
Federal officials advance plan to brace Boston from sea level rise
This week, the Corps launched a series of public meetings in Boston neighborhoods to get early
feedback on exactly where those barriers ought to eventually be built.
The flood projects will likely cost north of $10 billion — assuming the estimated price tags to protect other similarly sized coastal cities such as San Francisco and New York are indicative of Boston's future. They will also require congressional approval and funding, a possibly unpredictable endeavor given President Trump's dramatic cuts to federal funding.
Advertisement
The agency anticipates completing the Boston study and requesting funds from Congress between 2028 and 2029. The construction of the projects likely won't be finished until about 2040.
Years ago, a
specific geographic challenges and can be built piece by piece until the whole city is protected.
Advertisement
That strategy — called 'Climate Ready Boston' — provided the basis for the federal government's involvement, said Jeff Herzog, a program manager for the US Army Corps of Engineers and lead planner for the agency's Boston study.
'It's going to be a neighborhood-by-neighborhood solution,' Herzog said during a meeting Tuesday night in Charlestown.
The city has already begun to build berms and elevated parks on city-owned properties, focusing on areas that are currently at risk of flooding or will be within the next 10 years.
The cost of fortifying the entire 47-mile-long coast for the rest of this century, however, requires more financial resources, as well as regulatory authority,
than the municipal government can provide.
'The Corps has been looking at the risk that Boston faces due to increasing sea level rise and storm surge,' said Chris Osgood, director of the Office of Climate Resilience for the City of Boston, during the Charlestown meeting. 'It's that report that unlocks the opportunity for federal funding to be able to advance those projects in the 2030s and beyond.'
Both the city and federal strategies will design barriers to withstand at least 40 inches, or more than 3 feet, of sea level rise by the end of the century. That would likely protect the city from sea level rise in 2100, assuming about 2 degrees of global warming, according to a
Advertisement
However, there's still a chance 40 inches won't be high enough: Depending on the planet's ability to cut climate-warming emissions and depending on how glaciers in Antarctica react to continued warming, sea levels could be higher by then.
In Charlestown, the federal government is considering flood barriers along the shoreline by the Navy Yard, near the Little Mystic channel, and near Ryan Playground in north Charlestown. The flood protections could be a mound of earth, a raised harborwalk, a vertical floodwall, or an elevated roadway.
The neighborhood's development pushes very close to the water, so there is not enough room for 'nature-based' protections, such as planting or protecting a marsh, Herzog said.
Neighborhood meetings will continue through the end of the summer. By early next year, the agency will draft a plan for what and where to build.
The public can weigh in on those plans, and eventually, the proposal will be submitted to Congress as a request for
funds. Most large national engineering projects like this are typically 65 percent funded by the federal government and 35 percent funded by local entities.
The Trump administration has cut huge amounts of funding for climate initiatives, and several other coastal cities are similarly developing multibillion-dollar requests for coastal infrastructure projects. Still, Herzog said he feels confident that such engineering projects will continue to receive bipartisan support.
'The administration has invested heavily in coastal storm risk management,' Herzog said. '[They have] demonstrated over the years — on a bipartisan level — that they are committed to community resilience.'
Advertisement
While the Corps' study will focus on engineering projects, Herzog said that the federal government would also consider relocation for high-risk areas of Boston, a strategy known as managed retreat.
'It would be irresponsible for us not to [consider retreat],' he said at the Charlestown meeting.
After presenting the early plan for Charlestown, the Corps will turn its focus to Dorchester, East Boston, South Boston, and downtown later this summer.
Erin Douglas can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin. cancels Moderna bird fu vaccine contract
The Trump administration has canceled a contract with Moderna (MRNA) worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The contract was supposed to help Moderna develop a vaccine for humans to defend against bird flu. Yahoo Finance Senior Health Care Reporter Anjalee Khemlani reports the details in the video above. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Trump administration canceling more than $700 million awarded to drug maker Moderna to develop the vaccine against potential pandemic viruses. For more we're bringing in here Yahoo Finance Senior Health Reporter, Angeli Kamani. Ange. Yeah, like you mentioned, the NIH canceled more than $750, a million dollars, rather, in funding for Moderna. And this is something that the company found out just based on a notification to themselves, even though they were really expecting that to get into late stage development. They said in a statement, Moderna received notice that the Health and Human Services Department, remember led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy will terminate the award for the late stage development and rights to purchase the pre-pandemic influenza vaccines. Now, we went out to HHS to understand what their rationale was behind this. And among other things they mentioned that the MRNA technology remains quote, "under tested" and we are not going to spend taxpayer dollars repeating the mistakes of the last administration which concealed legitimate safety concerns from the public. And in that they're referring to the myocarditis that was evident in some males and some younger individuals. So, this is really just the latest setback for the company. We know it's been pummeled, the stock is down more than 30% on the year. This is one of the latest. So, we know that they pulled their filing of a combination flu and COVID vaccine earlier last week. Then we've got the NIH funding that's cutting the pandemic and bird flu. And then we've also got missing the Q1 estimates earlier this year. So, just really telling a really hard story for this company. We know it's been under pressure because of the waning COVID revenues, and these are just some of those areas that were supposed to sort of plug that hole. And now, without those in the way, it's a question on what Moderna's viability is. Now, on the flip side, you do have some good news, right? The company's still working on a number of clinical trials with Merck on cancer vaccine. It also has a partnership with Vertex on cystic fibrosis. So, they do have a few other things going for them, but this is really a longer play for the company rather than any near term that they would have otherwise been able to take advantage of. All right. Thanks, Angeli. Appreciate it. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Slams Trump's Spending Bill: ‘A Disgusting Abomination'
A serious rift has erupted between Elon Musk and President Trump over the massive government spending bill the president has urged Congress to pass. Musk, who donated nearly $275 million toward Trump's 2024 election campaign, on Tuesday posted on X an unambiguous denunciation of the bill, which is called the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act. More from Variety London Mayor Sadiq Khan Hails 'Adolescence' for Having 'Mainstreamed' Conversation About 'Epidemic' of Violence Against Women Jon Stewart Tackles Elon Musk's Exit From the Trump Administration: 'This Guy Has Seen Some S--' Elon Musk Says New York Times Is 'Lying Their Ass Off' About His Alleged Drug Use; Newspaper Defends Coverage 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The tech mogul wrote that the bill 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Musk, the world's richest person, also posted a warning that voters would 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' in the 2026 midterm elections. On May 28, Musk announced the he would end his tenure as a 'special government employee' — leading the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE — after 128 days. Per the U.S. Department of the Interior, a person cannot serve in such a role for more than 130 days in a consecutive year. Sen. Ran Paul (R-Kentucky) was among those chiming in to agree with Musk. 'We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better,' he wrote, quoting Musk's post. Trump, on Truth Social, earlier in the day slammed Paul, writing 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' At a White House press briefing, Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked press secretary Karoline Leavitt 'how mad do you think President Trump is going to be' about Musk's comments? Leavitt responded that Trump 'already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act passed the Republican-controlled House but has yet to clear the Senate. The legislation would make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent (with wealthy Americans benefiting the most) and increase funding for the U.S. military and immigration enforcement. In addition, the version that passed the House cuts funding for health, nutrition, education and clean energy programs. Musk has criticized the 'Big Beautiful Bill' before, but using tamer terminology. Last week, for example, Musk criticized Trump's 'massive spending bill' in an interview with CBS's 'Sunday Morning,' saying the legislation 'undermines the work' of DOGE. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?


New York Times
24 minutes ago
- New York Times
There Are Limits to Republican Lawmakers' Reach, Even in Texas
For weeks, Republicans lawmakers in Texas had promised that they would require proof of citizenship to vote in most elections, hoping the 2025 Legislature would be a vanguard for other conservative states considering similar measures. Voting rights groups cried foul. An analysis showed that the bill could disproportionately harm Republicans, who were less likely than Democrats to have the required documents. Then, as the Texas legislative session ended on Monday, the bill died. Its failure was one of the many surprising results of this year's legislative session, which was among the most conservative in recent memory. The Legislature passed measures requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom and creating publicly funded vouchers for private-school tuition. But the session also revealed the limits of right-wing governance, even in a state that President Trump won decisively and that is controlled by Republicans at every level of power. Lawmakers failed to pass strict curbs on wind and solar energy, and a tightened ban on abortion pills from out of state. Texas was a particularly good test case for the G.O.P.'s reach because for the first time in years, Republicans in the Legislature were not actively warring. Gone were the internal fights between House and Senate Republicans that had marred the last several sessions, which occur every two years. Instead, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who controls the State Senate with a firm hand, got mostly what he wanted, a more compliant Texas House. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.