
Medicare Update: Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Expand Health Care Program
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have reintroduced the Choose Medicare Act, a proposal that would allow individuals and employers to voluntarily enroll in a new, expanded version of Medicare.
Democratic Representatives Jimmy Gomez of California and Don Beyer of Virginia led the unveiling of the new version of the bill in the House on Tuesday, while Democratic Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Chris Murphy of Connecticut introduced companion legislation in the Senate last week.
The proposed legislation would establish "Part E," a self-funded Medicare plan to be offered alongside private insurance in all state and federal marketplaces, giving Americans and businesses a public option for comprehensive health coverage.
Why It Matters
The move to expand Medicare comes as millions of Americans remain uninsured or face financial instability due to high medical costs.
While current Medicare eligibility is primarily for individuals aged 65 and older or those with certain disabilities who are younger, the Choose Medicare Act aims to provide a voluntary public insurance option to anyone, regardless of age or employment status.
What To Know
Medicare "Part E" would be self-sustaining, funded entirely by premiums, and available through all existing state and federal health exchanges.
According to the legislation's sponsors, all employers could choose to offer Medicare Part E as a workplace benefit, in addition to, rather than as a replacement for, existing insurance plans.
Individuals not covered by employer insurance could also opt in directly. Part E would provide all of Medicare's traditional benefits, incorporate the Affordable Care Act's ten essential health benefits, guarantee access to reproductive health services (including abortion), and protect patients with pre-existing conditions from discrimination.
The legislation caps annual out-of-pocket spending for traditional Medicare recipients, expands premium assistance eligibility without income limitations, and allows existing Affordable Care Act subsidies to be applied to Medicare Part E premiums.
Medicare would be required to negotiate drug prices under Part E, a measure intended to lower prescription costs for all enrollees.
Representative Jimmy Gomez speaks at a rally outside the U.S. Capitol on April 10, 2025.
Representative Jimmy Gomez speaks at a rally outside the U.S. Capitol on April 10, 2025.for Fair Share America
The bill is co-sponsored by Democratic Senators Tammy Baldwin (WI), Richard Blumenthal (CT), Cory Booker (NJ), Tammy Duckworth (IL), Jack Reed (RI), Brian Schatz (HI), Tina Smith (MN), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), and Dick Durbin (IL), as well as Representatives Jared Huffman (CA), LaMonica McIver (NJ), and Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC).
Public support has come from groups including Families USA, MoveOn, the American Federation of Teachers, the Center for Medicare Advocacy, and the Center for Health and Democracy.
However, some have concerns that the legislation overly romanticizes Medicare, which has widespread issues, still, according to Chris Fong, the CEO of Smile Insurance and a Medicare specialist.
"The members of the House and Senate who are proposing the legislation are not considering the inefficiencies of Medicare. They seem to be romanticizing Medicare to be the perfect system, which it is not," Fong told Newsweek.
Medicare, on its own, is an 80/20 insurance plan, where members are responsible for about 20 percent, plus deductibles, with no maximum out-of-pocket protection, Fong said. And Medicare also does not cover prescription drugs, which must be covered under an additional private insurance policy.
"If something like this were to pass, it would be a very dramatic change to the health insurance of all Americans," Fong said. "It has many positives, but I think the path to passing legislation like this has many challenges and it would be unlikely for this to pass."
On the other side of the political aisle, Republicans have pushed for $2 trillion in mandatory spending reductions. For both Medicaid and Medicare, that could translate to major cuts, although Republicans have been vocal about not actively reducing benefits.
"The president has said, for example, that he doesn't want to touch Medicare and Medicaid...He's saying don't cut benefits to beneficiaries," Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy told CNBC in April.
"Let's look at Medicare. Is there some way that we can...reform Medicare so that benefits stay the same? But that is less expensive, more efficient, I would say that there is, and that's where our opportunity lies," Cassidy said.
What People Are Saying
Representative Jimmy Gomez, in a statement: "I got pneumonia when I was seven years old, and my family almost went bankrupt because we were uninsured. Today too many families are still one medical emergency away from financial crisis. Our bicameral legislation lets every American opt into Medicare — which is affordable, effective, and trusted — and we're going to keep fighting until everyone has access to the care they need."
Representative Don Beyer, in a statement: "Our bill would give all Americans access to Medicare, one of the most popular and successful health care delivery programs in history. Allowing employers and the general public the option to choose Medicare would fill many of the gaps in our health care system, get more people covered, and make the nation healthier. Every American should be able to access affordable, quality health care, and this bill represents the kind of bold action required to make that a reality for all."
Chris Fong, the CEO of Smile Insurance and a Medicare specialist, told Newsweek: "An expansion of Medicare with Part E could increase the concerns over the long-term financial sustainability of the Medicare program. The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2036. If Part E were to be approved, then there would need to be additional funding to maintain the current Medicare benefits."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The proposal made in the bill isn't far removed from similar calls for Medicare for all in the past. It would expand Medicare to being an option for all Americans and would allow it to be offered by online marketplaces and through employers as an option.
"While the bill may have a hard time gaining traction under current leadership, it is important to note some medical facilities have actually been more supportive of these measures than you would think.
"With private insurers becoming harder in some situations to get reimbursement from, some hospitals and clinics would rather work with Medicare as they know the odds are higher of getting paid."
What Happens Next
The Choose Medicare Act faces consideration in both chambers of Congress, with further debate and potential amendments expected in committee before any possible floor votes.
Lawmakers have not announced a date for further action. However, the legislation is unlikely to move forward in the near term, as Republicans control both chambers of Congress.
"I think this is still in its early stages of the legislative process," Fong said. "The bill still needs a lot more work to determine feasibility. Also, there would need to be significant increases in federal tax revenue or reappropriation from other federal allocations. I would say this is an interesting development but there is still a lot of work to be done."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Man charged with killing prominent lawmaker could face a rarity for Minnesota: the death penalty
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty. Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty. It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters. In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the U.S. courthouse in St. Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history . The federal case Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. 'Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options,' Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets , including officials in other states . Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea. On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison . Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson . In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates. President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions , more than the administration of any other president in modern history. The state's case The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd . At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged 'there's a tension' and said federal officials 'can speak for themselves.' Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday. As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors. 'Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts,' said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. 'Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here.' Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant U.S. attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors. 'There's no doubt that it's complicated,' Osler said. 'And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling.' What's next If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: 'a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas.' After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held. Thompson told reporters that the federal case 'does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere.' Boelter's next federal court appearance is June 27. He does not have any further appearances scheduled in state court. 'There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is,' Osler said. ___ Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Business Insider
41 minutes ago
- Business Insider
U.S. Senate passes bill to set up stablecoin regulatory framework, Axios says
The U.S. Senate has passed a bill to set up the first regulatory framework for stablecoins, Axios' Stephen Neukam reports. The GENIUS Act, which has been criticized by many Democrats over corruption concerns surrounding President Trump's growing cryptocurrency empire, was passed with a 68-30 vote, with two GOP members voting no on the legislation, the author says. Publicly traded companies in the space include Bit Digital (BTBT), Bitfarms (BITF), Coinbase (COIN), Core Scientific (CORZ), Greenidge Generation (GREE), Mara Holdings (MARA), Riot Platforms (RIOT), Strategy (MSTR), Stronghold Digital Mining (SDIG) and TeraWulf (WULF). Confident Investing Starts Here:

41 minutes ago
Older adults in the US are increasingly dying from unintentional falls
NEW YORK -- Older U.S. adults are increasingly dying from unintentional falls, according to a new federal report published Wednesday, with white people accounting for the vast majority of the deaths. From 2003 to 2023, death rates from falls rose more than 70% for adults ages 65 to 74, the report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said. The rate increased more than 75% for people 75 to 84, and more than doubled for seniors 85 and older. 'Falls continue to be a public health problem worth paying attention to,' said Geoffrey Hoffman, a University of Michigan researcher who was not involved in the new report. 'It's curious that these rates keep rising.' The CDC researchers did not try to answer why death rates from falls are increasing. But experts say there may be a few reasons, like gradually improving our understanding of the the role falls play in deaths and more people living longer — to ages when falls are more likely to have deadly consequences. More than 41,000 retirement-age Americans died of falls in 2023, the most recent year for which final statistics based on death certificates are available. That suggests that falls were blamed in about 1 of every 56 deaths in older Americans that year. More than half of those 41,000 deaths were people 85 and older, the CDC found, and white people accounted for 87% of deaths in the oldest category. Falls can cause head injuries or broken bones that can lead to permanent disability and trigger a cascade of other health problems. A number of factors can contribute to falls, including changes in hearing and vision and medications that can cause light-headedness. Death rates varied widely from state to state. In 2023, Wisconsin had the highest death rates from falls, followed by Minnesota, Maine, Oklahoma and Vermont. Wisconsin's rate was more than five times higher than the rate of the lowest state, Alabama. Ice and wintry weather may partly explain why fatal falls were more common in states in the upper Midwest and New England, but experts also pointed to other things at play, like differences in how well falls are reported and to what extent they are labeled a cause of death. 'We've yet to unravel why you see such differences in state rates,' said Hoffman, who studies falls among the elderly. Researchers also can't yet explain why white seniors die of falls at higher rates than people in other racial and ethnic groups. In the 85-and-up age group, the death rate for white Americans is two or three times higher than any other group, while older Black people had the lowest fall-related death rate. 'Kind of a flip of the traditional disparity lens,' Hoffman said, referring to the fact that for most other rates of illness and injury, people of color are disproportionately affected. Staying active can help people avoid falls, experts say. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.