thaksin's Pheu Thai party agreed to form a coalition with conservative and military-backed parties in order to block the MFP from power. In exchange, Thaksin was allowed to return to Thailand, which he did on the same day in August 2023 that the new government was sworn in. An eight-year prison sentence was conveniently watered down, and Thaksin was granted parole in February of last year.
Despite the truce, many royalist opponents of Thaksin did not let go of their strong mistrust of the former leader, and many perceived that he overstepped the political boundaries of the deal by inserting himself so actively into the affairs of government. While he does not occupy any official position in government, Thaksin has been very active in government-adjacent roles, leading critics on both sides of Thai politics to accuse Paetongtarn (with some justice) of acting as his proxy. They have since seized on the border dispute with Cambodia, which has worsened since an armed clash between Thai and Cambodian soldiers on May 28, to attack the legitimacy of Paetongtarn's government.
While the current cases will likely bring Paetongtarn's term to an end, sooner or later, they also raise questions about the future prospects of the Shinawatra clan as a force in Thai politics, as Joshua Kurlantzick and Pavin Chachavalpongpun argued in an article in late June.
'Although the family has weathered numerous challenges in the past, changing party names at times, the convergence of internal fractures among its backers and sustained external pressures from powerful Thai actors now suggests the dynasty is done for,' they wrote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
3 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
Isolated Sentinel tribe in focus as India readies census
A Sentinel tribesman aims his bow at an Indian Coast Guard helicopter as it flies over North Sentinel Island in December 2004. © Reuters KIRAN SHARMA NEW DELHI -- As India gears up for its next census after a delay of six years, the government faces a difficult task trying to account for the small Sentinelese tribal population on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The indigenous people, called the world's most isolated, fiercely resist all contact with outsiders. The nationwide, once-a-decade census was slated for 2021 but postponed due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The count will start for most parts of India in March 2027, while for a few states and territories in the country's north, it will begin early in October next year. Besides recording population data, the exercise includes caste details on all Indians for the first time since the South Asian nation's independence from British rule in 1947.
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Could Thailand's Cash Handout Scheme Have Worked?
One of the consequences of the Pheu Thai party's implosion is that its signature cash handout scheme will go down with it. Granted, the program was already approaching rigor mortis before Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra got herself, her dynasty, and her party (and Thai politics) into a hot mess by running her mouth to a foreign leader. The first tranche was delivered to welfare cardholders and people with disabilities last September, and a second tranche to the elderly in January, but the bulk of the funds for most Thais has been scrapped, with Bangkok blaming Trump's tariffs, although more likely because the first two tranches did little to stimulate the economy through consumption, the entire point of the project. (Phase 3 would have given money to 16-20 year olds, and Phase 4 to 21-59 year olds). Personally, I always thought the handout scheme was a good idea, but one unlikely to work given the mechanism, timing, and who was in charge. I don't think it would be a particularly controversial statement to say that Pheu Thai, and especially prime ministers Srettha Thavisin and Paetongtarn Shinawatra, were woeful articulators who couldn't explain why the scheme was necessary and what it intended to achieve. Srettha might have been a competent bureaucrat, but he was an appalling salesman. Likewise, Paetongtarn inspired little trust that she knew what she was doing, let alone in managing an unprecedented redistribution of state money. Recent surveys suggest that most Thais would still prefer the Phase 3 and Phase 4 handouts to proceed, but this is only around the 60 percent mark, which one might have expected to be higher when essentially they're being given money for free. The biggest problem, though, involved the matter of distribution. The purpose of the scheme was essentially a stimulus package to promote consumption in the most immediate and (although never stated) frivolous ways. The government wanted people to spend it on washing machines, clothes, food, household repairs, etc. The sort of consumption you'd do if you won a small sum in the lottery, for instance. This was sensible. The Thai economy had been lagging behind for several years due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and many sectors of the economy (mainly local businesses) needed an injection of capital. Moreover, domestic consumption rates have been worryingly low in Thailand for some time, and there will be an ever bigger need for domestic consumption as the population ages (for several complex reasons). While agnostic on ideas like Universal Basic Income, I am strongly in favor of a national dividend and have been since I first read Thomas Paine's Agrarian Justice (1797), which argues that all landowners should pay a ground rent that will be distributed as a dividend to each citizen upon reaching maturity. However, the mechanism for redistribution matters. It makes sense, for instance, that social benefits to the poor or unemployed are delivered in the form of cash or bank transfers (fiat currency, in other words), since, in an ideal world, while most of that money will be spent, a fraction of it will be saved. However, if you have a citizens' dividend scheme solely intended to boost consumption (like Thailand's), it makes less sense to deliver it in the form of hard currency. Firstly, that's because people could simply keep the money in their accounts, rather than spend it. Secondly, one of the obvious problems anyone could see before the scheme was enacted is that people could use the money to pay off debt. This meant the stimulus scheme largely became a transfer of wealth from the state to the banking sector. ('The impact of the handouts and the stimulus was less than we had expected,' central bank governor Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput told Reuters in January. 'The handouts that went out sometimes were used to pay down debt and whatnot, so you didn't see that translation into consumption.') Had the Pheu Thai party asked, I would have suggested they distribute the sums in the form of digital gift cards with relatively short expiration dates and which could only be spent at select shops. This would have required recipients to spend the money on consumption (rather than paying off debt or putting it into savings); it would have forced people to spend the money at specific places (local shops) that the government wanted to support; and it would have compelled people to spend the money relatively quickly (meaning central economists could see some bang for the buck, thus disproving the naysayers). Perhaps most importantly, a gift card would have had a novelty factor. It always seemed reductionist to have had the rather radical idea of transmitting $14 billion from the state to its citizens, yet to have decided that the mechanism by which this will be done is so utterly dull. People checked their phones and saw an extra 10,000 baht appear in their ledger or were simply given cash. In other words, like any other transaction. Ideally, the government should have made this dividend transfer as unlike a normal transaction as possible. Perhaps the government shouldn't have even given everyone the same amount of money! You could have randomly allocated payments of 8,000 baht, 9,000 baht, and 10,000 baht. If you only received 8,000 baht and were a little pissed off, maybe you'd have had more reason to go out that afternoon and splurge it on a purchase. And if you were lucky to get 10,000 baht, then spending 2,000 baht on something you might not have bought previously would have seemed like a free shot. In the end, the digital wallet mechanism was rational and relatively straightforward, as Pheu Thai would surely have been advised, yet sometimes an intuitive idea (giving people some money to spend) needs an unintuitive means of delivery.
Japan Today
10 hours ago
- Japan Today
Pakistan arrests suspect after viral video of couple shot dead in the name of `honour`
Pakistan on Sunday arrested a suspect after a video emerged on social media of a woman and a man being shot and killed for marrying against the wishes of their families, in a so-called honour killing, authorities said. The couple, who were not identified, were shot dead on the orders of a local tribal council last month in Pakistan's southwestern Balochistan province, according to provincial authorities, who investigated after the video went viral. One of the suspects has been arrested after the location and people in the video were identified, the provincial chief minister, Sarfraz Bugti, said in a statement. A case has been registered against all those involved, he said. The video shows people in a desert, and some pickup trucks and SUVs that they had apparently driven there. The woman is given a copy of the Quran, the Muslim holy book, and she then tells a man: "Come walk seven steps with me, after that you can shoot me." The man then follows her for a few steps. A local police official said the woman did not cry or seek mercy. "You are allowed only to shoot me. Nothing more than that," the woman says in the regional Brahavi language, translated by the official. It was not clear what she meant by "nothing more than that". The man, who had followed her, then aimed a pistol at her. The woman, wrapped in a shawl, stood still as shots were fired. She remained standing after two shots, delivered from close range, dropping to the ground after the third shot. That is followed by a series of gunshots. The footage then shows a bloodied man lying on the ground, close to the woman's body. Then, men are shown shooting at both the bodies. Reuters could not independently verify the authenticity of the video. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said that in 2024, there were at least 405 "honour killings", criticising the authorities for failing to stamp out these crimes. Most victims are women, and killings are usually carried out by relatives professing to defend their family's reputation, human rights groups say. Conservative families do not allow couples to marry against their wishes. Such killings are against the law. © (c) Copyright
