South Korean shipbuilders report 32 per cent decline in new orders from January to May
During these five months, Korean shipbuilders reported a total of 3.81 million compensated gross tonnage, representing 24 per cent of the global market, second only to China, which led with 7.86 million CGT, or 49 per cent.
This decline was attributed to selective order-taking, as companies like HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, Hanwha Ocean and Samsung Heavy Industries were prioritised as they deal with high-value-added vessels such as liquefied natural gas carriers rather than container ships.
Their docks are currently occupied with orders scheduled for delivery over the next three years.
From a broad perspective, this drop is also a reflection of a sharp downturn in the global shipbuilding market.
Industry sources noted that many shipping companies are delaying new orders amid uncertainties in global trade and falling freight rates, driven in part by ongoing geopolitical tensions between the US and China.
The Shanghai Containerised Freight Index, which measures shipping rates, dropped from over 3,000 in June last year to around 1,200 in May 2025.
Although the index has recently risen, experts believe this is a short-term bump due to temporary US tariff deferrals on Chinese goods.
As a result, South Korean shipbuilders have seen their order backlogs shrink by 8 per cent, or 3.09 million CGT, compared to last year. By early June, HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering had met just 38.7 per cent of its annual order target of USD 18 billion, and Samsung Heavy Industries had reached only 27 per cent of its annual order target of USD 9.8 billion. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Hong Kong interbank rates surge after repeated intervention, local dollar bounces
Aug 18 - Hong Kong interbank rates surged on Monday, reflecting a string of recent cash withdrawals by the city's de facto central bank and sharp rebounds in the local dollar. The Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate , a key barometer of liquidity, rose across the board, with key tenors jumping to levels last seen in May, when the Hong Kong dollar strengthened and prompted the Hong Kong Monetary Authority to intervene to defend the currency peg within 7.75 and 7.85 per U.S. dollar. The overnight HIBOR leapt to 1.96768%, the loftiest level since May 7, while the three-month tenor - a benchmark for bank funding costs - rose to 2.18333%, also a peak since May. The local dollar has seen sharp swings this year, oscillating between the two ends of the trading band. The intervention in May prompted the HKMA to inject the local currency quickly before the excess liquidity dragged the Hong Kong dollar down to hit the weaker side of the band and force it to tighten cash conditions from June onward. Those operations saw the aggregate balance, a gauge of cash at banks, drop to HK$53.71 billion as of Monday, down from a high of HK$176.45 billion in June and not far from HK$45.1 billion at end-April. "HIBORs have turned more responsive to additional liquidity drainage," said Frances Cheung, head of FX & rates strategy at OCBC Bank, referring to HKMA's most recent operations last week to drain a total of HK$10.441 billion to maintain the peg. "Investors have turned more cautious as reflected by spot USD/HKD not recovering back to near the 7.8500 level as it did shortly after previous rounds of intervention." The HKMA has stepped in to withdraw liquidity and defend a weakening Hong Kong dollar 12 times since June. The local dollar last traded at 7.8244 on Monday, after hitting a high of 7.8120 on Friday. The strength in the Hong Kong dollar also comes as investors in mainland China are making hefty purchases of Hong Kong-listed stocks via the southbound leg of the Stock Connect scheme, traders and analysts said. "From here, we maintain a mild upward bias to short-end spreads, as part of a normalisation process, while the prospect of equity-related inflows remains promising," OCBC's Cheung said. Southbound stock inflows hit a record high of HK$35.9 billion last Friday. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
Why model's slanted-eye ad sparked backlash, made Swatch apologise
Swiss watchmaker Swatch is in the eye of a storm, quite literally. The luxury watchmaker was forced to apologise and take down an advertisement that featured an Asian model pulling the corners of his eyes, after the image sparked backlash among Chinese social media users. The Chinese saw it as gesture in the Swatch ad was criticised as offensive, with many pointing out that the "slanted eye" stereotype has historically been used to mock Asians, particularly people of Mongoloid the controversy spread online, calls to boycott Swatch products grew louder in China. In response, Swatch issued a statement acknowledging the concerns raised over the portrayal of the model. On August 16, the company said it "sincerely apologize[d] for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused" and confirmed that it had removed all related advertising the apology, many critics remained dissatisfied, accusing the brand of being motivated only by financial Weibo, influencer Mei Hua Long_MHL, who has 1.1 million followers, condemned the advertisement as "racism towards Asians".Another influencer, Nie Hua Xiong, with 1.23 million followers, criticised the ad as an attempt to "disgust Asians and degrade Chinese" at a time "when the watch industry is going downhill".Users also voiced anger on RedNote. Dylan, one commenter, stated: "Some people will say those who feel offended are fragile, but this is a different situation, slanted eyes are an insulting gesture pointing to Asians made by whites."Another commenter, You Ren Ray, said: "The first thing to do after feeling offended is to boycott [the brand], instead of contemplating whether the other party intentionally thought of doing something."A third user, Wai, questioned the value of the gesture in the ad, stating."Even if I don't see racism [in the ad], there is no way to judge how this slanted eyes gesture can add value to the product, unless the move aims at getting attention with promotional effect for free."SWATCH SEES REVENUE DIPChina, Hong Kong, and Macau together account for about 27% of Swatch's total revenue, though its sales in China have been weakening amid the country's economic slowdown, according to dropped 14.6% in 2024 to 6.74 billion Swiss francs ($8.4 billion), with the company attributing the decline to reduced demand in China, where it reported "persistently difficult market conditions and weak demand for consumer goods overall".Swatch is also the parent company of luxury watch brands including Omega, Longines, and LED BOYCOTTS INCREASED IN CHINAadvertisementConsumer-led boycotts in China have become increasingly common in recent years, often in response to perceived cultural slights or political 2021, global fashion labels such as H&M, Nike, and Adidas faced widespread boycotts in China after raising concerns over alleged human rights violations in year, some consumers also called for a boycott of Japanese retailer Uniqlo after the company stated it did not source cotton from fashion brand Dolce & Gabbana similarly faced a massive backlash in 2018, when a campaign video showed a Chinese woman struggling to eat Italian food with the uproar, its products were removed from major Chinese e-commerce platforms, and the company was forced to cancel a fashion show in Shanghai after being accused of promoting racist took down the "slant eye" ad and apologised. Brands do often tend to use controversy to gain the media and people's attention, and Swatch might have attempted a shock campaign.- Ends
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Why Trump hiked India tariffs but extended truce with China for Russian oil: Rubio cites Beijing's supply chain role
Rubio has defended Washington's decision to impose additional tariffs on India for continuing to import Russian oil, while sparing China from similar measures, warning that sanctioning Beijing could push up global energy prices. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has acknowledged that targeting China with s econdary sanctions for refining Russian oil could drive up global energy prices, defending Washington's decision to impose additional tariffs on India for continuing to import crude from Moscow while granting Beijing an extended reprieve. Speaking to Fox News on Sunday (August 17), Rubio explained why China, Russia's largest oil buyer, has been spared from punitive measures, while India faces a 50 per cent tariff, including a 25 per cent additional penalty for oil trade with Moscow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He said much of the Russian oil purchased by Beijing is refined and sold into the global market, and imposing sanctions could disrupt supplies and raise prices. 'Well, if you look at the oil that's going to China and being refined, a lot of that is then being sold back into Europe. Europe's also buying natural gas still. Now, there are countries trying to wean themselves off it, but there's more Europe can do with regard to their own sanctions,' Rubio said in an interview with Fox News. Sanctions could drive up prices Rubio cautioned that sanctioning Chinese refiners would have disruptive consequences. 'If you put secondary sanctions on a country, let's say you were to go after the oil sales of Russian oil to China, well, China just refines that oil. That oil is then sold into the global marketplace, and anyone who's buying that oil would be paying more for it or, if it doesn't exist, would have to find an alternative source for it,' he explained. He added that European nations purchasing Russian oil via China have already expressed concern over potential punitive measures. 'We have heard, when you talk about the Senate bill that was being proposed — where there was a hundred per cent tariff on China and India, we did hear from a number of European countries… some concern about what that could mean,' Rubio said. Secondary sanctions on Europe? Asked whether Europe could face sanctions for continuing to buy Russian energy, Rubio said, 'Well, I don't know about (sanctions) on Europe directly, obviously, but certainly there are implications to secondary sanctions. If you impose secondary sanctions on a country, as in the case of Russian oil shipments to China, China will simply refine that oil and it will return to the global market. Anyone buying this oil will pay a higher price, or if it is unavailable, they will have to look for alternative sources.' He reiterated that European nations have already voiced unease over such measures. 'When we discussed the Senate bill proposing a 100 percent tariff on China and India, we heard from a number of European countries that they were unhappy with that possibility,' he added. India-US tensions over Russian oil Rubio's comments come after he highlighted India's energy trade with Moscow as a long-standing irritant in Washington. Speaking to Fox Radio, he said India's continued purchases of Russian oil were 'helping to sustain the Russian war effort in Ukraine' and were 'most certainly a point of irritation' in US-India relations, though not the only one. 'India has huge energy needs and that includes the ability to buy oil and coal and gas and things that it needs to power its economy like every country does, and it buys it from Russia, because Russian oil is sanctioned and cheap. In many cases, they're selling it under the global price because of the sanctions,' Rubio said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Unfortunately, that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India, not the only point of irritation. We also have many other points of cooperation with them.' While the US has refrained from sanctioning China, it has acted aggressively against India. After initially imposing a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, President Donald Trump recently doubled it to 50 per cent, penalising New Delhi for persisting with Russian oil imports. The White House also warned that secondary sanctions could follow if India did not alter course. The move has drawn accusations of double standards, as China continues to import large volumes of Russian oil without facing similar punitive measures. Despite Trump's repeated threats, India has maintained that its Russian oil purchases have continued and accused Washington of hypocrisy.
