logo
‘Betrayal of a sacred federal promise'

‘Betrayal of a sacred federal promise'

Yahoo21-03-2025

Kevin AbourezkICT
A Democratic U.S. senator and a Native American education advocate said Thursday that President Donald Trump's executive order calling for dismantling the U.S. Education Department could have disastrous impacts on Native students.Trump signed the order Thursday, advancing a campaign promise to take apart an agency that's been a longtime target of conservatives. He has derided the Education Department as wasteful and polluted by liberal ideology. However, completing its dismantling is most likely impossible without an act of Congress, which created the department in 1979. Republicans said they will introduce a bill to achieve that.The department, however, is not set to close completely. The White House said the department will retain certain critical functions. Trump said his administration will close the department beyond its 'core necessities," preserving its responsibilities for Title I funding for low-income schools, Pell grants and money for children with disabilities. The White House said earlier it would also continue to manage federal student loans.The president blamed the department for America's lagging academic performance and said states will do a better job.'It's doing us no good," he said at a White House ceremony.
However, U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawai'i, vice chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, said Thursday that Trump's order effectively violates the government's federal trust and treaty responsibilities to tribes to provide education.
'The Department of Education plays a critical role in Native education, on everything from special education and Impact Aid to Native language revitalization,' he said in a news release. 'Without a functional Department of Education, Native students – more than 90 percent of whom attend public schools – will be at the mercy of state governments that have no legal responsibility to meet their needs.'
The Education Department sends billions of dollars a year to schools and oversees $1.6 trillion in federal student loans.Currently, much of the agency's work revolves around managing money — both its extensive student loan portfolio and a range of aid programs for colleges and school districts, such as school meals and support for homeless students. The agency also is key in overseeing civil rights enforcement.Schatz called the order a 'betrayal of a sacred federal promise.''We have a duty to fight this reckless plan and protect Native students,' he said. More than 92 percent of Native students attend public and charter K-12 schools, not Bureau of Indian Education schools, Schatz said.Abolishing the Education Department would slash funding for Native students in public, charter and BIE schools, which rely on resources like Individuals with Disabilities Education Act special education services, Impact Aid, English Language Learner supports, and Every Student Succeeds Act Title VI Indian education programs.'It would also mean less dedicated funding for teachers, sports, building repairs, school meal programs, transportation, and after-school tutoring/activities – leaving Native students with fewer educational opportunities,' Schatz said.Already, the Trump administration has been gutting the agency. Its workforce is being slashed in half, and there have been deep cuts to the Office for Civil Rights.Advocates for public schools said eliminating the department would leave children behind in an American education system that is fundamentally unequal.'This is a dark day for the millions of American children who depend on federal funding for a quality education, including those in poor and rural communities with parents who voted for Trump,' NAACP President Derrick Johnson said.Democrats said the order will be fought in the courts and in Congress, and they urged Republicans to join them in opposition. The department was 'founded in part to guarantee the enforcement of students' civil rights,' said Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia, the top Democrat on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. 'Champions of public school segregation objected, and campaigned for a return to 'states' rights.''
Cheryl Crazy Bull, president and chief executive officer of the American Indian College Fund, said Native American students should not be considered as members of a racial group, such as Black or Hispanic students, but rather as members of politically distinct sovereign nations with rights secured by treaties.
'We gave up land and resources in order for the United States to be founded and grow as a country,' she said. 'We're having to deal with that lack of knowledge on the part of many people."
Native American students should be exempt from blanket attacks on programs and funding that serve minority and other vulnerable students, she said.
'We want to be allies with all of our other allies who are being attacked,' she said during a virtual panel discussion Thursday on efforts to protect minority students against federal policies. 'At the same time we have a different status that we have to advocate for.'She said further gutting or eliminating the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights would hurt Native American students, who rely on the office to ensure they are treated fairly. Native American students are suspended and expelled from schools at disproportionately high rates, studies have shown, including a recent study from WestEd.Crazy Bull also expressed concern about the Trump administration cutting funding to the department's Institute of Education Sciences, which gathers data on the nation's academic progress.'The loss of data is going to have a great impact on our ability to evaluate how our institutions are dealing with students and how investment should be made,' she said.And she said she worries the nation's 35 tribal colleges and universities also could see further funding cuts as a result of Trump's executive order. She said federal education funds account for roughly 74 percent of funds for those institutions, and some of those schools get 90 percent of their funding from federal sources.'Many of the institutions are at risk of having their programs decimated by the loss of funding,' she said.Trump's recent decision to lay off hundreds of thousands of federal probationary employees especially impacted the country's only two federally operated tribal higher education institutions, the Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute in Albuquerque and Haskell Indian Nations University in Lawrence, Kansas, both of which lost nearly one-fourth of their employees as a result of the federal layoffs.ProPublica published a report last year that showed tribal colleges and universities are perpetually underfunded by Congress despite federal legislation, as well as treaties, that have promised them adequate education funding. Those institutions receive a quarter-billion dollars less per year than they should, when accounting for inflation, and receive almost nothing to build and maintain their campuses, the nonprofit investigative news organization found. Those funding gaps have led to broken water pipes, leaking roofs and failing ventilation systems.Further exacerbating the problem is the fact that state funds and private donations make up a miniscule portion of tribal college and university funding, meaning the loss of federal funding likely would be disastrous for those institutions, ProPublica found.'You freeze our funding and ask us to wait six months to see how it shakes out, and we close,' Ahniwake Rose, president of the American Indian Higher Education Consortium, which lobbies for tribal colleges in Washington, D.C., told ProPublica. 'That's incredibly concerning.'Schatz said eliminating the Education Department, which administers federal loans and Pell grants, could impact Native students' ability to access college financial aid. And he echoed Crazy Bull's concerns about the impact of Trump's order on tribal colleges and universities.'Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs), which depend on federal dollars for nearly three-quarters of their funding, could face catastrophic cuts if states decide not to maintain critical funding – pushing many to the brink of collapse and jeopardizing educational opportunities for future generations,' he said.The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Our stories are worth telling. Our stories are worth sharing. Our stories are worth your support. Contribute today to help ICT carry out its critical mission. Sign up for ICT's free newsletter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?
Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?

New York Times

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?

About 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have been sent to Los Angeles as of Tuesday morning, after President Trump bypassed California leaders who said federal forces were not needed to respond to mostly peaceful protests. Here's how the deployment compares to past military activations on domestic soil responding to social unrest. 2021: Attack on the Capitol In 2021, officials in Washington initially requested 340 National Guard members to help respond to planned protests on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, according to the military. As the protests on Jan. 6 against the 2020 presidential election results deteriorated, with a violent mob attacking police officers and the Capitol, the mayor of Washington D.C., Muriel Bowser, requested assistance, and 1,100 D.C. National Guard members were sent. Later that night, the acting defense secretary at the time, Chris Miller, mobilized 6,200 more National Guard members from other states to ensure peace in the days leading up to former President Joseph R. Biden's inauguration. 2020: George Floyd Protests After protests sprung up around the United States in response to the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, National Guard members were deployed to several states. As of June 3, 2020, the National Guard had deployed more than 18,000 members in 28 states to respond to civil unrest related to Mr. Floyd's murder at the request of the states' governors. Another 42,000 National Guard members were activated at the same time for the coronavirus pandemic response. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Newsom Warns Trump May Use Soldiers on Immigration Raids
Newsom Warns Trump May Use Soldiers on Immigration Raids

Bloomberg

time39 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Newsom Warns Trump May Use Soldiers on Immigration Raids

Gavin Newsom is warning that Donald Trump's use of troops where state and local officials don't want them is actually a test, one the Republican president may seek to replicate across other American towns and cities as part of his mass deportation effort. 'We're getting word that he's looking to operationalize that relationship and advance significantly larger-scale ICE operations in partnership and collaboration with the National Guard,' the Democratic governor said on the podcast Pod Save America. Such a move would likely be illegal for reasons similar to those Newsom has cited in litigation to stop Trump's use of the military in Los Angeles. Legal experts have said that, as with many of Trump's emergency declarations since he took office, there is no legal basis for the Republican's move to take control of the California National Guard. State and city officials have reported that protests against Trump and his immigration raids have been largely peaceful during the day with minor skirmishes at night, while limited to a few parts of a city that spreads over several hundred square miles. With no reported deaths and few injuries—some among journalists shot with plastic rounds by local police —protests have begun spreading across the country. Demonstrations have been held in New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Texas and Washington. Meanwhile, Trump's federalization of 4,000 members of California National Guard and his ordering of 700 active duty Marines to Los Angeles will reportedly cost $134 million for 60 days.

Trump's invasion of California marches on
Trump's invasion of California marches on

Politico

time43 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump's invasion of California marches on

Presented by Health Justice Action Fund ALL ANGLES: California leaders are bracing as Donald Trump's administration continues its multi-pronged attack on the state. The president is considering cutting federal education funds to California, which could cost the cash-strapped state billions of dollars, our Rebecca Carballo, Juan Perez Jr. and Eric He report today. The development comes as Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass grapple with Trump's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Southern California. The governor is awaiting a Thursday afternoon hearing on a request for a restraining order over the deployment of the National Guard and Marines. (The federal judge assigned to the case is the younger brother of retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.) Trump claimed he called Newsom 'a day ago' and that Los Angeles 'would be burning' if not for the federal government's intervention. Newsom is fact-checking him in real time … 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail,' Newsom said in an X post responding to Trump's Oval Office comments. 'Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' Meanwhile, Bass today told reporters that she has 'no idea' what the 700 Marines sent to Los Angeles by U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth are for, and that coordination between the city and the federal government has not been strong. 'People have asked me, what are the Marines going to do when they get here? That's a good question.' she said. She said the National Guard's only assignment was to guard federal buildings. Bass said she plans to call the president later today to tell him to stop the raids that she says have the potential to 'devastate the economy of the city of Los Angeles.' 'Don't you want the World Cup to be a success, a success for you? Well, if that's what you want, give us help. Give us the $130 million that is being used for no reason,' Bass said, referencing what Hegseth said could be a 60-day effort from the federal government. The mayor said the Los Angeles Police Department has the situation under control and that assistance from the federal government is not needed. 'The violence that has happened has required LAPD to ask for additional assistance, but not from the federal government,' she said. Bass said there might be another rally today and that she would be attending an interfaith prayer service to call for peace. Norman reported from Los Angeles. IT'S TUESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY GETTING THE BOOT: State Sen. Caroline Menjivar — who has been vocal about her opposition to cutting Medi-Cal benefits for undocumented immigrants — will no longer serve on a legislative budget subcommittee, our Rachel Bluth reports for POLITICO Pro subscribers. Menjivar's removal from the panel by outgoing Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire comes after the Legislature released a budget proposal that includes some of the cuts to the insurance program that Newsom put forth in a plan to close a $12 billion budget hole. According to Menjivar, she was briefed about the Legislature's budget proposal over the weekend as her home district of Los Angeles was thrown into chaos over immigration raids and violent confrontations between protesters and police. With the subcommittee scheduled to vote on the cuts at a meeting Tuesday evening, she said she let McGuire know ahead of time that she planned to vote against them. Then, Monday evening, Menjivar's chief of staff got a call from McGuire's office with word that she was being removed from her post. Menjivar said she tried to get an explanation from McGuire but her calls to him went unanswered. 'I'm disappointed,' Menjivar said. 'I really wish I could have recorded my concerns.' IN OTHER NEWS TRAFFICKING DEBATE CONTINUES: The Assembly's embattled sex trafficking bill advanced from the Senate Public Safety Committee today, even as some members called for major changes as it moves through the second house. The legislation from Assembly Public Safety Chair Nick Schultz would increase penalties for people soliciting sex from 16- and 17-year-olds and would criminalize loitering with the intent to buy sex. State Sen. Scott Wiener had strong words about the second provision, which undoes part of a bill he authored three years ago that decriminalized loitering with the intent to commit prostitution. He and others who oppose that element of the bill say it could be used to target people of color and the LGBTQ+ community. Wiener voted to move the bill forward, but he said the loitering element 'needs to come out before it comes to the floor.' 'I've already spent years repealing the loitering law,' Wiener said. 'I'm not going to be introducing the bill and having to go through that again and have all the death threats and calling me a pedophile.' Assemblymember Maggy Krell — who originally authored the legislation — plunged her house into chaos by working with Republicans to restore the stronger sentences for soliciting older teens after Democrats removed the provision. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas then stripped the bill from Krell and gave it to Schultz, who committed to continuing discussions about the legislation as it heads to the Senate Appropriations Committee. POSTING THROUGH IT: As tensions between Trump and California have escalated, so has the intensity and, to some eyes, cringiness, of the governor's social media presence. Newsom's team this morning posted a Taylor Swift-themed Instagram reel showing Trump's Truth Social posts and photos of Newsom and the president to the soundtrack of 'You Need to Calm Down.' A Star Wars-style X post from the governor's press office account features another Truth Social post being read by a villainous-sounding voice with movie images in the background. (This newsletter writer must admit her colleagues had to tell her the voice is supposed to belong to Emperor Palpatine.) WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — National Guard units blocked roadways near the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and Courthouse in Santa Ana on Tuesday after the city's downtown saw clashes between protesters and law enforcement. (Orange County Register) — San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie is treading lightly over Los Angeles's clash with the Trump administration, saying his priority is 'keeping San Franciscans safe.' (San Francisco Chronicle) AROUND THE STATE — The San Diego city council approved a $43.60 monthly fee for trash collection at single-family homes. (San Diego Union Tribune) — Sacramento Police Chief Kathy Lester said that she did not violate policy when she flew first-class to ten conferences in a one year period because she reimbursed the city for the difference between a coach and first-class ticket. (Sacramento Bee) — compiled by Nicole Norman

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store