
MAGA Fury After Boys Suspended for Confronting Trans Student in Locker Room
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Prominent conservatives reacted with outrage over a report that Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) in Virginia suspended two students who were recorded by a transgender student they confronted in the boys' locker room.
A spokesperson for LCPS told Newsweek that "it is the general practice of LCPS not to publicly discuss private student matters" but that the "division has a comprehensive and objective process for Title IX investigations."
"At no time would LCPS suspend a student simply because they express discomfort," the spokesperson said. "A reading of our Title IX resources should make it clear that there is a high bar to launch a Title IX investigation and an even higher bar to determine a student is in violation of Title IX."
The district's Title IX policy says: "Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) is committed to providing a safe and inclusive educational environment for all students, employees, and community members. In accordance with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, LCPS prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, including sexual harassment and assault, in its educational programs and activities. LCPS does not discriminate on the basis of sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation in its programs and activities."
LGBTQ+ pride flags are displayed in New York City on Septemmber 22, 2023.
LGBTQ+ pride flags are displayed in New York City on Septemmber 22, 2023.
erremmo/iStock via Getty Images
Why It Matters
The incident reflects the divide in the major culture war battle over transgender rights.
Americans hold complex views on gender and sexual orientation issues. While many polls show that acceptance for LGBTQ+ rights has generally increased over the past 20 years, many LGBTQ+ advocates have warned about a backsliding in acceptance of the transgender community.
The Department of Education said on Friday it would pull funding from some Virginia school districts over their policies on transgender students, according to The Washington Post.
What To Know
Loudoun County-based news station WJLA reported on Monday that Loudoun County Public Schools suspended two boys who confronted a transgender student in the locker room. They were recorded asking why there was a girl in the school's boys' locker room in reference to a transgender boy, the station reported.
The video sparked an investigation from LCPS over potential Title IX violations.
The boys' families' attorney, Josh Hetzler, told WJLA that the investigation has concluded with a 10-day suspension and no-contact order with the complainant. They will also meet with school administrators to determine a corrective action plan, the station reported.
The decision sparked rebuke from many conservatives, including Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Justice Department.
"This is very wrong — and it WILL NOT STAND !" she wrote on X.
The Virginia College Republicans in a post to X accused the school system of "punishing the BOYS for not liking that a GIRL was using their locker room."
A YouGov poll from 2024 found that a majority of American oppose "allowing transgender people to use bathrooms that match their gender identity." Fifty percent said they opposed the policy, while 31 percent supported it. It surveyed 2,000 adults from January 23-26, 2024, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
A KFF survey of transgender Americans found that 41 percent reported being harassed or feeling unsafe inside a restroom or locker room. It polled 515 adults who identify as transgender from November 10-December 1, 2022.
What People Are Saying
Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican nominee in Virginia's gubernatorial race, on X: "For all the moms and dads out there, let me say what you're thinking: This is not normal. It is not normal to force boys and girls to share locker rooms. It is not normal to punish kids for their fears. All parents want is a little normalcy. That's what I'm fighting for."
Conservative attorney and commentator Marina Medvin, on X: "Virginia: Loudoun County Public School punished two boys for voicing their discomfort with having a girl use the boys locker room and video record them on her phone, suspending them at the start of the new school year."
Eric Daugherty, assistant news director for Florida Voice News, on X: "REINSTATE the boys and REMOVE the girl from the boys' locker room. This is absolutely absurd."
Tumay Harding, a Republican Virginia state Senate candidate, on X: "It's an insult to common sense for these boy's to be found guilty and suspended. LCPS has weaponized their Title IX office to enforce the radical and unconstitutional Policy 8040. This fight isn't over."
Journalist Erin Reed defended Virginia school district's policy on transgender students in a Substack post: "Despite facing serious federal threats, these Virginia school districts are doing what some of the nation's most prestigious universities and hospital systems have refused to: standing up for the transgender individuals in their care."
Fairfax County School Board Member Karl Frisch, in an August 15 Facebook post on gender policies: "As a school board member, I cannot sit idly by while adults who should know better try to pit one group of students against another. Our responsibility is to ensure that every child—including those who are transgender or gender nonconforming—has an opportunity to achieve their full, unique, and limitless potential.
"We can and must meet the needs of all students without undermining the dignity or rights of any of them. That includes ensuring they have full and equal access to all the incredible academic and enrichment opportunities we offer. To uphold our shared values of equity, dignity, and respect for all students, we owe them nothing less."
Threads user Vince Giglotti: "They are going to make this a national issue because there is an election for governor in November and Loudoun is a large swing county that might determine the election. The GOP candidate is a train wreck. So they're going to turn this into a referendum on trans bathrooms because that's their only shot at winning."
What Happens Next
Loudoun County Public Schools has faced investigation over the situation by Attorney General Jason Miyares, a Republican. The ongoing debate about the inclusion of transgender individuals in gender-segregated spaces will likely remain a major political issue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
34 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mother of boy suspended after questioning transgender student in boys' locker room speaks out
Victoria Cobb, president of the Founding Freedoms Law Center, and Renae Smith, the mother of a suspended student, discuss the results of a Title IX investigation involving two Virginia students on 'The Ingraham Angle.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Explainer-Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in U.S. elections?
By Jack Queen (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. CAN TRUMP UNILATERALLY BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? Only states and the U.S. Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the U.S. is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. COULD TRUMP'S ALLIES BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? States are responsible for administering their votes under the U.S. Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. WHAT OTHER POWERS DO PRESIDENTS HAVE OVER ELECTIONS? Presidents in the U.S. have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are U.S. citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel
Intel (INTC) rose roughly 7% on Tuesday, a day after SoftBank Group announced it would take a $2 billion stake in the struggling chipmaker. News of SoftBank's investment follows a Bloomberg report last week that said the Trump administration is considering taking up to a 10% position in the company. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed in a CNBC interview Tuesday that the investment would involve the US government converting Intel's grants from the Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act — worth $10.9 billion — into an equity stake aimed at stabilizing the company's US manufacturing business. Bessent did not confirm the size of the stake the government would take. Intel has fallen behind in an industry it once dominated. Its manufacturing division is bleeding cash, just as its legacy computer chip segment forfeits market share to rivals Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Qualcomm (QCOM) in the PC space. Intel is also woefully behind AMD and Nvidia (NVDA) in the AI race. The company's market capitalization of $111 billion is less than half of its value in 2021. And CEO Lip-Bu Tan has been forced to lay off 15% of the company's workforce and shelve plans to build plants in Europe. But the troubled chipmaker is the only large-scale US-based leading-edge chip manufacturer, giving it geopolitical significance as the nation looks to reshore semiconductor production. Intel's problems, however, may be too big for either SoftBank or the Trump administration to solve on their own. Intel in need of direction Deutsche Bank analyst Ross Seymore said news of the US potentially taking a stake in Intel, combined with the SoftBank investment, shows that "[Tan] is taking bold actions to solidify Intel's financial and strategic positioning during its ongoing difficult transformation process." Tan became CEO in March after Intel's board ousted former CEO Pat Gelsinger late last year. But others on Wall Street expressed skepticism that those investments would be enough to save Intel from its decline, which resulted from years of missteps. Loop Capital analyst Gary Mobley wrote in a recent note to clients that the support from SoftBank and, potentially, the US government may be "akin to a lifeline with no secure anchor at the other end," because while Intel may be "finding new buyers of its primary equity capital," that may not guarantee it can find customers for its manufacturing business. Gelsinger established Intel's third-party chip manufacturing business, otherwise known as its Foundry, in 2021 as a means of competing with rival TSMC, which produces chips for companies including Nvidia, Apple (AAPL), AMD, and others. But so far, its Foundry business has been a disappointment, struggling to secure customers. While Intel has said it reached agreements to build chips for Amazon (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT), the company is still its own largest manufacturing client. Intel's plan includes building chips based on newer technologies, including its 18A and upcoming 14A node design processes, part of Gelsinger's plan for five process nodes in four years. But 18A, which was initially supposed to roll out in the first half of 2025, is now slated to debut in 2026. Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon was similarly critical of Intel's cash infusion in his own investor note, writing, "We do not believe that Intel's capability gap has anything to do with money." Rasgon also questioned whether the US taking a stake in Intel would be enough to complete the company's domestic manufacturing expansions. "Intel was originally supposed to get these CHIPS Act funds for free; giving up 10% of the company for them seems worse," he wrote in a note to clients. "And if the goal is to help Intel build substantial US capacity, $10.9B really isn't enough." Moor Insights and Strategy founder and chief analyst Patrick Moorhead told Yahoo Finance that while SoftBank's $2 billion investment and the prospect of a potential US stake are good things, the company would require as much as $40 billion to build out its next-generation 14A technology. Still, getting the US government involved, at least in the short term, could prove to be a boon for the company. "My short-term answer is that the US government is a kingmaker, and they just made Intel the king, and they are going to wrap policy around that to make Intel foundry successful," Moorhead said. If the government sticks with Intel for the long haul, though, Moorhead said it could further complicate the company's development problems, leading to a lack of innovation, inefficiencies, and growing costs. "My hope is that Intel gets back on its feet, it turns itself into a reputable, leading-edge foundry, and the government sells the stake," he said. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Sign in to access your portfolio