One year, 27,850 jobs gone Stats NZ latest data shows
123RF
New data shows there were 27,850 fewer jobs in New Zealand in June compared to the year before, and young people are feeling the
impact of the weak labour market
.
Stats NZ's latest data shows the number of filled jobs was up 0.1 percent month-on-month but down 1.2 percent year-on-year.
Compared to the year before, construction had lost 12,169 jobs, or 6 percent, manufacturing 5850 jobs, or 2.5 percent, professional, scientific and technical services 5150 jobs, or 2.7 percent, and admin and support services 4860 jobs, or 4.7 percent.
Education and training and primary industries added jobs.
People aged 15 to 19 had 10 percent fewer jobs, those 20 to 24 had 3.5 percent fewer and those ages 25 to 29 had 3.9 percent fewer.
Hugh Hawkins, 23, has been looking for a job since finishing an honours degree last year.
"Now we're in late July and I've managed to find a
tiny bit of casual work
through connections of people I know. Otherwise I've been serially ghosted with absolutely no success."
Hawkins had set a target of 10 applications a week.
"A couple of jobs I was excited for, I felt genuinely directly qualified for, I've gone for and not reached the interview stage. The rejection email often comes with a total of applicants they've had and one I was qualified for had 630 people apply."
It seemed a widespread problem, Hawkins said. "Chatting to my coworkers they're virtually all in the same situation. They have to rely on the benefit to pay rent with casual work on the side. People from different walks of life, most young and very qualified…I worked hospitality roles through uni and took volunteer roles and internships relevant to my degree to set myself up as well as possible… if I'm struggling it must mean terrible things for what other people are also going through."
Infometrics economists noted that May's month-on-month increase in filled jobs had been revised down in the latest data to a decline. "June's narrow rise could also be revised to flat or negative growth in future releases."
Auckland had a 1.9 percent year-on-year fall in filled jobs and Wellington was down 2.3 percent. Canterbury was up 0.1 percent.
ASB senior economist Mark Smith said it had been noticeable in the last year or so that young people were being most affected.
He said there were likely to be more job losses than the data indicated because some businesses would have added roles during the year.
"This is normally a cyclical phenomenon. The hope is that some will go into training if it's available but it's not available for everyone.
"The labour market tends to be the last thing to move."
He said it was concerning that the revisions in the data in recent months had all been down.
"The trend is still falling. It has dragged on… Covid was huge and there are hangovers from that."
He said the unemployment rate was likely to move higher in the coming months.
Some people who had lost work had dropped out of the labour market, which meant the participation rate fell. The unemployment rate only counts people looking for work.
"If that participation rate did not keep falling we would have a much higher unemployment rate, it would be closer to six.
"Really the primary sector and the South Island are the good news stories. There is weakness still in the goods sector and the major centres."
BNZ chief economist Mike Jones said he still expected the "mid-year activity air pocket" would pass.
"The underlying drivers of the recovery remain in place and should reassert themselves in coming quarters.
"But the recent weakness does push back the likely timing of the eventual labour market recovery. We doubt the current undershoot of firms' labour requirements relative to worker availability will change appreciably this side of Christmas. Our forecast peak in unemployment has been shunted out to 5.4 percent in the final quarter of the year. Wage growth should thus continue to slow through to the middle of next year."
Green Party spokesperson for social development and employment Ricardo Menendez-March called on the government to "take charge and create jobs that help us build a better future".
He said the Green Job Guarantee in the party's alternative budget would create 40,000 jobs to rebuild infrastructure, restore nature and build state housing.
"We know people out there need opportunities, instead they are being punished and pushed into poverty."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
23 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Trump trade tariff decision came 'blunt and late', Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the 15 percent trade tariff is "not what he wanted". Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The decision by US President Donald Trumo to hit New Zealand exporters with a 15 percent tariff came "blunt and late", the Prime Minster says. Speaking to Morning Report, Christopher Luxon said the tariff, which had been expected to be at 10 percent, being at a higher percentage was "not what New Zealand wanted". "We disagree with tariffs," Luxon said, "the president is pretty fixed on his views and unlikely to change." "The decision came pretty blunt and late." Despite this, top diplomat Vangelis Vitalis was flying to Washington in the wake of the announcement, with Trade Minister Todd McClay intending to visit in coming days too. Luxon said prior to the announcement New Zealand had "really constructive" conversations with the US about trade, and the decision had been made close to the announcement. Despite the higher tariff, Luxon said the government had "played it well". "We continue to register our disappointment about the decision, we've also done it since April." He believed New Zealand exporters were "nimble and agile" and there was still huge demand for New Zealand products and services globally. But the opposition, said the 15 percent tariff was a "slap in the face" for exporters. Labour's trade spokesperson Damien O'Connor told Morning Report , it was a major fail for the government and noted other leaders managed to cut deals that kept tariffs at lower rates. "This is a disadvantage relative to our competitors," he said. "There is a strong demand for our beef in the US, but this will start to squeeze the market." O'Connor said New Zealand would be competing head-to-head with other countries like Australia, Argentina and Uruguay who all had 10 percent tariffs. "That's going to be tough... That's going to hurt." Kate Acland, chairperson of Beef and Lamb New Zealand agreed competing countries having a lower tariff rate would hurt New Zealand. "I think the key is we're on a different rate to many of our competitors," she told Morning Report , "this is more than $300 million additional hit if it can't be passed on to the consumers." "It will have an impact, this is quite significant." Acland said New Zealand was "one of the good guys" who played by the rules when it came to trade, but perhaps the reason for the higher tariff was that it didn't have much to bring to the negotiating table. "There's quite a queue to negotiate over there, I think the strategy was right, it'd hard to know what we could have done. Kate Acland, chairperson of Beef and Lamb New Zealand said the US needed New Zealand meat exports. Photo: © Clare Toia-Bailey / "Going over there now is the right thing to do." Acland said there was a global shortage of protein, particularly beef, so the US did need New Zealand meat exports. "They need that lean beef so we do have a good story to tell there on the beef side. She believed exporters would be okay, but it did put them at disadvantage. Felicity Roxburgh, director of the International Business Forum agreed New Zealand was now at a disadvantage. She told Morning Report , exporters had done a really good job t absorbing the cost so far, but only time would tell what the impact of 15 percent would be. "We can't invent new markets overnight as an exporter it takes time to invest... There not endless headroom to pass the price to consumers." She said she welcomed Vitalis heading to Washington to try and press New Zealand's case. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Watch: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford major education announcement
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford making a major education announcement. Watch the announcement in the the livestream at the top of the page from about 8.30am. Christopher Luxon told Morning Report there was nothing more/ important to New Zealand's economy and children's future than education. "We've had a lot of parents and principals and teachers raise with us some very real concerns with us about NCEA, and it's important we get that done and right." The key thing was to make sure there was a qualification comparable to overseas education. "We want to attract high paying jobs ultimately to New Zealand... our ability to do that is really contingent upon having our our kids super well-educated." Stanford signalled last month an announcement on NCEA was due within weeks and said the government was taking into account the Education Review Office report on the previous government's rollout of NCEA level 1. Westlake Boys' High School has dropped NCEA level 1 and its principal said the results so far had been "overwhelmingly positive" . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Why drilling for fossil fuels is not expected to fix our energy crisis
Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Six months ago, Taranaki businessman John Burling received an abrupt call: his gas company was increasing prices by 40 percent. Burling, who owns the Taranaki-based Carac Group engineering and manufacturing company, was floored. "What do you mean? How do I pass it on?'" The reply was stark. "There's a shortage of gas, so that's going to be the new price." Overnight, Carac Group had to cut powder coating plant operations from five days to four, shelving expansion plans and curtailing production due to the energy-intensive gas-fired ovens. Across the country, many businesses are facing the same gas woes. "The untold story here is that there's a very large number of smaller industrial businesses that rely on gas and frankly they're gonna struggle to stay afloat," says Barney Irvine, executive director of the Northern Infrastructure Forum. "A lot of these businesses are feeling very desperate and pretty lost." The Pohokura oil and gas field is 4km offshore in Taranaki. Photo: Rob Tucker New Zealand's natural gas is drawn from wells in Taranaki, on the North Island's wild west coast. Around 290,000 households use gas for cooking and heating; in business, it is burned at dairy factories, fertiliser plants and in manufacturing. It's also used to produce electricity when there's not enough power generated from wind, water or the sun. Until recently, gas was reliable, even when other energy sources were scarce. But now, our wells are old and in decline, and our gas supply is dwindling, fast. Data released by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) in June reveals gas production has almost halved in the last ten years. Supply in February 2024 was the lowest since the 1980s. Gas reserves - the estimated available gas in the deep, underground reservoirs - have also fallen sharply, down 27 percent in the year to January. Forecasts say there is barely enough gas left in our existing oil and gas fields to last the decade, and even that is an optimistic guess. Demand now outstrips supply, forcing some businesses to struggle for gas, others onto 'demand management' plans requiring production shutdowns to support the electricity grid, and some to close operations entirely. "In my opinion gas supply is currently our most pressing energy security issue," says energy commentator Larry Blair. "The scale of the problem is huge, and we don't have any readily available alternatives to turn to." To combat the shortfall, the government has repealed the former Labour government's 2018 ban on new offshore oil and gas exploration permits. The policy aims to 'future-proof' the natural gas industry and reduce reliance on imported coal during dry years when hydro dams are low. The bill, spearheaded by Resources Minister Shane Jones, passed in the House last week. Coupled with a $200m co-investment in gas exploration, Jones says the policy will signal to international petrochemical companies New Zealand is "open for business". "It's to send a message that we will invest with you if it's appropriate as the Crown, but more importantly, there is a long-term future in New Zealand in terms of how we power our economy by using gas or coal." Industry has celebrated the law change. John Carnegie, chief executive of Energy Resources Aotearoa called the bill a "pragmatic and necessary step to help rebuild investor confidence." Jones and the Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, have blamed the 2018 exploration ban for the current state of the gas market. "The basic problem is that we don't have enough gas thanks to Labour screwing the scrum by banning oil and gas," Luxon told Morning Report last month. Prime Minster Christopher Luxon is blaming the gas ban for the energy crisis. Official advice says it's more complex than that. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Jones has said the ban, which was implemented to address climate change, was "the most destructive decision in the history of New Zealand's industry." But experts, including the government's own officials, warned the ban was not the main driver behind a lack of investment in gas or New Zealand's high energy prices - and won't be a magic fix for them either. Global investment in speculative drilling for oil and gas has been declining since 2014, when the oil price crashed. Since then, oil companies have focused on high-ranking, lower-cost petroleum provinces, putting New Zealand at a "geographical and geological disadvantage" due to its isolation and relatively unexplored status, officials wrote in a Cabinet paper last year. Records show that even before 2018, most of the major oil companies had given up their exploration permits and left New Zealand, citing "bad data", high technical risk or better opportunities elsewhere. "Clearly the ban was an important nail in the coffin," says Green Party MP Steve Abel, who worked on Greenpeace's oil and gas campaign. "But the government also should have been well aware of the obvious evidence that gas was running out and no one was interested in drilling for more, even though a lot of oil majors came and had a look." Whether those companies can be lured back will largely depend on whether we have enough big buyers to make it worth their while. New Zealand has a closed gas market, meaning there are no exports. Instead, local supply must meet local demand. Historically, developing new gas fields has relied on big contracts from major users like methanol producer Methanex. But if demand from those large industrial users drops, it poses a risk that the remaining, smaller users might not be able to purchase enough gas to support new investment. Currently, demand is dropping rapidly - advice from officials on the $200m investment shows overall gas use has fallen by about a third since 2020, as companies close because of high prices, or decarbonise in the face of climate change. "At this point, the market is collapsing faster than we can put new reserves back into it," Larry Blair says. There is also the lingering damage by the ban to the country's reputation as a safe place to invest, and the very real risk that the policy could be re-reversed with a change of government. "The problem I see for people looking at New Zealand is there's no confidence that there's a sustainable market there in the long term." With such strong headwinds, experts say the $200m is unlikely to suddenly make it commercially viable to take a big gamble on entirely new discoveries, particularly when New Zealand hasn't found new gas in a new place for two decades or longer. It's more likely the money will be used to fossick around in our existing fields, trying to retrieve what's left. The government knows this. Its own advice has acknowledged the plan's flaws and its low certainty of success. "Investments may not all be successful. The risk of failed drilling is high in our mature fields. In the last five years around $1.8 billion has been invested in drilling 58 wells, and this investment has not managed to maintain or increase our gas reserves," MBIE's advice to Jones in March this year said. Even if the analysts are wrong, there is still the matter of timing. Data shows a new gas field could take a decade, or longer, to find, develop, and bring online. "There will be nothing left to power by then," says Consumer NZ chief executive Jon Duffy. "Why are we doubling down on expanding what is clearly an industry in decline? In my view we are taking an absolute wrong turn." Critics like Duffy say more needs to be done now to bring down gas and electricity prices and shore up energy supply. Last month, an influential collection of energy users and advocacy groups called on Luxon to urgently fix the "broken" energy sector, which they said was crippling industry and leaving families freezing during winter. "Regional employers are shutting their doors, with hundreds of jobs and decades of investment lost," it said. "Families and communities are being left behind." Luxon is also under pressure from climate advocates, who have said the bill is "tipping oil on the climate crisis fire." A government Climate Implications of Policy Assessment (CIPA) estimated that reversing the ban would lead to a "substantial increase in emissions" of approximately 14.2 million tonnes of carbon by 2035, primarily from prolonged gas usage in electricity, commercial, and industrial sectors. Drilling for gas would make it harder for New Zealand to meet climate change targets, but could also undermine its obligations under the Paris Agreement, risk trade deals and breach international law , critics said. "From a climate change point of view, which everyone should be worried about, we can't afford to burn the existing fossil fuels that have already been discovered on the planet," said Greenpeace executive director Russel Norman. "But also, potentially, you are facing liabilities from other countries who are negatively affected by you burning more and more fossil fuels and destabilizing the climate. So it's grossly irresponsible." Gas use has fallen by about a third since 2020, as companies close because of high prices, or decarbonise in the face of climate change. Photo: 123RF Jones recently said he considers climate change "largely moral hysteria." He said the recent judgment from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would not halt legitimate New Zealand industries. "Some people might try to use it, exploit it to undermine industry, undermine investment, stop manufacturing … but we will not allow our sovereignty to be compromised," Jones said. Instead, he has pitched gas as a "transition fuel" to reduce dependency on Indonesian coal to "keep the lights on". The government also plans to double geothermal energy. Plans to transition away from gas itself were shelved when the coalition was elected, alongside a plan to help fossil fuel workers retrain in low-emissions industries. While there are renewable energy projects in the pipeline it's not expected to be enough to fill the gap, especially as more companies decarbonise. Electricty Authority data shows more wind farms are in the pipeline, but critics say they need to be built now. Photo: In the same open letter sent last month, the group of concerned organisations called for the government to intervene in the market so more renewables could be built at pace. "Unlock investment in low-cost, renewable generation," it said. "Investment in new generation is being delayed, sustaining high prices, and contributing to the energy supply crisis we now face." Commentators say unless we can secure more energy soon, industry closures will begin to pile up as businesses run out of options. "I don't see a plan B for a lot of industries in New Zealand," says Blair. "That's the brutal reality of it." Consumer's Jon Duffy says he doesn't think there's a plan at all. "There's no Plan A. What we are really missing is a national energy strategy." Meanwhile, for industries like John Burling's, there are no good answers. His increased gas bill led to higher costs for running the gas-fired ovens, but Burling was unable to pass these on to customers. "It was a bit of a no-win really," Burling says. He's yet to find an alternative to his gas-fired ovens, and in any case, electricity would be even more expensive than gas. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
