Why manual gearboxes are still king
What's more, AA Driving School figures show that in 2024 one in five new drivers chose to take their test in an automatic. This was nearly double the number from five years previously.
Red Driver Training's chief executive Seb Goldin added: 'We've seen a marked increase in automatic-only drivers taking the test, typically in urban areas.'
There are multiple reasons for the shift towards autos. For a start, manufacturers are increasingly following customer demand for autos and not offering manual gearboxes on some or even all of their models. Automatics are becoming more affordable and more widely available, too. And the default transmission for electric vehicles is effectively an automatic.
But despite the manual gearbox seemingly having had its day, drivers are still divided on its benefits. Here we look at the case for and against changing gear yourself.
Manual pros
Driving enthusiasts love them
Driver coach Ivan Thompsett from Total Car Control is a fan: ' A manual gear change is so much more fun. On a good, open and flowing road, an auto is never as engaging, as stirring, as a manual gear stick.
'Get a good manual in the right car on a good road and you'll struggle to find a more satisfying driving experience.'
They are great for performance cars
Andreas Preuninger, the head of Porsche's GT division, says: 'For me personally, it has always been super important to have a manual gearbox. A manual gearbox is lighter, which helps with fuel efficiency and reduces emissions.
'It also allows for more horsepower because the internal resistance is significantly lower than in a PDK [semi-automatic] transmission.'
They are cheaper to buy
The big-selling Vauxhall Corsa 1.2 Turbo with a manual gearbox is £21,555; the same car with an auto costs £23,285. Manual technology has been around for years and manufacturers have been able to spread the development costs over time and vehicles.
In addition, manuals are less complex: the driver changes gear by pressing the clutch pedal and moving the lever rather than relying on electronics or twin clutches, now featured on many autos, for controlling and ensuring seamless changes.
Learning to drive is cheaper than with an auto
Although being taught with a manual will give you a more versatile driving licence, it will also cost less than qualifying for an automatic-only licence. Driving schools charge a premium for automatic-only lessons.
Seb Goldin, the chief executive of Red Driver Training, explains: 'On average, a lesson costs £35 an hour and we'll charge £5 more for lessons in an automatic. This reflects the additional cost of a vehicle with an automatic gearbox.'
Cheaper insurance for manuals than autos
Admiral insurance says: 'Automatics can be more expensive to insure due to higher claims costs, while automatic gearboxes cost more to replace than a manual.
'The Admiral pricing team did some research by looking at the average premium for both automatics and manual cars. Interestingly, we found the average premium was 5.63 per cent higher for automatic cars.'
Stops drivers becoming lazy
With a manual gearbox, you have no choice but to engage with the car. Driver coach Thompsett reveals: 'So many cars now do so much that drivers become lazy. People don't drive any more. They travel.
'A manual gearbox makes people think about their driving. That might make them safer than someone who is completely switched off.'
Manual cons
It's easier to design cars for automatics
Now car makers have worked out that they can replace the clunky old gear lever with little more than a switch, it has given designers greater freedom. Matthias Hossann, Peugeot's head of design, told us: 'With a gear lever, a lot of the cockpit environment was occupied. Now we can think about how we can re-engineer a new experience for our customers. We can provide places to rest your arm and storage.
'It opens up many interesting options regarding the touch and feel of the car.'
Clutch control can be a turn-off
With the increasing number of auto-only EVs around, young drivers are increasingly viewing changing gear as irrelevant. 'I think the only barrier to larger scale take-up of automatics has been, and is, cost,' said Red Driver Training's Goldin.
'I think it will be a while until the second-hand market for accessible small automatics catches up with manuals. But it will happen. And when it does, even more young drivers will go auto only.'
They can feel a bit clunky in traffic
No matter how much drivers love the experience of manuals, it's a reality in this country that everyone spends some time in stop-start traffic. And constantly pushing in the clutch pedal in stop-start traffic can become rather tedious.
With an automatic, on the other hand, you're simply dabbing the accelerator and brake to creep forward at a snail's pace.
Automatics are more fuel efficient
On the face of it, manual transmissions are more efficient. For example, the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 95PS with a five-speed manual gearbox returns 55.3mpg, the identical car with a seven-speed automatic gives 53.1mpg. The auto Vauxhall Corsa is thirstier than the manual model, too. But that doesn't tell the whole story.
Volkswagen's Trevor Rickwood explains: 'Small manual cars can offer better fuel economy when driven in the best possible way – and the official numbers quoted are always 'best case scenario' – but few people use manual gears in the perfect way.
'While official figures are correct in saying that manual cars such as the Polo 1.0 are more fuel efficient than their automatic counterparts, an automatic gearbox is still usually the most economical choice for most drivers.'
Verdict
Although the manual gearbox has a lot going for it, the automatic has one great benefit: convenience. And, as the statistics suggest, for most drivers, that's key.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Bristol's 'cheese-grater bridge' set to close for four weeks
A cycle and pedestrian harbour crossing in Bristol know as the "cheese-grater bridge" is scheduled to close for four weeks to allow for essential maintenance and strengthening Reach Bridge, in Temple Quay, will be completely closed to all users from 180ft (55m) long structure closed in 2017 for two years after a lorry driver attempted to cross it, causing "extensive damage" to the metal deck commercial property company that manages the crossing said maintenance works would ensure "the continued safety and integrity" of the 17-year-old bridge". Meads Reach Bridge is a pedestrian and cycle bridge designed to link a new mixed-use development at Temple Quay with the Bristol Temple Meads the closure, cyclists and pedestrians are asked to use either Valentines Bridge or Temple Bridge, located on Temple Way, as alternative Young Property Management Consultancy, who manage the bridge, said: "We appreciate the cooperation and understanding of all visitors and staff during these essential works, which are being carried out to ensure the continued safety and integrity of the structure."
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Meet Britain's real-life SUPERVILLAIN: Eccentric millionaire lives in a bunker beneath a Cold War radar - and is convinced he's going to find UFOs
Some millionaires might be happy frittering away their hard–earned cash on speed boats, golfing holidays, and perhaps the odd football team or two. But William Sachiti is far from your run–of–the–mill businessman. Much more Blofeld than Bill Gates, Mr Sachiti has decided to use his millions in a far less conventional way. Naturally, that meant buying a Cold War RAF base and firing up the radar station to hunt for UFOs. From his 'supervillain lair' in the nuclear bunker beneath former RAF Neatishead, Norfolk, Mr Sachiti is building what may be the world's most sophisticated UFO–hunting machine. But don't let the secluded compound, legions of robots, and enormous leather swivel chair fool you – Mr Sachiti isn't taking his role as Norfolk's latest supervillain too seriously. 'I'm a bit of a hedonist,' Mr Sachiti told Daily Mail from the freezing cold control room beneath the radar station. 'There's no point being the richest man in the graveyard, I just want to have fun and let people track UFOs.' Mr Sachiti, 41, is a British Zimbabwe–born inventor and entrepreneur best known for making autonomous delivery vehicles for the RAF, robots for the NHS, and for a particularly unsuccessful appearance on Dragon's Den. In 2017, Mr Sachiti founded The Academy of Robotics with the goal of developing autonomous vehicles, robots, and AI systems. His crowning achievement was the creation of Kar–go, a company which, in 2019, made the UK's first roadworthy autonomous car. It was this goal, rather than the hunt for extraterrestrials, which actually led Mr Sachiti to make the unusual business decision to purchase a disused RAF radar station. During the height of Cold War paranoia, RAF Neatishead was a key part of the UK's air defence network, keeping a watchful eye out for a potential nuclear attack. However, by the 1990s, the main radar had been decommissioned, and in 2004, the decision was made to significantly scale back activity at the base. For almost two decades, the site lay unused as the hulking green mass of the radar slowly turned brown with rust. But with private roads safely away from the public and buildings ready to become workshops, the base was the perfect place for Mr Sachiti to test his robots. Who is William Sachiti? William Sachiti is the millionaire owner of the Academy of Robotics, a company dedicated to creating autonomous robots. Mr Sachiti was born in 1984 in Harare, Zimbabwe and came to the UK when he was 17. He appeared on Dragon's Den in 2009 with his company 'Clever Bins', but was rejected by all four dragons. In 2011, he founded the digital concierge service mycityventure, which was sold to SecretEscapes in 2014. His most successful venture is the autonomous car company Kar–go, which created the UK's first roadworthy self–driving car. Mr Sachiti purchased the site in early 2022 and converted it into the headquarters of The Academy of Robotics, where he now lives and works. When The Daily Mail came to visit Mr Sachiti at his home on the former base, the site seemed caught somewhere between a graveyard for ageing military equipment and the playground of an eccentric millionaire. A herd of Scottish deer happily graze amid the remains of concrete pillboxes, and the ground is littered with craters made, not by explosions, but by Mr Sachiti himself to form ponds for the flamingos he plans to introduce. 'When I moved in, I thought it was going to look like Tron, but it's starting to look a lot more like Westworld,' Mr Sachiti said as he gave a tour of the grounds. However, the property's most obvious feature is the enormous Type–84 radar that looms over Mr Sachiti's bungalow. This radar was once responsible for tracking and identifying every aircraft moving over the south of the UK, but it hasn't been used in over two decades. Mr Sachiti's conspicuously villainous office is located deep beneath this structure, down a pitch–black corridor lined with enough concrete and steel to withstand a nuclear blast. Although Mr Sachiti freely admits he doesn't 'know anything' about how radars work, what he does know about is making artificial intelligence. He says: 'I have all the documents of how the Type–84 was made and how all the tech works, so what if I fed all this into a super–intelligent AI and turn it into the world's best radar expert? And that's how I made RadarBot.' RadarBot is just one of the many AI assistants who keep Mr Sachiti company in his somewhat solitary existence at the base. As he talks, Mr Sachiti frequently pulls up various AI assistants to explain various topics and, in one instance, couldn't find the light switch since 'the AI normally does that'. At first, I couldn't see why Mr Sachiti, who has a wife and children and seemed extremely sociable, chose to live on the base by himself. However, it soon became clear that everything was not quite right at RAF Neatishead. As we walked around the grounds, we came across one of Mr Sachiti's beloved deer decomposing under a cloth. Just a month ago, Mr Sachiti explained, someone had broken into the compound and killed a number of deer, leaving their bodies on the ground. In another incident, just weeks before our visit, a workshop holding Mr Sachiti's self–driving car was broken into and vandalised. 'I get horrible messages, constant abuse, they shot my animals, and no one takes it seriously,' said Mr Sachiti. 'It does affect me, I don't have my staff here, I can't have my kids here. There's guns being shot on my property, how could I have my kids in the garden? 'I don't have investor days anymore because you never know who's coming or whether they're going to vandalise the place. I wish people would just call it out more when they see people being horrible online for no reason.' In that isolation, however, what Mr Sachiti does have is a nearly endless amount of time and energy to work on new creations and build his AIs. In fact, part of the reason he invited Daily Mail to the base along with a group of his investors and former RAF radar operators was to prove that this system really worked and that he hadn't just 'been spending too much time in the bunker'. 'There's no such thing as done when you're surrounded by a cluster of super–intelligent AIs and you're tinkering until three or four in the morning,' he said. It was in the depths of such an AI–powered late–night tinkering session that Mr Sachiti's UFO–hunting side–hustle began. Buying the base purchase had come with a catch: to get planning permission, he was required to conduct restoration and renovation on the listed buildings – including the Type–84 radar station. With RadarBot's assistance, Mr Sachiti soon had the Type–84's radar receiver up and running, but was stumped as to what he should actually do with it. That's when Mr Sachiti decided to post on Reddit to see what the internet thought. Whether it was a joke or not, the reply soon came back decisively: Mr Sachiti should hunt for UFOs. 'I think what happens when you work in tech for so long is that certain things become intuitive and just look like they should be possible,' said he said. 'Then when people say it's not possible, it just became a bit of a challenge.' Although it might sound bizarre, Mr Sachiti seems to have seen the prospect of turning the UK's Cold War defences into a UFO–hunting network as a nice way to wind down after work. 'Some people have that car they refurbish over the summer, this is my version of that summer car,' said Mr Sachiti. 'I thought, why not? Either it slowly dies or you do something crazy and a lot of people benefit from it'.' But, as seems to be the case with many of Mr Sachiti's pet projects, his experiments with AI and radar systems were soon going well beyond a simple hobby. Since he couldn't use the Type–84's radar illuminator, it being far too power hungry for civilian use, he was limited to the smaller, passive secondary surveillance radar (SSR). So, instead of using the radar itself as the illuminator, Mr Sachiti's solution was to build a computer program that could listen for the signals which are already out there. 'What I thought is that, instead of using something like a BBC broadcast for reflection, I could use a plane in the sky,' Mr Sachiti said. 'I know where its signal is at all times, so what if I use that plane as an illuminator? And the plane next to it, and the one next to that, or all the planes in the sky.' That gives you a near–perfect picture of everything that is moving in the sky in a 150 to 250–mile radius, to a tested accuracy of 250 metres. Using the rather ominously labelled 'Global Domination Mode' to use the signals from every plane in the sky, Mr Sachiti's radar should pick up every large drone flying above London over 100 miles away. What makes this so bold is that anyone with Mr Sachiti's software can either log in and use RAF Neatishead's SSR or grab a £20 Amazon antenna and scan their own 150–mile radius. In theory, the resulting network would be unjammable, undetectable, unspoofable, and almost impossible to trick with existing stealth technologies. With just 20–30 of these antennas placed strategically around the country, nothing would move in the skies above Britain without Mr Sachiti and his network of UFO hunters seeing it. If you want to hunt for UFOs yourself, you can now download this software for free from Mr Sachiti's website to build your own station or search using RAF Neastishead's Type–84. Mr Sachiti says: 'We essentially ended up in the world's biggest UFO database just for fun.' Asked whether he has considered that the software might have military applications, particularly the possible drone hunting capabilities, Mr Sachiti seemed unconcerned. 'I'm a bit of a happy hippy person, for me it's fun and I don't really ever want to make weapons of war,' says Mr Sachiti. 'This is legitimately a UFO hunting machine, but it could be used for other things which I don't have an interest in.' However, Mr Sachiti's decision to create a 'UFO hunting machine' might have been inspired by something more than a desire to have a bit of fun. He said: 'I remember being in Zimbabwe in Africa, watching Star Trek thinking, 'wow!', so my passion for tech came from literal Star Trek.' But it was also during his childhood in Zimbabwe that Mr Sachiti found himself close to one of the most well–documented UFO sightings in history. In 1994, over 60 children at the Ariel school in Ruwa, Zimbabwe, reported seeing a UFO landing in the school grounds. Many reported having encountered a 'being' and were plagued by a terror that would follow many for their entire lives. Mr Sachiti recalls: 'I was in primary school, at a school named Greatstone Park, and we had just had a hockey game with students from the Aerial school. 'Apparently, the school had just seen a UFO land, and it was the talk of all the schools everywhere. 'So in my youth, we were all drawing pictures of UFOs and aliens and things, and I think maybe that dropped a seed, and that's where it started. Personally, Mr Sachiti says that UFOs' '100 per cent exist' but that he isn't convinced that they are extraterrestrial in origin. He says: 'The next model going down from humans is a chimp, right? But although there's only a 0.3 per cent genetic difference, the smartest chimp on Earth doesn't even know we're here. 'It doesn't know about electricity, the Hubble Space Telescope, all this tech. So if there's a being that's as much smarter than us as we are smarter than chimps, we wouldn't even know it was there. 'Nature didn't evolve from snails, go up to chimps, then to humans and stop there. Nature went past that ages ago, we just can't see it.' However, despite his absolute conviction in their existence and having spent months building a system to find them, Mr Sachiti says he's not bothered about looking for UFOs himself. He said: 'A person who makes a shovel isn't going to go digging for gold. 'I've made the tool and it's my job to make it the best tool I can, and when they find aliens, I hope they'll tell me.' WHAT IS RADAR? HIGH-FREQUENCY RADIO WAVES DEVELOPED DURING WW2 TO AID FIGHTER PILOTS Radar is an acronym, which stands for Radio detection and ranging. It uses high-frequency radio waves and was first developed in World War Two to aid fighter pilots. It works in a simple manner, a machine sends out a wave and then a separate sensor detects it when it bounces back. This is much the same way that sight works, light is bounced off an object and into the eye, where it is detected and processed. Instead of using visible light, which has a small wavelength, radar uses radio waves which have a far larger wavelength. By detecting the range of waves that have bounced back, a computer can create an image of what is ahead that is invisible to the human eye. This can be used to see through different materials, in darkness, fog and a variety of different weather conditions. Scientists often use this method to detect terrain and also see to study archaeological and valuable finds. As a non-invasive technique it can be used to gain insight without degrading or damaging precious finds and monuments.
Auto Express
3 hours ago
- Auto Express
It's incredible that no EV has got the full Electric Car Grant amount
As more cars become eligible for the Government's electric car grant, it's interesting that none of them yet qualifies for the higher £3,750 amount, with the total now sitting at 24 vehicles to choose from with a £1,500 contribution. With the latest batch of five including the likes of the Cupra Born, Volkswagen ID.3 and Peugeot 2008, there's now a decent array of cars included in the scheme, from the chic Renault 4 and 5 through to the practical, family-friendly Nissan Ariya – a former Auto Express Car of the Year! – the Vauxhall Frontera and the Renault Scenic. But it is interesting that nothing has yet achieved the full grant, especially as it's not clear from the outside how the calculations are being worked out. Advertisement - Article continues below Many industry commentators predicted the Renault 4 and 5 should be in pole position for the higher amount, but that didn't happen. That may have revealed something about where the batteries are coming from, and not all are yet being produced at the shiny new plant in northern France. When that facility is up to speed, there's a chance the Renault cars eligible for the grant – the 4, 5, Megane and Scenic are the ones that currently get £1,500 – could be moved to the higher level. But that's far from clear, due to the way the system has been set up. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Want to make the switch to an electric car? Our fantastic Buy a Car service has loads of great value new and used electric cars available right now. I've heard some cynical types suggest glibly that the bar for eligibility for the full £3,750 has deliberately been set unachievably high, so the headlines featured a nice big number, but behind the scenes the Government knew full well that few cars, if any, were going to achieve it. I'm sure that wasn't the case, but the lack of clarity isn't helpful. From what I hear, even manufacturers don't know how close they have come to achieving the higher grant level – they can reapply if anything changes, such as battery supply coming from a different country. However, it sounds like there's little transparency as to why a car is only eligible at the lower level, and if it's down to the environmental credentials of where the batteries are built – coal reliance versus nuclear, for example. The big one will be when the UK-built Nissan Leaf goes on sale in the coming weeks; if that car isn't eligible, then I'm guessing nothing will be. At least the grant scheme will last longer if it's ebbing away at £1,500 a car, rather than nearly £4,000. Pessimistic early projections had it running out as soon as next spring if too many cars were eligible for the higher level. It's obvious that won't be happening now! Did you know you can sell your car with Auto Express? Get the highest bid from our network of over 5,500 dealers and we'll do the rest. Click here to try Auto Express Sell My Car now ... Find a car with the experts Forget Netflix, Volkswagen locks horsepower behind paid subscription Forget Netflix, Volkswagen locks horsepower behind paid subscription Owners can now subscribe to boost the power of their car… for a fee Shock new mid-size Range Rover to get EV power and stunning design Shock new mid-size Range Rover to get EV power and stunning design Mid-size SUV will end the four-year wait for a new JLR model and our exclusive images preview how it could look New Jaecoo E5 is a Range Rover lookalike with a very attractive price New Jaecoo E5 is a Range Rover lookalike with a very attractive price Chinese newcomer's first electric SUV is also a rival to the award-winning Kia EV3 and Hyundai Kona Electric
