logo
The Texas County Where ‘Everybody Has Somebody in Their Family' With Dementia

The Texas County Where ‘Everybody Has Somebody in Their Family' With Dementia

The Atlantic29-04-2025

In Starr County, Texas, near the state's southern tip along the U.S.-Mexico border, escaping dementia can feel impossible. The condition affects about one in five adults on Medicare—more than double the national rate. 'Everybody has somebody in their family' with dementia, Gladys Maestre, a neuroepidemiologist who studies aging at the University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley, told me.
For Jessica Cantú, it was her father, Tomas. He asked her, his eldest daughter, never to put him in a nursing home. She promised. 'We take care of our own,' she told me. As Tomas's dementia progressed, the former pastor held to his routines. He played with his 19 grandchildren. He preached Wednesday-night services and hand-delivered donations of rice, beans, and oil across the border. He fed his chickens and sheep, and ate his favorite homemade foods—pineapple upside-down cake, enchiladas with saltine crackers, and cream-of-mushroom chicken over rice.
Dementia looms over the Cantú family tree. Two of Tomas's 10 siblings had it; Jessica wondered whether more might have, if they'd lived longer. Her maternal grandmother had dementia too. Seven months after her dad's death, she began working as a nurse practitioner at the county's first private Alzheimer's-specific research site, El Faro Health and Therapeutics. 'Patients will come in and say, 'So have you figured it out? What is it?'' she told me. She tells them the truth. 'I don't know what it is that's causing all of this.'
Dementia has no single trigger. As with many cancers, it can emerge from a lifetime of accumulated strain—from genetics, environment, and behavior. Researchers have identified a dozen risk factors that, if mitigated, could theoretically delay or prevent roughly 40 percent of cases worldwide: traumatic brain injury; conditions including high blood pressure, hearing loss, diabetes, and depression; habits such as smoking, inactivity, and heavy drinking; environmental and social forces including air pollution, social isolation, and limited education.
These 'risk factors usually do not come [as] one; they come in clusters,' Maestre said—and in Starr County, an almost entirely Hispanic community, they quickly stack up. Nearly one in three people lives in poverty; a quarter lack health insurance. Chronic conditions are widespread—especially diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease—while access to care is limited: There's just one primary-care physician for every 3,000 to 4,000 people, and few dementia specialists. Low education, language barriers, poor air quality, and extreme heat all compound the threat. These accumulate in cycles of grief and stress: The people I spoke with talked about deaths in the family followed by strokes that cascade into cognitive decline. Dementia isn't simply a diagnosis. It's a structural outcome.
Still, many in Starr County struggle to make sense of it. And no matter the cause—no matter which conglomeration of causes—they must live with dementia's reality.
In the Rio Grande Valley, people are also outliving their odds. The area's high dementia rate, Maestre has come to believe, may reflect not just risk but endurance: people living longer with the condition.
In general, research shows that Hispanic people tend to live longer than non-Hispanic white people, despite facing higher rates of chronic disease and steeper socioeconomic disadvantages—a pattern sometimes called the 'Hispanic paradox.' And in the Rio Grande Valley, part of what might sustain people through dementia, Maestre suspects, is the culture: Dementia is seen less as a medical emergency and more as a natural, if difficult, phase of life. Elsewhere, people with dementia may live in nursing homes or take expensive new Alzheimer's drugs with modest benefit. In Starr County, many older adults remain at home, surrounded by family who offer familiarity and stimulation. The care is physical, intimate—not clinical, but constant—and backed by research showing that familiar environments and home-based care can enhance both quality of life and cognitive function for people with dementia.
'He was never, never—since the day I brought him to my home—he was never one day alone,' says Juan 'Manny' Saenz of his father, Francisco 'Pancho,' who died at home last month at age 94. A professional body-shop painter, offshore fisherman, and lifelong jokester, Pancho began to grow forgetful and repetitive about a decade ago. Before Manny's mom, Amaro, died, she made him promise not to put his father in a nursing home. Under Manny's care, Pancho's appearance was impeccable: He was bathed and perfumed, with trimmed nails and a neat mustache. He ate his meals on ceramic dishes, and relished his coffee-and-cookie merienda snack break—or breaks, on days he'd forget the previous ones. Manny, who lives in Rio Grande City, told me exactly what Jessica Cantú had: 'We take care of our own.'
Monica Saenz Silva made a similar decision for her mother, Ramona—a bookkeeper at heart, the kind of person who kept every receipt for taxes and reminded her adult children to change their tires. She kept a running calendar of birthdays, not just for family and friends, but also for acquaintances, so she could wish them well. By 2019, a few years after her dementia symptoms appeared, 'that was out the door,' Monica told me
Today, Ramona will approach a taco or hamburger quizzically; she's forgotten how to bite into them. At times, she doesn't recognize the house where she's lived for decades. Still, Monica is determined to keep her at home. 'You want to keep them home, so they're in a familiar surrounding,' she said. 'It's not all the time that she doesn't know she's home.'
The response of many families here to dementia is shaped, partly, by limited treatment options: Alzheimer's and related dementias have no cure, and available medicines can be expensive, be limited in their benefits, and come with potentially life-threatening side effects. In Starr County, some caregivers eschew pharmaceuticals for aromatic teas, herbal compresses, and prayers to soothe loved ones, Maestre said. Theirs is an ethic of endurance: If dementia is here, families ask, why not build a life, tenderly, around it?
Still, many don't speak of it openly. Cantú told me that in her community, many still consider Alzheimer's to be a normal part of aging—at most, a mental illness of old age, but almost never a neurodegenerative disease. 'It's okay to just be forgetful at the age of 70. It's okay because Grandma and Grandpa were forgetful at the age of 70,' she said. 'There's no reason to discuss it.'
Still, some caregivers live with a sense of dread: In many cases, the disease does have a genetic component, and the structural forces that compounded their loved ones' risk haven't disappeared. They know their turn could be coming. Cantú frets about her mind; Monica Saenz Silva checks her memory every day. And they don't necessarily want for themselves what they did for their parents: If his time comes, Manny Saenz wants to go to a nursing facility. 'You won't know anything, so it doesn't matter,' he said. For him, the person with Alzheimer's is spared the memory of their decline; the burden belongs to those who remember, and that's a risk he doesn't want to pass on.
Hispanic Americans face a significantly higher risk of dementia than white Americans, and are also one of the country's fastest-aging groups. And yet, for decades, scientific understanding of dementia has drawn from data from mostly white, urban, and affluent populations; Hispanics make up fewer than 5 percent of participants in Alzheimer's clinical trials. That limits researchers' understanding of the condition. And the more they look, the less dementia seems like a single disease with a uniform pattern, and the more it appears to be a spectrum of diseases—each unfolding with its own course of symptoms, progression, and brain damage.
In some studies, researchers have detected amyloid plaques—the sticky protein clumps long considered hallmarks of Alzheimer's—more frequently in the brains of white participants with dementia or mild cognitive impairment than in their Black, Asian, or Hispanic counterparts. In several studies that measured tau proteins, another key Alzheimer's biomarker, Black adults with—or without—symptoms of dementia had lower levels than white participants. The genetic variant most strongly linked to Alzheimer's disease is less common—and possibly less potent—among people with certain Hispanic backgrounds than among white people.
In 2021, the National Institute on Aging designated a new Alzheimer's Disease Research Center in South Texas, co-directed by Maestre and Sudha Seshadri, a neurologist at the University of Texas at San Antonio. Their goal is to understand the Rio Grande Valley's dementia cluster—and what can be done about it—in part by examining the effects of environmental hardship and linguistic isolation, and by investigating protective factors such as bilingualism and family networks.
Eventually, Maestre hopes that urban design (such as shaded walkways, gardens, and spaces for intergenerational interaction) could help reduce the region's risks. 'It's not possible to put all the responsibility on the individual,' she told me. 'You cannot do that on your own.'
And yet, resources remain scarce. Texas is home to about 460,000 people living with Alzheimer's disease, but compared with other large states such as Florida and New York, it spends much less on dementia-related programs. (The Texas statehouse is considering a bill to establish a $3 billion fund for dementia research.)
For now, families like Jessica Cantú's are left to do what they can. When her father was a pastor, he would tell her about the sick people he visited who would reach up with their arms (toward the kingdom of heaven, he said) before dying peacefully. In the final weeks of his life, he was still going to church and chatting with people at the H-E-B grocery store. But then Tomas lost his appetite and grew frail. One night, Jessica kept vigil at his bedside, afraid he'd fall trying to get up. In the quiet hours, she said, he lifted both arms toward the ceiling. 'He was reaching up to the heavens, to the sky,' she said. 'It just gave me that comfort to know that he was ready, and that everything was going to be okay.'
Masha Hamilton contributed reporting.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New poll reveals majority of Californians oppose this key benefit for illegal immigrants
New poll reveals majority of Californians oppose this key benefit for illegal immigrants

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

New poll reveals majority of Californians oppose this key benefit for illegal immigrants

A majority of Californians oppose providing healthcare coverage for adults who are in the United States illegally, despite the Golden State currently offering it. The Public Policy Institute of California survey revealed that 58% opposed and 41% of those polled were in favor of the policy. The move took effect last year to allow people to enroll in Medi-Cal, the state version of Medicaid that takes taxpayer dollars, "regardless of immigration status." According to the pollster, a majority of those surveyed used to support the idea from 2015-2023. Illegal Immigrant Healthcare Costs In Blue State Triggers Intense Budget Debate The Medi-Cal program went insolvent this spring, as it required billions in loans to keep it afloat. The governor's office proposed changes like an "enrollment freeze" and a $100 monthly payment for "individuals with certain statuses" on Medi-Cal. However, some of those changes are unlikely to move forward in the Democratic supermajority legislature, according to CalMatters. According to the legislature's budget proposal, Democratic leadership is backing possibly creating a $30 monthly payment instead of $100 for those with "unsatisfactory immigration status" beginning in 2027, which would make some changes to the "enrollment freeze" that could start in 2026. Read On The Fox News App The legislature also proposes scrapping the governor's proposed $2,000 asset limit pitch for Medi-Cal participants and instead would bring it back to $130,000. Newsom Proposes Freeze On Allowing Adult Illegal Immigrants To Join California's Medicaid Program Assemblyman Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego, told Fox News Digital that the percentage of Californians opposing providing healthcare coverage for illegal immigrants may be even higher. Click Here For More Immigration Coverage "This debate is not about 'Should we provide healthcare to illegals or not?' because that's a false question. The bigger question is, should we provide free taxpayer funding to illegal immigrants and not have enough money and jeopardize services for citizens who are the neediest among us relying on Medicare?" DeMaio said. "That's the real debate. And this poll doesn't even capture that." "The Democrat position is a lot worse than this poll even suggests," he continued. Newsom's office previously attributed the issues with Medi-Cal to broader economic concerns. Lawmakers Reveal Whether Americans Should Pick Up The Medicaid Tab For Illegal Immigrants "Governor Newsom proposed adjustments in the 2025-2026 budget that will allow California to preserve our commitment to immigrant communities, protect coverage for millions of Californians, and preserve the strength of our values and health care system," Elana Ross, deputy communications director for Newsom's office, told Fox News Digital. "To be very clear, these proposals are the results of a $16 billion Trump Slump and higher-than-expected health care utilization." Fox News Digital reached out to the California Latino Legislative Caucus about the poll. The caucus has continuously raised concerns about the impact of Medi-Cal reform on immigrants. On the federal level, the reconciliation bill currently in Congress could also impact states that provide Medicaid coverage to illegal article source: New poll reveals majority of Californians oppose this key benefit for illegal immigrants

Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare
Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare

Americans planning and preparing for retirement have plenty of financial considerations on their minds, including thoughts about Social Security and other retirement income such as 401(k) plans and IRAs (Individual Retirement Accounts). Another important topic to tackle is how best to approach health care. For most people, that involves taking a good look at the complicated subject of Medicare. Personal finance coach Dave Ramsey helps to simplify the general Medicare processes and rules on which people are wise to gain a working knowledge. But we can get into his advice a bit more in a minute. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter I first wanted to note that I recently had a conversation with a woman who is near 65 years of age, but plans to continue working until she is 72. She plans to stay on her employer's health insurance until she eventually retires. That brought up the need to examine exactly what the rules are for health care coverage for those delaying Medicare because they have the option of staying with their company's health insurance beyond the age of 65, when eligibility for Medicare begins. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security If you're still working at 65 and have health coverage through your employer, you have choices when it comes to Medicare enrollment. Your options depend on the size of your employer, according to the AARP. If you work for a company with 20 or more employees, you can delay enrolling in Medicare without penalties if your employer provides creditable health coverage. Creditable coverage is employer-sponsored insurance that meets or exceeds Medicare's benefits, allowing you to delay enrollment without penalties. Large employers (20-plus employees) typically provide creditable Part B coverage (doctor visits and preventive health care), while prescription plans must match Medicare's drug benefits for Part D. You can keep your employer plan and postpone Medicare, switch fully to Medicare by dropping your employer coverage, or have both - though your employer plan will be the primary payer, meaning it covers costs first before Medicare kicks in. For those working at smaller companies with fewer than 20 employees, Medicare becomes your primary insurance once you turn 65, so enrolling is necessary to maintain full health benefits. Your employer coverage can act as secondary insurance, helping cover additional expenses. It's important to weigh your options carefully, taking into account premiums, out-of-pocket costs, and your coverage needs. For people planning to enroll in Medicare exclusively at age 65, Ramsey offers some thoughts. "You've reached your golden years. You've got a lot of life under your belt and wisdom under your hat. Things should be easier now. So, why does this dang Medicare feel so confusing?" Ramsey asked. "Well, it was created by the government so that might be your first clue," he wrote, answering himself. "And second, it's just a lot to understand." More on retirement: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has blunt words on 401(k) plansDave Ramsey strongly cautions U.S. workers on Social Security Ramsey simplifies Medicare by clarifying some key points on which to focus. Medicare is a federal health insurance program designed for people aged 65 and older, providing coverage for those who are no longer working. It is divided into different parts to address specific health care needs, Ramsey explains. Part A covers hospital stays, Part B includes doctor visits and other outpatient care, and Part D helps with prescription drug costs. When enrolling in Medicare, you can choose between Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage, Ramsey wrote. Original Medicare offers more flexibility in selecting healthcare providers, while Medicare Advantage (also known as Medicare Part C) functions as an all-in-one alternative with more structured coverage but less control over provider choices. Medicare Advantage is covered by private insurance companies. Because Original Medicare alone may not cover all medical expenses, many people choose Medicare supplemental insurance to help with costs such as copayments and deductibles. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Ramsey puts it simply: Medicare doesn't cover everything, and many people find they need extra protection to handle out-of-pocket costs. To fill in the gaps, private companies offer Medicare Supplemental Insurance, known as Medigap. This additional coverage helps pay for expenses such as copays, deductibles, and other costs left behind by Original Medicare. Most people on Original Medicare find Medigap necessary, but it comes at a price - you'll pay a premium for your Medigap plan in addition to the one for Medicare Part B, Ramsey wrote. Related: Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Medicare Update: Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Expand Health Care Program
Medicare Update: Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Expand Health Care Program

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Medicare Update: Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Expand Health Care Program

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have reintroduced the Choose Medicare Act, a proposal that would allow individuals and employers to voluntarily enroll in a new, expanded version of Medicare. Democratic Representatives Jimmy Gomez of California and Don Beyer of Virginia led the unveiling of the new version of the bill in the House on Tuesday, while Democratic Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Chris Murphy of Connecticut introduced companion legislation in the Senate last week. The proposed legislation would establish "Part E," a self-funded Medicare plan to be offered alongside private insurance in all state and federal marketplaces, giving Americans and businesses a public option for comprehensive health coverage. Why It Matters The move to expand Medicare comes as millions of Americans remain uninsured or face financial instability due to high medical costs. While current Medicare eligibility is primarily for individuals aged 65 and older or those with certain disabilities who are younger, the Choose Medicare Act aims to provide a voluntary public insurance option to anyone, regardless of age or employment status. What To Know Medicare "Part E" would be self-sustaining, funded entirely by premiums, and available through all existing state and federal health exchanges. According to the legislation's sponsors, all employers could choose to offer Medicare Part E as a workplace benefit, in addition to, rather than as a replacement for, existing insurance plans. Individuals not covered by employer insurance could also opt in directly. Part E would provide all of Medicare's traditional benefits, incorporate the Affordable Care Act's ten essential health benefits, guarantee access to reproductive health services (including abortion), and protect patients with pre-existing conditions from discrimination. The legislation caps annual out-of-pocket spending for traditional Medicare recipients, expands premium assistance eligibility without income limitations, and allows existing Affordable Care Act subsidies to be applied to Medicare Part E premiums. Medicare would be required to negotiate drug prices under Part E, a measure intended to lower prescription costs for all enrollees. Representative Jimmy Gomez speaks at a rally outside the U.S. Capitol on April 10, 2025. Representative Jimmy Gomez speaks at a rally outside the U.S. Capitol on April 10, Fair Share America The bill is co-sponsored by Democratic Senators Tammy Baldwin (WI), Richard Blumenthal (CT), Cory Booker (NJ), Tammy Duckworth (IL), Jack Reed (RI), Brian Schatz (HI), Tina Smith (MN), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), and Dick Durbin (IL), as well as Representatives Jared Huffman (CA), LaMonica McIver (NJ), and Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC). Public support has come from groups including Families USA, MoveOn, the American Federation of Teachers, the Center for Medicare Advocacy, and the Center for Health and Democracy. However, some have concerns that the legislation overly romanticizes Medicare, which has widespread issues, still, according to Chris Fong, the CEO of Smile Insurance and a Medicare specialist. "The members of the House and Senate who are proposing the legislation are not considering the inefficiencies of Medicare. They seem to be romanticizing Medicare to be the perfect system, which it is not," Fong told Newsweek. Medicare, on its own, is an 80/20 insurance plan, where members are responsible for about 20 percent, plus deductibles, with no maximum out-of-pocket protection, Fong said. And Medicare also does not cover prescription drugs, which must be covered under an additional private insurance policy. "If something like this were to pass, it would be a very dramatic change to the health insurance of all Americans," Fong said. "It has many positives, but I think the path to passing legislation like this has many challenges and it would be unlikely for this to pass." On the other side of the political aisle, Republicans have pushed for $2 trillion in mandatory spending reductions. For both Medicaid and Medicare, that could translate to major cuts, although Republicans have been vocal about not actively reducing benefits. "The president has said, for example, that he doesn't want to touch Medicare and saying don't cut benefits to beneficiaries," Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy told CNBC in April. "Let's look at Medicare. Is there some way that we Medicare so that benefits stay the same? But that is less expensive, more efficient, I would say that there is, and that's where our opportunity lies," Cassidy said. What People Are Saying Representative Jimmy Gomez, in a statement: "I got pneumonia when I was seven years old, and my family almost went bankrupt because we were uninsured. Today too many families are still one medical emergency away from financial crisis. Our bicameral legislation lets every American opt into Medicare — which is affordable, effective, and trusted — and we're going to keep fighting until everyone has access to the care they need." Representative Don Beyer, in a statement: "Our bill would give all Americans access to Medicare, one of the most popular and successful health care delivery programs in history. Allowing employers and the general public the option to choose Medicare would fill many of the gaps in our health care system, get more people covered, and make the nation healthier. Every American should be able to access affordable, quality health care, and this bill represents the kind of bold action required to make that a reality for all." Chris Fong, the CEO of Smile Insurance and a Medicare specialist, told Newsweek: "An expansion of Medicare with Part E could increase the concerns over the long-term financial sustainability of the Medicare program. The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2036. If Part E were to be approved, then there would need to be additional funding to maintain the current Medicare benefits." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The proposal made in the bill isn't far removed from similar calls for Medicare for all in the past. It would expand Medicare to being an option for all Americans and would allow it to be offered by online marketplaces and through employers as an option. "While the bill may have a hard time gaining traction under current leadership, it is important to note some medical facilities have actually been more supportive of these measures than you would think. "With private insurers becoming harder in some situations to get reimbursement from, some hospitals and clinics would rather work with Medicare as they know the odds are higher of getting paid." What Happens Next The Choose Medicare Act faces consideration in both chambers of Congress, with further debate and potential amendments expected in committee before any possible floor votes. Lawmakers have not announced a date for further action. However, the legislation is unlikely to move forward in the near term, as Republicans control both chambers of Congress. "I think this is still in its early stages of the legislative process," Fong said. "The bill still needs a lot more work to determine feasibility. Also, there would need to be significant increases in federal tax revenue or reappropriation from other federal allocations. I would say this is an interesting development but there is still a lot of work to be done."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store