NMC pushes onus of addressing medical student grievances onto colleges, universities and directorates
NEW DELHI: The National Medical Commission has through a public notice pushed grievance redressal onto medical colleges, universities and directorates of medical education of the respective states.
The commission, which is the regulator of medical education, will no longer address grievances faced by approximately seven lakh students studying undergraduate or postgraduate courses in over 700 colleges directly under its control, at least at the initial stage.
Calling it 'a structured mechanism at 3 levels' the commission has asked that if complaints are unresolved at the three levels 'the same may be escalated to the NMC for necessary resolution'.
A majority of complaints by doctors under training are against the medical college and the NMC Act gives the commission the power to take action.
The Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations, 2023 says that if the NMC board 'has reason to believe that a medical institution has failed to comply with any statutory provision, regulations framed thereunder or has not complied with the Minimum Standards of Requirements as prescribed by their respective Boards, or has conducted themselves in any manner which is not in accordance with the goals of medical education and practice, the Board shall either penalize the medical college or medical institution and /or conduct further enquiry into such act and wherever needed provide an opportunity to rectify the same'.
Unlike medical colleges, which come directly under the NMC, the commission has no jurisdiction over universities or directorates of medical education, and hence its public notice is only an advisory to these two entities. It has only 'suggested to form grievance redressal committees' at all three levels consisting of senior functionaries
The kind of complaints listed in the notice include 'charging of excess fee, delay in payment of stipend or non-payment of stipend, ragging/harassment, internship related issues, faculty or college staff related issues, disciplinary matters, health and safety concerns, academic issues viz.
curriculum, attendance, teaching methods, examinations, assessment, etc.'. Most of these would be against the college or its management.
From imposing monetary penalty and stopping admission to reducing the number of students a college can admit or withdrawing accreditation, the NMC alone has the punitive powers to take action against medical colleges.
Ophthalmologist and RTI activist Dr K V Babu said, 'Now NMC is asking the interns to address the grievances at the college/University/DME level. Internship is for a period of twelve months only. By the time interns utilise all these avenues, the twelve months period will be over. By the notification on 8th July 2025, the NMC is shirking the responsibility for non-payment of stipends, though they have their own data about non-payment of stipends by 60 medical colleges and 50 medical colleges paying only nominal stipends.
NMC can take action against the erring medical colleges under MSME regulations 2023.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
As young Indians turn to AI ‘therapists', how confidential is their data?
This is the second of a two-part series. Read the first here. Imagine a stranger getting hold of a mental health therapist's private notes – and then selling that information to deliver tailored advertisements to their clients. That's practically what many mental healthcare apps might be doing. Young Indians are increasingly turning to apps and artificial intelligence-driven tools to address their mental health challenges – but have limited awareness about how these digital tools process user data. In January, the Centre for Internet and Society published a study based on 45 mental health apps – 28 from India and 17 from abroad – and found that 80% gathered user health data that they used for advertising and shared with third-party service providers. An overwhelming number of these apps, 87%, shared the data with law enforcement and regulatory bodies. The first article in this series had reported that some of these apps are especially popular with young Indian users, who rely on them for quick and easy access to therapy and mental healthcare support. Users had also told Scroll that they turned to AI-driven technology, such as ChatGPT, to discuss their feelings and get advice, however limited this may be compared to interacting with a human therapist. But they were not especially worried about data misuse. Keshav*, 21, reflected a common sentiment among those Scroll interviewed: 'Who cares? My personal data is already out there.' The functioning of Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT, is already under scrutiny. LLMs are 'trained' on vast amounts of data, either from the internet or provided by its trainers, to simulate human learning, problem solving and decision making. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI that built ChatGPT, said on a podcast in July that though users talk about personal matters with the chatbot, there are no legal safeguards protecting that information. 'People use it – young people, especially, use it – as a therapist, a life coach; having these relationship problems and [asking] what should I do?' he asked. 'And right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it. There's doctor-patient confidentiality, there's legal confidentiality, whatever. And we haven't figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT.' Play He added: 'So if you go talk to ChatGPT about your most sensitive stuff and then there's like a lawsuit or whatever, we could be required to produce that, and I think that's very screwed up.' Therapists and experts said the ease of access of AI-driven mental health tools should not sideline privacy concerns. Clinical psychologist Rhea Thimaiah, who works at Kaha Mind, a collective that provides mental health services, emphasised that confidentiality is an essential part of the process of therapy. 'The therapeutic relationship is built on trust and any compromise in data security can very possibly impact a client's sense of safety and willingness to engage,' she said. 'Clients have a right to know how their information is being stored, who has access, and what protections are in place.' This is more than mere data – it is someone's memories, trauma and identity, Thimaiah said. 'If we're going to bring AI into this space, then privacy shouldn't be optional, it should be fundamental.' Srishti Srivastava, founder of AI-driven mental health app Infiheal, said that her firm collects user data to train its AI bot, but users can access the app even without signing up and also ask for their data to be deleted. Dhruv Garg, a tech policy lawyer at Indian Governance and Policy Project, said the risk lies not just in apps collecting data but in the potential downstream uses of that information. 'Even if it's not happening now, an AI platform in the future could start using your data to serve targeted ads or generate insights – commercial, political, or otherwise – based on your past queries,' said Garg. 'Current privacy protections, though adequate for now, may not be equipped to deal with each new future scenario.' India's data protection law For now, personal data processed by chatbots is governed by the Information Technology Act framework and Sensitive Personal Data Rules, 2011. Section 5 of the sensitive data rules says that companies must obtain consent in writing before collecting or using sensitive information. According to the rules, information relating to health and mental health conditions are considered sensitive data. There are also specialised sectoral data protection rules that apply to regulated entities like hospitals. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, passed by Parliament in 2023, is expected to be notified soon. But it exempts publicly available personal data from its ambit if this information has voluntarily been disclosed by an individual. Given the black market of data intermediaries that publish large volumes of personal information, it is difficult to tell what personal data in the public domain has been made available 'voluntarily'. The new data protection act does not have different regulatory standards for specific categories of personal data – financial, professional, or health-related, Garg said. This means that health data collected by AI tools in India will not be treated with special sensitivity under this framework. 'For instance, if you search for symptoms on Google or visit WebMD, Google isn't held to a higher standard of liability just because the content relates to health,' said Garg. WebMD provides health and medical information. It might be different for AI tools explicitly designed for mental healthcare – unlike general-purpose models like ChatGPT. These, according to Garg, 'could be made subject to more specific sectoral regulations in the future'. However, the very logic on which AI chatbots function – where it responds based on user data and inputs – could itself be a privacy risk. Nidhi Singh, a senior research analyst and programme manager at Carnegie India, an American think tank, said she has concerns about how tools like ChatGPT customise responses and remember user history – even though users may appreciate those functions. Singh said India's new data protection is quite clear that any data made publicly available by putting it on the internet is no longer considered personal data. 'It is unclear how this will apply to your conversations with ChatGPT,' she said. Without specific legal protections, there's no telling how an AI-driven tool will use the data it has gathered. According to Singh, without a specific rule designating conversations with generative AI as an exception, it is likely that a user's interactions with these AI systems won't be treated as personal data and consequently will not fall under the purview of the act. Who takes legal responsibility? Technology firms have tried hard to evade legal liability for harm. In Florida, a lawsuit by a mother has alleged that her 14-year-old son died by suicide after becoming deeply entangled in an 'emotionally and sexually abusive relationship' with a chatbot. In case of misdiagnosis or harmful advice from an AI tool, legal responsibility is likely to be analysed in court, said Garg. 'The developers may argue that the model is general-purpose, trained on large datasets, and not supervised by a human in real-time,' said Garg. 'Some parallels may be drawn with search engines – if someone acts on bad advice from search results, the responsibility doesn't fall on the search engine, but on the user.' Highlighting the urgent need for a conversation on sector-specific liability frameworks, Garg said that for now, the legal liability of AI developers will have to be assessed on a case-to-case basis. 'Courts may examine whether proper disclaimers and user agreements were in place,' he said. In another case, Air Canada was ordered to pay compensation to a customer who was misled by its chatbot regarding bereavement fares. The airline had argued that the chatbot was a ' separate legal entity ' and therefore responsible for its own actions. Singh of Carnegie India said that transparency is important and that user consent should be meaningful. 'You don't need to explain the model's source code, but you do need to explain its limitations and what it aims to do,' she said. 'That way, people can genuinely understand it, even if they don't grasp every technical step.' AI, meanwhile, is here for the long haul. Until India can expand its capacity to offer mental health services to everyone, Singh said AI will inevitably fill that void. 'The use of AI will only increase as Indic language LLMs are being built, further expanding its potential to address the mental health therapy gap,' she said.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Excessive use of AI may blunt creative thinking, caution experts
Bhopal: Artificial Intelligence or AI's tendency to fabricate or "hallucinate" content is raising fresh concerns among mental health professionals over its impact on cognition, originality and trust. Speaking at the National Consultation on Adolescent Mental Health in Bhopal, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS) Bengaluru, director Dr Pratima Murthy, cautioned that excessive use of generative tools may blunt creative thinking and reduce critical engagement. She reflected on AI-generated writing, noting, "Its ability to make up things on the go is very dangerous," emphasizing the need for fact-checking and careful scrutiny of outputs. The ethical dimensions are equally pressing. "People are talking about ethics in this area," Dr Murthy said, urging the development of responsible frameworks for interacting with AI—ones that consider the moral complexity of digital systems. Adding another layer, Dr Murthy highlighted the increasingly surreal quality of AI-generated visuals. She underscored growing unease over how artificial content blurs boundaries between reality and fabrication, prompting questions about its psychological and societal impact. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Is What First-Class Living Really Looks Like Explore Undo To illustrate the diminishing creative value, she cited her own experience: "You ask AI to write poems—it's great fun the first time, but then the second time you see it doing the same." With generative AI rapidly weaving itself into the fabric of thought and communication, mental health experts are calling for deeper examination—before dependence overshadows discernment. Peer-support training expanded for adolescent mental health: Union ministry of health and family welfare, in collaboration with UNICEF and NIMHANS, launched "I Support My Friends", an add-on training module under the RKSK programme. Designed to help adolescents recognize emotional distress, offer support, and connect peers to help, the module uses the Look, Listen, Link framework and interactive tools to foster empathy and resilience. At the national consultation, Dr Pratima Murthy, MP deputy CM and health minister Rajendra Shukla and UNICEF experts emphasized the importance of youth-led mental health support and early intervention. Sessions highlighted rising challenges like anxiety, depression, digital addiction, and academic stress—and the urgent need to build safe spaces and reduce stigma. The launch marks a step toward a more inclusive, community-based mental health system focused on prevention and empowerment, official said. 'Must know where use ends and addiction begins': NIMHANS, Bengaluru, director Dr Pratima Murthy, raised a clear warning about the blurred lines between technology use and dependency. Excessive screen exposure could reduce attention span, impair memory, and aggravate underlying mental health conditions. Addressing the challenges in regulating screen time, she noted, "We don't know where use ends and addiction begins." Highlighting the cognitive risks associated with excessive exposure to digital tools, Dr Murthy pointed to growing cases of reduced attention span, memory problems, and diminished creative engagement. She cited experiences from NIMHANS' SHUT clinic, which treats adolescents facing challenges linked to compulsive screen use and behavioral addictions. Key challenges and insights: Mental health experts present a clear picture of the issues facing young people in Madhya Pradesh and across India. The focus is on reaching diverse groups, using technology both as a tool and a challenge, and addressing deeper social and structural barriers. Their approach combines real-world data with on-the-ground experience for a well-rounded response. The multi-stakeholder approach to adolescent mental health emphasizes community-based and school-based interventions, framing mental health as a social development concern rather than solely a health issue. State-level initiatives in Madhya Pradesh, such as the TeleMANAS and Umang Program, demonstrate government commitment to prioritizing mental health alongside education and employment, particularly for adolescents facing unique challenges. The SHUT Clinic at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences serves as a specialized center addressing technology-related behavioral issues, highlighting the dual nature of technology as both beneficial and detrimental to mental health. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Superb Hygienic Disposals Fined Rs 10,000 Per Day
Nagpur: Cracking down on poor biomedical waste management, the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) has imposed a daily fine of ₹10,000 on Superb Hygienic Disposals—the agency responsible for collecting medical bio-waste in the city. The penalty, made effective retrospectively from July 15, followed a surprise inspection that uncovered serious lapses in the handling of hazardous waste. On July 15, additional municipal commissioner Vasumana Pant and deputy commissioner Rajesh Bhagat conducted an unannounced visit to the Bhandewadi bio-waste treatment facility. During the inspection, officials found used saline bottles, soiled plastic, syringes, and other contaminated materials dumped openly near the incinerator, a blatant violation of environmental safety norms and the agency's contractual obligations. "We have issued a notice, and I've initiated the fine as per the contract. The penalty is ₹10,000 per day, effective from July 15, and it will continue until complete compliance is achieved," Pant said. As per the agreement signed on August 12, 2004, Superb Hygienic Disposals is mandated to collect biomedical waste from hospitals, clinics, and pathological labs across the city and ensure its scientific disposal at the Bhandewadi incinerator within 48 hours. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo Clause 14 of the contract specifies that failure to meet this timeline attracts financial penalties. On July 30, deputy commissioner Bhagat issued a formal notice to the agency, demanding an explanation within 24 hours. Although the agency responded, its justification failed to satisfy NMC authorities. "They cited a machine breakdown, but the volume of accumulated biomedical waste far exceeded what could be expected from a one- or two-day disruption. That level of neglect is inexcusable," said Pant, adding that the civic body will no longer tolerate such lapses. "There was an unnecessary amount of biomedical waste lying in the open, which is dangerous and unacceptable. We're allowing a window for them to clear the backlog, but the penalty will continue until the waste is disposed of as per norms," she added. According to Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) guidelines, all biomedical waste must be incinerated within 48 hours of generation. Despite being entrusted with this task, Superb Hygienic Disposals has reportedly shown a pattern of negligence, prompting the NMC to take strict action for the first time. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
